1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
-
Upload
dedi-sutia -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
-
7/29/2019 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
1/6
Brain damage in cardiac surgery patientsWojciech Dabrowski1, Ziemowit Rzecki1, Jacek Pilat2 andMarek Czajkowski3
Neuropsychological disorders and brain injury are still a serious
problem in cardiac surgery patients. Owing to multifactorial
mechanism of brain injury during extracorporeal circulation, the
effective and safe protection is extremely difficult. Despite
several studies, the ideal neuroprotective treatment has not
been found. Based on literature we analysed the main
mechanisms of brain injury and new methods of brain
protection.
Addresses1Department of Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, Medical Universityof Lublin, Poland2Department of General Surgery, Transplantology andClinical Nutrition,
Medical University of Lublin, Poland3Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
Corresponding author: Dabrowski, Wojciech([email protected], [email protected])
Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194
This review comes from a themed issue on
Cardiovascular and renalEdited by Jamie Y Jeremy, Kai Zacharowski, Nilima Shukla
and Song Wan
Available online 9th February 2012
1471-4892/$ see front matter
# 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI 10.1016/j.coph.2012.01.013
Postoperative brain damage and neuropsychological dis-
orders are frequent complications of cardiac surgery and
elevate mortality, morbidity and hospital costs, as well assignificantly impair the quality of life [13].They occur in
3080% of patients undergoing extracorporeal circulation
(ECC) and in 3050% of patients undergoing cardiac
surgery without ECC [4,58]. In many cases, they sub-
side within three postoperative months; however, in 17
35% of
cardiac
surgery
patients,
the
disorders
can
persistfor even one year [2,5,8].Their incidences are age-related
and are significantly higher in patients aged 65 years or
more [9]. For instance, the incidence rate of the most
serious brain damage stroke, is less than 1% in younger
patients compared to 65.5% in patients aged 6575, and
more than 7% in patients over the age of 75.
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association classified the brain injury following cardiac
surgery into two main categories: type 1 severe neuro-logical dysfunction, stupor and coma, and type 2
intellectual deterioration and memory deficits [10].
All these disorders were also divided into focal, multi-
focal or global.
The brain injury after cardiac surgery is multifactorial.
Global or focal ischaemia appears to be the main factor
leading to brain injury, and may result from cerebralhypoperfusion, macroembolisation or microembolisation,
massive inflammatory responses, perioperative disorders
in oxygen delivery resulting from prolonged anaemia and
postoperative cerebral hyperthermia, cardiac arrhythmias
and genetic predisposition [1,1117].
Several clinicians and researchers suggest that intraopera-
tive and postoperative cerebral embolisms connected
with global or focal hypoperfusion are the crucial factors
leading to postoperative neurocognitive disorders
[11,12,15,18]. About 3050% of postoperative strokes
result from cerebral macroembolism, whereas encephalo-
pathy and neuropsychological disorders develop owing to
microemboli [11,12,19,20]. There is strong evidence that
a significant number of cerebral embolisms result from
the disrupted atherosclerotic aorta, opened left-side car-
diac chamber or extracorporeal machine [12,1820].
Indeed, atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta is the
predictive factor of brain injury in cardiac surgery patients[12,21]. A fragment of atherosclerotic plaque liberated bysurgical manipulation of the aorta (clamping or cannula-
tion) and translocated into the brain vessel induces
ischaemia and causes transient or permanent cellular
dysfunction in the vital centres of the brain. Such cerebral
emboli may contribute to the postoperative morbidity or
mortality. Importantly, similar disorders are observed
after fat embolism associated with extracorporeal circula-
tion and uncritical cardiotomy suction. Fat embolism
causes brain oedema with haemorrhage [22]. Unfortu-
nately, the arterial and venous filters routinely used
inadequately protect patients from fat microemboli [23].
Disorders in cerebral blood flow are another important
factor resulting in postoperative neuropsychological dys-
function. Physiologically, the cerebral blood flow ranges
from 40 to 60 mL/100 g brain tissue per min. It is mainlyregulated by the mean artery pressure. A traditional
extracorporeal machine with roller pumps produces the
pulsatile blood flow with the index of cardiac outputbetween 2 and 2.4 L min1m2. Despite this, the
cerebral blood flow decreases to 2060 mL/100 g of brain
tissue per min [24]. Additionally, this low brain perfusion
may be reduced by carotid artery stenosis, which strongly
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2012.01.013http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14714892http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14714892http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2012.01.013mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/29/2019 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
2/6
predicts the postoperative brain injury. The moderatecarotid artery diseases are noted in 1722% and severe
stenosis (higher than 80%) is observed in 612% of cardiac
surgery patients [25,26]. In patients over the age of 65,
past transient ischaemic attack (TIA), smoking, periph-
eral artery
diseases
and
female
sex
are
associated
withsevere carotid stenosis [26]. For this reason many clin-
icians perform carotid endarterectomy preoperatively or
synchronously with cardiac surgery [25,27]. Others
suggest that the use of centrifugal pumps significantly
reduces adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery [28,29].
