1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University...
-
Upload
samson-wright -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
5
Transcript of 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University...
![Page 1: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project
Master Oil and Gas StudiesMemorial UniversityDecember 16, 2004
By: Lloyd ButtonRandy HiscockPenny NormanLuis Serrano
![Page 2: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Purpose
Technical and economic feasibility of commercializing stranded gas development offshore Labrador
![Page 3: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
World Energy Demand Trends
Demand warrants serious consideration for Province’s future economic growth
![Page 4: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Field Locations
Atlantic Ocean
Quebec
NewBrunswick
Nova Scotia
Labrador
Newfoundland
CANADA
P. E. I.
USA
LABRADOR SHELF
HOPEDALE BASIN
HAWKE BASIN
ST. ANTHONYBASIN
EAST NEWFOUNDLANDBASIN(ORPHAN BASIN)
FLEMISHPASS
CARSON BASIN
JEANNE D'ARC BASIN
HORSESHOE BASIN
WHALE BASIN
NOVA SCOTIABASIN
SYDNEYBASIN
ANTICOSTI BASIN
NOVA SCOTIA SHELF
FUNDYBASIN
FRANKLINBASIN
GEORGES BANKBASIN
MAGDALENBASIN
APPALACH IAN ST R
UC
TUR
AL
FRONT
Landward edge of Mesozoic-
Cenozoic sediments
70°W
70°W
60°W
60°W
50°W
50°W
40°N
40°N
50°N
50°N
0 250 500Km
![Page 5: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Geology
AGE LEGENDFORMATIONS
TE
RT
IAR
YC
RE
TA
CE
OU
S
PALAEOZOIC
PLEISTOCENE
NE
OG
EN
EP
AL
AE
OG
EN
E
PLIOCENE
MIOCENE
OLIGOCENE
EOCENE
PALEOCENE
UP
PE
RL
OW
ER
MAASTRICHT
CAMPANIAN
SANTONIAN
CONIACIAN
TURONIAN
CENOMANIAN
ALBIAN
APTIAN
BARREMIAN
HAUTERIVIAN
VALANGINIAN
BERRIASIAN
MOKAMI
LEIF MBR
MARKLAND
UNNAMED (GLACIAL BEDS)
FREYDIS
MBR
BJARNI
ALEXIS
SAGLEK
CARTWRIGHT GUDRID
KENAMU
SANDSTONE
CONGLOMERATIVECOAL
ARGILLACEOUSSANDSTONE
SHALE
RED BEDS
MAFIC VOLCANICINTRA VOLCANICSEDIMENTS
LIMESTONE
DOLOMITE
META-SEDIMENT
SOURCE
RESERVOIR
Labrador Shelf Stratigraphic Chart
Labrador Shelf Cross-sectionHopedale Area
Source: CNOPB
![Page 6: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
ResourcesPotential Resources
GAS (TCF)Condensate (MMBL)
Potential Resources 18.99 500.1
% Discovered 17.2 9.2
Discovered Resources
FIELDProven Gas (TCF) Proven Condensate
(MMBLS)
North Bjarni 2.247 82
Gudrid 924 6
Bjarni 24.3 31
Hopedale 105 2
Snorri 105 2
TOTALS 4,244 123
![Page 7: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Exploration History
Discovery SDL Operator Year Water Reservoir Reservoir Estimated ReservesDepth
(m) Depth (m) Gas (BCF)Cond.
(MMBBL)
Bjarni 185APetro-
Canada 1973 140 L. Cret-Bjarni Fm 2515 863 31
Gudrid 184Petro-
Canada 1974 300 Paleozoic 2838 924 6
Hopedale 203 Husky 1978 550 L. Cretaceous 1983 105 2
Snorri 187Petro-
Canada 1975 141 Paleocene 2493 105 2
North Bjarni 185BPetro-
Canada 1980 150 L. Cret-Bjarni Fm 2423 2,247 82
Labrador Shelf Significant Discoveries
![Page 8: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Methods for Transportation
Gas gathering and transmission via pipeline. Volume reduction (liquefaction (LNG) or
compression (CNG)) followed by marine transportation.
