1

Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in CO

Presented to

the NGA’s Center for Best Practices

Integrated Justice Workshop

By

Theresa Brandorff, Director, CICJISDirector, CIOJim Lynn, CDPS CIO

September 2003

2

CICJIS

CICJISCENTRAL

DYC DOC

CDAC CBI

JUD

3

Getting the right information to the right people at the

right time and place in the criminal justice process.

Main CICJIS Benefit

4

5

CICJIS Information Sharing Main Components

1. Event triggered data transfersA warrant is entered by the courts (event) and it can be seen immediately by police on the street!

2. Information queriesDA or Probation Officer can directly access a persons RAP Sheet, Driver History, and Current Status

3. Central IndexEach agency has different business models – each agency has its own “language”– the CICJIS Central Index helps translate and communicate

6

New Requirements

• Information Sharing Model for the State

• Enterprise Model for the State• Use Model for Homeland Security

Information Sharing– Local and State Requirements

• Use Model for Homeland Defense– Pilots with Northern Command (US

NORTHCOM)

7

Constraints

• Time to Market• Existing technical solution

– Cost– Efficiency/Effectiveness

• Funding– State Budget Crisis– Traditional Justice Grants

8

CICJIS & Homeland Security

• U.S. Northern Command Informal Work Group

• Information Requirements & Gap Analysis• Cyber Security Task Force• 9 State Regions • OPSFS• HLS Grant – livescan in every sheriff’s

office• Pilots

– JRIES, ACTD,

9

Informal

Information

Sharing

Working

Group

10

Jim Rebeck, USNORTHCOM 719-554-8625

JRIESJRIES

Joint Intelligence Task Force –Combating Terrorism (JITF-CT)

Regional Information Sharing System network (RISS.NET)

Information Exchange System

- JRIES -

11

Communications InfrastructureCommunications Infrastructure

SIPRNET NIPRNET

RISS SATCOM

GuardNetNLETS

DISN

LEO INTERNET

12

Problem Statement

Communications interrupted DoD insight was very limited Limited Intelligence sharing Slow Command, Control, and Coordination

between DoD and Civil authorities

13

HLS C2 ACTD OverviewHistory:• Pre-dates “911” attacks• Submitted as candidate in Feb 2001• Approved for FY02 Start• Program Less Than One Year Old

5 Year Program – 4 Thrust Areas1. Assured Communications2. Interoperability3. Threat Attribution/Alert 4. Command, Control, & Coordination

Missions Supported

• Homeland Defense, Military Assistance to Civil Authorities, Critical Infrastructure Protection and Antiterrorism/Force Protection

Stakeholders:• OSD, DISA, NSA, DTRA, NIMA, DIA• JFCOM/NORTHCOM• National Guard Bureau

Additional Participants:• Federal Agencies, State and Local Governments• NGO’s and commercial enterprises

• Pentagon – OPNAV and HQMC command centers• NORTHCOM• Tidewater, VA

JTF/CS, JBC CINCLANTFLT, Navy Installations Cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake Virginia Port Authority

• Louisiana State EOC, State Police, Guard CST, Port Authority

• Hawaii• CINCPACFLT, MARFORPAC, Pacific Disaster Ctr

• California San Diego Navy and Marine Installations

• Washington Seattle

Program Schedule:• Stakeholder Meetings• Implementation Directive• Management Plan

Key Milestones:• Crisis Response Demonstration

(April 23-25)• WALEX (June 25-26)• Fall Demo - Coastal Operations• Industry Day (Dec 3-4)

Fall Demonstration Locations/Participants

14

Goal: Move DoD’s Reaction Goal: Move DoD’s Reaction PointPoint

State

EOC

RespondersNat'lGuard

Prevention Crisis ResponseDeterrence Consequence

Management

Strong DoD/Federal/Civil interfaces will save lives, infrastructure, & resourcesStrong DoD/Federal/Civil interfaces will save lives, infrastructure, & resources

Rea

ctio

n P

oin

t

Information Sharing/Intelligence Coordination

LocalRegional

FIRSTRESPONDERS

EOC

DHS Federal

Secret Service

US Marshals

FBI

FEMA

DoD

DTRANSA

NIMA

INTEL COMM

DISA NorthCom

Incident

15

Not Your Typical ACTD• National priority concern

• HLS Requirements emerging

• US NORTHCOM Command structure evolving

• Technology may precede policy– Rapid prototyping/spiral development

• Complex interagency interactions– DoD/Federal/State/Local/Commercial– Communications to the 1st Responder – Improve intelligence/information flow– Multi level information protection/release

16

Area Security Operations C2 Workstation

Information Push Situational Awareness Information Pull

•Database access and GCCS Track Database Manager •Web Access/Portal

•Common Operating Picture •Knowledge Board

•Event visualization capabilities•Arc IMS feed view

•Baseline Microsoft suite•SIPRNET approved

Operational Picture

17

Priority Network Access; Transportable Communications

Communications with Appropriate Assurance

Decision Support Tools/CR2OP

Intelligence Applications and Alert Function

Collaboration Planning and Prediction Tools

Transition to Operations

Ability to communicate through congestion and disruption

Private, protected information sharing between DoD, IC, Civil, State & Local agencies

Scalable collaboration applications for all HLS echelons

Intelligence sharing for attribution and prevention

HLS planning and prediction for deterrence and crisis management

Representative HLS architecture

What This ACTD Will DeliverCritical Operational IssuesCritical Operational Issues Potential TechnologiesPotential Technologies

18