Moreover, some other factors such as anaesthetic agents
or low carbon dioxide tension reduce the possibility of
brain vessels autoregulation and have a strong impact on
the cerebral blood flow. Therefore, the method of anaes-
thesia and correction of arterial carbon dioxide tension
according to body temperature play a crucial role in
intraoperative brain protection.
The role of venous outflow from the brain seems inter-
esting, yet not well documented. Several experimental
and clinical studies present the adverse effects of raisedvenous pressure in brain circulation [30,31]. Decreased
venous outflow from the brain impairs cerebral circula-
tion, declines cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and
increases brain blood barrier (BBB) permeability, which
raises vascular water shift into the extracellular space
resulting in cytotoxic and vasogenic oedema and exten-
sive haemorrhagic cerebral infarction [28]. Moreover,
increased brain venous pressure may cause transient
ischaemia,whichmanifests as a transient ischaemic attack
[30]. Interestingly, the elevated central venous pressure
during cardiac surgery increases the risk of postoperativeneurological complications [31]; however, the effect of
brain venous hypertension has not been described and
requires further studies.
Postoperative hyperthermia is another risk factor of brain
injury.Many clinicians focus on intra-operative hypother-
mia and disregard the re-warming period at the end ofextracorporeal circulation. Fast re-warming of the brain
and postoperative hyperthermia predispose to total
cerebral ischaemia and stroke [13]. Therefore, the avoid-
ance of full re-warming at the end of extracorporeal
circulation is the main strategy to reduce the number
of hypothermia
events
[2].
Systemic inflammatory responses are alsoseriousproblems
after extracorporeal circulation. Several authors suggest
that an inflammatory response following cardiac surgery
with extracorporeal circulation plays a crucial role in the
development of brain injury [16,32,33]. It has been well
documented that cardiac surgery increases the plasma and
cerebrospinal levels of cytokines, which strongly correlates
with severe postoperative encephalopathy and other
adverse neuropsychological disorders [3234]. The pro-longed contact with an artificial material surface of the
extracorporeal circuit and ischaemia-reperfusion injury oforgans activate the immunological reaction leading to
disorders of vascular permeability and cellular structures
[3336]. Interestingly, theuseof anti-inflammatory agents,
such as corticosteroids, significantly reduces postoperative
neuropsychological
disorders
and
brain
injury
[36].
Different cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrilla-
tion, are a serious problem in patients after cardiac
surgery. Atrial fibrillation episodes occur in 1040% of
such patients, their frequency increases with age and the
peak of its incidence is on the first postoperative day. It
potentially leads to many serious complications such as
thromboembolism with its worst forms neurological
disorders, haemodynamic disturbances, shock and higher
early and late postoperative mortality [37,38]. There is
strong evidence that atrial fibrillation precedes stroke in
36.5% of patients with cerebral ischaemic events [39].
Importantly, atrial fibrillation is not associated with the
risk of postoperative stroke but it is themajor independent
predictor of brain injury during the postoperative period.
Recently, several authors have studied the genetic pre-
disposition to postoperative brain injury in cardiac surgery
patients [4042].The presence of the apolipoproteinE e4
allele is the highest genetic risk factor of postoperative
stroke [40]. Additionally, minor alleles of C-reactive
protein, a variant of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/III re-
ceptor and interleukin-6 are postulated as independent
risk factors [41,42]. Nevertheless, our knowledge of
genetic predisposition to postoperative brain injury is
limited and further studies are needed to determine
the mechanism and risk stratification for cardiac surgery.
The main aims of brain protection are to reduce the
number of sources leading to brain injury and to increase
the brain tolerance to ischaemic events. Generally, there
are two kinds of brain protection: non-pharmacologic and
pharmacologic.The shortened duration of artificial circuit
and time spent in the operating theatre, reduced cardiacsuction and avoidance of hyperthermia may strongly
reduce adverse neurological disorders in the non-pharma-
cologic way. Several experimental studies documented
that mild hypothermia reduced the risk of brain injury;
however, clinical trials did not confirm that finding
[43,44]. Nevertheless,
many
clinicians
use
mild
hypother-mia during extracorporeal circulation. A decrease in body
temperature reduces cellular metabolism and energy
consumption, inhibits the release of neurotransmitters
and decreases the calcium influx into brain cells [4547]. Moreover, deep hypothermia significantly decreases
the cerebral blood flow and number of microemboli
[48,49,50].On the contrary, patients re-warming favours
brain injury and is associated with worse outcomes [50].
