1 Main
-
Upload
tom-curtis -
Category
Documents
-
view
15 -
download
3
Transcript of 1 Main
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
REBELLION DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED,
CHRISTOPHER KINGSLEY and JASON
KINGSLEY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STARDOCK ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and
IRONCLAD GAMES CORPORATION.
Defendants.
Case No. _____________
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Rebellion Developments Limited, Christopher Kingsley and Jason Kingsley
(collectively, “Rebellion” or “Plaintiffs”) allege against defendants Stardock Entertainment, Inc.
and Ironclad Games Corporation (collectively, “Ironclad” or “Defendants”) as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is an action for the infringement of a registered trademark and unfair
competition arising under the Lanham Act, 15 USC §1051 et seq. and various statutes of the
State of Michigan. This Court has jurisdiction of this action under 15 USC §1121, 28 USC
§1331, 28 USC §1338, and 28 USC §1367.
2. Venue is proper in this district under 28 USC §1391, this being a judicial district
where Defendant Stardock Entertainment, Inc. is doing business and in which a substantial part
of the events giving rise to the causes of action occurred.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1
2
THE PARTIES
3. Plaintiff Rebellion Developments Limited is a company organized and existing
under the laws of England and Wales, having its principal place of business at Riverside House,
Osney Mede, Oxford, OX2 0ES, United Kingdom.
4. Plaintiffs Christopher Kingsley and Jason Kingsley are individuals and citizens of
the United Kingdom, with a business address of Riverside House, Osney Mede, Oxford, OX2
0ES, United Kingdom.
5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Stardock Entertainment, Inc. is a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Michigan, having their
principal place of business at 15090 Beck Rd., Plymouth, Michigan 48170.
6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Ironclad Games Corporation is a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of Canada, having its principal place of
business at 5172 Kingsway, Suite 340, Burnaby, British Colombia, Canada V5H 2E8.
PLAINTIFFS AND THE “REBELLION” MARK
7. In 1991, Christopher Kingsley and Jason Kingsley founded Rebellion
Developments Limited, which has become and is now a well-known British computer games
company.
8. Since 1991, Rebellion has developed more than forty computer games, including
the awarding wining title Sniper Elite, and well-known games such as Aliens vs. Predator, Star
Wars Battlefront: Renegade Squadron, Judge Dredd: Dredd vs. Death, and The Simpsons Game.
Many of said games feature futuristic science fiction scenarios.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 2 of 14 Pg ID 2
3
9. Rebellion’s branded games are sold and distributed through-out the world,
including in the United States and the State of Michigan, to be played on PCs and most, if not
every, major gaming console, including but not limited to SONY PLAYSTATION, XBOX, and
the Wii.
10. Nearly every game sold throughout the world, including within the United States
and the State of Michigan, developed by Rebellion, bears the house mark REBELLION. A
representative sample is displayed below:
11. In addition to their common law rights, Christopher Kingsley and Jason Kingsley
own the U.S. trade/service mark registration of REBELLION, Reg. No. 2845116 (“the ‘116
registration”), for among other things, “entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus,
namely, video games and electronic games; discs, optical discs, silicon chips, microchips,
electronic circuits all encoded with computer programs for video games and all for use with the
aforesaid games apparatus; musical sound recordings, program memory cartridges for electronic
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 3 of 14 Pg ID 3
4
amusement, namely, video game apparatus; parts for the aforesaid goods” and “computer
programming, computer software development services for others; providing on-line website
information in the field of entertainment software and computer software development services
for others; customization, maintenance of computer programs; computer software design and
development”, which registered May 25, 2004, and claims use from October 1994. The
aforementioned trade/service mark registration is valid, subsisting and enforceable. Exhibit A
attached hereto is a copy of that registration.
12. Under license from Christopher Kingsley and Jason Kingsley, Rebellion
Developments Limited since at least as early as 1994 has extensively been using in interstate
commerce the REBELLION house mark for computer games and related goods/services.
DEFENDANTS’ ACTIONS
13. Upon information and belief, Defendant Ironclad Games Corporation is a
computer game development company.
