1 Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter...
Transcript of 1 Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter...
05 – Judy Chu – DAI 523 Information Design I – Design and Industry Department College of Liberal & Creative Arts – San Francisco State University – California, USA – October 2012Information Design: Proportions 17x22 Mailer – Android 2012
SOURCES:Android, Android Academy, Android Central, comScore, International Data Corporation, Lookout Mobile Security, Tech Jini, [x]cube LABS
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter
united states smartphone adoptions in the end
Back in August of 2011, Android-powered smartphone devices have reached almost 50% of the worldwide market share, climbing at a rapid rate since it’s first release five years ago on November of 2007. At at end of Q1 in 2012, Android has more than double the amount of Apple’s iOS market shares in the world, manufacturing and shipping out various devices supporting the Android platform.
In the United States, Linux-powered smartphone devices are rare and uncommon, thus not included in the domestic market share. Symbian-powered devices, mainly Nokia, announced its migration from Symbian to Windows early of 2011, causing the Symbian market to diminish with each quarter since, as seen in Q2 of the United States smartphone OS market share.
Closing off Q2 of 2012, Android continues to dominate the world market, grabbing 15% more of the market shares than in Q1. Although most of the big platforms shown above are losing their world shares, Windows have significantly increased their market shares by half since Q1, closing the gap with Nokia’s Symbian and Blackberry’s RIM. After the release of the iPhone 5 late of September, how will the international market share fare?
In Q2 of 2012, users of Blackberry’s RIM devices are shifting towards either Android or iOS. Android and iOS market share increased by about 1% and 5% respectively since Q1. Android has been able to hold on to more than half the domestic market share since the beginning of the year with the help of popular Samsung devices such as the S2 and the S3, however there may be significant changes Q3 with the release of the iPhone 5.
Android59.0%
Android51.0%
iOS30.7%
iOS32.4%
Android68.1%
Android51.6%
iOS23.1%
iOS16.9%
Symbian6.8%
Symbian4.4%
Research inMotion (RIM)6.4%
Research in Motion (RIM)4.4%
Linux2.3%
Linux2.3%
Windows3.5%
Win2.2%
Research inMotion (RIM)12.3%
Research inMotion (RIM)10.7%
Windows3.9%
Sym-bian 1.4%
Sym-bian 0.9%
Windows3.8%
Operating system market share: 3-month average ending April 30, 2012 Smartphone adoptions and Android platform versions
Android iOS
MicrosoftRIM
Feature Phone – Smartphone30.8%
Smartphone – Smartphone27.1%
Smartphone – Smartphone16.8%
Feature Phone – Smartphone12.60%
Smarphone – Smartphone4.80%
Feature Phone – Smartphone3.55%
Smartphone – Smartphone 1.50%
Feature Phone – Smart-phone2.40%
Jelly Beanv. 4.11.8%
7.1%
2.7%
65.0%
23.7%
1.9%
55.8%
19.1%
5.2%
0.6%
0.3%
12.9%
3.4%
Honeycombv. 3.1 – 3.2
Gingerbreadv. 2.3 – 2.3.7
Froyov. 2.2
Éclairv. 2.1Donut v.1.60.4%
Cupcake v.1.50.1%
Ice CreamSandwichv. 4.0.3 – 4.0.4
!
As the technical era continues to advance throughout the upcoming years, mobile phone subscribers have put a halt to the manufacturing of feature phones and increase the manufacturing of smartphones at a rapid paste. Adoption rates from feature to smartphones have increased significantly from 38% to 47.5% since April of 2011. According to comScore, 3 out of 5 first time smartphone subscribers chose an Android device while 1 out of 4 chose an iOS device.Despite taking about 4-5 years before gaining momentum, Android has been consistently making new releases to their software, averaging about two version releases a year starting in 2009. A charming featuer about Android is that Android names their software alphabetically and by desert. The codenames started at Cupcake (C) after releasing two previous versions, 1.0 (beta) and 1.1 (known as Petite Four). By naming their software in this manner, it will be more likely for its customers to remember the Android brand.
