1 Selecting Appropriate Assessment Methods Presented at the Teaching & Learning Innovations 17 th...
-
Upload
logan-kennedy -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 Selecting Appropriate Assessment Methods Presented at the Teaching & Learning Innovations 17 th...
1
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Methods
Presented at the Teaching & Learning Innovations 17th Annual Conference
At the University of GuelphMay 12, 2004
Peggy Maki, [email protected]
Material from Maki’s forthcoming book (May, 2004): Assessing for Learning: Building a Sustainable Commitment Across the Institution. Stylus and AAHE
2
Alignment
Methods that align with pedagogy, content, curricular and instructional design, educational tools, educational experiences
3
Assumptions UnderlyingTeaching
Actual Practices
Assumptions UnderlyingAssessment Tasks
Actual Tasks
4
Inventories
Position us to reflect on our expectations in terms of pedagogy
Position us to think about the relationship between how and what students learn and how we choose to assess that learning
5
Methods:
Emerge from multiple and varied opportunities to learn
Emerge from assessment practices such as self-reflection, peer to peer feedback, instructor feedback
Align with students’ learning histories and our values
6
Methods
Reveal different dimensions of learning:• Recall and recognition
• Higher order thinking abilities
• Students’ abilities to construct meaning
7
Standardized Instruments Psychometric approach—values
quantitative methods of interpretation
History of validity and reliability
Quick and easy adoption and efficient scoring
One possible source of evidence of learning
8
Do Not Provide: Typically, evidence about strategies,
processes, ways of knowing, understanding, and behaving that students draw upon to represent learning
Evidence of complex and diverse ways in which humans construct and generate meaning
9
Highly useful results that relate to pedagogy, curricular design, sets of educational practices
10
Locally-Designed Methods
Align with outcome statements
Relate to assessment methods students have experienced
Invite collaboration in design (faculty, students, TAs, tutors)
11
Do Not Provide
Usually, easy scoring unless closed-ended questions are used.
12
Authentic, Performance-based Methods
Focus on integrated learning
Directly align with students’ learning experiences
Provide opportunity for students to generate responses as opposed to selecting responses
13
Provide opportunity for students to reflect on their performance
Provide opportunity for quantitative and qualitative assessment
14
Some Methods That Provide Direct Evidence
Student work samples
Collections of student work (e.g. Portfolios)
Capstone projects
Course-embedded assessment
15
Performance on a case study/problem
Performance on problem and analysis (Student explains how he or she solved a problem)
Performances, productions, creations
16
Externally or externally juried review of student projects
Progression from writing to speaking to visual presentation
17
Mapping, charting, graphing (mind mapping or conceptual mapping)
Observations of student behavior
Disciplinary or professional practices
18
Internships and Service Projects
Oral Examinations
Self-reflective journals or writing
Learning logs
19
Team-based or Collaborative projects
Performance on national licensure examinations
20
Locally developed tests
Standardized tests
Pre-and post-tests
21
Development of Criteria (Scoring Rubrics)
Criteria descriptors (ways of thinking, knowing or behaving represented in work):
• Creativity
• Self-reflection
• Originality
• Integration
• Analysis
• Disciplinary logic
22
Criteria descriptors (identify traits of the performance, work, text)
• Coherence
• Accuracy or precision
• Clarity
• Structure
23
Performance descriptors (how well students execute each criterion or trait along a continuum of score levels):
Exemplary—Commendable-- Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Excellent—Good—Needs Improvement—Unacceptable
Expert—Practitioner—Apprentice--Novice
24
Development of Scoring Rubrics
Emerging work in professional and disciplinary organizations
Research on learning (from novice to expert)
Student work
25
Interviews with students
Experience observing students’ development
26
Scoring Sheet (rubric)
1 2 3 4 5
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4