14. Upon information and belief, Defendant Stardock Entertainment, Inc. is the
exclusive worldwide publisher and distributor of Ironclad’s computer games.
15. Upon information and belief, Defendants have recently begun marketing,
promoting, and selling throughout the United States a new computer game called “Sins of A
Solar Empire: REBELLION”.
16. Defendants on their websites, www.ironcladgames.com, www.stardock.com and
www.sinsofasolarempire.com, and elsewhere, conspicuously display Defendants’ product
packaging and/or promotional images for its game “Sins of A Solar Empire: REBELLION”.
Screenshots from Defendants’ www.ironcladgames.com, www.stardock.com and
www.sinsofasolarempire.com websites are attached as Exhibit B. As shown in the example
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 4 of 14 Pg ID 4
5
below, said image features the word REBELLION in font type that is larger and more prominent
than the wording “Sins of A Solar Empire”.
Exhibit C.
17. Consumers may order the game “Sins of A Solar Empire: REBELLION” from
Defendants’ and third parties’ websites. For example, see Exhibits B and C.
18. Defendants use the term REBELLION per se to identify the “Sins of A Solar
Empire: REBELLION” game. For example, Defendants, upon information and belief, use
REBELLION per se in the game itself as shown below, on an image used on the packaging or
used to promote the sale of the goods as shown below, in the download section of Defendants’
website, www.sinsofasolarempire.com, where a consumer may download “REBELLION
VIDEOS” and “REBELLION SCREENSHOTS”, and in sections of Defendants’ aforesaid
website entitled “REBELLION REVIEWS” and “REBELLION FEATURES”.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 5 of 14 Pg ID 5
6
(use in the game)
(use on an image on the game or to promote the game)
Exhibit D.
19. Third parties are also referring to Defendants’ “Sins of A Solar Empire:
REBELLION” game using only Plaintiff’s REBELLION trademark. For example, reviewers of
the game have stated:
. . .
Given the timing of the Rebellion announcement alongside news of the upcoming "free
to play" options added to Impulse Reactor, we asked if this next Sins would be a free-to-
play title. "Definitely not," Clair said, though pricing has not been set.
Rebellion will support achievements, multiplayer leagues and other features. Speaking to
concerns voiced by players that don't have the hours to set aside for a standard
multiplayer match in Sins, Clair said, "We're going to continue looking at ways to address
that for folks who want to get a game in under an hour."
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 6 of 14 Pg ID 6
7
. . .
… When the TEC Rebels start summoning Pirate fleets to their aid and the Vasari
Loyalists start eating entire planets for resources, Rebellion feels like its own excellent
game.
. . .
Rebellion also reminds me of the expansions for Age of Empires III. Ensemble and Big
Huge Games eventually brought to that RTS new ways to play by adding strange new
factions and victory conditions that drove the game in new directions. Native Americans,
Eastern cultures, trade monopolies, and revolutions made Age of Empires III almost
unrecognizable from its original form. Rebellion is nearly as revolutionary with its new
subfactions, and it’s easily as revolutionary with its new victory conditions.
Rebellion’s new victory conditions are arguably the most meaningful addition. It’s one
thing to add new toys, but it’s something else entirely to give those new toys a new
direction. . .
Exhibit E.
20. Consumers are led to mistakenly believe that the developer of the game “Sins of
A Solar Empire: REBELLION”, is in fact Plaintiff REBELLION, as evidenced by the following
description found on YOUTUBE:
The developers over at "Rebellion" talks to us about what to expect from their newest
game. As a tech rebel or a tech loyal, you will get to command legions of warships into a
galactic space battle. Check out the video for more!
See http://youtube/zGNSLdbfJVk and Exhibit E.
21. On April 23, 2012, Plaintiffs, through their counsel, requested that Defendant
Ironclad Games Corporation cease and desist from using REBELLION for computer games and
the like.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 7 of 14 Pg ID 7
8
22. Defendants, by their counsel’s letter dated May 10, 2012, have refused to cease
and desist and continue to use REBELLION as or as part of a trademark for computer games.
