1 Rural Utilities Service DIANA C ALGER Chief, Technical Accounting and Auditing Staff Program...
-
Upload
sylvia-whybrew -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Rural Utilities Service DIANA C ALGER Chief, Technical Accounting and Auditing Staff Program...
1
Rural Utilities Service
DIANA C ALGERChief, Technical Accounting and Auditing StaffProgram Accounting and Regulatory Analysis
Florida Finance and Accounting MeetingOcala, FloridaMay 21, 2010
2
Topics
• Electric Program• Telecommunications Program (as it applies to
Electric borrowers)• Broadband Stimulus Funding (ARRA)• Accounting Issues• RUS CPA Seminars
3
Electric Program
4
Electric Portfolio Overview
As of 12/31/2009
682 Active Borrowers
• 626 Distribution• 56 Power Supply
RUS Principle Outstanding $12,587,698,358FFB Principle Outstanding $28,230,575,896Total $40,818,274,254
5
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Approvals Subsidy
BILLIONS
LOAN PROGRAM VERSUS SUBSIDIES
-$10
$40
$90
$140
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
MILLIONS
LOAN SUBSIDIES
7
Summary of Loan ProgramElectric Programs Budget
(Dollars in Million)
Loan 2008 2009 2010Program: Actual Actual Budget
Direct 5% 99.3 100.0 100.0Municipal Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0Direct Treasury Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0FFB Guaranteed 6,500.0 6,500.0 6,500.0Non-FFB Guaranteed 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Loan Program 6,599.3 6,600.0 6,600.0
8
Loan ProgramsFY 2010 – As of 5/4/10
http://www.usda.gov/rus/electric/loans/loan_types041118.pdf
Loans Approved 63
Loan Applications In House 77
$1,171,110,000
$8,143,118,403
FFB Approved 59 $1,071,110,000
FFB Applications In House 76 $8,139,398,403
Hardship Approved 4 $100,000,000
Hardship Applications In House 1 $3,720,000
9
Loan Programs FY 2010
Hardship $ 100,000,000
FFB Guaranteed $6,500,000,000
313A Guaranteed Underwriter $ 500,000,000
High Cost Energy Grants $ 17,500,000
Loan Levels
10
Geographic Information Systems
Rural Development recognizes the importance of GIS in managing digital data and mapping systems, so that our borrowers can achieve greater efficiencies and capabilities in the future.
11
GIS Applications
FY
Number Applications Amount
2007 2 $2,445,698
2008 6 $5,398,197
2009 10 $6,373,919
2010 5 $3,269,570
12
COAL FIRED GENERATION
• 50% of the electricity in this country • 80% for rural electric cooperatives
WHY? Fuel Use Act of 1978• Prohibited the use of natural gas and oil to generate
electricity.• Forced the industry into coal and nuclear to meet
demand.
13
• 51% of cooperative generation
• 79% of MWhs generated
• Trend is not likely to be reversed any time soon.
• Strong track record in owning and operating coal fired plants.
• Meaningful options are limited.
COAL FIRED GENERATION
14
US Power Generation by Fuel Source
• US EIA Projections
• Annual Energy Outlook 2009
15
ALTERNATIVESRenewables
• Critical, but space limited, low energy density, and cannot be scaled up rapidly.
• Biofuels have their own environmental issues.
• Manufacturing Photovoltaic (PV) panels requires heavy metals, gases and solvents that are carcinogenic and must be disposed of in certified landfills
16
• 1,000 MW solar farm requires 50 square miles of land.
• 1,000 MW wind farm requires about 60,000 acres.
• Studies suggest that efficiency and renewables together can meet between 17 to 25% of demand.
ALTERNATIVESRenewables (continued)
17
ALTERNATIVESNuclear
• Nuclear sources are not expected to increase proportionally very much, but can provide scalability and energy density.
FACTOIDOne fuel pellet, size of little finger nail, contains
the same amount of energy as 149 gallons of oil, 157 gallons of gas, 17,000 cubic feet of
natural gas, and 1,789 pounds of coal.
