1 of 33 The Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 Canadian Institute of Geomatics – Ottawa...
Transcript of 1 of 33 The Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 Canadian Institute of Geomatics – Ottawa...
1 of 33
The Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013
Canadian Institute of Geomatics – Ottawa Branch29 April 2014
Marc VéronneauCanadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General
Branch
2 of 33
OUTLINE
The Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS)… 3
WHAT - Canada’s Height Modernization… 4
WHY - Canada’s Height Modernization… 5
WHAT - Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1928 … 7
WHAT - Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013… 11
WHAT - Impact, Velocity, Labelling and Tools… 19
SUMMARY… 23
General concepts (optional)… 24
3 of 33
Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS)
NAD27
CGVD28
NAD83
NAVD 88
NAD83(CSRS)NAD83(CSRS)Velocity models
CGG2013
Horizontal network (f, l)
Vertical network (H)
3-D Geometric frame (f, l, h)
Adopted in U.S.A.,but not in Canada
4-D Geometric frame(f, l, h, t)
Dynamic coordinates
4-D Geometric frameGeopotential frame (f, l, h, H = h – N, t)
NAD83(CSRS)Velocity models
DirectTransformationITRF96
CGVD2013
4 of 33
WHAT is Canada’s Height Modernisation?
It is the establishment of a new vertical datum for Canada that is integrated within the CSRS The Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum
of 2013 (CGVD2013) Released in November 2013
It replaces the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1928 (CGVD28) Adopted in 1935 by an Order in Council
Three important changes: New definition: from mean sea level at
specific tide gauges to an equipotential surface
New realisation: from adjusting levelling data to integrating gravity data
New access: from benchmarks to a geoid model
CGVD2013 is compatible with Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) such as GPS
Orthometric height determination by two techniques: levelling and combination of GPS measurements and a geoid model.
5 of 33
WHY Height Modernisation in Canada? TECHNOLOGY, ACCESS & COST
Levelling is a precise technique that served Canada well over the last 100 years to realise and maintain a vertical datum, but for a country as wide as Canada …
It is prone to the accumulation of systematic errors over long distances;
It does not provide a national coverage (BMs only along major roads and railways);
It is a costly and time-consuming technique.
Motorized Levelling
6 of 33
Modern technology in positioning GNSS positioning is now mature and has
gained widespread adoption by users. It is a cost efficient technique in
determining precise heights everywhere in Canada.
Satellite gravity missions offer unprecedented precision in the determination of the long and middle wavelength components of the geoid.
A geoid model realizes an accurate and homogeneous vertical reference surface all across Canada (land, lakes and oceans).
Our U.S. partners contributed GRAV-D data in the Great Lakes region.
GPS
GOCE
WHY Height Modernisation in Canada?
GRACE
GRAV-D
7 of 33
WHAT is the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1928 (CGVD28)?
Name: Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1928
Abbreviation: CGVD28
Type of datum: Tidal (Mean sea level)
Vertical datum: Mean sea level at tide gauges in Yarmouth, Halifax, Pointe-au-
Père, Vancouver and Prince-Rupert, and a height in Rouses Point, NY.
Realisation: Levelling (benchmarks). Multiple local adjustments over the years since the general least-squares adjustment in 1928.
Type of height: Normal-orthometric
A
Backsightreading BS
Foresight reading FS
Backsigh
t rod
B
Levelling
DH = BS - FS Foresight rod
DH
8 of 33
CGVD28: Levelling networks
Original constraints for Canada’s mainland
Examples of later constraints
Vancouver
Prince Rupert
Rouses Point
Pointe-au-Père
Halifax
Yarmouth
1906-1928 1929-1939 1940-1965 1966-1971 1972-1981 1982-1989 1990-2007
~ 90 000 benchmarks
?
9 of 33
Levelling surveys over the years in Canada
1906-1928 1929-1939 1940-1965
1966-1971
1972-1981 1982-2012
10 of 33
Earth surface
Atlantic Ocean(near Halifax)
(near Vancouver)
St-Lawrence River(Pointe-au-Père)
CGVD28
WHAT are the error sources in CGVD28?
