1 Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse...

Mal

e-on

ly

Femal

e-on

lyBot

h0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1923

58

1922

59

80th Percentile

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

139

78

913

78

1

Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)

Couple Prevalence: 62%

Dyadic Concordance Types Frequent Psychological Aggression (50th & 80th Percentile) by 6,002 Couples in 2nd National Family Violence Survey

%

Dyadic Concordance Types Type

Couple Prevalence: 17%

50th Percentile

Male Female

Male-Only Female-Only

Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

23

45

32

24

41

35

Chart Title

Male Respondents Female Respondents

%

Dyadic Types for Psychological Aggression As Reported By 481 University Students

2

Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.

Prevalence Men: 11%Women: 9%


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1.4 2.8

96

0.5 2.7

97

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Assault Types for Psychological Aggression As Reported By 5,219 Spanish High School Students

3

Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dy Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .

Prevalence Men= 92%Women= 96%

Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

16

23

60Chart Title

%

Dyadic Types of Psychological Aggression By 202 CouplesIn First Year Of Marriage

4

Prevalence 36%

Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of psychological aggression

Cut point for Psychological Aggression: 3 or more times in past year

Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2.14.9

93

1.74.9

93

Chart Title

Short Form Full Form

%

Dyadic Types for Any Psychological Aggression As Reported By 1,157 University Students

5

Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.

Prevalence Short: 62%Full: 79%


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

33

19

48

19

26

56

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Types for Severe Psychological Aggression As Reported By 1,157 University Students

6



7

Volpe, Ellen M., Thomas L. Hardie, and Catherine Cerulli. 2012. "Associations among Depressive Symptoms, Dating Violence, and Relationship Power in Urban, Adolescent Girls." Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing:n/a-n/a.

Low income, adolescent girls (n = 155), ages 14–18.

8

194 pairs of questionnaires were included for consideration

Has data on mutual as reported by males and females, but DTs need to be figured out if possible

The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in ChinaJuan Hou & Li Yu & Siu-Man Raymond Ting &Yee Tak Sze & Xiaoyi Fang


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

67

8

25

Chart Title

Female Respondents

%

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

9

Hess, K. L., Javanbakht, M., Brown, J. M., Weiss, R. E., Hsu, P., & Gorbach, P. M. (2013). Intimate Partner Violence and Anal Intercourse In Young Adult Heterosexual Relationships. [Article]. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(1), 6-12. doi: 10.1363/4500613

Prevalence Couple: 11%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

28

11

61Chart Title

%

Dyadic Types For Sexual Coercion By 202 CouplesIn First Year Of Marriage

10

Prevalence 55%

Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of coercion

Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Coerce

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Coerce

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

32

13

55

41

8

51Chart Title


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Past Year Sexual Coercion Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities

11

Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9

Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 23%Women: 19%

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Coerce

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Coerce

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

29

11

60

42

6

52

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Sexual Coercion, Lifetime Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities

12

Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9

Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 14%Women: 11%


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

31

11

58

45

13

42

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Assault Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By 2016 Spanish High School Students

13

Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dy Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .

Prevalence Men= 27%Women= 11%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

23

18

58

Chart Title

%

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By 388 Married Couples in China

14

Hou, J., Yu, L., Ting, S.-M., Sze, Y., & Fang, X. (2011). The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 26(2), 81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3

Prevalence Couple: 55%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

20

1

79Chart Title

Female Respondents

%

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women

15

Temple, J. R., Weston, R., & Marshall, L. L. (2005). Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Women in Nonviolent, Unilaterally Violent, and Mutually Violent Relationships. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 335-359. doi: 10.1891/088667005780997947

Prevalence Women: %


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

18 18

64

29

11

60Chart Title


%

Dyadic Types for Any Sexual Coercion As Reported By 1,157 University Students

16




Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

28 28

45

28

13

59Chart Title


%

Dyadic Types for Severe Sexual Coercion As Reported By 1,157 University Students

17

Prevalence Short: 2.3%Full: 4.6%



Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

21

6

73

50

11

39

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By 481 University Students

18

Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.

Prevalence Men: 31%Women: 27%


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

32

53

15

84

107

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Types for Lifetime Forced-Sex By High School Students(1997 South Carolina Youth Risk Behavior Survey, N = 2,923)

19

Prevalence Men 14%Women 26%

Coker, A. L., McKeown, R. E., Sanderson, M., Davis, K. E., Valois, R. F., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Severe dating violence and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American journal of preventive medicine, 19(4), 220-227.

