1 Presenters: Cynthia D. Vargas, Esq., Fagen, Friedman & Fulfrost; Zhanna Preston, Executive...
-
Upload
sara-bradley -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Presenters: Cynthia D. Vargas, Esq., Fagen, Friedman & Fulfrost; Zhanna Preston, Executive...
1
Presenters: Cynthia D. Vargas, Esq., Fagen, Friedman & Fulfrost;
Zhanna Preston, Executive Director Murrieta Valley USD;
and
Jon Eyler, Ed. D, CEO, Collaborative Learning Solutions
With the assistance of: Caryl Miller. Ed. D, Financial &
Program Analyst
Let’s Avoid Disproportionality
www.f3law.com
2
Agenda
What is disproportionality in general?Why does it matter?
What is “significant disproportionality”?Why does it matter?
What are the causes? How to determine if your district is at
risk? How to minimize the risks?
3
Disproportionality in Special Education Disproportionality is when the
percentage of students with a specific characteristic (e.g., race or ethnicity) enrolled in, and eligible for, special education is higher or lower than their proportion in the general population
It generally results in the over-identification of a particular group in special education
4
An Example
In California, during the 2008-2009 school year: African-American students comprised
7.5% of the general population, but 10.92% of special education students
Asian students comprised 12.2% of the general population, but 6.84% of special education students.
5
Disproportionality in Discipline
Those school districts with a significant discrepancy from the state rate with regard to the suspension and/or expulsion of students for a period greater than 10 days in a school year
CDE calculated a statewide rate (based upon previous school year) and added a 2 percent variation The current state rate was .54% + the 2 %
variance This year’s state bar is 2.54 %
6
An Example The USDOE estimates that
By Disability: In 2009-2010, 13% students with disabilities were suspended at least once, compared to 7% for non-disabled students
By Race: In 2011-2012, black students represented 18% of preschool enrollment but 42% of students suspended once, and 48% of the students suspended more than once
By Race: In 2011-2012, English learners make up 5% of high school enrollment but 11% of high school students held back each year
(Expansive Survey of America's Public Schools Reveals Troubling Racial Disparities; USDOE (March 2014).)
7
IDEA Mandate The IDEA mandates that states and
LEAs address disproportionality in special education and student discipline Define, calculate and report disproportionality Monitor compliance Provide for the review of policies, procedures and
practices Identify those school districts that are
“significantly disproportionate”
(CDE Guidance on Disproportionality, Critical values and beliefs, background, goals, data, and improvement strategies related to disproportionality (May
2014).)
8
Why Does Over-identification Matter? Less likely to receive access to rigorous
and full curriculum Experience higher drop out rates Limited post-secondary opportunities Separation from non-disabled peers Increased sense of social
stigmatization
9
Why Does Disproportionality Matter? Tracking of disproportionality is
required under the IDEA States must collect and examine data and
monitor the LEAs located in the state, using quantifiable indicators in each of the following priority areas:
Disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education, to the extent the representation is the result of inappropriate identification.
(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a) & 1418 (d); 34 C.F.R. 300.600(d) and 300.646(b).)
10
Why Does Disproportionality Matter? Discrimination claims?
IDEA violations, including evidence of disproportionality in special education programs does not necessarily result in per se race discrimination
Race discrimination requires discriminatory intent
However, if a district knows that a particular race or ethnicity is overrepresented in special education programs, it must review identification, evaluation and placement procedures to address deficiencies
Blunt v. Lower Merion School District (E.D. Pa. 2011) 826 F.Supp.2d 749, 111 LRP 67652
11
Why Does Disproportionality Matter? Inappropriate use of special education
funds for children who should not qualify
Inefficient use of special education funds, which must be devoted to address issues of disproportionality
State mandate to identify and monitor “significant disproportionality”
12
How is a LEA Identified as Being “Disproportionate”
First, a LEA will be identified as “disproportionate” if within the current year it does not meet the rigorous target rates related to key indicators tracked by the state More on the indicators later
The LEA is not yet “significantly disproportionate” at this point, but it may be at risk
13
What is “Significant Disproportionality” and how it is identified? A calculation of race or ethnicity related to the
identification of children in special education, including specific categories; and the incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary actions, calculated over a period of time
It is determined as follows: The LEA is identified as disproportionate during
the current year; AND The LEA has had disproportionate representation
in 2 out of the prior 3 years in the same cells for each of the key indicators tracked by CDE
14
What Are the Key Indicators?
