1 Sentencing the Guilty Chapter 15. 2 Eighth Amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, not...
-
Upload
beatrice-little -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Sentencing the Guilty Chapter 15. 2 Eighth Amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, not...
1
Sentencing the Guilty
Chapter 15
2
Eighth Amendment
• Excessive bail shall not be required, not excessive fines imposed, not cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
3
Reasons for Sentencing
• Retribution: “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”
• Incapacitation: “lock them up and throw away the key.”
• Deterrence: “let this sentence be a warning to others.”
• Rehabilitation.
4
Retribution
• “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”
• Focus on past behavior.
• Severity of the punishment is directly tied to the seriousness of the crime.
• Desire for revenge.
• Just deserts: deserved punishment.
5
Incapacitation
• “Lock them up and throw away the key.”
• Crime can be prevented if criminals are physically restrained.
• Future-oriented: goal is to prevent future crimes, not punish past ones.
• Focus is on the personal characteristics of the offender.
6
Deterrence
• “Let this sentence be a warning to others.”
• Purpose of punishment is the prevention of future crimes.
• Punishment should fit the criminal.
• Jeremy Bentham.
• General deterrence vs. special deterrence.
7
Rehabilitation
• Criminal behavior is the result of social or psychological disorders, and treatment of such disorders should be the primary goal of corrections.
• Offenders should be treated, not punished.
• Sentences should fit the offender, not the offense.
8
Legislative Sentencing Responsibility
• Legislators provide wide parameters for possible sentences.
• Indeterminate sentencing:– Has both a minimum and a maximum term of
imprisonment.
– Actual term determined by parole board.
• Determinate Sentencing:– Specific number of years that must be served.
– Also called “fixed sentencing.”
9
Judicial Sentencing Responsibility
• Judges had wide discretion in deciding on a specific sentence until the mid-1970’s when the sentencing discretion of judges was greatly curtailed.
• Judges may choose among sentencing options provided by legislature.
• Judicial discretion reflects the “rehabilitative model.”
10
Executive Sentencing Responsibility
• Governors, parole boards, and departments of corrections make decisions on when to release an inmate.
• Parole: the conditional release of an inmate from incarceration under supervision, after a portion of the sentence has been served.
• Good time: prisoners are awarded days off their terms as a reward for good behavior or participation in various programs.
• Pardon: an act of executive clemency that has the effect of releasing an inmate.
11
Sentencing Options
• Prison• Parole• Probation• Intermediate sanctions• Fines• Restitution• Capital Punishment
12
Imprisonment
• Placing a person in a prison, jail, or similar correctional facility for committing a crime.
• The U.S. imprisons a larger share of its population than any other nation.
• Compared to Europe, the prison sentences are quite long in the U.S.
13
Cost of Imprisonment
• Construction costs for a single cell for a prisoner range from $75,000 to $100,000.
• Annual costs to house a prisoner range from $20,000 to $30,000.
Financial Projections over 30 Years for Building a New 500-Cell Prison Cells 1-Year Total 30-Year Total Construction costs 500 x $75,000 $37.5 million $37.5 million Incarceration costs 500x $20,000 $10 million $300 million Totals $47.5 million $337.5 million
14
Imprisonment Jurisprudence
• Cooper v. Pate: Prisoners can sue prison officials in federal court.
• Estelle v. Gamble: Deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of prisoners constitutes the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain, and thus violates the Eighth Amendment.
• Rhodes v. Chapman: Double-celling and crowding do not necessarily constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
15
Probation
• Punishment that allows the offender to remain in the community without incarceration but subject to certain conditions.
• Principle alternative to imprisonment.• Designed as a means of maintaining control over
offenders while permitting them to live in the community.
• Approximately 4 million adults are on probation in the U.S.
16
Factors to Consider in Granting Probation
• The defendant is not likely to commit another offense.
• The public does not require that the defendant receive the penalty provided for the offense.
• The rehabilitation of the defendant does not require that he or she receive the penalty provided for the offense.
17
Intermediate Sanctions
• Diversionary Programs– Counseling Programs– Therapy– Medication and counseling
• Fines• Restitution
– Direct Restitution – Symbolic Restitution
18
Death Penalty
• Capital Offenses– Used to include variety of crimes, including rape– Coker v. Georgia (1977): rape is not a grave
enough offence to justify the imposition of the death penalty.
– Now, only murder and treason are generally death penalty cases
• All Western democracies, except the U.S. have abolished the death penalty as a punishment.
19
Persons Executed in the U.S., 1930-2002
Insert Figure 15.3 on page 353 here.
20
Furman v. Georgia (1972):
• Invalidated all 37 state death penalty statutes based on cruel and unusual punishment of the 8th Amendment.
• Did not hold that the death penalty was unconstitutional, but, rather, the methods used were unconstitutional.
• Caused states to revise their death penalty legislation.
21
Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
• Held that the death penalty did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under all circumstances.
• For a death penalty law to be constitutional it must provide for a bifurcated process.
1. Guilt phase2. Penalty phase
22
Other Key Death Penalty Jurisprudence
• Thompson v. Oklahoma: Youths who are 15 years or younger at the time of the crime may not be executed.
• Stanford v. Kentucky: Youths who are 17 years old at the time of the crime may be executed.
• Penry v. Lynaugh: It is constitutional to execute mentally retarded persons.
• Atkins v. Virginia: Convicted defendants with an IQ of 70 or less may not be executed. – Overturned Penry v. Lynaugh.
23
The Jury and the Death Penalty
• Witherspoon v. Illinois: Prospective jurors cannot be excluded because they oppose the death penalty.
• Lockhart v. McCree: Potential jurors may be excluded if they oppose the death penalty. – Overturned Witherspoon v. Illinois.
• Simmons v. South Carolina: Defense may tell jurors that the only alternative to a death sentence is life without parole.
• Harris v. Alabama: States may give judges the power to sentence a capital defendant to death even if the jury votes not to impose the death penalty.
24
Jurisdictions Without a Death Penalty
• Alaska• District of Columbia• Hawaii• Iowa• Maine• Massachusetts• Michigan
• Minnesota• North Dakota• Rhode Island• Vermont• West Virginia• Wisconsin
25
Prisoners Under Sentence of Death by Region
Insert Figure 15.4, page 358 here.
26