international smartphone os market share android platform versions
united states smartphone os market share
OCTOBERAndroid Inc. founded in
Palo Alto, CA by Andy Rubin, Rich Miner, Nick Sears and Chris White
MAYAndroid v. 2.2 (Froyo) released – based on Linux kernel 2.6.32
NOVEMBERAndroid overtakes Symbian and becomes the #1 OS in Asia
DECEMBERAndroid v. 2.3
(Gingerbread) released – based on Linux
kernel 2.6.35
NOVEMBERAndroid v. 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) released – based on Linux kernel 3.0.1
OCTOBER500,000 Apps are
available on the Android Market
MARCHAndroid Market changes
to Google Play
JUNEAndroid activates 1 million devices a day
SEPTEMBERGoogle Play reaches 25 million app downloads
JULYAndroid v. 4.1 (Jelly
Bean) released – based on Linux kernel 3.0.31
evolution
JULYGoogle buys Android Inc. for $50 million
NOVEMBER The Open Handset Alliance announces the creation of Android
SEPTEMBERFirst Android device
released: HTC Dream (G1), featuring Android v. 1.0
NOVEMBER Android Beta & its
Software Development Kit (SDK) is released
OCTOBERAndroid Market opens
OCTOBERAndroid announces Open Source Project
FEBRUARYAndroid v. 1.1 (Petite Four) released
APRILAndroid v. 1.5
(Cupcake) released – based on Linux
kernel 2.6.27
SEPTEMBERAndroid v. 1.6 (Donut) released – based on Linux kernel 2.6.29
2003
2004
2010
2011
2012
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009OCTOBER
Android v. 2.0 (Éclair) released – based on
Linux kernel 2.6.29
FEBRUARYFirst tablet released using Android v. 3.1: Motorola Xoom
FEBRUARYAndroid v. 3.0
(Honeycomb) released – based on Linux
kernel 2.6.36
android history
Which Doctor is
most popular with the viewers?
900 Episodes
100 Episodes
a history of doctor who in terms of ratings
the plot of doctor who
doctor who vocabulary
Doctor Who is both the longest – running sci-fi program of all time and a British institution The show’s popularity in the UK can be compared to the popularity of Star Wars in America. The show is reaching the fifty year mark in 2013 and it is arguably more popular than ever. It has already gained cult status in America, Canada, and Australia. The main reason the show has been able to stay alive for so long is because it is constantly reinventing itself. It’s conceit is to essentially change the actor who plays the the main character, the Doctor, every few years – and with that actor change, the show can sometimes gain a new aesthetic as well. Of course over those fifty years, the show hasn’t maintained the level of success it currently has now. Let’s take a look at how the show has fared over the years.
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
eACH DOCTOR’S AVERAGE VIEWERSHIP
IN RELATION TO THEIR EPISODE COUNT
Doctor Who is the kind of show with a language of it’s own. Here are some words that are commonly used in the show in order for you to gain a little more perspective on this British icon.
Regeneration: Regeneration is really the reason Doctor Who has stayed on the air for so long. Regeneration is the process the Doctor goes through every time the actor is changed; it’s his way of cheating death. Every time the Doctor regenerates, he changes his appearance and some variations in his personality, but overall, the basic personality traits of the Doctor stay in tact. The Doctor has regenerated 10 times and is meant to be over 1200 years old.
TARDIS: Stands for Time And Relative Dimensions in Space. The TARDIS is essentially the Doctor’s spaceship. Throughout the entirety of the show, his spaceship has been disguised as a 1960S, British blue police box. One thing to remember about the TARDIS is that it is bigger on the inside. Because the show deals with dimensions in time and space, the TARDIS is an infinite spaceship within the confines of a tiny police box.
Time Lord: The Doctor looks like a human, but he is actually part of an alien race from the planet Galifrey and they are known as Time Lords. Time Lords have two hearts and the ability to regenerate.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
ChristopherEccleston
ColinBaker
DavidTennantJon Pertwee
MattSmith
PatrickTroughton
PeterDavison
SylvesterMcCoy
Tom Baker
William Hartnell
The show premiered in 1963 to an average of 6 million viewers with William Hartnell as the Doctor.
