1. Technology: Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0 2. Structure of the organisation &...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1. Technology: Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0 2. Structure of the organisation &...
1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Structure of the organisation & leadership
0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus
3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation
4. Governance:Management by processes and facts
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
7. Partnership development
6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement
SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07
8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility
1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Structure of the organisation & leadership
0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus
3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation
4. Governance:Management by processes and facts
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
7. Partnership development
6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement
SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07
8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
PlanOrganisation Information
IntellectInteraction
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
PlanOrganisation Information
IntellectInteraction
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Knowledge* Generic* Contextual
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Knowledge* Generic* Contextual
Knowledge* Generic* Contextual
Network
Learning organisationTeam
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and
planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants
• Embedded in the structure of the organisations
• Innovative tech. infrastructure
• Rewarding and support forparticipants
• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific
objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of
participants• “light” tech. infrastructure
• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local
control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional
modes of education
Structured
Unstructured
Established Emergent
Team
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
••
• cycle••
•
• tech.
•
•to
•
• tech.
•• for
••
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
tech.
.
Network
LearningorganisationTeam
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and
planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants
• Embedded in the structure of the organisations
• Innovative tech. infrastructure
• Rewarding and support forparticipants
• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific
objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of
participants• “light” tech. infrastructure
• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local
control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional
modes of education
Structured
Unstructured
Established Emergent
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and
planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants
• Embedded in the structure of the organisations
• Innovative tech. infrastructure
• Rewarding and support forparticipants
• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific
objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of
participants• “light” tech. infrastructure
• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local
control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional
modes of education
Structured
Unstructured
Established Emergent
Team
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
••
• cycle••
•
• tech.
•
•to
•
• tech.
•• for
••
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
tech.
.
1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Structure of the organisation & leadership
0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus
3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation
4. Governance:Management by processes and facts
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
7. Partnership development
6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement
SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07
8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility
Organisation
Objectives & Strategy
Statues and bylaws
Local conditions
OrganisationOrganisation
Objectives & StrategyObjectives & Strategy
Statues and bylawsStatues and bylaws
Local conditions Local conditions
1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Structure of the organisation & leadership
0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus
3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation
4. Governance:Management by processes and facts
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
7. Partnership development
6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement
SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07
8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility
"Job" functionalities
Functionalities of a learning organisation
Tools with open access on Internet
Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)
"Job" functionalities"Job" functionalities
Functionalities of a learning organisationFunctionalities of a learning organisation
Tools with open access on Internet
Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)
1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Structure of the organisation & leadership
0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus
3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation
4. Governance:Management by processes and facts
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
7. Partnership development
6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement
SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07
8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility
Transparency
Managemenentby processes and facts
Flexibility
Foresight
TransparencyTransparency
Managemenentby processes and facts
Flexibility Flexibility
ForesightForesight
1. Technology:Collaboration environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Structure of the organisation & leadership
0. Explicit invariants Result orientation & customer focus
3. Competencies & Know-how: Continuous learning, Improvement & Innovation
4. Governance:Management by processes and facts
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
7. Partnership development
6. Actions in parallel with the changes:People empowerment & involvement
SEOUL 2.0First draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07
8. Sharing of competencies & know-how Corporate social responsibility
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
PlanOrganisation Information
IntellectInteraction
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
PlanOrganisation Information
IntellectInteraction
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Knowledge* Generic* Contextual
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Do
Check
Reflect
Plan
Knowledge* Generic* Contextual
Knowledge* Generic* Contextual
Network
Learning organisationTeam
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and
planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants
• Embedded in the structure of the organisations
• Innovative tech. infrastructure
• Rewarding and support forparticipants
• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific
objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of
participants• “light” tech. infrastructure
• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local
control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional
modes of education
Structured
Unstructured
Established Emergent
Team
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
••
• cycle••
•
• tech.
•
•to
•
• tech.
•• for
••
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
tech.
.
Network
LearningorganisationTeam
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and
planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants
• Embedded in the structure of the organisations
• Innovative tech. infrastructure
• Rewarding and support forparticipants
• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific
objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of
participants• “light” tech. infrastructure
• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local
control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional
modes of education
Structured
Unstructured
Established Emergent
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
• Clear aims and goals• Needs support and
planned management • Defined life cycle• Balanced composition• Clear roles for participants
• Embedded in the structure of the organisations
• Innovative tech. infrastructure
• Rewarding and support forparticipants
• Limited in scope and goals• Value assigned to specific
objectives and outputs• Limited involvement of
participants• “light” tech. infrastructure
• Decentralised responsibility• Greater desire for local
control• Open goals • Frustration about traditional
modes of education
Structured
Unstructured
Established Emergent
Team
Community
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
••
• cycle••
•
• tech.
•
•to
•
• tech.
•• for
••
NetworkNetwork ScenariosScenarios
tech.
.
"Job" functionalities
Functionalities of a learning organisation
Tools with open access on Internet
Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)
"Job" functionalities"Job" functionalities
Functionalities of a learning organisationFunctionalities of a learning organisation
Tools with open access on Internet
Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)
Organisation
Objectives & Strategy
Statues and bylaws
Local conditions
OrganisationOrganisation
Objectives & StrategyObjectives & Strategy
Statues and bylawsStatues and bylaws
Local conditions Local conditions
Transparency
Managemenentby processes and facts
Flexibility
Foresight
TransparencyTransparency
Managemenentby processes and facts
Flexibility Flexibility
ForesightForesight
"Job" functionalities
Functionalities of a learning organisation
Tools with open access on Internet
Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)
1. Collaborative environment of type WEB 2.0
Evolution of the existing structure to a network type structure structure
The bottlenecks disappearDevelopping the participation of all actors
2. Modification of the organisation
Organisation
Objectives & Strategy
Statues and bylaws
Local conditions
0. Invariants to explicite
Explicitation of implicite ways
Know-hows transmission
To promoote and facilite informal education/learning
Attitudes "LifeLong Learning"
Storage & putting at disposal the explicite information
3. Competencies & Know-how
Transparency
Managemenent by processes and facts
Flexibility
Foresight
4. Gouvernance
Criteria & Evaluation
Regulation
Projects
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation
internal
external
6. Communication
7. Actions for accompagnying the changes - Empowerment
8. .........................
SEOUL 2.0first draft of a generic
model for IFIP 2.0
Seoul AGORA/06.07