1 Santilli, Juliana. “Farmers´Rights”, Chapter 8 of Santilli, Juliana
date post
05-Feb-2017Category
Documents
view
215download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of 1 Santilli, Juliana. “Farmers´Rights”, Chapter 8 of Santilli, Juliana
1
Santilli, Juliana. FarmersRights, Chapter 8 of Santilli, Juliana. Agrobiodiversity and
the Law: regulating genetic resources, food security and cultural diversity, Earthscan,
London, 2012
AGROBIODIVERSITY AND THE LAW, JULIANA SANTILLI
CHAPTER 8: FARMERS RIGHTS
8.1. HISTORICAL BACKGOUND
The realization of farmers rights is essential to ensure the conservation and
sustainable use of agrobiodiversity, and a cornerstone of the International Treaty on
Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Farmersrights include access to
land and agrarian reform, water, natural resources, energy, appropriate technology and
education, health care, political participation and freedom of association, among others1.
Although these rights are intrinsicably linked. However, in this book, we will focus on
farmersrights as set out in article 9 and in other provisions of the International Treaty,
since we believe that such instrument provides an important opportunity to construct
and implement farmersrights at the national level, since it is the first legally binding
international agreement that explicitly recognizes farmers' rights. We do not understand
that farmers rights are limited to those recognized by the International Treaty it must
be stressed but these can be a starting point.
Currently, there is not an international instrument that deals specifically with
farmersrights, and the responsibility for realizing farmers rights, as set out in the
International Treaty, rests with national governments, according to their needs and
priorities. There are no legally binding international standards on farmersrights. Via
2
Campesina (an international movement of peasants) has already called for an
International Convention on the Rights of Peasants, arguing that there are already
conventions to protect vulnerable groups of people, such as Indigenous peoples,
women, children and migrant workers2. However, such international convention still
does not exist, and contracting parties to the International Treaty must adopt national
laws and measures to protect and promote farmersrights. Next, we will show how the
concept of farmers rights developed internationally and reached the formulation in the
treaty. Then, we will analyze how farmers rights can be implemented at the national
level, and more specifically in developing countries.
The expression farmers rights was coined in the 1980s by Pat Mooney and
Cary Fowler, from the non-governmental organization Rafi3, to highlight the valuable
contribution of farmers for the global genetic pool and food diversity. They defended
the recognition of farmers rights at the FAO Commission on Plant Genetic Resources
as a measure for North-South equality and as a counterweight for plant breeders rights,
which already existed and were legally enforced. According to Mooney (2011),
international NGOs insisted that farmers varieties were the product of farmer genius
and should not be treated in any way as being less than varieties produced by the public
or private sector4 Since then, the expression farmers rights became widely used, and
was included in several international instruments, but with few concrete results.
Farmers rights were formally recognized for the first time in 1989, when the
FAO Conference adopted Resolution 5/89, which endorsed farmers rights as rights
originating from past, present and future contributions of farmers to conservation,
development and availability of plant genetic resources, particularly those from centers
of origin/diversity. These rights were vested in the international Community5, as
trustee for present and future generations of farmers, for the purpose of ensuring full
3
benefits to farmers, and supporting the continuation of their contributions, as well as the
attainment of the overall purposes of the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic
Resources for Food and Agriculture, in order to: a) ensure that the need for conservation
is globally recognized and that sufficient funds for these purposes will be available; b)
assist farmers and farming communities, in all regions of the world, but especially in the
centers of origin and diversity of plant genetic resources, in the protection and
conservation of their plant genetic resources, and of the natural biosphere; c) allow
farmers, their communities, and countries in all regions, to participate fully in the
benefits derived, at present and in the future, from the improved use of plant genetic
resources, through plant breeding and other scientific methods."
Resolution 5/89 considers that: a) in the history of mankind, unnumbered
generations of farmers have conserved, improved and made available plant genetic
resources; b) the majority of these plant genetic resources come from developing
countries, the contribution of whose farmers has not been sufficiently recognized or
rewarded; c) farmers, especially those in developing countries, should benefit fully from
the improved and increased use of the natural resources they have preserved, d) there is
a need to continue the conservation (in situ and ex situ), development and use of the
plant genetic resources in all countries, and to strengthen the capabilities of developing
countries in these areas. Resolution 5/89 was the first international instrument to
recognize farmers rights, but it was not legally binding. It was adopted as an annex of
the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture,
along with Resolution 4/89, which also recognized plant breeders rights as provided for
under UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plant). As
Andersen (2005) points out, recognition of Farmers' Rights (under Resolution 5/89) was
clearly motivated by the need to create acceptance for the formulations on plant
4
breeders' rights, particularly among developing countries. Nevertheless, opponents of
plant breeders' rights gained recognition of farmers' rights in exchange for something
that already existed, i.e. plant breeders' rights. Two years later, a new resolution (3/91)
decided that farmers' rights would be implemented through an international fund on
plant genetic resources, to support plant genetic conservation, particularly, but not
exclusively, in the developing countries. This fund, however, never materialized, which
created frustration among developing countries.
In 1992, Agenda 21, a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally,
nationally and locally to promote sustainable development, approved during the United
Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also stressed the
need to strengthen the Global System on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Plant
Genetic Resources for Food an Agriculture by, inter alia, taking further steps to realize
farmers' rights 6
. In the Nairobi (Kenya) Conference which approved the agreed text of
the Convention on Biological Diversity, on May 1992, Resolution 3 also recognised the
need to seek solutions to outstanding matters concerning plant genetic resources, in
particular: a) access to ex situ collections not addressed by the Convention, and b)
farmers' rights. CBD does not explicitly recognize farmers rights, but sets forth, in its
Article 8 (j), that knowledge, innovations and practices of local communities and
indigenous populations should be respected and application of this knowledge should be
encouraged by means of approval and participation of its holders and benefit sharing
with local and indigenous communities. In 1996, the Global Plan of Action for
Conservation and Sustainable Use of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture,
also included, among its long-term objectives the realization of farmers rights, at the
national, regional and international levels. In 1999, a study by the Economic and
Social Council about the right to adequate food submitted to the UN Human Rights
5
Commission, held that farmers' rights should be given attention by the human rights
community and promoted, since our future supply of food, and its sustainability,
depend on such rights being established on a firm footing.
Although the concept of farmers rights has been incorporated into many
international instruments, there was never consensus as to its meaning, the extent of its
content and the adequate way to implement it. Some arguments for the recognition of
farmersrights are listed below:
1) It would be a measure of equity between the holders of plant germplasm (farmers,
especially those living in centers of diversity of agricultural crops, in tropical and sub-
tropical countries) and the holders of agricultural biotechnology (based mainly in the
northern countries). There would be a moral obligation to ensure that farmers are
compensated for their contribution to conservation of agrobiodiversity. While
intellectual property rights in the form of patents or plant breeders rights
compensate breeders and encourage them to develop new commercial varieties, there is
no compensation and/or support for farmers to continue to conserve and sustainably use
plant genetic resources. Furthermore, inte