1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung...

13
1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung [email protected] Contribution to Conference Tentative Governance in Emerging S&T 28/29 October 2010

Transcript of 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung...

Page 1: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

1

Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies

Bärbel [email protected]

Contribution to Conference Tentative Governance in Emerging S&T

28/29 October 2010

Page 2: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

2

Soft regulation

Soft regulation: rules of conduct which in principle have no legally binding force, but which nevertheless have effects in regulatory practice to achieve certain policy goals (Senden 2004).

Examples: technical standards, codes of conduct, best practices

Page 3: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

3

Central question

How can soft regulation enhance responsible nanotechnological development?

Answers… Effectiveness problems Effectiveness enhancement (lessons)

Page 4: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

4

(Potential) effectiveness problems nano soft regulation

1. Voluntary self-reporting schemes2. Voluntary codes of conduct3. Voluntary nano reference values at

the workplace→ implementation and compliance

problems, questions on appropriateness regulatory tool

Page 5: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

5

Effectiveness enhancement

Framework of responsive regulation (Ayres and Braithwaite 1992; Baldwin & Black 2008; Dorbeck-Jung et al 2010)

Unit of analysis: (multi-level) governance system (Hood et al 2001)

Co-evolutionary institutional perspective

Page 6: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

6

Effectiveness interrelated conditions (lessons)

Consistent & unambiguous regulation Strong binding force Strong interest in compliance Supportive implementation Knowledgeable oversight Responsive enforcement and

adaptation

Page 7: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

7

Exposure limits nano-materials NL

Regulatory system: EU directives and principles (precautionary

and ALARA) National legislation International standards Safety guidelines Ministerial recommendation on nano

reference values (NRVs)→ multi-level hard and soft regulation

Page 8: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

8

Consistent and unambiguous regulation Regulatory system seems to be

consistent However, parts are ambiguous (general

duty to care, EU principles and Aug. 2010 Ministerial Recommendation on NRVs )

→ Improve unambiguity

Page 9: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

9

Strong binding force soft regulation

→ Confer binding force (Recommendation Dutch Minister on NRV’s)

→ Attribute quasi-legal status (harmonized standards)

Page 10: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

10

Strong interest in compliance

Reputational advantages Economic advantages Keeping the advantages of soft

regulation

→ More insights into interests needed

Page 11: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

11

Supportive implementation/compliance

Strengthen interests in implementation

Information distribution Provide guidelines Funding

→ Extent measures

Page 12: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

12

Summary and conclusion

Lessons Next steps: - empirical research - translational research: taking social

learning seriously

→ NanoNext projects on governance arrangements, standardization, regulatory partnerships

Page 13: 1 Tentative governance by soft regulation – the case of nanotechnologies Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Contribution to Conference Tentative.

13

The end

Thank you for your attention !!