Conversion to other products by changing from methane molecule (GTL) followed by marine transportation; and
Conversion to other energy forms such as electric power and transmission via subsea cable.
![Page 9: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Production Volume verses Distance to Market
Pipeline LNG Carriers Production Volume CNG Carriers Distance to Market
![Page 10: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Process Facilities
CNG is the most viable method of transporting gas from Labrador
The processing and conditioning will depend on CNG requirements ( most likely they will have the same as pipelines)
Requirements will depend on the flow rate, composition, temperature, and pressure of the produced gas and the components/impurities
![Page 11: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Main Processing Considerations
Remove water vapor to avoid the hydrate formation and corrosion
Removal of solidsRemoval of gas condensate No H2S or CO2
Heating Required
![Page 12: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Options Considered
Floating production storage offloading (FPSO) with CNG tankers;
Caisson / Island - CNG tanker; and Concrete gravity based structure (GBS)
- CNG shuttle tanker
![Page 13: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Option 1: FPSO-CNG
Wells Drilled from separate MODU
![Page 14: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Option 2: Caisson/Island-CNG
Erosion Protection
![Page 15: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Option 3: GBS-CNG
![Page 16: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Economic Analysis Assumptions
Field Size Base Case: 2.3 TCF (Bjarni North field) High: 5.0 TCF Low: 1.5 TCF
Price Base Case of $US 4.30 / MCF High: $US 5.45 / MCF Low: $US 3.20 / MCF.
Economic sensitivities Royalties: 5% & 10%, CAPEX: high and low models
Exploration risk assumed to be zero Operational down time assumed to be the same for all three
assessed options (100 days/year)
![Page 17: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Economic Analysis - Results
FPSO – CNG gave most favorable economic based on: CashflowNPV discounted at 10% & 15% ATROR
GBS-CNG produced marginally more attractive economics vs. Caisson/Island-CNG
![Page 18: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Economic Analysis - Findings
Only FPSO-CNG is feasible with gas prices of $US 5.00 / MCF or less
Other options require 4.0 TCF or higher and / or the significant higher gas prices
![Page 19: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Economic Analysis - Sensitivities
1. Development costs (most sensitive)
2. Pricing
3. Reserve Size
![Page 20: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Development Option
Field Size (TCF)
Gas Price $ / MCF
Cash Flow $US mm
NPV10 $US mm
NPV15 $US mm
ROR (after tax) %
FPSO/CNG 2.3 4.30 1001.63 253.2 20.0 15.5 5.0 4.30 2320.1 703.4 212.6 17.8 1.5 4.30 618.3 141.3 -14.2 14.5 2.3 5.44 2358.0 1004.8 613.4 29.1 5.0 5.44 4910.9 2144.4 1350.5 31.3 1.5 5.44 1588.7 682.4 414.3 28.5 2.3 3.20 -90.7 -408.9 -528.1 NEG 5.0 3.20 145.8 -598.4 -863.2 1.7 1.5 3.20 -174.4 -336.8 -408.4 NEG CNG / Island 2.3 4.30 424.0 -296.1 -529.5 5.2 5.0 4.30 1479.9 -99.9 -595.2 9.2 1.5 4.30 122.6 -322.7 -475.0 2.4 2.3 5.44 1810.5 502.8 117.5 16.9 5.0 5.44 4191.2 1417.9 616.5 20.5 1.5 5.44 1117.5 262.2 2.7 15.1 2.3 3.20 -1508.2 -1494.2 -1515.2 NEG 5.0 3.20 -1946.7 -2259.7 -2393.3 NEG 1.5 3.20 -1306.5 -1197.1 1188.9 NEG CNG / GBS 2.3 4.30 282.4 -277.5 -473.5 4.6 5.0 4.30 1286.1 -62.3 -503.1 9.4 1.5 4.30 12.0 -305.1 -427.6 0.4 2.3 5.44 1692.9 523.5 170.5 18.1 5.0 5.44 4035.4 1461.6 707.4 21.9 1.5 5.44 1022.3 279.1 45.9 16.2 2.3 3.20 -1641.7 -1461.8 -1455.6 NEG 5.0 3.20 -2162.3 -2207.5 -2280.9 NEG 1.5 3.20 -1411.19 -1171.8 -1134.27 NEG
Results
![Page 21: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Economic Analysis - Royalty
Royalty of 5% and 10% had modest sensitivity impact
However, base reserve and price, 5% and 10% royalty result in marginal to sub-marginal economics
Given political sensitivity with foregoing royalty revenue, other revenue methods must be considered
![Page 22: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Other Revenue Sources
[Randy any ideas??]Confirm higher reserves (exploration)Higher Prices likely
![Page 23: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Ranking Of Investor Internal Rate of Return (Gas)
Ireland
Morocco : Deep WaterMorocco : On & Off-shore
United Kingdom
Faroe IslandsGuyana
CongoGreenland
Canada : Nova ScotiaCanada : New foundland
DenmarkBrazilTrinidad and Tobago
Namibia