FIRST COUNT
(Infringement of U.S. Trademark)
23. Plaintiffs repeats and re-alleges each of the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1
through 22 of the Complaint above, as though same were fully set forth herein.
24. Defendants’ unauthorized use of REBELLION alone or as part of aforementioned
mark “Sins of A Solar Empire: REBELLION” for computer games has caused and/or will cause
confusion, to cause mistake and to deceive purchasers and potential purchasers as to the source
or origin of Defendants’ goods/services.
25. The aforesaid activities of Defendants constitute an infringement of the rights of
Plaintiffs as embodied in its United States trade/service mark registration set forth above,
contrary to the express provisions of 15 U.S.C. §1114(1) of the Lanham Act, in that Defendants,
without the authorization of Plaintiffs, have used and are using in commerce confusingly similar
imitations of Plaintiff’s aforesaid house mark for computer games and related goods/services
offered in the State of Michigan and in interstate commerce, all to the damage and detriment of
Plaintiffs.
26. Upon information and belief, Defendants’ infringing activities are and have been
undertaken and carried out with knowledge of Plaintiffs’ prior rights in and to its above noted
mark within the United States, all for the purpose of capitalizing on the substantial reputation and
goodwill of Plaintiffs and the REBELLION mark.
27. All of the acts of Defendants herein complained of in the preceding paragraphs
are calculated to and will invariably cause substantial damage to the reputation and goodwill of
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 8 of 14 Pg ID 8
9
Plaintiffs. Unless enjoined by this Court, said unlawful and unauthorized acts of Defendants will
inevitably cause confusion, mistake or deception and will lead or tend to lead the trade and
public to believe erroneously that the goods of Defendants originate with Plaintiffs, or that
Defendants’ “Sins of A Solar Empire: REBELLION” computer game is authorized, licensed or
controlled by Plaintiffs, or that Defendants are affiliated with or in some way related to
Plaintiffs, by reason of which the reputation and goodwill of Plaintiffs will be subject to the
hazards and perils attendant upon the activities of Defendants, over which Plaintiffs have no
control.
SECOND COUNT
(False Designation of Origin And Unfair Competition)
28. Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1
through 27 of the Complaint above as though fully set forth herein.
29. Defendants have used and are using the above noted trademark as a false
description and a false representation that the goods offered by them originate with, are
sponsored by or are connected with Plaintiffs.
30. Defendants have used and are using the above noted trademark in its advertising
and promotional activities without authorization in a manner which is likely to cause confusion,
or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the origin, affiliation, sponsorship or approval by
Plaintiffs of Defendants’ goods, or commercial activities.
31. These actions of Defendants violate 15 U.SC. §1125(a) of the Lanham Act, and
Plaintiffs are and are likely to continue to be damaged by such illegal acts.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 9 of 14 Pg ID 9
10
THIRD COUNT
(Violation of Michigan Consumer Protection Act)
32. Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1
through 31 of the Complaint above as fully set forth herein.
33. In violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act § M.C.L. § 445.903, the
Defendants’ conduct aforesaid has caused a probability of confusion or misunderstanding as to
the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of its goods or services.
34. Through its conduct aforesaid, Defendants have represented that its goods or
services have sponsorship, approval, or characteristics that they do not have.
35. As a direct result of Defendants’ violations, Plaintiffs have suffered substantial
harm, which cannot be remedied unless Defendants are enjoined from use of the REBELLION
trademark.
36. Plaintiffs have been and will continue to be damaged by Defendants’ above-stated
activities and conduct. Defendants have or will profit thereby and, unless enjoined by this Court,
the business, goodwill and reputation of Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable injury which cannot be
adequately calculated or compensated for solely by money damages.
FOURTH COUNT
(Common Law Unfair Competition)
37. Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1
through 36 of the Complaint above as fully set forth herein.
38. By assisting and encouraging third parties to market, advertise, promote, sell
and/or otherwise deal in the infringing products, Defendants have engaged in unfair competition
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 10 of 14 Pg ID 10
11
and contributory trademark infringement in violation of the common law of the State of
Michigan.