The maintenance of arterial carbon dioxide tension(alpha-stat acidbase management) at the level of
190 Cardiovascular and renal
Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194 www.sciencedirect.com
-
7/29/2019 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
3/6
3538 mmHg prevents spasms of cerebral arteries andreduces postoperative neuropsychological disorders [51].
Similar effects are achieved by maintaining the adequate
mean artery pressure of 5060 mmHg [52,53]. The pres-
sure higher than 80 mmHg and lower than 50 should be
avoided, irrespective
of
the
disease
and
age.
This
pressureshould be maintained at the undisturbed level, because
the cerebral perfusion pressure strongly depends on the
mean artery pressure. Rapid changes in mean artery
pressure strongly predispose to brain injury, particularly
during the disconnection of the extracorporeal machine.
During the recent years, the cerebral oxygen saturation
monitored continuously using near infrared spectroscopy
is frequently used to maintain the adequate cerebral
oxygen delivery during cardiac surgery. Increasing evi-
dence reveals that decreased oxygen saturation below
50% associates with worse neurological outcomes
[54,55]. This simple measurement gives much infor-
mation about the brain status, especially its oxygen
metabolism during extracorporeal circulation. Moreover,
the continuous measurement of brain saturation allowsfast correction of disturbances in brain oxygen delivery.
Despite the non-pharmacologic protection, some anaes-
thetic agents should be used for brain protection. The
volatile anaesthetics are one of them.
The proposed mechanisms of volatile anaesthetics
related neuroprotection are based on an increase in
cerebral blood flow, slight increase in intracellular
calcium, upregulation of bioenergy metabolism in brain,
nitric oxide synthase and antiapoptotic factors as well asreduction in oxidative stress [56]. The use of volatile
anaesthetics increases mitochondrial adenosine tripho-
sphate-sensitive potassium channels (mitoKATP) activity
leading to mild hyperpolarisation [5759]. The opened
mitoKATP channel decreases mitochondrial energy con-
sumption by ATP sparing, enlarging mitochondrial
energy. Moreover, moderately increased intracellularcalcium prevents large intracellular calcium influx and
plays a crucial role in neuronal survivability after hypoxia/
ischaemia events [58]. Volatile anaesthetics cause the
membrane depolarisation in the presynaptic mitochon-
dria, also after the removal of extracellular calcium [57].
This
increase
in
intracellular
calcium
concentrationresults from a decrease in ischaemic activity of
calcium-calmodulin receptors, inhibition of N-methyl-
D-aspartate (NMDA) and a decrease in glutamate release
[5760]. Moreover, the use of volatile anaesthetics sig-
nificantly reduces the concentration of brain injury mar-
kers [61]. Similar effects are observed in patients
receiving magnesium infusions. Magnesium plays an
important role in the central nervous system. Its decline
affects a number of secondary brain injury factors, in-
cluding neurotransmitter release, ion changes, oxidativereaction and energy metabolism. Numerous studies have
shown that magnesium is essential in CNS injuries [62].Indeed,magnesium decreases afterbrain trauma,which is
correlated with neuronal cell dysfunction. The moderate
brain injury results in a decrease in intracellular brain free
magnesium up to 60% [63]. Recently, several magnes-
ium disorders
in
brain
circulation
have
been
documentedduring extracorporeal circulation [64]. Importantly, con-
tinuous supplementation of magnesium reduces substan-
tially the plasma S100b protein concentration [65].
Moreover, intravenous infusions of magnesium reduce
the incidence of atrial fibrillation, improve cardiac func-
tion and postoperative neuropsychological outcomes
[64,66].Nevertheless, the neuroprotective effect ofmag-
nesium is still open to debate, particularly in cardiac
surgery patients.
Moreover, the neuroprotective effect of lidocaine is still
controversial. Indeed, infusion of antiarrhythmic dose of
lidocaine before ischaemia onset increases the number of
surviving neurons in the CA1 region of the hippocampus
and preserves cognitive functions in experimental studies
[67]. Some randomised, double-blind prospective clinicalstudies confirm neuroprotective effects of intra-operative
infused lidocaine in cardiac surgery patients [68]. Some
other studies document lack of them [69]. Therefore, the
neuroprotective effect of lidocaine requires further
clinical studies.
Propofol is another interesting agent used for neuropro-
tection in cardiac surgery patients. It strongly inhibits the
NMDA receptor, activates gamma amino-butyric acid
(GABA) receptors and slightlymodulates the intracellular
calcium influx. By decreasing the internalisation of D-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid
(AMPA) receptor glutamine R2 (GluR2) subunit, it
reduces infarct size, promotes neurogenesis and improves
spatial learning and memory in rats [70]. Likewise,
clinical studies demonstrate its neuroprotective effect
[71]. Contrarily, there is experimental evidence that
propofol activates the mechanisms leading to cell deathin the cortex and thalamus of the developing brain [72].
From this reason, propofol is recommended as an anaes-
thetic of choice in adult patients undergoing cardiac
surgery.