NOTE: These data do not refer to dating couples and therefore are not DTsHigh rates because of lifetime and not restricted to partners. But check what is forced sex


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

32

53

15

84

107

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Types for Any Sexual Coercion by Male and Female University Students IN 32 Nations

20

Prevalence Men %Women %


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

32

53

15

84

107

Chart Title


%

21

Prevalence Men 14%Women 26%

Dyadic Types for Verbal Sexual Coercion by Male and Female University Students IN 32 Nations

22

Self-Only Partner-Only Both-Abuse*0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Women

Men

% of childhood

sexual abuse

Childhood Sexual Abuse

Dyadic Abuse Type

Prevalence % Men WomChildhood sexual abuse 8% 5%Partner abuse 43% 50%

* Perpetration of one or more of the following: threatened assault, assaulted, insisted on sex, injured partner

Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007Table 2.

23

Self-Only

Partner-Only

Both-Abuse*

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Women

Men

% of childhood

sexual abuse

Childhood Sexual Abuse

Dyadic Abuse Type * Perpetration of one or more of the following: threatened assault, assaulted, insisted on sex, injured partner

Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007Table 2.

Grades 9-12)

Coker 2000 NOTE: THESE DATA DO NOT REFER TO DATING COUPLES AND THERE FORE CANNOT BE PART OF THE DT TABULATION

25

194 pairs of questionnaires were included for consideration

Has data on mutual as reported by males and females, but DTs need to be figured out if possible

The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in ChinaJuan Hou & Li Yu & Siu-Man Raymond Ting &Yee Tak Sze & Xiaoyi Fang

Chronicity Fathers and Mothers: When violence between parents occurred

• Violent fathers: 75% - two or more times that year• Violent mothers: 73% - two or more times that year.

Dyadic Aggression Types •Father-Only type: 65 % assaulted two or more times•Mother-Only type: 59% two or more times that year• Both-Violent type: 80% of the fathers and 80% of

mothers

Typical pattern Two or more times rather than an isolated incident

26

Straus, M.A . and Michel-Smith, Y. 2012. "Mutuality, Severity, And Chronicity Of Exposure To Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations." Presented at International Family Violence And Child Victimization Research Conference. Sheraton Harborside Hotel, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 9 July 2012. IPS02

27

Mean Frequency of Behavior By Men and Women In Each Dyadic TypeInternational Dating Violence Study

BehaviorSex of Participanta

Male-Only DT

Female-Only DT

Both DT F test for:DT=

DT x SEX =Male Female

Initiated MaleFeml

Assault Any MaleFeml

3.5-

-5.1 11.42 14.8 123.87***

5.84**Assault, Severe Male

FemlInjury, Any

etc

Dyadic Types Can be Important For Understanding and TreatingAlmost All Types Of Relationship Behaviors

(Results for 14,282 University Student Dating Couples in 32 Nations)_

Dyadic Type Gender of

Respondent% Male

Only% Female

Only

% Both Any Assault Female 9 25 67 Severe Assault Female 16 31 53Any Injury-Perpetration Female 21.1 13.8 65.1Severe Injury-Perpetration Female 39 10 51 Any Psych Aggression Female 9 17 74 Severe Psych Aggression Female 13 31 55 Any Sexual Coercion Female 33 10 57 Verbal Sexual Coercion Female 44 9 47 Physical Sexual Coercion Female 43 15 43 Intransigent Female 13 9 78

Percentages are similar when based on reports by male students

Dyadic Types Can be Important For Understanding and TreatingAlmost All Types Of Relationship Behaviors

(Results for `14,282 University Student Dating Couples)_

Dyadic Type Gender of

Respondent% Male

Only% Female

Only

% Both Any Assault Female 9 25 67 Severe Assault Female 16 31 53Any Injury-Perpetration Female 21.1 13.8 65.1Severe Injury-Perpetration Female 39 10 51 Any Psych Aggression Female 9 17 74 Severe Psych Aggression Female 13 31 55 Any Sexual Coercion Female 33 10 57 Verbal Sexual Coercion Female 44 9 47 Physical Sexual Coercion Female 43 15 43 Intransigent Female 13 9 78

Percentages are similar when based on reports by male students

Taylor Study

I think the three bar charts were made from one of these two Tables, but I am not sure. In addition, I am not sure it is correct

33

Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.

34

Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.

FA MO FA MO FA MO0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Use of Alcohol or Other Drugs

%

Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent

FA MO FA MO FA MO0

5

10

15

20

25

Depression Rates

%


FA MO FA MO FA MO0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Father Ever In JailAs Reported By Father’s and Mother’s

%


1 Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse...

Documents

Transcript of 1 Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse...