1 QUANTITATIVE RISK MANAGEMENT AT ABN AMRO Jan Sijbrand January 14th, 2000.
-
Upload
job-arnold -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 QUANTITATIVE RISK MANAGEMENT AT ABN AMRO Jan Sijbrand January 14th, 2000.
1
QUANTITATIVE RISK MANAGEMENTAT ABN AMRO
Jan SijbrandJanuary 14th , 2000
2
Quantitative methods in banking
I. Risk and Capital Reserves
II. Modelling Financial Instruments
3
I. Risk and Capital Reserves
A bank (like any company) aims to earn money inreturn for taking risk.
But:Taking risk may result occasionally in
experiencinglosses. In the extreme, banks may default.Bank default will have large impact on economy:
Depositors lose their money Firms lack source of financing for investments
4
Therefore:Bank is required by Central Bank to hold Capital.Level of required capital is set so as to make
bankdefault extremely unlikely.
Sources of bank capital: Equity capital Reserves Subordinated loans
5
Required capital ABN AMRO(1998, millions EURO)
Credit risk - on balance 13.474
Credit risk - off balance 3.137
Market risk 651
Actual capital 22.612
6
What is Market risk?
The possibility to gain or lose on an exposure to market prices
Profit may result from– bid/offer spreads– commissions and fees– trading profits (?)
The banks’ own Capital protects against losses.The profit should provide a return on this capital.
7
The value at Risk concept
1) Register current risk position accurately
2) Calculate the effect of market price movements (profit/loss) from one day to the next during the last thousand days
3) Present all these daily results in a histogram
8
The Value at Risk distribution:Market Risk
1%
VatR
0
* Expected result (average): zero* With 99% certainty no greater loss than VatR* Bid/Ask spread etc. have to compensate for taking this risk
9
What is Credit risk?
“Potential drop in the value of an asset because a
debtor may not fulfill its obligations”
Asset DebtorLoan CustomerBond IssuerDerivative transaction Counterparty
with positive MtM
10
Credit Losses (1)
S&P Rated Corporate Bond Defaults (Mil. $)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Source: S&P Ratings Performance 1997
11
Credit Losses (2)
Probability distribution of credit losses
Average
12
Distribution of Credit Losses
Non-symmetric (skewed)
– Large probability of small losses– Small probability of large losses
Long, fat tail
Non-normal distribution
13
Credit Losses =
Unexpectedcredit losses
Expected credit losses +
Amount one expects to lose Deviation from expected credit losses
“Cost of doing business” Not risk, because expected
Unanticipated losses risk Capital as protection
14
Loss distribution
Probability distribution of credit losses
Expected Loss
Unexpected Loss
15
Risk/Reward for Credit exposures:
Reward comes in the form of interest margin
(interest on loan minus funding rate)
This income needs to cover– the Expected Losses fully;– a Return on the Economic Capital (say 20%)
16
Economic capital
Capital needed to sustain potential credit losses with probability (=confidence level)
Can be calculated for: portfolio of assets incremental assets line of business
Also called Value-at-Risk (VatR)
17
Portfolio models for Credit risk
Determine: Expected credit losses Probability distribution of credit losses
potential unexpected credit losses
Examples:CreditMetrics, KVM, CreditPortfolioView, CreditRisk+
18
Main ingredients of Portfolio Models
Probability of default (credit quality) of debtors
Estimated exposure at default for assets
Loss rate given default for assets
Extent of diversification / concentration of portfolio (default correlation's)
19
One-Year default probabilities per rating
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC
Source: S&P
20
Exposure at default
Forecast of amount owed at time of default
Different from current exposure Forecast depends on asset type:
– loan facility: nominal amount, or estimated outstanding for committed but (partly)
undrawn line
– derivative: estimated positive market value
– bond: nominal amount
21
Loss rate given default
Percentage of exposure at default which one expects
to lose
Depends on
seniority of claim on debtor type, quality and quantity of collateral
22
Historic bond recovery
Seniority Average
Senior secured 58.52
Senior unsecured 49.60
Subordinated 35.30
Total 43.77
Source: S&P “Ratings Performance 1997”. Data from 1981 - 1997. Recovery as % of par.
23
Default correlation
Likelihood of simultaneous defaults of multipleobligors
Depends on e.g.:
geographic diversification diversification over industry sectors state of the economy
24
Estimating correlations
Bond credit spreads
Equity returns
Industry andcountry factors
Factor models(CreditMetrics, KMV)
Defaultcorrelations
25
Loss Distribution +Economic capital
Probability distribution of credit losses
Expected loss
Economic capital
26
Conclusion on Credit risk and capital
Modelling credit risk on a portfolio basis
presents many challenging modelling questions:
- Estimating default probabilities
- Estimating default correlations
- Assessing effect of economic cycles
- Optimization of risk/return
Results may substantially change approach towards
taking and managing credit risk in banking industry.
27
II. Financial Instruments: Model risk
Mismatch: model and reality
Interesting questions:– How severe is model risk for
pricing/hedging of derivatives, market risk evaluation of a portfolio (VaR), etc?
– For example: Do we need to model a stochastic interest rate for a convertible?
Need for quantification of model risk!
28
Managing Model risk
Models for derivatives are developed by commercial line in the dealing room (“frontoffice”)
Independent validation by Risk Management
One of the tests: Hedge Performance Measurement
Model reserve where necessary
29
Hedge performance measurement
Derivative: Hedge instruments: Hedge ratios: Consider the hedged portfolio:
Uncertainty tomorrow hedge errors:
dtS )(dt )(
)()'()()( tSttftM
)(tf
)()'()()1()'()1()1( tSttfetSttftHE r
30
Hedge performance measurement
Different hedge strategies (choice of and ) different hedge errors.
Different models (predict ) different hedge errors.
Estimate density of hedge errors (risk profile).
S )1(),1( tStf
31
Application Dollar/Yen
Model: Black-Scholes (for FX) Hedge strategy: Black-Scholes delta
hedge Model risk profile vs. empirical risk
profile Test criteria of interest (e.g. VaR or
variance). Could interpret test-statistic as first
quantification of model risk
32
Application Dollar/Yen
-.7 -.6 -.5 -.4 -.3 -.2 -.1 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7
10
20
30
40
50Density
Model based risk profile
-.7 -.6 -.5 -.4 -.3 -.2 -.1 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7
10
20
Density
Empirical risk profile
33
Model reserves
Uncertainty in hedge error (up to 99%)
may be covered by a VaR-style capital
reserve.
34
Summary
The impact of quantitative methods on bank risk
management
Market risk:Capital Adequacy Reserve based on Historical Simulation.
Credit risk: Modelling reserves likely to be Monte-Carlo based. Correlations stilldifficult to estimate.
Model risk: Ad hoc and sometimes quite complex.