1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
-
Upload
susan-goodwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
![Page 1: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW
![Page 2: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
M7.6 Padang Earthquake,30 September 2009, 05:16 PM88 km depth 1.2 M People Affected 1,120 Deaths (est.) 3,000 Serious Injuries 140,000 Damaged Structures 2,100 School Damaged or Destroyed No tsunami (too deep)
1,400 Large Hotels or Office Buildings Seriously Damaged
![Page 3: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
M7.6 Padang Earthquake,30 September 2009
OutlineRegional tectonicsRegional quake historyThis quakeSimilar quakes in the Pac NWFuture predictions for the Pac NW
![Page 4: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Sept. 30, 2009, first Samoa M8 (with tsunami)Sept. 30, 2009, first Samoa M8 (with tsunami)then,then, M7.6, PadangM7.6, Padang
LEMPENG PASIFIK
LEMPENG FILIPINA
LEMPENG EURASIA
LEMPENG INDO-AUSTRALIA
LEMPENG COCOS
LEMPENG AMERIKA UTARA
LEMPENG NAZCA
LEMPENG ANTARTIKA
LEMPENG AMERIKASELATAN
LEMPENG CARIBIA
LEMPENG SCOTIA
BMKG
![Page 5: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INDONESIA BMGBMG
SOURCE : BPPT
![Page 6: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PLATE TECTONIC MODELNORTH-SOUTH GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION THROUGH SOUTH OF JAWA
![Page 8: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Background seismicity
Background seismicity w/ aftershocks
![Page 9: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
M7.6 mainshock
M6.6 aftershock on Sumatra fault
![Page 10: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2004 Earthquake and Tsunami
![Page 12: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1797
1833
18611907
1822
1926 (~7)
1984 (6.4(
1935
1987 (6.6)
19211916198419871892
1822
1943190919951952
1926
1942
18931900
193319941908
19901997
1936
19641967
1893
1892 (7.7)
1900
1908
1916
1933 (7.5)
1942 (7.3)
1936 (7.2)
1952 (6.8)
1979 (6.6)
1943 (7.3)
1990 (6.5)
1997 (6.5)
1964 (6.5)
1921 ( >7)
1994 (6.9)
1995 (7.0)
1909 (7.6)
1967 (6.1)
Historical Earthquakes
1797 (8.2)
1833 (8.7 – 9)
1861 (~8.5)
1907
1935 (7.7)
2000 (7.8)
2002 (7.4)
2004 (9.2)
2005 (8.7)
Subduction ZoneSumatran fault
2000
2005
2004
2002
???
Fig. 6 : Map of damaging earthquake in Sumatera (Hilman, 2004)
![Page 13: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
PDSI*
PPI
SDSI
![Page 14: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Acceleration
![Page 15: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Velocity
![Page 16: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Landslides• Causes
– steep mountain slopes– triggered by heavy rain
combined with earthquake shaking
• Mud and debris flow• 5+ villages reported buried• 600+ casualties• Inaccessible
– damage to roads– lack of communication
AP News
![Page 17: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
September Rainfall – Met. Station
Tabing, Pandang
Sept. 1 – 1.0 mmSept. 2 – 2.8 mmSept. 4 – 0.6 mmSept. 8 – 53.0 mmSept. 14 – 123.3 mmSept. 15 – 66.5 mmSept. 16 – 0.7 mmSept. 17 – 19.6 mmSept. 24 – 3.7 mmSept. 27 – 44.1 mmSept. 28 – 2.7 mmSept. 30 – 20.4 mm
![Page 18: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Local Areas with Very High Levels of Damage (MMI 8-9).
Evidence of Strong Localized Site Effects.Near-surface geologyheight of the water tabledepth to bedrock
• Massive Triggered Liquefaction/Debris Flow Killed 100’s of People.
Conclusions I
![Page 20: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Not the Anticipated M8+ Earthquake on the Sunda Megathrust - no tsunami.
Damage was greater than would be expected for a comparable magnitude earthquake on the subduction interface
• closer to land
• Strong need remains in region for earthquake preparedness.
• About 1 such earthquake of M>=7 per year
Conclusions II
![Page 21: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
M7.6 Intraplate event at 80 km depth.Unusual focal mechanism.Usually normal faulting - this was oblique thrustOnly 4 aftershocks that could be located - typical for large intermediate depth quakes
• Normal faulting would unload shallow thrusts, but this event may load thrust and render future big events more likely.
• Strong need remains in region for earthquake preparedness.
Conclusions III
![Page 22: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Complicated controls on subduction earthquakes
23Audet et al., 2009
![Page 24: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ETS & subduction cross-section
24
Abers et al, 2009
![Page 25: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Intraplate quakes in cross-section
![Page 26: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Nisqually strong shaking
• Nothing is red• Radiation pattern is visible• Deep is milder than shallow
![Page 27: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Low Potential for Large Intraslab Earthquakes in the Central Cascadia
Subduction ZoneBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 1880–1902, October 2005
by Ivan G. Wong
28
4 types of slab earthquakes
![Page 29: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Three zones along
Cascadia
![Page 30: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Hexagons are earthquakes
below megathrust
Note a-d profile latitudes
![Page 31: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
• Source Investigation and Comparison of the 1939, 1946, 1949 and 1965 Earthquakes, Cascadia Subduction
Zone, Western Washington Pure appl. geophys. 164 (2007) 1905–1919
Katy Wiest, Diane Doser, Aaron Velasco, & James Zollweg
31
![Page 32: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Puget Sound intermediate depth earthquakes
11/13/1939 5.8 63 S. Puget Sound02/15/1946 6.3 26 Puget Sound04/13/1949 7.1 55 Olympia04/29/1965 6.6 63 Sea-Tac07/03/1999 5.7 40 Satsop02/28/2001 6.8 55 Nisqually
![Page 33: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Detailed conclusions
Our results suggest that the 1946 earthquake is not an intraslab eventthe 1939 event closely resembles the 1965 eventthe 1949 event is similar to the 2001 Nisqually earthquakealthough the 1949 event appears to have ruptured toward the south, causing significantly more damage than the Nisqually event.
33
![Page 34: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Less seismogenesissouth of Puget Sound
young plate age
slower convergence rate
contributes to heating
the insulating effect of the Siletz terrane above the plate
contributes to heat
less stress concentration
slab contortions, perhaps tears, are visible under Puget Sound
34
![Page 35: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Four profiles
Note paucity of events east
of 124° W, except in top
profile
![Page 36: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
1873 M7.3 earthquakeBrookings, ORNo reported aftershocks
Perhaps deep earthquake,Wong claims likely shallow
Plenty of lower plates earthquakes south of OR-CA border
![Page 37: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Analogs:Japan
MexicoNankai
a few M6.5-7 events,
mainly at bends
![Page 38: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e735503460f94b735f7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Implications
The Padang M7.6 earthquake in the same setting is a reminder that such activity is not exceedingly rare.
Usually we think in terms of Gutenberg-Richter distributions of earthquakes, but intermediate-depth events may be different, thus odds are difficult to judge.
Current estimate is 85% chance of M6.5+ intraplate event, similar to Nisqually, in next 50 years.
38