Patrick Troughtontook over in 1966 until 1969.
The show switched to color television in 1970 with Jon Pertwee as the 3rd Doctor from 1970-1974.
Tom Baker is, to this date, the show’s longest running Doctor from 1974-1981.
Peter Davison brought the show into the 80s as the 5th Doctor from 1982-1984.
Colin Baker played the 6th Doctor when ratings began to drop. He played the Doctor from 1984-1986.
Sylvester McCoy por-trayed the 7th Doctor from 1987-1989 before show was inevitably cancelled in 1989 due to low ratings.
For a one-off, American-made TV movie in 1996, Paul McGann played the 8th Doctor.
Christopher Eccleston brought back the show 2005 into the modern age for only one season.
One of the most popular Doctors, David Tennant debuted to fairly average standards in 2006.
Doctor Who’s highest rated year, ironically only had 3 episodes. The peak is likely due to David Tennant’s last episode in 2009-2010.
Matt Smith began his reigns as the 11th Doctor in 2010 and is the current Doctor as of 2012.
*Data taken from a 2009 issue of Doctor Who Magazine.*22,000 fans were polled.*David Tennant was the Doctor at the time the poll was taken, potentially skewing results. *Poll does not include current Doctor, Matt Smith.
PAUL MCGANN
Average Ratings(In Millions)
*The show originally began with the format of roughly 30 episode seasons with a 25 minute run-time per episode.*In 2005,, the show changed it’s format to 45 minute episodes in a 13 episode season.
Stella Cunanan | DAI 523: Information Design | Fall 2012
SOURCES: http://guide.doctorwhonews.net/info.php?detail=cast&rank=1 http://guide.doctorwhonews.net/info.php?detail=cast&rank=2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Doctor_Who_serialshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Whohttp://www.themindrobber.co.uk/ratings.htmlhttp://www.examiner.com/article/david-wins-best-doctor-doctor-who-magazine-pollhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/tvandradioblog/2007/apr/18/isdavidtennantthebestdoct
25.64%
24.73%
11.39%
9.84%
9.66%
5.71%
4.69%
3.88%2.87% 1.6%
Average Ratings of Each Doctor (In Millions)
Now that you have familiarized yourself with some of the vernacular of Doctor Who, you can gain some insight on what the show is about. The show follows the (now) 1200 year old Time Lord as he travels through time and space in his TARDIS with a companion – generally a human who serves to keep the Doctor grounded along their travels. Each episode var-ies widely – the Doctor and his companion could go back to 1800s France in one episode or go to the end of the universe in another. In some cases, he travels to both to the future and the past within the same episode. Gen-erally in every episode, he fights some form of alien. His greatest known enemies are the Daleks and the Cybermen, who have been fighting the Doctor since the show began. Along with the more science – related as-pects of the show, the show really delves into the human condition, ethical values, and romantic drama. The show is filled with action, adventure, drama, romance, and even comedy. While it is generally known as a sci-fi show, it’s no surprise that it’s gaining wide-spread popularity because it is truly a show that everyone can enjoy.
http://www.starpulse.com/news/Emily_AsherPerrin/2010/11/04/how_many_times_can_the_doctor_really_rhttp://www.scififx.com/2011/11/doctor-who-movie/http://www.nerdist.com/2010/12/doctor-who-for-newbies-the-eighth-doctor-the-wilderness-years-2/http://docohobigfinish.blogspot.com/2011/05/complete-seventh-doctor-adventures-so.htmlhttp://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m03m7myPR11qdchwo.jpghttp://iaith.tapetrade.net/doctorwho/doctor4.htmlhttp://brightcomedy.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/off-the-topic-chameleon-circuit/http://thesnufkin.blogspot.com/2011/07/best-of-doctor-who-sixth-doctor.htmlhttp://chalbo.blogspot.com/2012/03/dw50-countdown-second-doctor-part-two.htmlhttp://tto.libsyn.com/tim-s-take-on-episode-9-the-ninth-doctor-http://www.virginmedia.com/tvradio/top-tv-shows/doctor-who/where-are-they-now.php?ssid=3http://daleksrus.wikia.com/wiki/File:The_Third_Doctor.jpghttp://static.tumblr.com/zaqdpqi/IfJm7lbkq/dr.-who-tardis-2005-prop.jpeg
THE POPULARITY OF
IMAGE SOURCES:
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
● ●
●
United States314,505,000
14%
Thailand65,479,45357% Vietnam
87,840,00055%
Russia143,200,0004%
BrazilPOP. 193,946,886
10%
Congo DR69,575,000
13%
Mexico112,336,53825%
Indonesia237,641,326
55%
Iran75,149,669
20%
Ethiopia84,320,98733%
Egypt82,638,000
37%
Nigeria166,629,000
80%
Pakistan180,837,000100%
Turkey74,724,269
43%Japan127,520,000151%
Germany81,844,000
102%
Philippines92,337,852127%
A COUNTRY’S POPULATION VS. AREA
7,500,000
5,000,000
1,000,000
10,000
● ●Country Area [SQ M]
Madeleine Lucero-SimmonsInfographics
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
● ●
●India1,210,193,422
164%
Bangladesh152,518,015472%
China1,347,350,00063%
-10 -20 -30 -40 50 -40 -30 -20 -10
100 Yards - 300 Feet
●●OvercapacityPopulation
X Football Fields[SQ M]
What if every person in a country’s population was given the area of a football field?When it comes to graphing a country’s population, the size of the country is not always considered. By using a unit most people comprehend and can visualize, this project tries to display how much area of a country would be taken up if each person in the population had their own football field. The 20 countries with the highest populations were recorded along with the area in square miles of said country. Of those 20 countries, 7 wouldn’t be able to house the entire population in this given situation. One must also take into account the fact that not every single part of a country is habitable. For instance, two-thirds of Russia and half of China are uninhabitable. While this is shocking once first heard, those countries have large amounts of mountainous terrain and harsh weather conditions, that range from flooding to snow stroms. With so many different variables affecting a persons living conditions, this project tries to show that if we were given the space, the world’s population would have to reorganize itself.
sources:http://flowingdata.com/http://factsanddetails.com/http://home.netcom.com/~runar/geogr.htmhttp://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/populations/ctyareal.html
Percent of country covered by the square miles if each person in the country’s population had a football field
Federer vs. Sampras
12.08.1971
WASHINGTON, D.C., USA
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, USA
6’1” (185 CM)
170 POUNDS (77 KG)
RIGHT-HANDED
1988
08.08.1981
BASEL, SWITZERLAND
BOTTMINGEN, SWITZERLAND
6’1” (185 CM)
187 LBS (85 KG)
RIGHT-HANDED
1998
ROGER PETE
DAI 523 - Information Design 1Pino TroguAssignment 03: ProportionsLuke MarsdenOctober 2012
REFERENCESATP Profile Pete Sampras: http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Sa/P/Pete-Sampras.aspx
ATP Profile Roger Federer: http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Top-Players/Roger-Federer.aspx
Sampras & Federer Title Race: http://thesis.armina.info/node/133
In sport, there is always raging debate as to who is the greatest of all time (GOAT) with many people naming several of the top players as contenders. What is even more difficult to discern is on what basis someone can be judged the greatest of all time. Within the sport of tennis there are many heavyweights who are often referred to from Rod Laver to Bjorn Borg, however, when considering the greatest of all time, two names seem to rise above the rest - Roger Federer and Pete Sampras.
Both men have the honor of taking the top two spots of individuals with the most Grand Slam titles earned. Having been born 10 years apart with their careers exhibiting so many similarities, a comparison between the two is a startling one. With a 10 year gap between their rather similar careers, each man can claim to be the best of their era, however, who is the greatest of all time and on what basis?