39. Upon information and belief, the conduct of Defendants have been knowing,
deliberate, willful, intended to cause confusion, or to cause mistake or to deceive, and in
disregard of Plaintiffs’ rights.
40. Defendants’ wrongful conduct, as alleged above, has permitted and will permit
them to make substantial sales and profits on the strength of Plaintiffs’ nationwide marketing,
advertising, sales and consumer recognition. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’
wrongful conduct, as alleged herein, Plaintiffs have been and will be deprived of substantial sales
of its products in an amount as yet unknown but to be determined at trial, and has been and will
be deprived of the value of its trademarks as commercial assets, in an amount as yet unknown
but to be determined at trial. Plaintiffs seek an order granting Defendants’ profits stemming from
its infringing activity, and its actual and/or compensatory damages.
41. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law for Defendants’ continuing violation of
its rights set forth above. Plaintiffs seek preliminary and permanent injunctive relief.
42. Plaintiffs seek exemplary or punitive damages for Defendants’ intentional
misconduct.
WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS pray that:
1. Defendants and those in privity with each of them and their officers, attorneys,
agents, employees and representatives and all other persons acting on their behalf or under their
direction be preliminarily and permanently enjoined and restrained from using, in connection
with the offering, sale distribution of computer games and related goods/services:
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 11 of 14 Pg ID 11
12
a. any design, symbol, style, device, mark, or any other designation, or any
combination thereof which infringes United States Registration No. 2845116;
b. any design, symbol, style, device, mark, or any other designation which is
likely to confuse, or to cause mistake or to deceive or to otherwise mislead the trade or public
into believing that goods/services promoted and provided by Defendants are in any way
connected with, related to or under the supervision or control of Plaintiffs;
c. any design, symbol, style, device, mark, or any other designation, which
injures or creates a likelihood of injury to the business reputation and goodwill of Plaintiffs, the
mark REBELLION, or creates a likelihood of the dilution or misappropriation of the goodwill
appurtenant to the mark REBELLION; and
d. any trade practice whatsoever which unfairly tends to injure or infringe
upon the business of Plaintiffs and the goodwill appurtenant thereof.
2. Defendants be ordered to pay to Plaintiffs the damages they have suffered and
will suffer by reason of their illegal conduct complained of herein, in an amount to be
determined at trial, and that such damages be trebled pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1117.
3. Defendants be ordered to account for and pay over to Plaintiffs all gains, profits
and advantages derived from the activities herein complained of.
4. Defendants, their officers, attorneys, agents, employees and representatives and
all persons in privity with them deliver up to this Court for destruction all name plates, labels,
signs, prints, advertisements, promotional materials and the like in their possession or control
bearing the imitations of the mark REBELLION, and all plates, molds, matrices, and other
means of making the same in their possession, custody and control.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 12 of 14 Pg ID 12
13
5. That Defendants’ conduct be deemed willful, and Defendants be ordered to pay to
Plaintiffs punitive and exemplary damages as punishment for their intentional acts of misconduct
and to deter any future misconduct by them.
6. That this case be deemed "exceptional" in the sense of 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), and
Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiffs its litigation expenses, including reasonable attorneys’
fees and the costs of this action.
7. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiffs interest on the foregoing as provided
by law.
8. Plaintiffs be granted such other and further relief as to the Court seems just and
proper.
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 13 of 14 Pg ID 13
14
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiffs hereby request a trial by jury of all issues that are triable by jury.
Respectfully submitted,
BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. Dated: June 26, 2012
/s/ Robert C.J. Tuttle
Robert C.J. Tuttle (P25222)
Hope V. Shovein (P64116)
1000 Town Center, Twenty-Second Floor
Southfield, Michigan 48075
Telephone: (248) 358-4400
Facsimile: (248) 358-3351
Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Of Counsel for Plaintiffs:
William C. Wright (WW 2213)
Jason M. Drangel (JD 7204)
EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP
60 East 42nd
Street, Suite 2410
New York, NY 10165
Tel.: (212) 292-5390
Fax: (212) 292-5391
2:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 06/26/12 Pg 14 of 14 Pg ID 14