NAVD 88
+36 cm
CGVD28: Assume that oceans are at a same equipotential surface Use entirely gravity values from a mathematical model Omit systematic corrections on old levelling data Neglect post-glacial rebound Accumulation of systematic errors
NAVD 88 (not adopted in Canada): Significant east-west systematic error (~1 m)
of unknown sources in Canada (in the US too)
-140 cm
Pacific Ocean
Level surface wrt MSL in Vancouver
Level surface wrt MSL in Halifax
11 of 33
WHAT is the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013)
Name: Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013
Abbreviation: CGVD2013
Type of datum: Gravimetric (geoid)
Vertical datum: W0 = 62,636,856.0 m2s-2
Realisation: Geoid model CGG2013 (NAD83(CSRS) and ITRF2008)
Type of height : Orthometric
12 of 33
WHAT is the definition of CGVD2013? U.S. NGS and NRCan’s GSD signed an agreement (16 April 2012) to realize and maintain a common vertical datum for USA and Canada defined by W0 = 62,636,856.0 m2/s2
Canadian tide gauges American tide gauges
CGVD2013: Conventional equipotential surface (W0 = 62,636,856.0 m2/s2) averaging the coastal mean sea level for North America measured at Canadian and American tide gauges.
It also corresponds to the current convention adopted by the International Earth Rotation and Reference
Systems Service (IERS) and International Astronomical Union
(IAU).
Canada’s recommended definition for a World Height System
Sea Surface Topography
13 of 33
Ellipsoidal height and Orthometric height
Ellipsoidal heights
Orthometric heights
Heights are traditionally referred to mean sea level (BM, DEM, Topo maps).
Orthometric heights are consistent with the direction of water flow.
Sept-IlesPortneuf
Sept-Iles
Baie-Comeau
Rimouski
Gros-Cacouna
St-Joseph-de-la-Rive
Ste-Anne-des-Monts
St-Francois
Slope of the Saint-Lawrence River between Portneuf and Sept-Iles
GPS ellipsoidal heights require conversion to orthometric heights (heights above mean sea level) using a geoid model.
14 of 33
Canadian Gravimetric Geoid of 2013 (CGG2013)
GRACE (2002 - ) GOCE (2009 – 2013) Land & ship gravity Altimetry DEM
Boundaries North: 90° South: 10° West: -170° East: -10°
Resolution 2’ x 2’
Satellite model EIGEN-6C3stat (GFZ) Förste et al., IAG 2013 GOCE (until May 24, 2013) Transition zone Degrees: 120-180 (l = 333 km-222 km)
Reference frames ITRF2008 and NAD83(CSRS)
15 of 33
The accuracy considers data errors (gravity and DEM), grid resolution, discrepancies between gravity datasets and cut-off of satellite contribution.
3 cm or better accuracy over 80% of Canada’s landmass
Decimeter level in areas with greater topography/mass distribution variability
Centimeter level relative precision over distances of 100 km or less
1 53 7 9
67% confidence (1 s)
Unit: cm11
Accuracy of the geoid model (CGG2013)
16 of 33
WHAT is the difference between CGVD2013 and the mean sea level?
Terrain
Geoid (CGVD2013)
Mean Sea Level
-39 cm
17 cm
Table 1: Mean Sea Surface Topograpy (SSTCGVD2013) at five tidal gauges in Canada. These are preliminary values based on CGG2010 (W0 = 62,636,856.0 m2s-2).
Location Gauge numberCoordinates Observation period
SSTCGVD2013 (m)Lat. Lon. From To
Halifax 490 44.67 -63.58 12/1992 11/2011 -0.39
Rimouski 2985 48.48 -68.51 12/1992 11/2011 -0.30
Vancouver 7795 49.34 -123.25 12/1992 11/2011 0.17
Churchill 5010 58.77 -94.18 01/1993 12/2012 -0.22
Tuktoyaktuk 6485 69.44 -132.99 08/2003 12/2011 -0.36
Vancouver
HalifaxMean Sea Level
17 of 33
WHAT is the difference between CGVD2013 and CGVD28?
CGVD2013
CGVD28
Vancouver
Distance (km)
St John’s -37 cmHalifax -64 cmCharlottetown -32 cmFredericton -54 cmMontréal -36 cmToronto -42 cmWinnipeg -37 cmRegina -38 cmEdmonton -04 cmBanff +55 cmVancouver +15 cmWhitehorse +34 cmYellowknife -26 cmTuktoyaktuk -32 cm
Approximate valuesHCGVD2013 – HCGVD28
Diff
ere
nce
(m)
Halifax
Banff
Regina
Thunder Bay
MontréalWindsor
CGVD28(HTv2.0) – CGVD2013(CGG2010)
18 of 33
WHAT is the difference for Ontario?