$43,280,489
762
222
64
14
286
31
$73,691,177
868
194
76
17
298
41
WimbledonAustralian Open US OpenFrench Open
4 - 2 1 - 0
ATP MastersSeries Canada
ATP MastersSeriesCincinnati
ATP MastersSeriesHamburg
ATP MastersSeries IndianWells
ATP MastersSeries Madrid
ATP MastersSeries Miami
ATP WorldTour Masters1000Cincinnati
ATP WorldTour Masters1000 Madrid
AustralianOpen
Bangkok BarclaysATP WorldTour Finals
Basel
Doha
Dubai
Halle
Rotterdam
TennisMasters Cup
US Open
Vienna
Wimbledon
Federer
Antwerp
ATP MastersSeriesCincinnati
ATP MastersSeries IndianWells
ATP MastersSeries Miami
ATP MastersSeries Paris
ATP Tour WorldChampionship
ATP TourWorldChampionship
AustralianOpen
Basel
Grand SlamCup
Hong Kong
Indianapolis
Los Angeles
Lyon
Memphis
Philadelphia
Philadelphia
San Jose
Sydney
Tokyo Outdoor
US Open
Wimbledon
SamprasClay Grass Carpet Hard
TITLES WON BY COURT SURFACE
London / Queen’s Club
BORN
PLACE OF BIRTH
HOMETOWN
HEIGHT
WEIGHT
STYLETURNED PROFESSIONAL
Total prize money
Career wins
Career losses
Total CAREER titles
Grand slam titles
Total WEEKS ranked world no.1
Longest match winning streak
KING OF THE SURFACEWhen comparing the performance of the two players on the various tennis surfaces, there are also noticeable differences. Both have had success in winning titles on hard courts (at events like the Australian Open) and on grass courts (e.g. at Wimbledon) unlike the vast differences in carpet and clay court performances.
Carpet is not widely used in tennis often being reserved for smaller tournaments such as the ATP Tour Championships, amongst others, which Sampras has been seen to have greater success on than Federer.
Meanwhile, clay is a prominently featured court surface as it is used at the French Open. Often considered by those within the game as the most difficult surface to master, Federer has clearly had greater success on the clay court than Sampras who has won fewer tournaments on clay and can not claim to ever winning a French Open like many of the greats.
WHO IS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME?It is difficult to compare the two given both came from different eras as they only faced each other once in different peaks of their career and faced substantially different competitive environments from each other. However, on nearly every performance criteria, Federer has surpassed Sampras.
Ultimately, Federer holds more titles, reached his success in a far shorter timeframe and has consistently reached more finals than Sampras. He can also lay claim to achievements Sampras cannot such as winning the French Open. Clay is considered the ultimate test of a player’s ability, something Sampras was not able to turn into Grand Slam glory.
There’s no denying that Sampras was an exceptional player and is one of the games’ greatest, however, Federer is more deserving of the title of the greatest of all time based on his performance against that of Sampras.
QUICKEST RISE TO THE TOPAs shown, Federer leads Sampras in the number of Grand Slam titles earned which are considered the top achievements within the sport. Federer currently leads with 17 to Sampras’ 14 titles equaling him at the 2009 French Open, a tournament neither man had previously won.
In addition to number of titles, it is also worth observing how long it took each player to earn their titles. Sampras took 12 years to earn his 14 titles as his wins were mostly spread out. Meanwhile, Federer has acquired his 17 titles in just 9 years, 3 whole years ahead of Sampras. Staggeringly, Federer had won 16 of those in 7 years which averages to more than two per year.
