1 Paper Survey Fabrication of various dimensions of high fill-factor micro-lens arrays for OLED...
-
Upload
brice-allison -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Paper Survey Fabrication of various dimensions of high fill-factor micro-lens arrays for OLED...
1
Paper Survey
Fabrication of various dimensions of high fill-factormicro-lens arrays for OLED package
Sensors and Actuators A xxx (2010) xxx–xxx
a Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.O.C. Military Academy, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
b Department of Mechanical and Electro-Mechanical Engineering, Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,
National Sun-Yat-Sen University, 70 Lien-hai Rd., Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, ROC
c Department of Photonics, National Sun-Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, ROC
Advisee ﹕ Sung-Wen Tsai
Institute of Mechanical EngineeringDate 2010/06/18﹕
K.H. Liua, M.F. Chenb, C.T. Panb, , M.Y. Changc, W.Y. Huangc∗
2
Outline
The design principle
Fabrication process of gapless hexagonal micro-lens array
Results and discussions
Conclusion
The design principle
3
22
21 DDT
1.T D≧ : gap group
2.T < D : gapless
groupFig. 1. The three smaller circles (A, B and C) are the patterns of a mask; three bigger circles which are drawn in dotted line are used to describe the micro-lenses how to interwork; finally, the interworked micro-lenses become hexagonal micro-lenses.Diameter (D) is the original diameter of a pattern on a mask; vertical (V) is a distance of; period (T) is a distance of AB, and it is also a distance of centers of two circles.
22
21 DDT
(D1=D2=D)
T<D(gapless)
4
A B A B
A B A B
D
T
v
5
A B A
T
DB
T=D(tangential)
v
T>D(Not gapless)
6
D
T
v
7
No. Diameter Thickness(H)
Vertical(V)
Period(T)
Hypotensue Layout Aspect ratio
1 40 12.5 100 50 55.90 gapless 0.313
2 30 12.5 100 40 53.85 gapless 0.416
3 25 12.5 100 35 52.97 gapless 0.5
4 15 5 100 25 51.54 gapless 0.33
5 40 12.5 100 50 55.90 Not gapless 0.25
6 25 12.5 100 35 52.97 Not gapless 0.5
7 15 5 100 25 51.54 Not gapless 0.313
The design principle
Table 1 The designed variables of seven micro-lens arrays (unit: μ m)
(aspect ratio = H/D)
Fabrication process of gapless hexagonal micro-lens array
8
Fig. 2. A sketch of a circle array on a mask with three parameters.
V : constant valueD : variableT : variable
9
Fabrication process of gapless hexagonal micro-lens array
Fig. 3.Schematic lithography process: (a) spin coating the photoresist AZ4620; (b) a cylindrical array was obtained after development; (c) reflow the microstructures at 140 ◦C; (d) sputtering a Ni-film as a seed layer
10
Fabrication process of gapless hexagonal micro-lens array
Fig. 3.(e) NiCo electroplating was used to wrap the photoresist micro-lenses to form a gapless mold; (f) a passivation treatment with thermal method was applied on the surface of NiCo alloy; (g) a secondary electroplating was performed, and CMP process was used to flat the surface; the substrate was removed.
11
Fig. 4. A replication of UV-cured process: (a) spin coating the polymer on the secondary mold, and exposed to UV light; (b) after several seconds, the polymer was cured.
Fabrication process of gapless hexagonal micro-lens array
12
gapless gapless
gapless gapless
13Not gaplessNot gapless
Not gapless
Results and discussions
14
22
222
22
cbaHypotenuse
baV
cT
Fig. 4. The definition of three measured distance of a micro-lens. The three values can be used to calculate the length of Hypotenuse as shown in Fig. 1. This figure was drawn by computer software, Solidworks.
15
No. Diameter a Diameter b Diameter c Hypotenuse Error(c) Error(hypotenuse)
1 38.01 62.21 50.80 56.18 0.80 0.28
2 40.09 59.10 40.09 53.49 0.09 -0.36
3 43.20 55.64 35.25 52.47 0.25 -0.5
4 47.35 52.53 25.23 51.51 0.23 -0.03
5 26.61 57.02 50.11 48.75 0.11 -7.14
6 39.40 52.18 35.25 49.06 0.25 -3.91
7 42.51 50.11 25.23 48.00 0.23 -3.54
Error(C)=Diameter c –TError(hypotenuse)=measured value – designed value
Results and discussions
Table 2 The measured data of seven different micro-lens arrays and the error of measured and designed value. Positive errors mean the micro-lenses are bigger than designed one and negative errors mean they are smaller (unit: μ m).
Results and discussions
16
Measurement instrument : SpectraScan Colorimeter PR-650
Fig. 5. Nine points of measurement of an optical film, and an OLED as light source under the optical film (a region of a gray rectangle).
17
Results and discussions
18
Results and discussions
19
Results and discussions
20
Results and discussions
21
Results and discussions
22
Results and discussions
23
Results and discussions
24
Results and discussions
25
Results and discussions
26
Results and discussions
Fig. 11. The luminance comparison of a base and an optic film, Sample 3, (a) the comparison of points 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 of a base and Sample 3, and the raising percentages are 120.59%, 830.90%, 313.42%, 502.86%, 512.35% and 599.82%, respec-tively
27
Results and discussions
Fig. 11. (b) the comparison of points 2, 5 and 8 of a base and Sample 3, and thedecreasing percentages are 26.88%, 7.74% and 21.85%, respectively.
Conclusion
1.A LIGA-like process was applied in this study, because it has good replication for microstructures.
2.The effect of an optical film with gapless and high aspect ratio micro-lens array can show more obvious results than of the other designs.
28
29
Thanks for your attention