Indicator 4a – Suspension and expulsions overall Indicator 4b – Suspensions and expulsions by
Ethnicity Indicator 5b – Students in general education less
than 40% Indicator 5c – Students served in NPS, RTC and HHI Indicator 9 – Disproportionality in special education
overall Indicator 10 – Disproportionality in special
education, by eligibility categories
(Calculation Methodologies; CDE, Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit (Feb. 2012).)
15
Once a LEA Is Identified as Significantly Disproportionate, Then What? The state must monitor to ensure that the
LEAs policies, procedures, and practices are compliant, and that they do not lead to inappropriate identification
The state must monitor to ensure that the LEAs policies, procedures, and practices with regard to suspensions and expulsions are compliant
16
Once a LEA is Identified as Significantly Disproportionate, Then What? The LEA will be required to complete a self-
review of their policies, procedures, and practices With some exceptions if the LEA is already under
a corrective action plan
and Reserve 15% of its federal IDEA allotment for
“Coordinated Early Intervention Services” (CEIS)
(20 U.S.C. 1418(d); 34 C.F.R. 300.646(b); Special Education Resource Center, Keenan & Associates.)
17
Once a LEA Is Identified as Significantly Disproportionate, Then What? For a 27 month period LEAs identified
as significantly disproportionate must report on: The number of students receiving “SD-CEIS”
supports; and The number of students who received early
intervention services and who subsequently received special education within two years after receiving CEIS
(CDE Guidelines on Disproportionality (May 2014).)
18
Causes of Disproportional Representation This is a complex issue At least four key reasons:
Lack of effective pre-referral instruction and intervention services
Bias in the/incomplete assessment process Teacher inexperience with classroom
management and cultural behavior differences
Underlying cultural ignorance in staff and school processes
19
Is Your School District at Risk?
Each year the state monitors the key indicators
The state compares each school district with the benchmarks of the state
If not meeting the benchmarks, then identified as “disproportionate”
This information is reported to the various SELPAs
SELPAs then distribute the information to the individual LEAs
20
Can We Monitor Ourselves?
Absolutely, I am so glad you asked that question!
21
Self Monitoring The specific key indicators are on CDE’s website
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/se/ds/leadatarpts.asp Also, verify whether you are meeting your target
goals http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/se/qa/
Student reporting systems have the capability of gathering more specific data CASEMIS Enrollment Discipline
Contract with outside organizations to track data
22
How Do We Prevent It?
Understand the causes Develop a self-monitoring process Implement preventative measures Keep an open dialogue Work with the CDE if there is a finding
of disproportionality
23
Pre-Referral Practices Examine the quality of instruction and
classroom management of the referring general education teacher What pre-referral strategies have been
implemented? Are referrals primarily behavior-based?
Rigorously rule out ELL status Have efforts been made to reach out
to minority parents prior to referral? Community services? Parent-Teacher conferences to address behavior?
24
Pre-Referral Practices
Is parental-rights information pursuant to the IDEA being provided appropriately to language minority parents?
Are we fully examining environmental factors:
Screening for hearing and vision or environmental risk factors in the home (e.g., lead levels);
Excessive absences, displacement (family mobility);
Lack of consistent access to technology or supplies
25
Assessment Policies and Practices The IDEA requires that all assessments be
administered in a “non-discriminatory” manner
However, the National Council on Disability finds a higher level of over-identification in areas where assessment is "judgmental" (i.e., based on subjective observation rather than actual tests): Emotional Disturbances; Other Health Impairments; Autism; and Intellectual Disabilities.