ONLY MATCH MEETING2001 Wimbledon, EnglandGrass, Round 16 Federer 7(7) 5 6 6(0) 7 Sampras 6(5) 7 4 7(2) 5
GRAND SLAM WimbledonAustralian Open US OpenFrench Open
7 - 7 5 - 5
TITLES EARNED
Peter Sampras vs Roger Federer: http://www.tennis28.com/studies/Federer_Sampras.htmlTennis Records & Statistics: http://www.tennis-x.com/stats/tennisrecords.php
Federer Breaks Sampras Record: http://www.nytimes.com/
Federer & Sampras: 10 Years of Separation: http://straightsets.blogs.nytimes.com/
2nd Round
1st Round
Final
Semi-Final
Quarter-Final
4th Round
3rd Round
2nd Round
1st Round
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15WN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Year 15AU FR WN US
Year 14AU FR WN US
Year 13AU FR WN US
Year 12AU FR WN US
Year 11AU FR WN US
Year 10AU FR WN US
Year 9AU FR WN US
Year 8AU FR WN US
Year 7AU FR WN US
Year 6AU FR WN US
Year 5AU FR WN US
Year 4AU FR WN US
Year 3AU FR WN US
Year 2AU FR WN US
Year 1AU FR WN US
Final
Semi-Final
Quarter-Final
4th Round
3rd Round
2nd Round
1st Round
Final
Semi-Final
Quarter-Final
4th Round
3rd Round
2nd Round
1st Round
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
PERFORMANCE AT GRAND SLAMS DURING THEIR CAREER
Year 15AU FR WN US
Year 14AU FR WN US
Year 13AU FR WN US
Year 12AU FR WN US
Year 11AU FR WN US
Year 10AU FR WN US
Year 9AU FR WN US
Year 8AU FR WN US
Year 7AU FR WN US
Year 6AU FR WN US
Year 5AU FR WN US
Year 4AU FR WN US
Year 3AU FR WN US
Year 2AU FR WN US
Year 1AU FR WN US
PERFORMANCE AT GRAND SLAMS DURING THEIR CAREER
FINAL ENCOUNTERSAs can be seen to the right, on a tournament-by-tournament basis, it can be seen that Federer reached more finals and more consistently than Sampras. Both men won all but a few of the finals they participated in, but on the whole, Federer reached the later stages of tournaments on more occasions than Sampras did.
TITLES WON BY COURT SURFACE
The Land ofOpportunity
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Earnings proportion of total foreign-born population 1999 – 2009
Percentage of foreign-born residents in each state in 2009
EuropeMigrants originating from Europe accounts for 18percent of the foreign-born population that earnsover 75,000 U.S. dollars per year. 64.8 percentare in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.
EUrope18%
ASia51.4%
LatinAmerica20.9%
other9.7%
White-collar occupation (64.8%)
Blue-collar occupation (35.2%)
Occupation proportion ofEuropean-born migrants
AsiaMigrants originating from Asia accounts for51.4 percent of the foreign-born populationthat earns over 75,000 U.S. dollars per year. 69.7percent are in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.
White-collar occupation (69.7%)
Blue-collar occupation (30.3%)
Occupation proportion ofAsian-born migrants
Latin AmericaMigrants originating from Latin America accountsfor 20.9 percent of the foreign-born populationthat earns over 75,000 U.S. dollars per year. 28.5percent are in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.
White-collar occupation (28.5%)
Blue-collar occupation (71.4%)
Occupation proportion ofLatin American-born migrants
Other areasMigrants originating from other areas of the Worldaccounts for 9.7 percent of the foreign-bornpopulation that earns over 75,000 U.S. dollars peryear. 59 percent are in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.
White-collar occupation (59%)
Blue-collar occupation (41%)
Occupation proportion of migrantsborn in other areas of the World
75,000 U.S. dollars and greater Less than 75,000 U.S. dollars
Scale
NJ5%
IL5%
NY11%
FL9%
TX10%
CA26%
Thousands of migrants arrive in the United States every year seeking a more prosperous future.They come from all walks of life; from neighboring countries to continents oceans apart; everyone arrives with dreams and a common goal.
Some migrants who come to the United States are escaping hardship in their countries of origin, and some relocate for personal benefit. The majority of migrants come to find employment. 81 percent of migrants live above the poverty level earning a median personal income of 32,932 U.S. dollars.
With various business and technological industry booms, some people are migrating to the United States for higher income attainment. These people tend to be those from developed countries or at a high educational level. The United States Census
Bureau gathers foreign-born workers earning 75,000 U.S. dollars or more into one category and this will be the focus of the infographic.
The United States Census Bureau also categorizes the occupations that foreign-born workers have, which will be further refined into white-collar (which includes: management, and sales and office occupations) and blue-collar (which includes: service occupations, primary industries, contruction, production, and transportation).
