1 FY 2009 Port Security Grant Program Outreach Coast Guard Headquarters Domestic Port Security...
-
Upload
ernest-singleton -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 FY 2009 Port Security Grant Program Outreach Coast Guard Headquarters Domestic Port Security...
1
FY 2009 Port Security Grant Program Outreach
Coast Guard Headquarters
Domestic Port Security Evaluation Division(CG-5142)
Assessment, Integration, and Risk Management Directorate
2Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
CGHQ Domestic Port Security Evaluation Division (CG-5142)
Division DirectorCaptain Hishon
Assessments Branch Analysis Branch (MSRAM) Port Security Grants Branch
Deputy DirectorCDR Brown
DHS liaison
3Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Outline of Presentation
History, Outreach and Current Priorities
Risk, Port Area Groupings, Funding
Fiduciary Agent/Port Wide Risk Mitigation/Management Plans
FY09 Options Group I/II, III/All Other Ports
Admin/Review Process
Good Practices
Dates/POCs
4Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Why does PSGP Exist?
Majority of US infrastructure owned by state, local, and private sector
Part of larger strategy of supporting homeland security (HLS) preparedness
Implements objectives addressed in laws, national strategies, and plans
To quote National Strategy for HLS, a strategic objective is to deter terrorist threat by decreasing likelihood of success of a terrorist attack on critical infrastructure
5Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
History of PSGP Important to emphasize: FEMA administers programs, USCG provides SME
Program initiated FY02 by MARAD, original goal for CG was MTSA compliance, gates/guns/gadgets
FY2003: Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) port security grant program coordinated with TSA,
FY2005: DHS legacy office of State and Local Government Coordination & Preparedness (SLGCP) coordinated, focused on underwater, small craft, and vehicle borne improvised explosive device (VBIED) detection capabilities for ferries
FY 2006: administered thru DHS Grants and Training; laid foundation for port-wide risk management vice focus on individual port entities
FY 2007: SAFE PORT Act expanded pool of eligible applicants to include all entities covered under an Area Maritime Security Plan (AMSP)
FY 2007 Supplement (FY07A): August 2007; introduced concept of Fiduciary Agent (FA) as single entity to apply for funding on behalf of Group I/II ports; any projects funded had to support a Port-Wide Risk Mitigation Plan (PWRMP)
FY 2008: gave Group I/II ports option to continue with round 7A FA or “opt out” and compete with Group III ports
6Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Outreach--- FY09 Guidance Development
Consulted with American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
Coast Guard Area Maritime Security Committees
Fiduciary Agents
7Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
09 Investment Strategy and Priorities
Overall Investment Strategy:
-Risk-based funding
-Regional security cooperation (emphasis on port wide risk management plan started FY07 supplemental)
FY09 PSGP Priorities:
-Enhancing Maritime Domain Awareness
-Enhancing IED and WMD prevention, protection, response, recovery capabilities
-Training and Exercises
-Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) implementation efforts
8Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Ferry Priorities
IED and VBIED prevention, protection, response, and recovery
Mitigation of other risks
Use of canines
Mobile technology for explosives/other threats detection
Perimeter security capabilities
Emergency response capabilities if ferry used as weapon against infrastructure
Training for ferry operators
Public awareness training
9Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 Key Changes from 08
Expand Improvised Explosive Device (IED) priority to include enhancing WMD prevention/response capabilities (DNDO info included)-p.6, 64
Fiduciary Agent guidance updated-p. 11, 17-19 Cost-sharing requirements updates-p. 16-17 Allowable Construction-p. 42-43 Explosive Detection Canine Team Operational Packages
(OPACKS)-p. 44-45
10Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
How Port Area Groups are Determined
Port Consequence List (PCL)
FEMA adds a series of economic “factors” for specific target vulnerabilities and consequence from both “open sources” and Coast Guard MSRAM data
Results in a ranked risk listing
Risk of individual ports then aggregated by geographic region, individual ports who share risk
The resulting list is the basis for Group I, II, III and All Other Ports as determined by DHS Leadership
11
FY09 FEMA’s PSGP RISK FORMULA
Total Port Risk
National Infrastructure
Index
Economic Index
National Security
Index
Population Index
Threat (20%)(HITRAC)
Vulnerability & Consequence (80%)
+
x
++
12Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Significant Changes to Port Risk Formula
FEMA formula changes annually
-Oil terminals moved from National Security Index to Economic Index as petroleum deliveries
-National Security Index now includes military personnel as opposed to military base counts
-Change in volume or type of cargo
-Annual validated MSRAM data
13Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY09 Port Area Groupings
91 named port areas:
- 7 Group I, 48 Group II, 36 Group III
Reference pgs 14-16 of FY09 PSGP guidance
Groups represent 95% total international waterborne commerce in U.S.