Several
studies
document
the
neuroprotective
effect
ofbarbiturates [73]. Barbiturates depress the brain metab-
olism, inhibit mitoKATP channel, facilitate protein syn-
thesis, activateGABA receptors, and present antioxidative
activity. Similarly to propofol, barbiturates cause a dose-
dependent neurodegeneration in the developing brain.
The use of pentobarbital alters synaptic plasticity and
leads to a long-lasting spatial learning deficit [74].
Interestingly, the perioperative use of b-blockers
improves postoperative neurological outcomes in cardiacsurgery patients. b-blockers are known to have many
Brain injury and heart surgery Dabrowski et al. 191
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194
-
7/29/2019 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
4/6
benefits during non-cardiac and cardiac surgery. Theneuroprotective action of this drug has been not fully
known. However, several authors reported a significant
reduction of postoperative neuropsychological disorders
in patients receiving b-blockers during the perioperative
period [75,76].
It
is
recommended
to
continue
b-blockerstherapy until surgery with the last dose included as a part
of oral premedication. Moreover, this effect is intensified
by preoperative statin administration [75].The analysis of
6813 patients undergoing cardiac surgery showed that
such a combination has a strong neuroprotective effect.
Therefore, it can be suggested to include statins to b-
blockers therapy, however their neuroprotective effect
requires future studies.
Several other drugs have been studies as potential neu-
roprotective agents in cardiac surgery patients. Amanta-
dine and memantine, the antagonists of NMDA receptor,
appear to have promising neuroprotective effects. They
bind to NMDA with a higher affinity than magnesium
and thus decrease the prolonged influx of calcium into the
cellular space. Moreover, they increase dopamine releaseand block dopamine reuptake. Memantine moderately
decreases clinical deterioration and profitably affects the
mood, behaviour and cognitive function [77]. Therefore,
they can improve neuropsychological outcome, however,
their neuroprotective effect has been completely undo-
cumented in cardiac surgery patients.
The ideal brain protection has been not specified in
cardiac surgery patients. Despite several adverse effects
of extracorporeal circulation, cardiac surgery is the only
method of treatment of many cardiac diseases. Manyneuroprotective techniques and pharmacologic methods
are used to improve the quality of life; however, a sig-
nificant reduction of brain injury is still the subject of
many experimental and clinical studies. Therefore, neu-
ropsychological disorders and brain injury remain the
main problem of cardiac surgery patients.
References and recommended readingPapers of particular interest, published within the period of review,have been highlighted as:
of special interest
of outstanding interest
1. Hogue CW, Palin CA, Arrowsmith JE: Cardiopulmonary bypassmanagement and Neurologic outcomes: an evidence-basedappraisal of current practices. Anesth Analg 2006, 103:21-37.
2. Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K,Reves JG, Laskowitz DT, Mark DB, Blumenthal JA, NeurologicOutcome research Group and Cardiothoracic AnesthesiaResearch Endeavors (CARE) Investigators of the Duke HeartCenter: Report of the substudy assessing impact ofneurocognitive functionon quality of life 5 years after cardiacsurgery. Stroke 2001, 32:2874-2881.
3. Gottseman RF, Grega MA, Bailey MM, Pham LD, Zeger SL,Baumgartner WA, Selnes OA, McKhann GM: Delirium aftercoronary artery bypass graft surgery and late mortality. AnnNeurol2010, 67:338-344.
4.
Ahonen J, Salmenpera M: Brain injury after adult cardiacsurgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2004, 48:4-19.
In this important up-to-date review, the authors characterised and sys-tematised types, incidences and consequences of postoperative neu-ropsychological damage, and analysed the main mechanisms of thesepathologies in cardiac surgery patients.
5. van Dijk D, Moons KG, Keizer AM, Jansen EW, Hijman R,
Diephuis JC, Borst C, de Jaegere PP, Grobbee DE, Kalkman CJ,Octopus Study Group: Association between early and threemonth cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pumpcoronary artery bypass. Heart2004, 90:431-434.
6. Hernandez F,Brown JR, Likosky D,Clough RA, HessAL,RothRM,Ross CS, Whited CM, OConnor GT, Klemperer JD:Neurocognitive outcomes of off-pump versus on-pumpcoronary artery bypass: a prospective randomized controlledtrial. Ann Thorac Surg 2007, 84:1897-1903.
7. Grocott HP: Characteristics, incidence and pathomechanismsof neurological damage during cardiac surgery. ApplCardiopulm Pathophysiol2009, 13:20-26.
8. Yin Y, Luo A, Gio XY, Li LH, Huang YG: Postoperativeneuropsychological change and its underlying mechanism inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. ChinMed J 2007, 120:1951-1957.
9. Murkin
JM: Central nervous system dysfunction aftercardiopulmonary bypass. In Cardiac Anaesthesia. Edited byKaplanJA. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1999:1259-1279.