18
Energy Efficiency Program
Provide loan guarantee to rural electric utility for energy efficiency projects.
Goals:• Ensure energy efficiency at the end user level• Increase electric system reliability by reducing overall system
demand• Increase load factors, allowing for efficient utilization of existing
electrical distribution systems• Use existing electric capacity more efficiently at distribution,
transmission, and generation levels• Attract new businesses and create new jobs to rural communities
by providing energy efficiency jobs
19
Smart Grid• RUS is an active participant on the Smart Grid
Task Force, established under Title XIII of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
• Task Force includes experts from seven different federal agencies
• The Smart Grid Task Force mission is to ensure awareness, coordination and integration related to Federal Government activities in Smart Grid technology
20
RUS and the Smart GridRUS:
• Monitors the standards making process related to the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Project to ensure that the resulting standards are relevant to the electric systems owned and operated by the rural electric cooperatives.
• Reviews and evaluates smart grid related materials and equipment that borrowers propose to use in upgrading their power grids.
• Provides loan funds to eligible borrowers to purchase and integrate smart grid equipment into their existing utility plant.
21
Telecommunications Programs Loan and Grant Programs
• Infrastructure Loan Program: Loans to local telecoms in rural communities
• Broadband Access Loan Program and Community Connect Grant Program: Loans and grants for local telecoms and other providers who offer broadband services in eligible communities
• Distance Learning/Telemedicine (DLT) Loan and Grant Program: Loans and grants for providing Distance Learning and Telemedicine services to rural residents
• American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Broadband Initiatives Program: Loans, grants and loan/grant combinations for broadband in rural communities
22
Telecommunications Program Budget Levels
2009 Obligations 2010 Budget
Infrastructure Loans $690.0 million $690.0 million
Broadband Loans $6.0 million $532.0 million
Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants
$36.3 million $29.7 million
Community Connect Grants
$13.4 million $13.4 million
Recovery Act (ARRA) Loans and Grants
N/A $2.5 billion (budget authority; approx $3-4B
in funding available)
23
Community Connect Grant Program
• Nationally competitive grant program to provide service to the most rural and economically challenged communities
• Since inception, program has provided 197 grants and invested $88.2M
• One community, recognized by US Census or Rand McNally, currently unserved
• 20,000 population or less• Minimum $50,000 – Maximum $1,000,000• 15% matching funds required
24
DLT Loan and Grant Program
• Provides rural communities with opportunities to obtain educational and medical services from distant locations using communications technologies
• $403 M in DLT loans and grants have been awarded since the inception of the program
25
Distance Learning and Telemedicine Program (modification)
• Re-authorized through 2012
• Places emphasis on ensuring that “libraries” are included as eligible purposes/entities
• $29.7 Million available in DLT Grants for FY10 (including carryover)
26
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Broadband Funding
National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA) $4.7 Billion
Rural Utilities Service (RUS) $2.5 Billion
Total $7.2 Billion
27
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Broadband Funding
USDA RUS: $2.5 billion total budget authority authorized under the
ARRA in the form of loans, grants and loan/grant combinations for broadband infrastructure – the RUS Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP)
First NOFA: $2.4 billion program level funding• Up to $1.2 billion for Last Mile projects• Up to $800 million for Middle Mile projects• Up to $325 million for a National Reserve
2828
RUS BIP Project Requirements • 75 percent of the areas to be served by a project receiving funds from such grants or loans shall be in a rural area without sufficient access to high speed broadband service to facilitate rural economic development;
• Priority shall be given to:– Projects that will deliver end users a choice of more than one service provider;
– Projects that provide service to the highest proportion of rural residents that do not have access to broadband service;
– Current or former RUS Title II borrowers– Projects that commence immediately upon approval.
