1 Metadata Data integration for tackling global environmental challenges - Rebecca Koskela, Keith...
-
Upload
jordan-hunter -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Metadata Data integration for tackling global environmental challenges - Rebecca Koskela, Keith...
1
Metadata Data integration for tackling global environmental
challenges-
Rebecca Koskela, Keith Jeffery, Jane Greenberg, Alex Ball
2Science and Informatics Challenges
Vin
es, T
. H. e
t al.
Cur
r. B
iol.
http
://dx
.doi
.org
/10.
1016
/j.cu
b.20
13.1
1.01
4 (2
013)
.
DIFDwC DC
EML
FGDC
Ope
n G
IS ISO
My
Lab
none
12 21 26 95 95 96 97266
676
Metadata standards
3Science and Informatics Challenges
Vin
es, T
. H. e
t al.
Cur
r. B
iol.
http
://dx
.doi
.org
/10.
1016
/j.cu
b.20
13.1
1.01
4 (2
013)
.
4
“Data intensive science” and the “80:20 rule”
4
Dec
reas
ing
Spa
tial C
over
age
Incr
easi
ng P
roce
ss K
now
ledg
e
Adapted from CENR-OSTP
Remotesensing
Intensive science sites and experiments
Extensive science sites
Volunteer & education networks
5
1. Data discoverability challenges
2. Few metadata management tools that support the creation of comprehensive metadata
3. Usability of existing data management tools
4. Availability of best practices and self-paced education materials for scientists and students
5. Paucity of clear and enforceable mandates from funders and publishers
6. Data management insufficiently budgeted/funded
7. Sustainability of key cyberinfrastructure
From DataONE: Obstacles to wider data sharing
6
Identified the DCC Disciplinary Metadata directory as a great starting point: Aspires to be comprehensive across disciplines Actively maintained
Conducted worldwide survey, asking for entries to add. To date, have added more than: 14 new standards 4 new profiles/extensions 13 new tools for working with metadata
Collected 5 sets of use cases for the directory Collected 4 use cases for disciplinary metadata
standards
Metadata Standards Directory WG
7DCC Metadata Directory
8OMetadata IGs P4
Raise profile of metadata For data first But also software,
resources, users
Present MIG Plan Which involves other
metadata groups and ~all RDA groups
MIGMSDWG MSCWG
DICIG
Directory / catalog
Common Metadata ‘standard’
Interop-erability
discoverycon
textualsch
em
a
Brokering, interoperation,
services
OTCOMEQuality-Trust
provenance
RDPIG
9
Use Cases towards Repository
Metadata Standards Directory towards Catalog
Towards Recommended Metadata Packages for Purposes
Metadata Plan
10
Please communicate with us and work together on it Use cases into repository Standards into Directory (Catalog)
Bringing benefit to all groups in RDA
Request from Metadata Groups