10.
Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA,Gardner TJ, Hart JC, Herrmann HC, Hillis LD, Hutter AM Jr et al.:ACC/AHA guidelines update for coronary artery bypass graftsurgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines(Committee to update the 1999 guidelines for coronary arterybypass graft surgery). Circulation 2004, 110:e340-e437.
In this review article, the authors described the incidence of coronaryartery diseases and current recommendation of treatment. They pre-sented advantages and risk factors of surgical revascularisation of ather-osclerotic heart disease as well as outcomes and quality of life after thissurgery. Moreover, they characterised morbidity associated with coron-ary artery bypass graft surgery, classified the brain injuries followingcardiac surgery andpresented the current recommendation in preopera-tive prediction of postoperative complication.
11. Pugsey W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrisin M,Newman S: The impact of microemboli duringcardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning.Stroke 1994, 25:1393-1399.
12. Brckken SK, Russel D, Brucher R, Abdelnoor M, Svennevig JL:Cerebral microembolic signals during cardiopulmonarybypass surgery. Frequency, time of occurrence andassociation with patient and surgical characteristics. Stroke1997, 28:1988-1992.
13. Grocott HP, Macensen GB, Grigore AM, Mathew J, Reves JG,Phillips-Bute B, Smith PK, Newman MF, Neurologic OutcomeResearch Group (NORG), Cardiothoracic AnesthesiologyResearch Endeavors (CARE) Investigators of the Duke HeartCenter: Postoperative hyperthermia is associated withcognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graftsurgery. Stroke 2002, 33:537-541.
14. Mathew JP, Podgorenau MV, Grocott HP, White WD, Morris RW,Stafford-Smith M, MacKensen GB, Rinder CS, Blumenthal JA,Schwinn DAet al.: Genetic variants in P-selectine and C-reactive protein influence susceptibility to cognitive declineafter cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol2007, 49:1934-1942.
15. Hogue CW, Murphy SF, SchechtmanKB, Davila-Roman VG: Riskfactors for early or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery.Circulation 1999, 100:642-647.
16. Ramlawi B, Rudolph JL, Mieno S, Feng J, Boodhwani M,Khabbaz K, Levkoff SE,MarcantonioER,Bianchi C, SellkeFW:C-reactive protein and inflammatory response associated toneurocognitive decline following cardiac surgery. Surgery2006, 140:221-226.
17. Hogue CW, Creswell LL, Gutterman DD, Fleisher LA, AmericanCollege of Chest Physicians: Epidemiology, mechanism and
192 Cardiovascular and renal
Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194 www.sciencedirect.com
-
7/29/2019 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
5/6
risk: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for theprevention andmanagement of postoperativeatrial fibrillationafter cardiac surgery. Chest2005, 128:9S-16S.
18. Litosky DS, Marrin CA, Caplan LR, Baribeau YR, Morton JR,Weintraub RM, Hartmen GS, Hernandez F Jr, Braff SP,Charlesworth DC et al.: Determination of etiologic mechanismsof strokes secondary to coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Stroke 2003, 34:2830-2834.19. Caplan LR, Hennerici M: Impaired clearance of emboli
(washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion,embolism and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol1998,55:1475-1482.
20. Litosky DS, Caplan LR, Weintraub RM, Hartmen GS, Malenka DJ,Ross CS, Landis ES, Applebaum B, Braff SP, OConor GT,Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group,Lebanon, New Hampshire: Intraoperative and postoperativevariables associated with strokes following cardiac surgery.Heart Surg Forum 2004, 7:E271-E276.
21. Roach GW, Kanchuger M,Mangano C,NewmanM, Nussmeier N,WolmanR, Aggarwal A,Marschall K,GrahamSH, Ley C:Adversecerebraloutcomes after coronary bypass surgery.MulticenterStudy of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and theIschemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators.NEJM 1996, 335:1857-1863.
22. Kamenar E, Burger P: Cerebral fat embolism: aneuropathological study of microembolic stage. Stroke 1980,11:477-484.
23. Brooker RF, Brown WR, Moody DM, Hammon JW Jr,ReboussinDM,Deal DD, Ghazi-Birry HS, StumpDA:Cardiotomysuction: a major source of brain lipid emboli duringcardiopulmonary bypass.Ann Thorac Surg 1998, 65:1651-1655.
24. Carrascal Y,Guerro AL:Neurological damage related to cardiacsurgery: pathophysiology, diagnostic tools and preventionstrategies. Using actual knowledge for planning future.Neurologist2010, 16:152-164.
25. GopaldasRR,ChuD, Dao TK, Huh J,LeMaireSA, Lin P,CoselliJS,Bakaeen FG: Staged versus synchronous carotidendarterectomyandcoronary artery bypassgrafting: analysisof 10-year nationwide outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2011,91:1323-1329.
