1

National 8(a) Association Winter Conference

February 11, 2014

Christine V. Williams

Richard W. Oehler

Perkins Coie LLP

2

Perkins Coie

With more than 900 lawyers in 19 offices across the United States and Asia, Perkins Coie represents great companies across a wide range of industries and stages of growth-from start-ups to Fortune 50 corporations.

Listed on Fortune magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” for eleven consecutive years (2003 – 2013)

Ranked as a leading firm in Chambers USA. Law 360 Award for Top Government Contracting Firm. Extensive SBA Knowledge.

Avoiding and Resolving Government Contract Disputes with the Federal

Government

Christine WilliamsRick Oehler

February 11, 2014

4

Having disputes with the Federal Government can be a time consuming and costly process

We will discuss concepts for avoiding and resolving Government Contract disputes with the Federal Government

We will discuss some processes and also some substantive tips

Avoiding and Resolving Contract Disputes with the Federal Government

5

Differences in Resolving Claims with Federal Government

A contractor's chances of resolving an issue or dispute improves if he submits to the Government a well-reasoned explanation of his position and supporting documentation

In our experience, this is true regardless of where the parties are in the issue resolution process So, typically, the sooner the better

6

Differences in Resolving Claims with Federal Government

Early documentation of an issue helps ensure that one identifies all relevant events and compiles all relevant information

Avoid potential lack of timely notice defense asserted by the Government Differing Site Conditions – Prompt written notice to

the CO before the condition is disturbed Changes – Within 30 days of receipt of change order

7

Prescribes a specific process (usually with deadlines) for consideration of an issue at 2 or 3 levels within the contracting agency and the contractor

Limited use in Government Contracts, but becoming fairly common in commercial contracts

Issue Escalation Clause

8

Issue Escalation Clause - Elements

First Level – Involves personnel who are familiar with the dispute

Second Level – Involves personnel who are not involved in the dispute

Sometimes a third, senior level

9

Issue Escalation Clause – Elements

The time periods to convene the first level and subsequent levels typically are tight (such as 10 days)

Sometimes provides for an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism if multi-level consideration by the parties has not resolved the dispute

ADR = Non-judicial resolution (mediation or arbitration)

10

Issue Escalation Clause

Easy to draft and use such a clause No need to involve a third party neutral under

this clause and can be scheduled when convenient

This process conceivably could be utilized before a CDA claim or REA is submitted

Can result in a quick resolution

11

Partnering

Focuses on the relationship between the parties and the achievement of mutually beneficial objectives

Build an alliance, improve communications and avoid disputes

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – leader in use of partnering USACE includes Partnering clauses in some

solicitations

12

Partnering

Parties seek to accomplish their goals through their own actions without the involvement of a third party neutral

Focus is more on business interests than contract rights

Initiated at the beginning of the contract Must have the buy-in of all stakeholders

13

Partnering

Usually a workshop immediately after award to identify mutual objectives, roles and responsibilities of the parties, methods to ensure effective communications and establish an issue resolution ladder

Involves cost of facilitator and training Substantial involvement of management

including senior management

14

Partnering – Workshop Agenda

Workshop Agenda Establish expectations Describe partnering Importance of communication and cooperation Mutual vision

15

Partnering – Workshop Agenda

Workshop Agenda (cont) Potential problems Common Goals Plan to sustain the relationship Draft and sign Charter

16

Resolving a Dispute After the CO's Final Decision

This focuses on the alternative dispute resolution (usually mediation) that may be available in the forums where contractors appeal and litigate an adverse Contracting Officer's Final Decision

17

Resolving a Dispute After the CO's Final Decision

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) – solid program

Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (BCA) Court of Federal Claims – Appendix H

18

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Less common in Government Contract disputes, but we frequently try to convince the Government to use ADR

It can produce a result in less time than traditional litigation

It also may result in a business solution There may be something of value (other than

money) that the Government can provide and the contractor values

19

ASBCA ADR

Three ADR techniques generally used at ASBCA Settlement judge (non-binding mediation) Mini-trial (non-binding) Summary trial with binding decision