Ports aggregated by common waterways, shared risk
14Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Risk drives Groupings
Changes to port groups- Continued regionalization of planning
Allows for development of 8 (new Group II port areas) Port Wide Risk Mitigation/Management Plans
- 47% of Risk represented in Group I- 93.5% of aggregate risk allocated in Groups I & II- 8 port areas new to Group II- 21 port areas new to Group III
All Other Ports (AOP) can receive funding from their geographically proximate higher Group if projects have regional impact across entire port area, but can’t receive funding from both higher group and AOP allocation
15Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Comparison of FY08, FY09 PSGP Funding Levels
FY08 FY09 Delta
Group I 210,649,989 210,649,989 0
Group II 139,049,701 140,014,000 964,299
Group III 19,150,310 17,592,011
(1,558,299)
All Other Ports 19,150,000 15,344,000
(3,806,000)
Ferries 5,600,000 5,000,000 (600,000)
Total 388,600,000 388,600,000
16Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
A Refresher: The Fiduciary Agent
The FA can be a member of the AMSC, non-profit, or entity approved in conjunction with the Federal Maritime Security Coordinator (FMSC), and approved by FEMA
FA coordinates development of a Port Wide Risk Mitigation/Management Plan
-ensures future applications “buy-down risk” per the plan
-Use up to 20% of funds to develop plan
-Retain 3% for management/administrative costs
FA is responsible to AMSC and other plan stakeholders for utilizing grant funds as directed by committee, not sole decision maker
-Acts as principal POC w/FEMA for application, management, financial reporting
-Remaining funds expended to implement plan’s findings and supporting projects during timeframe (up to 36 months)
17Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
A Refresher: Port Wide Risk Mitigation/Management Plans
Plan should develop strategy and framework
-for investing in vulnerability reductions
-resiliency enhancements Establishes a prioritized 5-year planning cycle Request funding through future grant applications Structure deliverables so not redundant
18Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY09 Group I/II Options
For 09, Group I and II port areas that were also Group I or II during FY08 will have option to:
1. Continue with current FA; or
2. Select a new FA for FY 09 projects.
Ports newly identified within Group II (previously Group III, all other ports), can either select to use the FA process, or opt out and compete w/ Group III/all other ports
Must certify their intention to opt out to FEMA and CGHQ (CG-5142)
19Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY09 Group III/All Other Ports
Group III and All Other Ports submit investment justifications, budgets, all other requirements per previous FY09 guidelines. Individual port entities must comply w/all FEMA programmatic requirements
20Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Investment Justifications, Budgets, MOAs, etc
Reference pages 24-36 of guidance
Also FEMA promulgated PSGP Plan Implementation Guidance for Fiduciary Agents
21Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Allowable Costs for FY09
OPACKs
-In FY09, introduction of OPACKs-Explosive Detection Canine Team Operational Packages—only authorized for Groups I, II and ferries
-Newly obtained canine and handler
22Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Allowable Costs for FY09 (con’t)
Construction
-FY09: Allowable Construction Costs:
1. Maritime Domain Awareness Fusion Centers
2. Maritime Security Operations Centers
3. Port Security Operations Centers
4. Port Security Emergency Communications Centers
5. Any building enhancing access control to port area
23Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 PSGP Matching Funds
Public Sector - 25% of total project costs (CASH or IN-KIND)
-25% applies to regionalized projects submitted by FA in that the FA represents Area Maritime Security Committee, a public entity
-Private Sector - 50% of the total project costs for each project. (CASH or IN-KIND)
-Consortia representing federally regulated entities: 25% CASH or IN-KIND
-Construction must be a 25% cash-match for public, 50% cash match for private
Exception: No match – projects costing $25,000.00 or less. National and/or regional corporations submitting 11 or more
projects throughout their system must meet the 50% match for projects 11, 12, etc.
24Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 PSGP Field Review Process Group I/II
Three steps:
-Initial Screening (Grants Program Directorate)
-Field Review (FMSC, AMSC, MARAD)
-National Review (National Review Panel)
FEMA conducts initial screening of all projects
-Group I and II ports using an FA, the FA in conjunction with other field reviewers will ensure projects are in compliance with respective Port Wide Risk Mitigation/Management Plans
-FY07 supplemental/FY08 PSG projects awaiting approval, groups I and II, Investment Justifications submitted per approved Risk Mitigation/Management Plan
25Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 PSGP Field Review Process Group III, All Other Ports
Group III, All Other Ports, and ports new to Group II from III and opting out of FA process will have each application scored for compliance with the four core grant program criteria listed in FY08 PSGP Guidelines
FMSCs assign a total score compilation; with all proposals received from each port being ranked from highest to lowest in terms of their priority and contributions to risk reduction and cost effectiveness. Recommendations for full/partial funding, together with candid comments as to applicant’s ability to manage the project.
FMSCs are to make specific notation if other entities within the port region have similar capabilities and the need for or lack of redundancy.
All applications will undergo a final review by the National Review Panel (NRP)
26Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Harris County Ship Channel Security District(HCSCSD)—Good Practices
Public – Private partnership
Improve security in Houston ship channel area
System-wide security approach
List of projects created to improve security in Houston ship channel
HCSCSD is mechanism to allow for county, facilities and others to fund local share of port security grants
Also provides mechanism to fund operating expenses of security projects
HCSCSD also provides mechanism to implement ship channel security plan
27Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 PSGP IMPORTANT DATES
Date Milestone
November 5, 2008 Guidance Released
November 12-December 19, 2008 AMSC Outreach
January 13, 2009 1159 PM EST Applications Due (Tuesday 1/13/09 1159 PM EST)
January 14-23, 2009 Initial Review
January 26-30, 2009 Field Review Preparation
February 2-20, 2009 Field Review
February 23-24, 2009 Field Review QA/QC
February 25-27, 2009 National Review Panel Preparation
March 2-4, 2009 National Review Panel
March 5-6, 2009 Finalize National Review Panel Recommendations
March 9 through April 9, 2009 Award Determinations/Leadership Approval/Roll-Out
April 10, 2009 Allocations Announced
28Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 PSGP
REFERENCES/POCs
FY2009 Port Security Grant Program Guidelines.
FEMA POC list (next slide)
CAPT John Marks [email protected]
- Mr. Randall Barr [email protected]
29Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
MTN/A
WYN/A
IDN/A
WA26
OR10
NVN/A
UTN/A
CA46
AZN/A
NDN/A
SDN/A
NEN/A
CON/A
NMN/A
TX90
OK4
KSN/A
AR2
LA66
MO7
IAN/A
MN13
WI10
IL7
IN8
KY12
TN10
MS12
AL11
FL39
SC12
NC14
WV
OH8
MI10
NY20
PA31
MD8
DE9
NJ11
CT13
RI10
MA19
ME15
VT
NH5
AK16
HI8
VA12
Guam: 2Northern Mariana Islands: 2American Samoa:
DC:Puerto Rico: 7
Port Security Grant Program State Assignments
Virgin Island: 5
X
IX
VI
IV
III
I
I
II
V
VII
VIII
Tier I Port Area
Jackie [email protected]
Duane [email protected]
Kathleen [email protected]
Venita [email protected]
CT/NY9
GA13
IL/IN1
NY/NJ47
WV4
Alex [email protected]
30Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Way Forward
Read FY09 Guidance for more details If required--Identify a Fiduciary Agent if required to do so If required--Develop a Port Wide Risk Mitigation/Management Plan
and/or optional Business Continuity/Resumption of Trade plan Submit applications, investment justifications, budgets, and other
required documents to FEMA Work with FEMA during all phases of grant application process Direction in which Grants are headed: allocating grant money based
on extent to which applications support 37 DHS Target Capabilities, capabilities tied back to National Preparedness Guidelines
Ensure FMSC/AMSC collaboration to ensure MSRAM data accurate!
33Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
FY 2009 MSRAM Updates MSRAM=Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model Used by COTPs, AMSCs to assess risk to port infrastructure, facilities,
vessels, etc DHS formula: Risk = Threat x Vulnerability x Consequence Updates:
-Increased risk profile scope with more target classes (emphasis on barges/vessels)
-More confidence in Secondary Economic consequences
-Updated threat input from USCG Intelligence Coordination Center (ICC)
-Higher risk threshold/cutoff point for meaningful risk
-Assessment and review training for Port Security Specialists-Districts, Sectors, Areas, update analysis tools (i.e. blast calculator)
34Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
MSRAM Scenario Elements Comprehensive targets classes & attack modes
MSRAM Design is Based on
Terrorist Attack Modes against Types of Targets
21
National Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources/Assets (CI/KA) Sectors
Critical Infrastructure1. Agriculture & Food
2. Water (WTS)
3. Public Health
4. Emergency Services
5. Defense Industrial Base
6. Information Technology
7. Telecommunications
8. Energy
9. Transportation
10. Banking and Finance
11. Chemical & Hazardous Materials
12. Postal and Shipping
Key Resources/assets1. National Monuments & Icons
2. Nuclear Power & Materials
3. Dams
4. Commercial Facilities
5. Government Facilities
HSPD 7:
Target / Asset Attack ModeScenario
Attack Modes address the full range of DHS Attack
Modes (WMD)
Risk = Threat * Consequence * Vulnerability DATA
35Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
LIK
EL
IHO
OD
(T
hrea
t *
Vul
nera
bilit
y)
CDC Facility – Car/Truck Bomb
Cruise Terminal – Car/Truck Bomb
HighLow
LOW
HIGH
MSRAM creates a Risk-Based Risk-Informed Security Profile
Cruise Ship - Boat Bomb
National Icon – Boat Bomb
Bridge – Attack By Hijacked Vessel
High Capacity Ferry Terminal- Car/Truck Bomb
Petroleum Refinery – Car/Truck Bomb
Bridge - Boat Bomb
Nuclear Power Plant – Car/Truck Bomb
High Capacity Ferry – Boat Bomb
Ferry 150 -1000 – Boat Bomb
Cruise Ship - Car/Truck Bomb
Cruise Ship – Attack By Hijacked Vessel
LPG Tanker - Boat Bomb
LPG Tanker – Stand-Off Weapon
Oil Tanker – Boat Bomb
High Capacity Ferry - Car/Truck Bomb
CONSEQUENCE
36Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
MSRAM change case supports Risk Mitigation Decision Strategies
37Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
MSRAM References/POCs- LCDR Brady Downs 202-372-1173- LT Dave Dixon 202-372-1176- LT Tyana Thayer 202-372-1178- LT Eric Taquechel 202-372-1185- Mr. Gerald DelRosario 202-372-2609
HOMEMPORT Customer Service - [email protected]
MSRAM HELP DESK – [email protected]
38Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
PRND Equipment and Costs DHS SVSS recommends and Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) supports a layered defense strategy
that could include hand-held or back-pack radiation detectors, Radio-Isotope Identifying Devices (RIID), boat/vehicle mounted systems, and permanently installed detection systems.
- Current hand-held device average costs are $1-3K per unit- RIID average costs are between $10-25K- Back-pack type device average costs are between $15-$30K
Vehicle and boat mounted device costs are not as well defined, as these are not as commonly used as other devices. Well-tested systems are not yet commercially available.
- Boat and vehicle mounted systems are larger, more sophisticated devices with increased capabilities, and cost significantly more then human portable detection systems.
Additional Information on preventative rad/nuc detection (PRND) equipment can be found at www.rkb.us.
39Port Security Grant Program Teleconference 5/18/05
Terrorist Indicator Handbook
5142 awaiting funding for Terrorist Indicator Handbook
-Distributed during last year’s outreach
-Overall goal: a guide to help security managers identify locations and activities around their facilities that might be indicators of terrorist activity.