1 Learning Curve. 2 Example Consider a product with the following data about the hours of labor...
-
Upload
winfred-perkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 Learning Curve. 2 Example Consider a product with the following data about the hours of labor...
1
Learning CurveLearning Curve
Cumulative Production
Ho
urs
Re
qu
ire
d
to
Pro
du
ce
th
e M
ost
Re
cen
t U
nit
2
ExampleConsider a product with the following data about the hours of labor required to produce a unit:
Hours required to produce 1-st unit: 100
Hours required to produce 10-th unit: 48
Hours required to produce 25-th unit: 35
Hours required to produce 75-th unit: 25
Hours required to produce 200-th unit: 18
As more and more units are produced, the hours of labor required to produce the most recent unit is lower and lower.
3
Graph for Example
1 10010 4825 3575 25200 18
Hours Required to Produce
Most Recent UnitCumulative Production
Learning Curve
0102030405060708090
100110
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225
Cumulative Production
Ho
urs
Re
qu
ire
d
to
Pro
du
ce
M
ost
Re
cen
t U
nit
4
Reasons for Continual Decease in the Number of Hours Required to
Produce the Most Recent Unit
On the previous slide, we observed that, as more and more units are produced, the hours required to produce the most recent unit is lower and lower.
What are some potential reasons why this occurs?
5
What happens whencumulative production doubles?
The concept of a Learning Curve is motivated by the observation (in many diverse production environments) that, each time the cumulative production doubles, the hours required to produce the most recent unit decreases by approximately the same percentage.
For example, for an 80% learning curve,
If cumulative production doubles from 50 to 100, then the hours required to produce the 100-th unit is 80% of that for the 50-th unit.
If cumulative production doubles from 100 to 200, then the hours required to produce the 200-th unit is 80% of that for the 100-th unit.
6
The Functional Formof a Learning Curve
To model the behavior described in the previous slides, we proceed as follows:
Let x = cumulative production
y = hours required to produce the x-th unit
Then, y = ax-b
where a and b are parameters defined as follows:
a = hours required to produce the 1-st unit
b = a value related to the percentage associated with the Learning Curve
7
An 80% Learning Curve
Assume that production of the first unit required 100 hours and that there is an 80% Learning Curve.
Again, let
x = cumulative production
y = hours required to produce the x-th unit
Then, mathematicians can show that the Learning Curve is
y = 100x-0.322
8
An 80% Learning Curve(continued)
Hours RequiredCumulative to ProduceProduction Most Recent Unit
x y = 100x -0.322
1 100.0002 80.000
--- --- 4 64.000
--- --- 8 51.200
--- --- 16 40.960 --- --- 25 35.478 --- --- 32 32.768 --- --- 50 28.383 --- --- 64 26.214 --- --- 100 22.706 --- --- 128 20.972 --- --- 200 18.165
9
A 70% Learning Curve
Assume that production of the first unit required 100 hours and that there is an 70% Learning Curve.
Again, let
x = cumulative production
y = hours required to produce the x-th unit
Then, mathematicians can show that the Learning Curve is
y= 100x-0.515
10
A 70% Learning Curve(continued)
Hours RequiredCumulative to ProduceProduction Most Recent Unit
x y = 100x -0.515
1 100.0002 70.000
--- --- 4 49.000
--- --- 8 34.300
--- --- 16 24.010 --- --- 25 19.083 --- --- 32 16.807 --- --- 50 13.358 --- --- 64 11.765 --- --- 100 9.351 --- --- 128 8.235 --- --- 200 6.546
11
The Relationship Betweenb and p
The table below shows the relationship between the exponent b and p, the percentage associated with the Learning Curve:
Recall that the functional form for a Learning Curve is
y = ax-b
b 0.000 0.074 0.152 0.234 0.322 0.415 0.515 0.621 0.737 0.862 1.000 1.322 1.737 2.322 3.322p 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
12
The Relationship Betweenb and p (continued)
There is a direct mathematical relationship between the exponent b in the equation y = ax-b and (p/100)%, where p is the percentage associated with the learning curve:
)2ln(*)%100/()2ln()100/ln( beppb ly,equivalentor,
For example, if p=75%, then 415.0)2ln()75.0ln( b
For example, if b=0.737, then 60.0)2ln(*737.0)%100/( ep
NOTE: e=2.7183… (never ending, like ¶)
ln(x) is the exponent of e that yields x.
That is, eln(x)=x
13
Operational Applicationof the Leaning Curve
Assume that production of the 1-st unit required 100 hours, and assume that there is an 80% learning curve. Then, y = 100x-0.322.
