1 Improving our support for Editors-in-Chief: What we have done, what we are doing, and what we are...
-
Upload
lesley-parks -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Improving our support for Editors-in-Chief: What we have done, what we are doing, and what we are...
1
Improving our support for Editors-in-Chief:
What we have done, what we are doing, and what we are planning
Deborah Kahn, Publishing Director, BioMed Central
2
What I will cover• A brief history• The growth of open access: opportunities
and challenges• How BioMed Central is responding to the
challenges• Support for Editors-in-Chief:
– progress so far– current activities– plans for the future
3
A brief history of BioMed Central
• Launched first open access journal in 2000
• Now publishes 215 OA titles• >90,000 peer-reviewed OA articles
published • All research articles published under
Creative Commons licence• Costs covered by 'article processing
charge' (APC)
5
Open access in 2011
• Nearly 6500 open access journals in the DOAJ
• Submissions to open access journals grew by
over 44% between 2008 and 2009
• Over 1000 open access journals are indexed
by Thomson Reuters
• Open access to research is now mandated in
over 110 institutions and by nearly 50 funders
6
BMC
Copernicus
PLoS
HindawiSpringerOpen Choice
Growth in OA 2000 - 2010
Presented by Mark Patterson, PLoS, at the SOAP Symposium, Berlin, January 2011
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
7
BioMed Central submissions
2411589 1683
3349
6894
10793
15145
17950
22957
29465
35602
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
8
The challenges and opportunities of the growth of OA
• Increasing numbers of– authors are choosing to publish their articles in open access
journals– journal editors are choosing to start journals in or move their
existing journals to an open access model– publishers and societies are launching OA journals– funders are requiring the results of the research they fund to
be published open access
• In order to remain the leading open access publisher, BioMed Central needs to continue to deliver excellent service to authors, reviewers and editors and we need to remain competitive with respect to all the other Open Access players
9
Organising for growth
Matt CockerillManaging Director
Bev AcremanCommercial Director
Customer Services, Marketing, PR,
Sales
Deborah KahnPublishing DirectorEditorial, Journal
Development, Journal
Acquisitions, Data and Database
Publishing
Bryan VickeryChief Operating
OfficerJEO, Editorial Production, Production,
Supplements, Web Management, OR
Mike Nuttall,Chief Technical Officer
IT Operations, IT Development
10
Organising for growth
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
number of BMC staff
11
Organising for growth• Creation of the Journal Development Editor
roleTo provide a single regular internal contact to support
Editors-in-Chief with journal development and general issues with their journals
• Outsourcing of the Journal Editorial OfficeTo support the growing need for editorial administration
support• Reorganisation of Editorial Production and
Production processesTo reduce the number of stages in the post acceptance
process, and to reduce time to publication
12
Investing in the journal platform and editorial
tools• The new journals platform provides us with an
updated design and a much more flexible infrastructure– paving the way for journal-specific requirements,
such as customisable Instructions for Authors• Once this is complete we will be updating our
editorial tools – to allow for many features which were previously not
possible• Reviewer database
– Currently being tested before rollout
13
Improving communications with
Editors-in-Chief• In addition to the establishment of
the Journal Development Group, we have– Instituted the Annual Editors
Conference– Implemented a LinkedIn group for
Editors-in-Chief– Continued to improve our quarterly
Editors newsletter
14
Monitoring author satisfaction
• Authors are surveyed twice– after submission and after publication
• They are asked their opinions on – Speed of peer review, post acceptance and overall
speed of publication– Responsiveness and helpfulness of staff– Whether they would recommend the journal to a
colleague, or publish again• We closely monitor their responses, and act on
their suggestions on how we can improve.
15
Author Satisfaction – Independent journals
Q1-09 Q2-09 Q3-09 Q4-09 Q1-10 Q2-10 Q3-10 Q4-10 Q1-112
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Speed of Peer ReviewResponsiveness
1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = neutral, 4 = good, 5 = very good
16
Keeping our APCs competitive
Publisher APC ($ USD)
BioMed Central 960-2545
Public Library of Science 1350-2900
Springer Open 1065-1730
Wiley Open 1850 - 2500
BMJ Open 1900
Oxford Open 3000
Elsevier 3000-5000
Nature Communications 5000
http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/apccomparison/
17
Editors’ feedback• Further improvements to communication • Editorial tools/reviewer database• Customisable Instructions for Authors• New features/processes• Faster turnaround times• Acceptance dates• Impact factors• Plagiarism checking• Google Adverts
18
Plans: Further improvements to communication
• Establish an Editors Advisory Board• Implement a Senior Contact
Network• Enhance the usefulness of the
Editors newsletter• Undertake an annual editor
satisfaction survey
19
Plans: System and process improvements
• Complete the rollout to the new journals platform
• Implement reviewer database• Start work on new editorial tools• Complete production process
improvements• Implement customisable I4A
21
In summary• Open access is growing rapidly and at BioMed
Central we have been working hard to ensure that we have the people, technology and processes in place to ensure that we remain the leading open access publisher.
• Over the past year, we have been able to provide more support to Editors-in-Chief than in the past.
• We now have the building blocks in place to significantly enhance this support, so that we can work together with you to ensure that the journals meet their potential.