Although the amount of foreign-born white collar and blue collar workers generally increases each year, it is shown that is it drastically affected by local and global economic situations. The majority of foreign-born workers earning 75,000 U.S. dollars or more are from Asia with 69.7 percent in white-collar jobs.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2012, Current Population Survey Data on Foreign-Born Population, Annual data tables 1999 to 2009, U.S. Department of Commerce. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://1.usa.gov/SWxiZzU.S. Census Bureau, 2012, Population: Native and Foreign-born Populations 2009. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://1.usa.gov/SSWV1LU.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2011, The 2009 HHS Poverty Guidelines, published 23 January 2009. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://1.usa.gov/RmSxECWikipedia contributors, 2012, Personal income in the United States, Wikipedia. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://bit.ly/TpwVr2
HENRY NGO 14 DAI523-01
1%
5%
10%
26%
Sources:http://moneyland.time.comhttp://www.wineinstitute.org http://www.ttb.gov/Christina Davidson
DAI 523 - Trogu
Americans LoveWine
Change−150 −100 −50 0 50 100 150 200 250
Change−25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Argentina971400
Australia530000
Brazil355000
China 929000
France 2892000 Germany 2020500
Italy 2450000
Netherlands
Portugal447700
Romania509700
Russia 1150000
South Africa346000
Spain 1060000
United Kingdom1320000
United States 2912041
Wine production and consumption continues to rise in the United States. The United States each year becomes a bigger producer of wine. California especially produces most of the wine made in the United states, as shown in the graph below. The graphs show how the United states is a serious competitor in wine production, and even consumption, ranking above France in total wine consumption for the first time in 2010.
100
2010 marked the first time ever that more wine was consumed in the U.S. than in France
U.S. vs CaliforniaWine Production
0
100
200
500
600
700
800
400
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
in millions of gallons
Year
Still Wine State Production change between 2008 and 2010
California 605619613
Florida1920638
Kentucky2196055
Michigan1540149
New Jersey1507311 New York
25183355Ohio1568378
Oregon5479553
Vermont3356568
Washington24656796
World Wide Consumptionchange between 2007 and 2010
California produces an average of 90 percent of total United States wine production.
U.S. Wine Consumption
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
300
400
500
600
700
800
Year
Gallons
347000
Awards Won
Academy Awards
Golden Globe
Grammys
Dana LuiDAI 523-Info Design
Fall 2012 -- Pino TroguSan Francisco State University
Sources:http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/Pixar.phphttp://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=bearandthebow.htmhttp://www.fanpop.com/spots/pixar/images
23
5
2
United StatesGross
ForeignGross
Toy Story1995
A Bug’s Life1998
The Incredibles2004
Up2009
Toy Story 21999
Cars2006
toy Story 32010
Monsters Inc2001
Ratatouille2007
cars 22011
Finding nemo2003
WALL-E2008
Brave2012
192M
163M
246M 256M
340M
261M244M
206M224M
293M
415M
191M
234M
30M45M
94M90M 92M
150M
180M 175M200M 200M
185M
115M
70MBudget
527M
462M
362M
1B
Revenue & Budget Per Movie (Millions)
Located in Emeryville, California, Pixar Animation Studio is known for their animated films. Pixar started out as a part of Lucasfilm until 1986 when they began to become funded by Steve Jobs of Apple Inc. In 1995, Jobs was able to get the Disney Company to work alongside Pixar as they worked on their first big animation film, Toy Story. By 2006, The Walt Disney Company bought Pixar for $7.4 billion. Since then, Pixar has created 13 major films.
363M
485M
516M
560M
731M
533M
620M633M
868M
F e a t u r e F i l m s
COLOR BLINDNESS
Who is more Color Blind?
Justin PangilinanProject 3DAI 523.02 Information Design 1 Instructor: Pino TroguDesign and IndustrySan Francisco State University
5% 8%
Percentage of Different types of Color Blindness
People affected bycolorblindess (Millions)
Color Blindness in Different Countries
ARE YOUCOLORBLIND?