HCGVD2013 – HCGVD28
Conversion CGVD28-CGVD20131. GPS on BM
2. Published elevations at BMs
3. HTv2.0 - CGG2013 (image on the left)
19 of 33
HOW CGVD2013 impact heights in Canada?
All reference points (benchmarks) will have a new elevation.
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) stopped levelling surveys for the maintenance of the vertical datum.
NRCan is NOT maintaining benchmarks by either levelling or GNSS technique. However, the levelling networks is readjusted to conform with CGVD2013 using existing data. NRCan is publishing CGVD28 and CGVD2013 heights at benchmarks. NRCan cannot confirm the actual height of benchmarks in either CGVD28 or CGVD2013 (cannot
confirm stability of benchmarks).
The Canadian Active Control Stations (CACS) and Stations of the Canadian Base Network (CBN) form the federal infrastructure for positioning. 250 stations
Modern alternative techniques provide height determination. NRCan’s Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Differential GNSS positioning Public and Private Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning
Levelling will remain the most efficient technique for most short distance work.
20 of 33
Vertical velocity of the terrain (GPS)
Colour scale: -14 mm/a to 14 mm/a
Vertical velocity of the geoid (GRACE)
Colour scale: -1.4 mm/a to 1.4 mm/a
Vertical velocity (Glacial Isostatic Adjustment)
21 of 33
Height: 101.61 mPrecision: ± 0.01 mEpoch: 2013.2Type of height: OrthometricHeight system: CGVD2013Height frame: CGG2013
H = 23.126 ± 0.007 m CGVD2013(CGG2013) Epoch 2013.2
Labelling Heights
Type of height: Orthometric (H), dynamic (Hd), normal (Hn), ellipsoidal (h), geoid (N) Height Reference System: NAD83, ITRF, CGVD28, CGVD2013, NAVD 88 Height Reference Frame: CSRS v., geoid model Precision (e.g., ± 0.05 m) Epoch (e.g., 2012.75)
HHeight: 91.256 mPrecision: ± 0.007 mEpoch: 2013.2Type of height: Ellipsoidal (geodetic)Height system: NAD83Height frame: CSRS (version if available)
h = 23.126 ± 0.007 m NAD83(CSRS) Epoch 2013.2 h
Geoid Height: -10.354 mPrecision: ± 0.015 mEpoch: StaticModel: CGG2013Frame: NAD83(CSRS)
N = -10.354 ± 0.015 m CGG2013, NAD83(CSRS)
N
22 of 33
Tools available for Height Modernisation
Precise Point Positioning (PPP): Process GPS RINEX files to provide coordinates (latitude, longitude, ellipsoidal height and orthometric height)
GPS-H: Convert ellipsoidal heights to orthometric heights (makes use of any geoid models, works with different types of coordinate systems (geographic, UTM, MTM and Cartesian), and different geometric reference frames (NAD83(CSRS) and ITRF))
TRX: Transform coordinates between different geometric reference frames, epochs and coordinate systems.
23 of 33
NRCan released a new vertical datum in November 2013 Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013) Realised by geoid model CGG2013 (W0 = 62,636,856.0 m2/s2) Compatible with GNSS positioning technique Levelling networks were readjusted using existing data to conform with
CGVD2013
Why a new national vertical datum? Cost of conducting levelling surveys at the national scale To provide access to the vertical datum all across Canada New space-based technologies (GNSS/Gravity) in positioning
The difference between CGVD2013 and CGVD28 Separation ranging from -65 cm and 55 cm at the national scale.
US and Canada signed an agreement for the realisation of a unique height reference system between the two country by 2022. The common datum is defined by W0 = 62,636,856.0 m2/s2 (adopted definition of CGVD2013).
SUMMARY
24 of 33
General concepts: Datum
Datum Reference point or surface against which position measurements are
made
Vertical Datum Reference for measuring the elevations of points
TerrainH
H
Datum
H H
The vertical datum should have physical meaning in order to i.e. properly manage water.
