1 Public-Private Partnership as a Policy Instrument Hong Qiu.
-
Upload
donald-harrington -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
3
Transcript of 1 Public-Private Partnership as a Policy Instrument Hong Qiu.
1
Public-Private Partnership as a Policy Instrument
Hong Qiu
2
Outline
1. What is P3 1. What is P3
3. How to develop P3 3. How to develop P3
Case 1:The Confederation Bridge Case 1:The Confederation Bridge
Case 2:Sponsorship Program Case 2:Sponsorship Program
2. Why P3 2. Why P3
3
A Historical Overview
• Early 1980s in USA and UK
• Increasing public debt
• Emergence of New Public Management
• A dramatic growth in the development of a very wide range of P3
4
A Historical Overview
• Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships (CCPPP) was established in 1993
• Canadian federal government and Policy on Alternative Service Delivery
• A Canadian guide on P3 was issued by Industry Canada in 2001
5
What is P3
• Public-Private Partnership is a co-operative venture for the provision of infrastructure or services, built on the expertise of each partner that best meets clearly defined public needs, through the most appropriate allocation of resources, risks, and rewards.
Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships, http://www.pppcouncil.ca/aboutPPP_definition.asp
6
What is P3
• The main idea is the same:– How to utilize private sector’s expertise and resources
to address public needs or to meet political goals
• But no standard definition– P3 takes a wide variety of forms, discrepancy on
contract services and privatization– Legal implication of “partnership”– Development of P3 blurred the boundaries between
public and private sector– Evolution of the concept of partnership
7
P3 and the Risk Transfer Continuum
8
Why P3
• From the controller to the partner• Internal impetus
– Fiscal deficit– Extensive spending cuts and public service
downsizing – New ideas about public service delivery
• External pressures– Information technology weakened governments’
power over individuals– The need to develop domestic private sector’s
capacity in response to global competition– NPM, emphasis on decentralization and efficiency
9
Why P3
• The new politics calls for new skills –
skills in building bridges and alliances, broking interests, forging consensus, articulating shared values…The future of governance is partnership and shared responsibility.
Jim Armstrong , Donald G. Lenihan
From Controlling to Collaborating: When Governments Want to be Partners
10
Why P3
• Change of values – Relates to the role shifting of the govt.– Crown Corporations vs. P3/Privitization
• The term partner conveys a sense of empowerment, flexibility, collaboration, consultation, proactivity, efficient and a service orientation
M. Charih & A. Daniels (Eds.)
New public management and public administration in Canada
11
Why P3
• Evaluation of policy instruments – Effectiveness
• e-government initiatives and private IT companies– Political feasibility
• The increasing public demands– Administrative feasibility
• How to hold private sector accountable for delivering public service ?
– Efficiency• Private sector is better at delivering value for money
– Equity • private sector is given equal opportunities to compete with
governments’ departments • How to ensure the equity criterion will be complied by private
partner?
12
Why P3
• A blended approach
• P3 often comes with other policy instruments – e.g. spending, information and regulation etc.
• The success of P3 depends on how well the instrument package works
13
How to Develop P3
• The pros and cons of P3
• The implementation problems associated with P3
• How to overcome these problems
14
P3 Matrix
Parameter Components
What is the purpose?
•Focus: range from external-oriented to internal oriented •Aims: range from employment creation to employment redistribution•Range of activities: range from single project to long-term program•Level: range from strategic-oriented to one-off project collaboration
Who is involved?
•Range of actors: range from public sector to private sector•Structure: range from legal binding contracts to general agreements•Process of mobilization: range from top-down approach to bottom-up approach•Power relationship: range from unequal power to fair power relationship
15
P3 Matrix
Parameter Components
When?
• Stages: range from pre-development to operation• Decision points: range from close partnership to
continuous partnership
Where?• Area: range from geographical area to client group
How?
• Implementation mechanism: range from stand-alone partnership organization to agreements influencing existing services
Adapt from S. Osborne (ed), Public–Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective
16
The Confederation Bridge
• A 13 km toll bridge built in 1997 linking Prince Edward Island to New Brunswick
• A Build-Own-Transfer P3 project valued at $840 million
• What purpose? – Reduce public cost
• Why P3?– Fiscal constraints– Private technical expertise
17
Provincial GovtsProvincial Govts
NB Crown Corp.
Other Federal DeptsPWGSC
SCDI
P3 & Intergovernmental
collaboration
P3 & Intergovernmental
collaboration
Who is involved?
18
The Confederation Bridge
• Stages (when)– From proposal stage to the completed
construction, 10 yrs– Construction period, 44 months – SCDI will operate the bridge for 35 years
(1997 to 2032), then transfer the bridge to the federal government
19
The Confederation Bridge
• Area (where)– “a continuous means of communication
between Prince Edward Island and the mainland.”
• Implementation (how)– Feasibility analysis and negotiation were quite
long – Focus on risk management– Significant delay due to a federal election
20
The Confederation Bridge
• Overall, a positive experience
• 1+1>2 effects– compared with former failing efforts to build
such an infrastructure
• Innovative design– a 100-year design life vs. an average 40-50
year life span
• Effectiveness and efficiency– a 44-month construction period is remarkable
21
Sponsorship Program
• A contract P3 program initiated in 1997 • Became a scandal and got cancelled on
December 2003• What purpose?
– promote the profile of federal government in Quebec
– more strategic-driven rather than project-driven
• Why P3?– Lack of in-house marketing experiences
22
Advertising Companies Advertising Companies Crown Corps.
Communication CanadaAfter 2001
CCSB
Who is involved?
Contracts
23
Sponsorship ProgramExpenditures and events sponsored
Source: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20031103xe01.html
24
Sponsorship Program
• Area (where)– Quebec and 1995 referendum
• Implementation– has been audited at least three times since 2000 for
misused funds and mismanagement problems
• “The use of the Sponsorship Program for purposes other than national unity or federal visibility because of a lack of objectives, criteria and guidelines for the Program”
2003 Auditor General’s report
25
Sponsorship Program
• Presents many negative aspects of P3
• Sacrificed public interests – political corruption – lack of performance and risk management
• Accountability problems – within the public sector, top-down decision-
making and speak truth to power– contracting out model puts little risk on the
private partner
26
• Partner selection problem – process is manipulated by someone – there is a weak market and the potential
partners are limited
• Organizational difficulties – in the public sector, election or public sector
reform– in the private sector, the risk of bankruptcy
27
Lesson Learned
• The reason for using P3 must be justified
• Clear criteria for partner selection
• Selection process should be competitive, impartial, and transparent
• The role and responsibilities should be clearly defined and fully communicated
28
Lesson Learned
• The commitment for the project should be demonstrated by all partners
• a reasonable and fair share of resources and risks and mutual benefits
• A systematic management framework
29
Conclusion
• PPP is like a marriage
• It takes time for partners to get to know each other and find a good way to work together
• The earlier private partners are involved, the better results may be achieved
30
Thank You
Questions? Comments?