Trinidad and Tobago
Suriname
Algeria
Algeria
Iraq
Portugal : Offshore < 200mPortugal : Deep WaterPortugal : Onshore
Kyrgyzstan
Falkland IslandsNetherlands
BrazilSuriname
USA : AlaskaNorw ay
Angola : On & Off-shoreAngola :Deep Water
RussiaMongolia
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Source: IHS Energy
Benchmarking
![Page 24: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Fiscal System Benchmarking
Benchmarked with the following countries:Netherlands IrelandNorwayTrinidadAlaskaCanada – Nova Scotia
![Page 25: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Benchmarking Recommendations(1)
Pricing tied to NE US price and linkage to price of competitor fuels
No domestic market obligation or export restrictions (i.e. lack of infrastructure, small dispersed population - no local market)
Consider State involvement for direct marketing of its share
![Page 26: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Benchmarking Recommendations(2)
Local content quota, with focus on Labrador people, in the issuance for future exploration licenses and SDL’s.
Province must be innovative and flexible in making new gas legislation to promote exploration.
Gas fiscal terms and tax incentives need to balance restricted operating environment with accrued economic value
![Page 27: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Significant Discovery License (SDL)
Issued by CNOPBSDL have no prescribed date for expireNo economic trigger for operator to
move forward when market conditions allow
No requirements for company to periodically revisit economics if pricing environment changes
![Page 28: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
SDL - Recommendation
Requirements should be designed to place onus on operators to revisit the economics on a bi-annual basis
The trigger could be when the gas price exceeds a specific threshold
![Page 29: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Market Analysis – NE US
Labrador Shelf
![Page 30: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Justification for NE US Market
Reserve SizeProximity to NE USUS gas pricing (vs Europe pricing)Low local domestic consumption
![Page 31: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Local Benefits
The people of Labrador should be the ones who benefit most
Best opportunities in marine transportation Particular emphasis should be on training in
marine sector Other opportunities at the offshore
facility and onshore support
![Page 32: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Local Labour Content
Phase Option Engineer
Development
Operation
Abandonment
FPSO
75% 30% 95% 95%
Caisson/Island 90% 95% 95% 95%
GBS
90% 95% 95% 95%
Overall Project
![Page 33: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Local Labour Content
Phase Option Engineer
Development
Operation
Abandonment
FPSO 75% 85% NA 90%
Island 75% 95% NA 95%
GBS 75% 95% NA 80%
Drilling
![Page 34: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Local Labour Content
Facilities Construction
Phase Option Engineer
Development
Operation
Abandonment
(de-construction) FPSO 20% 25% 90% 90%
Island 90% 95% 95% 95%
GBS 90% 95% 95% 95%
![Page 35: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Local Labour Content
Facilities Installation
Phase Option Engineer
Development
Operation
(maintenance) Abandonment (operations)
FPSO 65% 75% 85% 90%
Island 80% 95% 95% 95%
GBS 80% 95% 95% 80%
![Page 36: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Local Labour Content
Transportation
Phase Option Engineer
Development
Operation
Abandonment
FPSO 5% 75% 95% 95%
Island 5% 95% 95% 95%
GBS 5% 95% 95% 95%
![Page 37: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Local Labour Content
Management
Phase Option Engineer
Development
Operation
Abandonment
FPSO 100% 100% 100% 100%
Island 100% 100% 100% 100%
GBS 100% 100% 100% 100%
![Page 38: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Local (Labrador) Stakeholders
The Innu Nation The Labrador Inuit Association Labrador Métis Nation The Newfoundland and Labrador Association
of Municipalities Individual Communities on the south Labrador
Coast not included above Labour Organizations (collective agreements)
![Page 39: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Adjacency Principle
People of Labrador should have first chance for the competitive supply of labour and services Members of the Innu Nation and Labrador Inuit
Association Members of Labrador Métis Nation. Other residences of Labrador who are members of
collective bargaining agencies Other residences of the Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador.