ASBCA allows the parties to use any ADR method, or combination of methods, regardless of the amount in dispute

Mutual agreement and Board concurrence required to use ADR

20

ASBCA ADR

Settlement Judge ASBCA judge not assigned to the appeal Procedures can be altered based on parties'

agreement Non-binding mediation Mediation Statement

21

ASBCA ADR

Mini-trial Each party presents an abbreviated version of its

position to principals with authority and to a Board-appointed neutral advisor

Upon conclusion of presentations, settlement discussions are conducted

Neutral advisor's recommendations are not binding

22

ASBCA ADR

Summary Trial with Binding Decision Expedited appeal hearing Trial informally before a judge A summary bench decision at the conclusion of the

hearing or a summary written decision issued NLT 10 days after conclusion of trial or after receipt of trial transcript

The decision is final and nonappealable Decision has no precedential value Pretrial, trial and post-trial procedures generally

modified or eliminated to expedite resolution of the appeal

23

ASBCA ADR Procedure

If non-binding ADR is unsuccessful, the appeal will be restored to the docket

ASBCA judge who participated in the non-binding ADR will not: Participate in the restored appeal, unless explicitly

requested by both parties and approved by the ASBCA Chair

Discuss the merits or substantive matters with other ASBCA judges

24

CFC ADR

ADR Automatic Referral Program All cases, except bid protests, assigned to certain

judges shall automatically be referred to an ADR judge for ADR consideration

There is then a early meeting with the ADR judge to understand the differences between the parties and the prospects for settlement

After the initial meeting with the ADR judge, the parties indicate whether they agree to go forward with ADR

25

ADR Prior to Submitting a Claim

ADR may be employed to resolve a Request for Equitable Adjustment

Use of ADR must be voluntary by both parties Remain aware of any time bars for submitting

your claim Even after a claim is submitted, the parties can

agree to postpone a final decision and possible appeal to the ASBCA pending ADR proceedings

26

Benefits of ADR

Parties save in terms of cost Parties save in terms of time

A formal ASBCA appeal (including pleadings, discovery, trial, post-trial briefing and time for the judge to write the decision) can take two to three years

27

When ADR Makes Sense

Routine matters are well suited for ADR For matters that are more significant ("bet the

company" disputes), litigation may be a more appropriate approach

28

Lessons Learned

Keep the process as simple as possible Allow for sufficient, but not excessive,

information exchange Ensure that business representatives and

financial decision-makers are available and willing to commit the necessary time

Identify funding sources for an anticipated settlement prior to beginning ADR

29

Funding An ASCBA Settlement

Funds allocated to the contract Judgment Fund – for "judgments" Binding ADR decisions for BCA appeals qualify

as judgments

30

Funding an ASBCA Settlement

For non-binding ADR, the parties may agree to a "stipulated judgment" and request the board to treat it as a consent judgment Also payable from the Judgment Fund

Parties must reach agreement on how to treat CDA interest for settlements paid from the Judgment Fund

31

Combination ADRs

"Med-Arb" proceedings have become more common Process begins with a full mediation Parties agree that if mediation is unsuccessful, it will

be followed by a summary trial with a binding decision "Last Chance" arbitration is where, prior to a

judge rendering a decision in a summary trial proceeding, the parties attempt a mediated settlement (usually just a few hours). If unsuccessful, the judge issues a decision.

32

Confidentiality

Written material prepared specifically for use in ADR, oral presentations made in ADR, and all discussions in connection with ADR proceedings are confidential

The underlying facts and information used during ADR are not confidential

The parties can agree to allow the admission of ADR materials and discussions as evidence in future proceedings

33

Questions or comments?Christine WilliamsPerkins Coie LLP

1029 West Third Ave., Suite 300Anchorage, AK 99501

(907) 263-6931CWilliams@perkinscoie.com

Rick OehlerPerkins Coie LLP

1201 Third Ave., Suite 4800Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 359-8419ROehler@perkinscoie.com

28943111