26. Berens ES, Kouchoukos NT, Murphy SF, Wareing TH:Preoperative carotid screening in eldery patients undergoingcardiac surgery. J Vasc Surg 1992, 15:313-321.
27. Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Smith ST, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG,Claqett GP: Trends and outcome of concurrent carotidrevascularization and coronary bypass. J Vasc Surg 2008,42:355-360.
28. Pertti la J, Salo M, Petola O: Comparison of the effect ofcentrifugal versus roller pump on the immune response inopen-heart surgery. Perfusion 1995, 10:249-256.
29. Scott DA, Silbert BS, Doyle TJ, Blyth C, Borton MC, O/Brien JL,de L, Horne DJ: Centrifugal versus roller head pumps forcardiopulmonary bypass: effect on early neuropsychologicoutcomes after coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac VascAnesth 2002, 16:715-722.
30. Usman U,Wasay M: Mechanism of neuronal injury in cerebralvenous thrombosis. J Pak Med Assoc 2006, 56:509-512.
31. Zeitlhofer J, AsenbaumS, Spiss C,Wimmer A,Mayr N,Wolner E,Deecke L: Central nervous system function aftercardiopulmonary bypass. Eur Heart J1993, 14:885-890.
32. Ramlawi B, Rudolph JL, Mieno S, Khabbaz K, Sodha NR,BoodhwaniM, Levkoff SE,Marcantonio ER,Sellke FW: Serologicmarkers of brain injury and cognitive function aftercardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Surg 2006, 244:593-601.
33. Caputo M, Mokhtari A, Rogers CA, Panayitou N, Chen Q,Ghorbel MT, Angelini GD, Parry AJ: The effects of normoxicversus hyperoxic cardiopulmonary bypasson oxidative stressand inflammatory response in cyanotic pediatric patientsundergoing open cardiac surgery; a randomized controlledtrial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 138:206-214.
34. Gessler P, Schmitt B, Pretre R, Latal B: Inflammatory responseandneurodevelopmental outcome after open-heartsurgeryinchildren. Pediatr Cardiol2009, 30:301-305.
35. Gao L, Taha R, Gauvin D, Othmen LB, Wang Y, Blaise G:Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery.Chest2005, 128:3664-3670.
36. Ben-Abraham R,Weinbroum AA, Dekel B, Paret G: Chemokinesand the inflammatory response following cardiopulmonarybypass: a new target for therapeutic intervention? A review.Paediatr Anaesth 2003, 13:655-661.
37. Weber R, Diener HC, Weimar C: Prevention of cardioembolicstroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Expert Rev CardiovascTher 2010, 8:1405-1415.
38. FunkM, Richards SB, DesjardnsJ, BebonC,WilcoxH: Incidence,timing, symptoms and risk factors for atrial fibrillation aftercardiac surgery. Am J Crit Care 2003, 12:424-433.
39. Lahtinen J, Biancari F, Salmela E, Mosorin M, Satta J, Rainio P,Rimpilainen J, Lepojarvi M, Juvonen T: Postoperative atrialfibrillation is a major cause of stroke after off-pump coronaryartery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2004, 77:1241-1244.
40. Fuller S, Nord AS, Gerdes M, Wernowsky G, Jarvik GP,Bernbaum J, Zackai E, Gaynor JW: Predictors of impairedneurodevelopmental outcomes at one year of age after infantcardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009, 36:40-47.
41. Grocott HP, White WD, Morris RW, Podgoreanu MV, Mathew JP,Nielsen DM, Schwinn DA, Newman MF, Perioperative Geneticsand Safety Outcomes Study (PEGASUS) Investigate Team:Genetic polymorphisms and the risk of stroke after cardiacsurgery. Stroke 2005, 36:1854-1858.
42. Mathew JP, Podgoreanu MV, Grocott HP, White WD, Morris RW,Stafford-Smith M, Mackensen GB, Rinder CS, Blumenthal JA,SchwinnDAet al.:Geneticvariants in P-selectin andC-reactiveprotein influebce susceptibility to cognitive decline aftercardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol2007, 49:1934-1942.
43. Grigore AM, Mathew J, Grocott HP, Reves JG, Blumenthal JA,White WD, Smith PK, Jones RH, Kirchner JL, Mark DB et al.:Prospective randomized trial of normothermic versushypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass on cognitive functionafter coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesiology2001, 95:1110-1119.
44. Campos JM, Paniagua P:Hypothermia during cardiac surgery.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2008, 22:695-709.
45. Cavus E, Hoffman G, Bein B, Scheewe J, Meybohm P, Renner J,Scholz J, Boening A: Cerebral metabolism during deephypothermic circulatory arrest vs moderate hypothermicselective cerebral perfusion in piglet model: a microdialysisstudy. Paerdiatr Anaesth 2009, 19:770-778.