Also, assume that cumulative production to date is 150 units.
The learning curve can be used to provide estimates of answers to questions about the production of the next 100 units.
14
Operational Application of a Leaning Curve (continued)
Question 1: To produce the next 100 units, how many hours of labor will be required?
Question 2: With a labor force of 6 workers each working 40 hours per week, how long will it take to produce then next 100 units?
Question 3: To produce 100 units in 5 weeks with each worker working 40 hours per week, what should be the size of the labor force?
Question 4: To produce 100 units in 5 weeks using a work force of 6 workers, how many hours per week should each worker work?
Hours RequiredCumulative to ProduceProduction Most Recent Unit
x y = 100x -0.322
1 100.000 Cumulative --- --- Hours Required100 22.706 from 151-st Unit --- --- through Most Recent Unit150 19.928151 19.885 19.885152 19.843 39.728153 19.801 59.529154 19.759 79.288155 19.718 99.007 --- --- --- 200 18.165 948.644 --- --- --- 246 16.994 1755.483247 16.972 1772.455248 16.950 1789.404249 16.928 1806.332250 16.906 1823.238
15
Effect of Sales’Annual Growth Rate
Assume that:
Three firms have the same 80% learning curve: y=100x-0.322
During Year 1, all three firms sold 5000 units.
The three firms have respective annual growth rates in sales of 5%, 10%, and 20%.
Compare the three firms at the end of Year 4.
Conclusion?
Cummulative Production At End of Year 4Hours Required to Produce
Most Recent Unit
x y =100 x -0.322
A 5% x = [1.00+(1.05)+(1.05)2+(1.05)3](5000) = 15,764 4.453
B 10% x = [1.00+(1.05)+(1.05)2+(1.05)3](5000) = 16,551 4.384
C 20% x = [1.00+(1.05)+(1.05)2+(1.05)3](5000) = 18,202 4.252
Firm
Annual Growth Rate
in Sales
16
Effect of Sales’Annual Growth Rate (continued)
Learning Curve
0
2
4
6
8
5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
Cumulative Production
Hou
rs R
equi
red
to P
rodu
ce
M
ost R
ecen
t Uni
t
Learning Curve Firm A Firm B Firm C
17
Strategic Applicationsof a Learning Curve
Frequent Decreases in Selling Price.
Each decrease in selling price increases your market share, which in turn leads to a “faster ride” down the learning curve, which in turn makes it tougher for your competitors.
Reinvest Increased ProfitsAs the hours required to produce the most recent unit continually decreases, the cost to produce the unit continually decreases. Therefore, your profits increase. You can reinvest the incremental profit to improve the product or the production process, or you can reinvest the incremental profit in another area of the firm.
As the hours required to produce the most recent unit continually decreases, the cost to produce the unit continually decreases. Therefore, you can frequently decrease the selling price without decreasing total profit.
18
How do we determine the parameters of a Learning Curve?
From previous slides, we know that, to model a learning curve, we proceed as follows:
Let x = cumulative production
y = hours required to produce the x-th unit
Then, y = ax-b
where a and b are parameters defined as follows:
a = hours required to produce the 1-st unit
b = a value related to the percentage associated with the learning curve
For a given set of data, how do we determine the specific values of a and b?
19
Example
For the Learning curve y=ax-b, how do we determine the specific values of a and b?
We begin by taking the natural logs of both sides of y=ax-b.
1 4000
7 255025 185065 1500180 1170
Cumulative Production
Hours Required to Produce
Most Recent Unit
Learning Curve Data
0500
10001500
20002500
30003500
40004500
0 50 100 150 200
Cumulative Production
Ho
urs
Re
qu
ire
d
to P
rod
uce
the
Mo
st
Re
ce
nt
Un
it
Note the linear relationship between ln(x) and ln(y).
This suggests taking the natural logs of the data.
)*ln()ln( xbaybaxy
20
Example (continued)
Natural Log Natural Log
0.000 8.2941.946 7.8443.219 7.5234.174 7.313
5.193 7.065
Cumulative Production
Hours Required to Produce
Most Recent Unit
Note the approximate linear relationship between ln(Cumulative Production) and ln(Hours Required).
Natural Log of Learning Curve Dataln(Cumulative Production) versus ln(Hours Required)
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
ln(Cumulative Production)
ln(H
ou
rs R
eq
uir
ed
)
We can use the statistical technique of Regression to determine the straight line that “best fits” the data.
