1 Strategies for Enhancing Procurement Reforms: Monitoring Results & Involvement of Civil Society:...
-
Upload
steven-flynn -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Strategies for Enhancing Procurement Reforms: Monitoring Results & Involvement of Civil Society:...
1
Strategies for Enhancing Procurement Reforms:
Monitoring Results & Involvement of Civil Society: Bangladesh Case
Zafrul IslamLead Procurement Specialist
(Fiduciary Forum, NCC, VA; March 25, 2008)
2
Session: Key Parts
Strategies in Monitoring Results for effective Reform
Monitoring: Procurement Management Information System (PROMIS)- “Supply Side”
Monitoring: Involvement of Civil Society- “Demand Side”
3
Framework for Reform and Monitoring Results
Reforms: Design of a robust & sustainable package for
procurement reform considering the context (country). 1st reform package includes: nodal agency;
legislations; and capacity development 2nd reform package includes: institutionalizing capacity
development; strengthening monitoring; electronic procurement (e-GP); social accountability
Monitoring Results: Measurement of contribution of reform to improve
efficiency, transparency & accountability of the system.
Procurement management information system used by procuring entities (PROMIS)
Outcome and/or process monitoring by civil society
4
Monitoring Results through MIS (PROMIS)(“supply side”- compliance based)
Developed a real-time centralized procurement performance monitoring system (PROMIS)
PROMIS uses a set of indicators to monitor results and performance of public procuring entities
PROMIS central server is at the proc. policy unit (CPTU)
Direct linkage of CPTU’s PROMIS with procuring entities through online (web-based) and off-line connectivity
Proc. Monitoring Coordinator (PMC) at procuring entity monitors its own performance while the system transfer relevant data to CPTU for country-wide monitoring
PROMIS is being enhanced to introduce e-procurement (e-GP) in phases through 2nd reform package
5
PROMIS Key Indicators
Customized indicators based on OECD-DAC approach
Bidding opportunity Publishing contract awards (> specified threshold) Bidding time Bidders’ participation & responsiveness Procurement method Time for bid evaluation & approval Bidders’ Protests & resolution Contract variation Late payment Direct contracting/ sole source selection)
6
Data Flow Diagram: CPTU & Procuring Entity
CPTU-MIS site
Database Server
Web ServerInternet
CPTU
Procuring Entities
1. Login to CPTU-MIS site
2. Online Data entry
3. Automated hourly download of data from CPTU-MIS site
4. Approval of Data and available online for reporting and view
MinistryGoB
IMED
5.1 Reports
5.2 Reports
6
5.3 Reports
7
Civil Society in Monitoring: (“demand side” intervention)
Key elements: Creating greater social awareness to demand best
value for public money & held government accountable for it
Engaging civil society through a long-term intervention in monitoring procurement process and outcomes
Building blocks: for social awareness Communication strategy Education program Behavior change Advocacy program
8
Civil Society Monitoring Contd……
Building blocks: civil society engagement Engaging beneficiary/ civil society/ business and/or
media apex body
Public access to procurement related information
Technical training to media professionals
Establishing a government-contractors forum
Creation of formal civil society group for monitoring
9
Civil Society Monitoring Contd……
Key developments: Government formed a public-private stakeholders
council (PPSC), headed by the Minister for Finance & Planning
PPSC has members from high govt. officials, key civil society groups, think-tank, business bodies, contractors associations
Formation of government-contractors forum is on the way
Communication strategy being developed Social awareness: anti-bribery billboard; music video,
road show, rallies, short plays, street drama Education: introducing social accountability
mechanism, training of selected NGOs on procurement Advocacy: users of public goods & services; “to do and
not to do” for officials, bidding community, and politicians
10
Procurement Performance Comparators
Average Time Elapsed: IFB to Contract Award
CPAR (up to 1998) Sample Study (FY05)8% contract 4 months 39% contract 5 months21% contract 8 months 18% contract 8 months28% contract 12 months 34% contract 12 months43% contract > 12 months 9% contract > 12 months
Average Time Elapsed: Bid Opening to Contract Award
Cabinet Committee level approval : > 9 monthsMinistry level approval : > 7 months Department/ Agency level approval : > 5 months