26
Assessment Policies and Practices Use multiple measures and modalities,
including non-verbal assessments where appropriate. Evaluations should be individualized Evaluations should be completed by appropriate
personnel
Must be “administered so as not to be racially, culturally, or sexually discriminatory” (Ed. Code § 56320(a).)
27
Assessment Policies and Practices “Shall be provided in the pupil’s native
language or mode of communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to do so.” (Ed. Code § 56320(a).)
“Provided and administered in the language and form most likely to yield accurate information on what the pupil knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally….” (Ed. Code § 56320(b)(1).)
28
Assessment Policies and Practices Observations “in an appropriate setting” should
include both measurable (numeric) and observable data as well as a narrative ruling out possible cultural reasons for identified behaviors. (Ed. Code § 56327(c).)
Examine the quality of the general education instruction and classroom management techniques.
Evaluators should gather, include and consider information about the student’s home and family culture. What about attendance/truancy?
Family members should be included throughout the evaluation process (as appropriate).
29
Assessment Policies and Practices Rule out environmental or socio-
economic factors (including life stressors)
Document this discussion in both the assessment and during any IEP team meetings
Report on “educationally relevant health and development, and medical findings, if any.” (Ed. Code § 56327(e).)
30
Assessment Policies and Practices Examine a student’s previous
instruction in math and reading to determine if this is the primary reason for learning or behavior difficulties
Allow for ample time for assessment
31
Early Intervention
Is the student’s behavior impeding his or her learning (or the learning of others)?
If so, consider: Strategies to respond to behavior; Behavior supports; and Behavior interventions
32
Early Intervention
Intervention strategies can include: Supporting teachers to implement
classroom management programs and accommodations
Educating general education teachers as to the truth about mental health disabilities (ending the stigma)
Encouraging collaboration between general and special education teachers, as well as support staff (e.g. counselors, nurses), administration, and (perhaps) private providers to establish a consistent approach
33
Early Intervention
Individual Supports and Services: Classroom accommodations or
modifications Sensory breaks or objects Time outs Preferential seating Token economies Creative strategies
34
Supporting Teachers Examine whether this is racial disparity among
teacher referrals By race? By experience of teacher?
Examine whether referrals come from teachers with classroom management issues. Provide support in classroom management
techniques Provide on-going training and supervision
Ensure all teachers have been trained to effectively participate in pre-referral intervention strategies. Response to Intervention (RTI)—Academics and
Behavior
35
Supporting Teachers Allocate time for general education and
special education teachers to collaborate on a routine basis
Ensure that teachers are making a consistent effort to communicate with parents Are teachers given the time and opportunity to
do so? Are they encouraged to do so? Do they know how?
Ensure that all students are given access to enrichment opportunities, technology and supplies
36
Understanding Biases
Ensure administrators and teachers are trained in sensitivity to racial and cultural bias in instruction and assessment
Cultivate a diverse culture through curriculum and student expectations
Include both special and general education teachers in discussion and review of data
37
Understanding Biases
Understand that behavioral standards may be culture-bound
Behavioral incidents may occur as a result of “cultural mismatch” – Address these accordingly.
What are the differences between a student’s culture and the school’s culture? What are the expectations?
What if the child is from another country?
38
Keeping an Open Dialogue
Issues of race can be sensitive
Keep an open, nonjudgmental dialogue to address biases and solutions
Get “ahead of the game” and pinpoint where any disproportionality may exist. Are certain programs racially unbalanced? Do certain administrators or teachers express a
bias?
39
Information in this presentation, including but not limited to PowerPoint handouts and the presenters' comments, is summary only and not legal advice. We advise you to consult with legal counsel to determine how this information may apply to your specific facts and circumstances .