21
Example (continued)
Best Linear Fit (via Regression)ln(Cumulative Production) versus ln(Hours Required)
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
ln(Cumulative Production)
ln(H
ours
Req
uire
d)
ln(Data) Best Linear Fit
Using Excel’s Regression Tool, we obtain
ln(y) = 8.29642 – 0.23694 ln(x)
Intercept=8.29642
Negative of Slope = 0.23694
22
Example (continued)
From the previous slide, we know
ln(y) = 8.29642 – 0.23694 ln(x)
So,
eln(y) = e[8.29642 – 0.23694 ln(x)]
or, equivalently, the equation for the Learning Curve is
y = 8.29642 x-0.23694
23
Example (continued)
Learning Curve
0500
10001500200025003000350040004500
0 50 100 150 200
Cumulative Production
Ho
urs
Re
qu
ire
d
to
Pro
du
ce
th
e M
ost
Re
cen
t U
nit
Data Learning Curve
y = 8.29642 x-0.23694
24
Example (continued)
y = 8.29642 x-0.23694
b 0.000 -0.074 -0.152 -0.234 -0.322 -0.415 -0.515 -0.621 -0.737 -0.862 -1.000 -1.322 -1.737 -2.322 -3.322p 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
So, in our example, we have a Learning Curve that is close to but just below an 85% learning curve.
25
Excel Templatefor a Learning Curve
A B C D E F G H I2
3 Hours Required LN of Regression4 Cumulative to Produce Cumulative LN of Estimate of5 Production Most Recent Unit Production Hours Required Hours Required6 1 4000 0.000 8.294 4009.57 7 2550 1.946 7.844 2528.48 25 1850 3.219 7.523 1870.19 65 1500 4.174 7.313 1491.2
10 180 1170 5.193 7.065 1171.4
1112131415 SUMMARY OUTPUT1617 Regression Statistics18 Multiple R 0.99987412719 R Square 0.9997482720 Adjusted R Square 0.9996643621 Standard Error 0.00876481622 Observations 52324 ANOVA25 df SS MS F Significance F26 Regression 1 0.915298765 0.915298765 11914.53938 1.69521E-0627 Residual 3 0.000230466 7.6822E-0528 Total 4 0.9155292312930 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%31 Intercept 8.296416964 0.007427526 1116.982525 1.58245E-09 8.272779238 8.320054689 8.272779238 8.32005468932 X Variable 1 -0.236941604 0.002170714 -109.1537419 1.69521E-06 -0.243849792 -0.230033415 -0.243849792 -0.23003341533 4009.48134
Rows 15-32 generated using the menu selection "Tools, Data Analysis, Regression" with Input X-Range of E6:E10 Input Y-Range of F6:F10 Output Range of A15
=LN(B8) =LN(C8) =$B$33*(B8^$B$32)
=EXP(B31)
NOTE: Regression output in cells B31 and B32 shows that LN(Hours Required) = 8.296 - 0.237*LN(Cumulative Production) or, equivalently, (Hours Required) = 4009.5*[(Cumulative Production)^(-0.237)]
26
A “Not So Nice” Example
In our example, there was a very close linear relationship between
ln(Cumulative Production) and ln(Hours Required)
This is NOT the typical situation.
A more typical situation is shown on the next slide.
27
A “Not So Nice” Example(continued)
1 37217 271325 174765 1593
180 1099
Cumulative Production
Hours Required to Produce Most
Recent Unit
Natural Log Natural Log0.000 8.2221.946 7.9063.219 7.4664.174 7.3735.193 7.002
Cumulative Production
Hours Required to Produce Most
Recent Unit
Learning Curve Data
0500
1000150020002500300035004000
0 50 100 150 200
Cumulative Production
Ho
urs
Re
qu
ire
d
to P
rod
uce
the
Mo
st R
ece
nt
Un
it
Natual Log of Learning Curve Dataln(Cumulative Production) versus ln(Hours Required)
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
ln(Cumulative Production)
ln(H
ou
rs R
eq
uir
ed
)
28
A “Not So Nice” Example(continued)
Although the linear relationship in this example is not as strong as in the previous example, we proceed in the same manner.
Best Linear Fit (via Regression)ln(Cumulative Production) versus ln(Hours Required)
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
ln(Cumulative Production)
ln(H
ours
Req
uire
d)
ln(Data) Best Linear Fit
Learning Curve
0500
1000150020002500300035004000
0 50 100 150 200
Cumulative Production
Hou
rs R
equi
red
to P
rodu
ce
th
e M
ost R
ecen
t Uni
t
Data Learning Curve