1 · Web viewSupplementary Material Ripple-like NiFeCo sulfides on nickel foam derived from in-situ...
Transcript of 1 · Web viewSupplementary Material Ripple-like NiFeCo sulfides on nickel foam derived from in-situ...
Supplementary Material
Ripple-like NiFeCo sulfides on nickel foam derived from in-
situ sulfurization of precursor oxides as efficient anodes for
water oxidation
Yong-Ming Chai a, Xiao Shang a, Zi-Zhang Liu a, b, Bin Dong*a, b, Guan-Qun Han a, b,
Wen-Kun Gao a, b, Jing-Qi Chi a, Kai-Li Yan a, Chen-Guang Liu *a
a State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (East China),
Qingdao 266580, PR China
b College of Science, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, PR China
* * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (B. Dong), [email protected] (C.-G. Liu)
Tel: +86-532-86981376, Fax: +86-532-86981787*
1
2
Fig. S1 TEM images of (a) NiFeCo/NF, (b) sNiFeCo/NF and (c) sNiFeCo-Fe/NF.
3
Fig. S2 SEM mapping and EDX spectra of (a, b) NiFeCo/NF, (c, d) sNiFeCo/NF and
(e, f) sNiFeCo-Fe/NF.
Fig. S2 SEM mapping and EDX spectra of (a, b) NiFeCo/NF, (c, d) sNiFeCo/NF and
(e, f) sNiFeCo-Fe/NF.
4
Fig. S3 N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms with corresponding pore size distribution
(insertion) of all samples.
5
Potentials conversion from vs. SCE to vs. RHEThe potentials conversion from vs. SCE to vs. RHE are based on the following
equations:
pH (1.0 M KOH) = 14
SCE (saturated KCl) vs. RHE = 0.244 V
E (vs. RHE) = E (vs. SCE) + 0.244 V + (0.059 V) pH = E (vs. SCE) + 1.07 V
6
Table. S1 Elemental values of fitted equivalent circuit corresponding to EIS spectra.
Samples Rs/Ω Rct/Ω
NiFeCo/NF 1.6 3.9
sNiFeCo/NF 1.8 1.4
sNiFeCo-Fe/NF 1.7 2.7
7
Calculation of electrochemically active surface area (ECSA)
Based on previous work [1, 2], the value of ECSA can be determined through the
following equations:
ECSA=Cdl/Cs (1)
RF=ECSA/GSA (2)
where Cdl is the measured double layer capacitance in 1.0 M KOH (mF), Cs is the
specific capacitance (Cs = 0.04 mF cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH) and GSA is the geometric
surface area of as-prepared sample (2.00 cm2).
8
9
Fig. S4 CVs of (a) NiFeCo/NF, (b) sNiFeCo/NF and (c) sNiFeCo-Fe/NF for
measuring the corresponding values of ECSA.
Table S2 Calculated ECSA values of NiFeCo/NF, sNiFeCo/NF and sNiFeCo-Fe/NF.
SampleCdl, Cs, ECSA,
cm2
GSA,
cm2RF
mF mF cm-2
NiFeCo/NF 2.3 0.04 57.5 2.00 28.8
sNiFeCo/NF 22.3 0.04 557.0 2.00 278.5
sNiFeCo-Fe/
NF18.4 0.04 459.0 2.00 229.5
10
References
[1] C. C. L. McCrory, S. Jung, J. C. Peters, T. F. Jaramillo, Benchmarking
heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
135 (2013) 16977-1691.
[2] X. Lu, C. Zhao, Electrodeposition of hierarchically structured three-dimensional
nickel-iron electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution at high current densities, Nat.
Commun. 6 (2015) 7616-7623.
11