1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Single, multiple slit(s) & Circular aperture Fri. Nov. 22, 2002.
-
Upload
dylan-manning -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Single, multiple slit(s) & Circular aperture Fri. Nov. 22, 2002.
2
Fraunhofer diffraction limit
If aperture is a square - X The same relation holds in azimuthal plane and 2
~ measure of the area of the aperture Then we have the Fraunhofer diffraction if,
apertureofaread
or
d
,
2
Fraunhofer or far field limit
4
Fraunhofer diffraction
Typical arrangement (or use laser as a source of plane waves)
Plane waves in, plane waves out
S
f1 f2
screen
5
Fraunhofer diffraction
1. Obliquity factorAssume S on axis, so Assume small ( < 30o), so
2. Assume uniform illumination over aperture
r’ >> so is constant over the aperture
3. Dimensions of aperture << rr will not vary much in denominator for calculation of amplitude at any point Pconsider r = constant in denominator
1'ˆˆ rn1ˆˆ rn
'
'
r
eikr
6
Fraunhofer diffraction
Then the magnitude of the electric field at P is,
aperture
ikrikr
oP dSe
rr
eikEE
'2
'
7
Single slit Fraunhofer diffraction
y = b
y
dy
P
ro
r
r = ro - ysin
dA = L dy
where L ( very long slit)
8
Single slit Fraunhofer diffraction
'2sin
2
,
sin
_______________
'
sin
rr
eikEC
kb
where
ebCeE
dyeeCE
dAeCE
ikro
iikrP
ikyb
o
ikrP
ikrP
o
o
2
2sin
oII
Fraunhofer single slit diffraction pattern
2bCIo
9
Single Slit Fraunhofer diffraction: Effect of slit width
Minima for sin = 0 = p = k(b/2)sin or, sin = p(/b) First minima at sin = /b
-3
-2
-1
01
23
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I/Io
b
10
Single Slit Fraunhofer diffraction: Effect of slit width Width of central max 2 (/dimension of
aperture) This relation is characteristic of all Fraunhofer
diffraction If b is very large 0 and a point source is
imaged as a point If b is very small (~) /2 and light spreads
out across screen (diminishes at large angles for to F()
11
Diffraction from an array of N slits, separated by a distance a and of width b
y=0
y=a
y=a+b
y=2a
y=2a+b
y=3a
y=3a+b
y=(N-1)a
y=(N-1)a + b
y=b
P
12
Diffraction from an array of N slits
It can be shown that,
where,
22
sin
sinsin
N
II oP
sin2
bk sin
2
ak
13
Diffraction and interference for N slits
The diffraction term Minima for sin = 0 = p = k(b/2)sin or, sin = p(/b)
The interference term Amplitude due to N coherent
sources Can see this by adding N phasors
that are 2 out of phase. See Hecht Problem 10.2
sin
sin
sin NIo
14
Interference term
MaximaMaxima occur at = m (m = 0,1, 2, 3, ..) To see this use L’Hopital’s rule _______ Thus maxima occur at sin = m/a This is the same result we have derived for
Young’s double slit Intensity of principal maxima, I = N2Io
i.e. N times that due to one slit
15
Interference term
MinimaMinima occur for = /N, 2/N, … (N-1)/N and when we add m For example, _______________________ Thus principal maxima have a width determined by
zeros on each side Since = (/)a sin = /N The angular width is determined by
sin = /(Na) Thus peaks are N times narrower than in a single slit
pattern (also a > b)
16
Interference term
Subsidiary or Secondary MaximumSubsidiary or Secondary Maximum Now between zeros must have secondary
maxima Assume these are approximately midway Then first at [ m+3/(2N) ] Then it can be shown that
3
2
sin
sin NN
max2
2045.0
9
4IINI o
17
Single slit envelope Now interference term or pattern is modulated by
the diffraction term
which has zeros at =(b/)sin=p or, sin = p/b But, sin = m/a locate the principal maxima of
the interference pattern
2sin
18
Single slit envelope
Thus at a given angle a/b=m/p Then suppose a/b = integer For example, a = 3b Then m = 3, 6, 9, interference maxima are
missing
19
Diffraction gratings
Composed of systems with many slits per unit length – usually about 1000/mm
Also usually used in reflection Thus principal maxima vary sharp Width of peaks Δ = (2/N) As N gets large the peak gets very narrow For example, _________________
20
Diffraction gratings
ResolutionResolution Imagine trying to resolve two wavelengths 1 2
Assume resolved if principal maxima of one falls on first minima of the other
See diagram___________
21
Diffraction gratings
m1 = a sin m2 = a sin ’ But must have
Thus m(2 - 1 )= a (sin’ - sin) = (1/N) Or mΔ =/N Resolution, R = /Δ = mN E.g.
Nm
a 1'sin
2
m
a
1
sin
23
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
22 yR
22 yR
Do x first – looking downPath length is the same for all rays = ro
dyyReCE ikrP
222
Why?
24
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
Do integration along y – looking from the side
-R
+R
y=0
ro
r = ro - ysin
P
25
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
R
R
ikyikrP dyyReCeE o 22sin2
sinkRR
y
)1(sin
kRRkky
)2(1 222222 RRRyR
)3(dyRd
Let
Then
26
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
1
1
22 12 deRCeE iikrP
o
The integral 1
1
1
21J
de i
where J1() is the first order Bessell function of the first kind.
27
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
These Bessell functions can be represented as polynomials:
and in particular (for p = 1),
0
2
!!
21
k
pkk
P pkkJ
!4!3
2
!3!2
2
!2
21
2
642
1
J
28
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
Thus,
where = kRsin and Io is the intensity when =0
2
12
J
II o
29
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
Now the zeros of J1() occur at, = 0, 3.832, 7.016, 10.173, … = 0, 1.22, 2.23, 3.24, … =kR sin = (2/) sin
• Thus zero atsin = 1.22/D, 2.23 /D, 3.24 /D, …
30
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
0.5
1.0
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
0.5
1.0
Fraunhofer diffraction from a circular aperture
12J
2
12
J
The central Airy disc contains 85% of the light
32
Diffraction limited focussing
sin = 1.22/D The width of the Airy disc
W = 2fsin 2f = 2f(1.22/D) = 2.4 f/D
W = 2.4(f#) > f# > 1
Cannot focus any wave to spot with dimensions <
D
f
-10
-8-6
-4-2
02
46
810
0.5
1.0
33
-10
-8-6
-4-2
02
46
810
0.5
1.0
Fraunhofer diffraction and spatial resolution
Suppose two point sources or objects are far away (e.g. two stars)
Imaged with some optical system Two Airy patterns
If S1, S2 are too close together the Airy patterns will overlap and become indistinguishable
-10
-8-6
-4-2
02
46
810
0.5
1.0
S1
S2
34
Fraunhofer diffraction and spatial resolution
Assume S1, S2 can just be resolved when maximum of one pattern just falls on minimum (first) of the other
Then the angular separation at lens,
e.g. telescope D = 10 cm = 500 X 10-7 cm
e.g. eye D ~ 1mm min = 5 X 10-4 rad
D
22.1min
radXX 6
5
min 10510
105