46. Nordmark J, Enblad P, Rubertson S: Cerebral energy failurefollowing experimental cardiacarrest.Hypothermia treatmentreduces secondary lactate/puryvate-ratio increase.Resuscitation 2009, 80:573-579.
47. TangXN,Yenari MA: Hypothermia as a cytoprotective strategyin ischemic tissue injury. Ageing Res Rev2010, 9:61-68.
48. Paolin A, Michielon P, Betetto M, Satori G, Velfre C, Rodriquez G,Murkin M: Lower perfusion pressure during hypothermiccardiopulmonary bypass is associated with decreasedcerebral blood flow and impaired memory performance 6months postoperatively. Heart Surg Forum 2010, 13:E7-E12.
49.
Grogan K, Stearns J, Hogue W: Brain protection in cardiacsurgery. Anesthesiol Clin 2008, 26:521-538.
In this up-to-date review,the authors presentedpathophysiology of braininjury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery andprovided an analysis ofmethods reducing the occurrence of postoperative neuropsychologicaldysfunctions.
50. Nathan HJ, Rodriguez R, Wozny D, Dupuis JY, Rubens FD,Bryson GL, Wells GA: Neuroprotective effect of mildhypothermia in patients undergoing coronary artery surgerywith cardiopulmonary bypass: five-year follow-up of arandomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007,133:1206-1211.
Brain injury and heart surgery Dabrowski et al. 193
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194
-
7/29/2019 1-s2.0-S1471489212000148-main.pdf
6/6
51. Abdul Aziz KA, Meduoye A: Is ph-stat or alpha stat the besttechnique to follow in patients undergoing deep hypothermiccirculatory arrest? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010,10:271-282.
52. Brady KM, Mytar JO, Lee JK, Cameron DE, Vricella LA,Thompson WR, Hogue CW, Easley RB: Monitoring cerebralblood flow pressure autoregulation in pediatric patients
during cardiac surgery. Stroke 2010, 41:1957-1962.53. Wang S, Dai ZG, Dong XW, Guo SX, Liu Y, Wang ZP, Zeng YM:
Duplicate preconditioning with sevoflurane in vitro improvesneuroprotection in rat brain via activating the extracellularsignal-regulated protein kinase. Neurosci Bull2010,26:437-444.
54. Murkin JM, ArangoM:Near-infrared spectroscopy as an indexof brain and tissue oxygenation. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:i3-i13.
55. Schoen J, Heringlake M, Tiemeyer C, Husemann L, Paarmann H:The association between gender, cognitive function, markersof inflammation and preoperative cerebral oxygen saturationin cohort of preoperative cardiac surgery patients. ApplCardiopulm Pathophysiol2011, 15:62-70.
56. Zhang J, Zhou W, Qiao H: Bioenergetic homeostasis decidesneuroprotection or neurotoxicity induced by volatileanesthetics: a uniform mechanism of dual effects. MedHypotheses 2011, 77:223-229.
57. Bains R, Moe MC, Larsen GA, Berg-Johnsen J, Vinje ML: Volatileanaesthetics depolarize neural mitochondria by inhibition ofthe electron transport chain. Acta Anaesth Scand2006,50:572-579.
58. Bickler PE, Fahlman CS: The inhalated anesthetic, isoflurane,enhances Ca+-dependent survival signaling in corticalneurons and modulates MAP kinases, apoptosis protein andtranscription factors during hypoxia. Anesth Analg 2006,103:419-429.
59. Kitamura T,SatoK, KawamuraG, YamadaY:The involvement ofadenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels in thedifferent effects of sevoflurane and propofol on glucosemetabolism in fed rats. Anesth Analg 2012, 114:110-116.
60. Codaccioni JL, Velly LJ, Moubarik C, Bruder NJ, Pisano PS,Guillet BA: Sevoflurane preconditioning against focal cerebralischemia. Anesthesiology2009, 110:1271-1278.
61.
Dabrowski W, Rzecki Z, Czajkowski M, Pilat J, Wacinski P,KotlinskaE, SztankeM,SztankeK,StazkaK, PasternakK:Volatileanesthetics reduce biochemical markers of brain injury andbrain magnesium disorders in patients undergoing coronaryartery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011.doi:org/10.1053/j.jvca.2011.10.014.
The authors presented that isoflurane and sevoflurane significantlydecreased plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) andmatrix metal-loproteinase 9 (MMP-9) concentrations. Reduced brain injury markersconcentration confirmed lower brain damage following cardiopulmon-ary bypass documenting the neuroprotective action of volatile anaes-thetics.
62. Vink R, CernakI: Regulation of intracellular freemagnesium incentral nervous system injury. Front Biosci2000, 5:d656-d665.
63.