![Page 40: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Diversity
In addition to First Nations people, commitment to provide fair and equal opportunities should be given to: WomenPeople with disabilities Other visible minorities
![Page 41: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Local Contracts
Onshore base including Port Development and infrastructure (buildings, roads, utilities etc)
Temporary Services for Port Development Environmental Monitoring Onshore site surveying Helicopter Transportation Others
![Page 42: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Corporate Social Responsibility
Centre for Marine CNG in Harsh Environments
Co-ordinated Training Plan for LabradorCentre for Marine Training Quebec/Labrador North St. Lawrence
RoadScholarships
![Page 43: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
QHSE - Policy
Protection of workersProtection of environment Desirable qualityModest Profit
![Page 44: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
QHSE
Design of QHSE ProcessLoss Avoidance vs Max ProfitsHuman Element
Investor/OwnersManagementWorkforce
![Page 45: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
QHSE – System Integration
“Us and Them” Gap Demonstrative actions (physical behaviour) Communications (face to face meetings, focus
groups, personal written notices, a vehicle for “bottom up” communications as well as “top down)
Consistent reactions to all incidents Regular follow-up and closeout Safety training and drills
![Page 46: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Environment Impact - Exploration
Reported effects in mammals Reported effects in fishSeismic guns deployment (determine
environmental effects, horizontal Vs downward)
Other means of exploration and data acquisition are less harmful to environment (electrical surveys, gravity, magnetic, satellite, etc.)
![Page 47: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Environment Impact - Drilling
Drilling fluids Impacts water column and seafloor
differentlyReduce light penetrationDecrease in sea lifebiological changes in fish larvaeTechnology and advances in drilling fluids
can reduce impact
![Page 48: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Environment Impact - Drilling
Drilling Cuttings Impact is proportional to solids dischargeThe fate of the drilling cuttings piles
depends on thickness, ocean condition, conditions of discharge and fluids retention on cuttings
Estimate1-2 years for initiation of recovery after discharge has stopped
Limits for discharge imposed by law
![Page 49: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Environment Impact - Production
Most significant contaminant is the produced water Produced water is composed of dispersed oil and
dissolved organic compounds, metals, including aromatic compounds, organic acids, phenols, inorganic compounds, and also of chemicals added in the production/separation line.
Its chemical composition varies over a wide range and depends on attributes of the reservoir’s geology.
The produced water and any other discharge are closely monitored to minimize adverse effects
![Page 50: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Environment Impact – De-comissioning
Disposal in deep waters can impact sea life
May be considered for an artificial reef Removal and dismantling of the
installation is an option
![Page 51: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Environment Impact – Spills
Operator company must submit contingency plans for environmental emergencies to CNOPB
CNOPB liaisons with environmental advisory agencies
CNOPB helps to design and implement the process through which the public may participate in the review
![Page 52: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Conclusion (1)
4.3 TCF of gas, potential of 19 TCF FPSO – CNG option most favorableBase reserve and price, 5% and 10%
royalty result in marginal to sub-marginal economics
Given political sensitivity with foregoing royalty revenue, other revenue methods must be considered
![Page 53: 1 Monetizing Labrador Shelf Gas – Group Project Master Oil and Gas Studies Memorial University December 16, 2004 By: Lloyd Button Randy Hiscock Penny Norman.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f285503460f94c4076a/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
Conclusion (2)
Exploration to confirm reserves required Gas Clause RequiredMarket – NE USLocal Benefits Agreements required,
other local initiatives that could be taken