ARRA Broadband Funding
29
Announced Rural Broadband Projects
Announcement Date
Number of Projects
States Covered
Project Amounts
12/17/2009 8 9 $ 53.8M
1/25/2010 14 11 $ 309.9M
2/17/2010 11 9 $ 277.3M
3/4/2010 22 18 $ 254.6M
3/23/2010 12 8 $ 150.0M
3/31/2010 1 1 $ 10.9M
68 $ 1,067.0M
30
Projects Taking Place in 32 States or Territories
Alabama Kansas New York
Alaska Kentucky North Dakota
American Samoa Louisiana Ohio
Arizona Michigan Oklahoma
California Minnesota Oregon
Colorado Mississippi South Dakota
Georgia Missouri Tennessee
Hawaii Montana Texas
Idaho Nebraska Virginia
Indiana New Hampshire West Virginia
Iowa New Mexico
31
RUS expects to use approximately $2 billion to provide grants, while the remaining funds will finance loans, for potential total investment in rural broadband of around $3-$4 billion, which may vary depending on the demand for grants versus loans.
RUS will award all funds no later than September 30, 2010.
Two rounds of funding:Round 1: window has closed; $1.067 B in awards have been announced
Round 2: window has closed; $2.2 billion is available
ARRA Broadband Funding
3232
Round 2 Funding (“NOFA 2”):AVAILABLE FUNDS
Last Mile: $1,700,000,000Middle Mile: 300,000,000Satellite: 100,000,000TA & Library: 5,000,000Reserve: 95,000,000
TOTAL $2,200,000,000 Repooling: RUS retains the discretion to divert funds from one category of projects to another.
SEE NOFA FOR COMPLETE DETAILS ON PROGRAM FUNDING AND REQUIREMENTS
NOFA=Notice of Funds Availability. Please visit www.broadbandusa.gov for more information.
ARRA Broadband Funding
33
RUS-NTIA Joint Public Workshops
• Portland, OR• Reno, NV• Denver, CO• San Antonio, TX• Eureka, MO
• Sioux Falls, SD• Dearborn, MI• Fayetteville, NC• Atlanta, GA
Total of more than 2,500 participants attended.
3434
ARRA Broadband FundingNOFA 2 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES 1. Last Mile Projects
Must predominantly provide broadband service directly to the premises or to end users. Only those applications whose proposed funded service area contains 75 percent or more rural areas, within which not more than 50 percent of the premises in the rural areas have High Speed Access will be considered for funding.
2. Middle Mile ProjectsRUS strongly encourages applications for Middle Mile projects from current RUS loan and grant recipients. Applicants must propose that at least 75 percent of the interconnection points be in rural areas with no more than 50 percent of the premises having High Speed Access. The communities in which the interconnection points terminate shall be used to determine the percentage of High Speed Access.
3535
ARRA Broadband FundingNOFA 2 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES continued
3. Satellite ProjectsApplicants must propose to serve only unserved rural premises in any of 8 regions. Applicants may propose to serve more than one region; however, Applicants must submit applications which are broken out for each region. Only 1 Applicant will be selected to serve a region.
At a minimum, an application must commit to providing broadband service, to providing customer-premises equipment (CPE) to subscribers at no cost (including no costs for installation, activation, or other hidden fees) and to providing to such subscribers at least a 25 percent reduction in the Applicant’s service rates as of 12/1/2009, for a term of at least one year.
3636
ARRA Broadband FundingNOFA 2 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES continued
4. Technical Assistance GrantsAwardees under the First Round NOFA or Applicants under this NOFA may submit a request for an additional grant for funding for the purpose of developing regional broadband development strategies in rural areas. Technical Assistance grants may be used for the development of a USDA-recognized regional strategy.
5. Rural Library Broadband GrantsAwardees from the First Round NOFA or Applicants under this NOFA may submit a request for a grant to reimburse the associated costs for connecting any rural library in their proposed funded service area, being constructed, or to be constructed, with funding from an award from USDA’s Community Facilities program of the Rural Housing Service. Such costs need not have been addressed in the original application submitted under the First Round NOFA or Second Round NOFA.
37
Accounting Issues
• Grant Accounting
• Tax Treatment of Grants
• 2010 CPA Seminars
38
The Basics – Accounting for the Grant Proceeds
Letter Guidance issued January 7, 2010
Note: This guidance applies only to non-regulated entities and the non-regulated activities of regulated entities.