Dabrowski W, Rzecki Z, Sztanke M, Visconti J, Wacinski P,Pasternak K: The efficiency of magnesium supplementation inpatients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: changes in
serum magnesium concentrations and atrial fibrillationepisodes. Magnes Res 2008, 21:205-221.
This study demonstrated the changes in plasmamagnesium concentra-tion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery and themost profitable dose of MgSO4 (10 mg MgSO4 per min intravenously)correcting plasma magnesium disorders and reducing frequency ofperioperative atrial fibrillation episodes.
64. Dabrowski W, Rzecki Z, Czajkowski M, Pilat J, Biernacka J,KotlinskaE,PasternakK, Sta zkaK,SztankeM,SztankeK:PlasmaMartix metalloproteinases 9 correlates with disorders of brain
magnesium homeostasis in patients undergoing coronaryartery bypass surgery. Magnes Res 2010, 23:169-179.
65. Dabrowski W: Magnesium supplementation significantlyreduces serum S100beta concentrations in patientswhohaveundergone coronary artery bypass surgery.MagnesRes 2009,22:21-31.
66.
Bhudia SK, Cosgrove DM, Nagle RI, Rajeswaran J, Lam B-K,WalterE,Petrich J,Palumbo RC,GillinovAM, Apperson-HansenCet al.: Magnesium as a neuroprotectant in cardiac surgery: arandomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006,131:853-861.
This is important study documented the profitable effect of magnesiumsupplementation on postoperative neuropsychological disorders. Theauthors presented a significant reduction of short and long-term neu-ropsychological dysfunction in patients receiving extra dose of magne-sium during cardiopulmonary bypass.
67. Popp SS, Lei B, Kelemen E, Fenton AA, Cottrell JE, Kass IS:Intravenous antiarrhythmic doses of lidocaine increase thesurvival rate of CA1 neurons and improve cognitive outcomeafter transient global cerebral ischemia in rats. Neuroscience2011, 192:537-549.
68. WangD,Wu X,LiJ,XiaoF,LiuX, MengM: Theeffect of lidocaineon early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronaryartery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 2002, 95:1134-1141.
69. Mitchell SJ, Merry AF, Frampton C, Davies E, Grieve D, Mills BP,Webster CS, Milsom FP, Willcox TW, Gorman DF: Cerebralprotectionby lidocaine duringcardiac operations: a follow-upstudy. Ann Thorac Surg 2009, 87:820-825.
70. Wang H, Luo M, Li C, Wang G: Propofol post-conditioninginduced long-term neuroprotection and reducedinternalization of AMPAR GluR2 subunit in a ratmodel of focalcerebral ischemia/reperfusion. J Neurochem 2011,119:210-219.
71. Kotani Y, Shimazawa M, Yoshimura S, Iwama T, Hara H: Theexperimental and clinical pharmacology of propofol, ananesthetic agent with neuroprotective properties. CNSNeurosci Ther2008, 14:95-106.
72. Pesic V, Milanovic D, Tanic N, Popic J, Kanazir S, Jevtovic-Todorovic V,Ruzdijic S:Potentialmechanismof celldeath in thedeveloping rat brain inducedby propofol anesthesia. Int J DevNeurosci2009, 27:279-287.
73.
Schifilliti D, Grasso G, Conti A, Fodale V: Anaesthetic-relatedneuroprotection. Intravenous or inhalational agents? CNSDrugs 2010, 24:893-907.
In this up-to-date review, the authors performed a systematic review ofarticles published between January 1980 and April 2010, includingstudies in animals andhumans describingpharmacological neuroprotec-tion. They analysed advantages and disadvantages effect of volatile andintravenous anaesthetics in patients with traumatic brain injury.
74. Tachibana K, Hashimoto T, Kato R, Tsuruga K, ItoR, Morimoto Y:Long-lasting effects of neonatal pentobarbital administrationon spatial learning and hippocampal synaptic plasticity. BrainRes 2011, 1388:69-76.
75. Bouchard D, Carrier M, Demers P, Cartier R, Pellerin M,Perrault LP, Lambert J: Statin in combination with b-blockertherapy reduces postoperative stroke after coronary arterybypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011, 91:654-659.
76. Amory DW, Grigore A, Amory JK, Gerhardt MA, White WD,Smith PK,SchwinnDA, Reves JG,NewmanMF:Neuroprotectionis associated with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonistsduring cardiac surgery: evidence from 2,575 patients. JCardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002, 16:270-277.
77. HanneyM, Prasher V,Williams N,JonesEL,AarslandD, Corbett A,Lawrence D, Yu LM, Tyrer S, Francis PT et al.: Memantine fordementia in adults older than 40 years withDowns syndrome(MEADOWS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlledtrial. Lancet2012 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61676-0.
194 Cardiovascular and renal
Current Opinion in Pharmacology2012, 12:189194 www.sciencedirect.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61676-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61676-0