25 of 33
General concepts: Reference system and Reference frame
Reference System Collection of abstract principles Definitions, conventions, standards, fundamental parameters
Reference frame Concrete realisation of the reference system
• Levelling (e.g., CGVD28, NAVD88, IGLD85)• Geoid modelling (e.g., CGG2010, EGM08)
A reference system may have several realisations (reference frames) New data New processing approach
A new reference frame is generally an improvement (more accurate) with respect to the previous frame.
26 of 33
General concepts: Types of vertical datum
Tidal Sea level at tide gauges Levelling (benchmarks) Advantage: Simple concept Disadvantage: MSL stops at the coast, MSL is not level
Gravimetric Potential Geoid model Advantage: Define everywhere Disadvantage: Complex process
Geodetic Ellipsoid Geometric reference frame Advantage: Efficient and precise method Disadvantage: No physical meaning
N = f(gsat, gter)
?
27 of 33
General concepts: Types of height
W0
W1
W4
W3
W2
W5
W0 = Geoid
Wi = Equipotential surfaces
Hd1 = (W4 – W0)/g45
North South
W4 = Lake surface
Hd1 = Hd
2
H1 = (W4 – W0)/g1
Eart
h’s
Lake
Hd2 = (W4 – W0)/g45
Dynamic Height (Hd)
Q1
Q2
P1
P2
Orthometric height (H)
H2 = (W4 – W0)/g2
H1 < H2 -
-
gi is the mean gravity along the plumb line between Qi and Pi.
-
As the lake is in the northern hemisphere, g1 is larger than g2 because gravity increases towards the pole.
surfa
ce
Ellipsoid
Ellipsoidal height (h)
h1 > h2
28 of 33
Gravity is the vertical gradient of potential (W)
General concepts: Relation between heights, potential and gravity
H
Wg
W = 90 m2/s2
W = 80 m2/s2
W = 70 m2/s2
W = 60 m2/s2
W = 90 m2/s2
W = 70 m2/s2
W = 50 m2/s2
W = 30 m2/s2
W = 80 m2/s2
W = 60 m2/s2
W = 40 m2/s2
g
WWH
p 0
g1 g2<
29 of 33
What is the Geoid?
Equipotential surface representing best, in a least-squares sense, the global mean sea level (MSL) The actual shape of the Earth Vertical datum (W0)
Gravity is perpendicular (vertical) to the geoid Water stays at rest on the geoid (a level surface)
g
geoid
g g
The water drop stays in place
30 of 33
h NAD83(CSRS)
ITRF origin
NAD83(CSRS) origin
~2.2 m
Earth’s surfaceh ITRF
Note: WGS84 has the same origin as ITRF
Geoid
N ITRF
N NAD83(CSRS)
General concepts: Geometric reference frames (NAD83(CSRS), ITRF, WGS84)
Ellipsoid(e.g. GRS80)
Ellipsoid(GRS80)
Geodetic (ellipsoidal) heights (h) and geoid heights (N) do not have the same magnitude in the ITRF and NAD83(CSRS) reference frames because the position of the origin is different. Orthometric heights (H) are independent to the 3D geometric reference frames.
H
H = h – N
31 of 33
Ellipsoid
W0
W1
W2
ht0 ht1
H = 0
Wi: Equipotential surface
W0: Equipotential surface (datum)
Ht1= 1
Ht1= -1DW
DW
gt0gt1
DW
DW
General concepts: Mass and potential
A
B C
0x 2x
32 of 33
EllipsoidGeoid
Sphere
Ellipsoid (GRS80) a: 6,378,137 m b: 6,356,752.3141 m a-b: 21,384.6859 m Everest: 8848 m N max.: 100 m SST max.: 2 m
If a = 1 m b: 0.996647 m a-b: 3.35 mm Everest: 1.387 mm N max: 0.016 mm SST max: 0.3 mm
Continent
Ocean
Semi-major axis: aSe
mi-m
inor
axi
s: b
General concepts: The real Earth
33 of 33
NRCan Contacts: Philippe Lamothe ([email protected]) Marc Véronneau ([email protected]) Jianliang Huang ([email protected])
General information: Web: http://www.geod.nrcan.gc.ca Email: [email protected] Phone: 1-613-995-4410 Fax: 1-613-995-3215
QUESTIONS?