39
Grants Related to Expenses
Dr. Cash $XXX,XXX
Cr. Expense Accounts $XXX,XXX
To record the receipt of a government grant related to current expenses.
40
Grants Related to Expenses in Future Periods
In the year the grant is received:Dr. Cash $XXX,XXX
Cr. Deferred Credits $XXX,XXXTo record the receipt of a government grant related to expenses in future periods.
In the future period when expenses are incurred:Dr. Deferred Credits $XXX,XXX
Cr. Expense Accounts $XXX,XXXTo properly offset the grant received against expenses incurred.
41
Grants Related to Fixed AssetsIn the year the grant is received:Dr. Cash $XXX,XXX
Cr. Deferred Revenue $XXX,XXXTo record receipt of a government grant related to the purchase or construction of fixed assets.
In the year the fixed asset is put into service and each year after during the useful life of the fixed asset:
Dr. Deferred Revenue $XXXCr. Grant Revenue $XXXTo record the grant revenue earned by the passage of time (the amount of revenue earned is calculated as 1/nth of the original grant where n equals the useful life of the asset purchased or constructed).
42
Taxability of ARRA Grants?
• Requests for Guidelines– NARUC Request – March 10, 2010 Letter
– Department of Commerce Request
43
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
• IRS Letter dated March 4, 2010, to Dept of Commerce dealing with tax treatment of ARRA Broadband Grants
• “Taxpayers other than nonprofit or governmental entities must include governmental grants in gross income absent a specific exclusion.”
44
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
• Only exclusion that could apply, in some circumstances, is Section 118 of the Internal Revenue Code.
• Section 118(a) of the Code provides that, in the case of a corporation, gross income does not include any contribution of the capital of the corporation.
• Section 118(a) applies to contributions to capital made by a person other than a shareholder, for example, property contributed to a corporation by a governmental unit for the purpose of enabling the corporation on expand its operating facilities.
45
In United States v Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. the Supreme Court adopted a two-part inquiry to identify a nonshareholder contribution of capital:1. The intent or motive of the transferor; and
2. The economic effect on the transferee corporation
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
46
• The transferor’s intent must be to enlarge the transferee corporation's capital to expand its trade or business for the benefit of the community at large and not to receive a direct or specific benefit for the transferor.
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
47
• The following five factors must be present for the requisite economic effect on the transferee corporation:1. The contribution certainly must become a permanent
part of the transferee's working capital structure,
2. The contribution must not be compensation, such as a direct payment for a specific, quantifiable service provided fo the transferor by the transferee,
(Cont’d)
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
48
3. The contribution must be bargained for,
4. The contributed asset, foreseeably, must result in benefit to the transferee in an amount commensurate with its value; and
5. The contributed asset ordinarily, if not always, will be employed in or contribute to the production of additional income and its value assured in that respect.
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
49
A grant payment that is made to a corporation restricted solely to the acquisition of capital assets to be used to expend the corporate grant recipient’s trade or business and that satisfied the five factors is exclude from the corporation’s gross income as a nonshareholder contribution to capital under section 118(a). A grant payment made to a corporation that may be used for operating expenses, however, will not qualify as a section 118(a) contribution to capital and so must be included in the corporation's gross income.
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
50
Another limitation on section 118(a) is that it applies only to corporation, including Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. Section 118(a) does not apply to noncorporate entities such as partnerships, including LLCs treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. In the case of an LLC treated as a “disregarded entity” for federal income tax purposed, we would look to the owner of the disregarded entity, i.e. a corporate owner could qualify for the exclusion while a disregarded LLC owned by a partnership would not.
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
51
If a grant recipient must include a grant payment in gross income, the grant recipient is allowed to deduct against the grant proceeds and other gross income all deductible business expenses, net operating losses, and other allowable deductions for that year.
Response to ARRA Taxability Question
52
2010 RUS CPA Seminars
Locations Dates
Denver, CO August 16 – 17
Oklahoma City, OK September 20 – 21
St. Petersburg, FL October 18 – 19
53
http://www.usda.gov/rus/[email protected]
54
Questions