1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom...

4
We apologize for not using open source software IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom Nadeau ([email protected]) George Swallow ([email protected]) Monique Morrow ([email protected])

description

We apologize for not using open source software 3 Motivation (cont) Requirements gathered from a diverse set of MPLS operators and their research departments. Requirements consider both current operational requirements as well as future ones based on real deployments. Providers want evolutionary approaches NOT revolutionary ones. Sensitive to both OPEX and CAPEX. These approaches are suitable for existing MPLS technologies. We do not want to reset current protocols; we want to evolve them.

Transcript of 1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom...

Page 1: 1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom Nadeau George Swallow

11

We apologize for not using open source software

IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks

Tom Nadeau ([email protected])

George Swallow ([email protected])

Monique Morrow([email protected])

Page 2: 1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom Nadeau George Swallow

2

We apologize for not using open source software

Motivation• Providers have been coming to us with OAM

requirements that differed from those that were available.• There was a concern that current requirements did

not reflect real operational environments.• Disparately located requirements for MPLS-

related OAM scattered about.• Makes it difficult for those writing drafts to find all of

the requirements.• It is a good idea to put these together in one place.

Page 3: 1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom Nadeau George Swallow

3

We apologize for not using open source software

Motivation (cont)• Requirements gathered from a diverse set of MPLS

operators and their research departments.• Requirements consider both current operational requirements

as well as future ones based on real deployments.• Providers want evolutionary approaches NOT

revolutionary ones.• Sensitive to both OPEX and CAPEX.• These approaches are suitable for existing MPLS

technologies. • We do not want to reset current protocols; we want to evolve

them.

Page 4: 1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom Nadeau George Swallow

4

We apologize for not using open source software

Recommendations

• Clarify draft based on comments.• Cull out requirements from Dave’s OAM Framework

draft. • Deliver combined draft by March IETF Meeting.

• Accept this combined document as an MPLS WG document.• Addresses operations and management requirement in

charter.• Gives direction to future OAM solutions/tools.• Keep requirements for MPLS OAM tools and solutions for

not only MPLS, but PWE3 and PPVPN MPLS