Presented on the right, is a bar graph that shows numbers (in millions) of those who are colorblind in different countries. The bar graph shows eight countries were the high numbers of those who are color blind is located in Britain. Studies shown that within ethnicities, those who are Caucasian are more likely to be color blind than those who are different race.
The circle chart on the right explains the percentage of color blindness within gender. In relation to color blindness within gender, about 8% of males have some form of color blindness, whereas, women have about 5%. In most cases, genetics are a huge factor with the percentage of males because of the mother passing the recessive chromosome to the male child.
Within the three categories of color blindness, there are several different sub-categories within them depending on the severity of the color blindness. The exploded circle chart on the right presents the percentage of each sub-category and the bottom of the chart provides a small description of each color deficient
Color Blindness also known, as color vision deficiency is a visual disorder where those who are colorblind, perceive and visualize a limited color spectrum than those with normal vision. Although the term, “colorblind” is misleading, many believe that if a person is color blind, they cannot see color but that is not true. Almost all that are color vision deficient can see color. Color blindness is caused when there is a malfunction in the eye. Inside the eye, there are three different photo pigments inside the cones – red, green and blue. When mixed together, the absorption of the three different types of cones creates our color vision. When one of the three cones does not work properly, the absorption of the person’s color vision changes.
The Ishihara color blind test was created by Shinobu Ishihara who is a Japanese ophthalmologist. Shinobu first invented the color test in a military medical school where he had to create a test to screen potential military men who where color deficient. The Ishihara test consist of 38 plates filled with different colored dots that are molded into hidden numbers or shapes. Some plates have different patterns were normal vision individuals can see them whereas there are some patterns that those who are color blind can only see. Today it is one of the widely used test to distinguish if the individual is red-green color blind. Below is a sample of Schelindas test where you can identify and see if you are color blind. Below each image has an answer.
Those who have normal vision see #42. Those who are red colorblind see #2. Those who are mild-red colorblind see #4
Those who have normal vision see #8. Those who are red-green color blind see #3
Those who have normal vision see #15. Those who are red-green color blind see #17
Those who have normal vision see #7. Those who are colorblind cannot see the number.
Extremly rare form of color blindness were the individual can only see only black, white and limited shades of grey.
Severe form of color blindness were the red photo- pigment are missing. Individuals suffering from Protanopia see red, dark.
Different form of red-green color blind, where the green photo-pigments are missing. Affects the green hue spectrum.
Those who have normal vision see #29. Those who are red-green color blind see #70
Those who have normal vision see #26. Those who are red colorblind see #6. Those who are milding red colorblind see #2
Those who have normal vision see #74. Those who red-green colorblind see #21
Those who have normal vision see #73. Those who are colorblind cannot see the number clearly.
Sourceshttp://www.rightdiagnosis.com/d/deuteranopia/stats-country.htm
http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/r/red_green_color_blindness/stats-country.htmhttp://www.colblindor.com/2007/04/17/deuteranopia-red-green-color-blindness/
http://wearecolorblind.com/article/a-quick-introduction-to-color-blindness/http://www.colblindor.com/2010/03/09/types-of-color-blindness/
http://www.howstuffworks.com/environmental/life/human-biology/colorblindness1.htmhttp://www.colour-blindness.com/colour-blindness-tests/ishihara-colour-test-plates/
Deuteranomaly
Protanopia
Deuteranopia
Protanomaly
Achromatopsia
Protanopia
Deuteranopia
Tritanopia
Protanomaly
Deuteranomaly
TritanomalyVery rare form of blue colorblind, where the blue photo-pigment is absent. Affects the blue hue spectrum.
Mild form of red-green color blindness were the red photo pigment are nearly absent.. Affects the red hue spectrum.
The most common form of colorblindness were the green photo pigsments nearly absent. Affects the red-green hue spectrum.
Rare form of color blindness where the blue-yellow photo pigments are altered. Affects the blue-yellow hue spectrum.
0%
1.01%
1.27%
0%
1.08%
4.63%
0%
9
1.7
1.8
8
7.8
1.3
4.2
3.8