1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

141
1 Figure 11 Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* E 45 o E’ Y

Transcript of 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

Page 1: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

1Figure 11 Multiplier effect

E

Y

E

0 Ye Ye’

Y-line

C* + I*

E

45o

E’

Y

Page 2: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

2

The Multiplier(Parkin)

Real GDP (trillions of 1992 dollars)

Agg

rega

te e

xpen

ditu

re

(tri

llion

s of

199

2 do

llars

)

5

6

7

8

9

5 6 7 8 9

45o line

ab

c

d

e

e' AE0

…increasesreal GDP by$2 trillion

A $0.5 trillionincrease ininvestment...

AE1

a'

b'

c'

d'

0

Page 3: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

3

The Multiplier Process (Parkin)

Expenditure roundIncrease in current round

Cumulative increase from previous rounds

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Page 4: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

4Figure 14 The movement of expenditure multiplier

E

Y

E

0 Ye Ye’

Y-line

45o

E’

Y1 Y2

Dr. Lam Pun Lee

Advanced LevelMicroeconomicsAdvanced Level

Macroeconomics

Previousslide

Page 5: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

5

1. Calculate the equilibrium level of income.

AE = C + I

AE = 40 + 0.75Y

AE = Y in equilibrium

40 + 0.75Y = Y

Y = 160

2. If I is increased by 10, calculate the new equilibrium level of income.

AE = C + I = 50 + 0.75Y

AE = Y in equilibrium

50 + 0.75Y = Y

Y = 200

Page 6: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

6

An autonomous change in investment by 10 induces a larger change (40)

in equilibrium level of income. Why is this so?

Page 7: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

7

Autonomous change in I

Induced change in C

Change in YRounds of

effects

$10 - $101st

- $7.5 $7.52nd

- $5.625 $5.6253rd

- $4.21875 $4.218754th

- ... ...…

$10 $30 $40Total change:

Page 8: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

8

The Multiplier Process (Miller)

Assumption: MPC = .8 or 4/5

Annual Increase Annual Increase Annual Increasein Real in Planned in Planned

National Income Consumption SavingRound ($ billions per year) ($ billions per year) ($ billions per year)

1 ($100 billion per year increase in I) 100.00 80.000 20.000

2 80.00 64.00 16.000

3 64.00 51.200 12.800

4 51.20 40.960 10.240

5 40.96 32.768 8.192

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

All later rounds 163.84 131.072 32.768

Totals 500.00 400.00 100.000

Slide 12-62

Page 9: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

9

How does the MultiplierMultiplier work (P.13-7.2.2.2.)?

Any initial change in spending by the government, households, or firms creates a chain reaction of further spending

Page 10: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

10

Y = $10 + $7.5 + $5.625 + …

= I + C + C + …

= I + cY + c2Y + …

= I + cI + c2I + …

= I (1 + c + c2 + …)

= I [1/(1-c)]

Multiplier (k) = Y / I = 1/(1-c)

Page 11: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

11

One divided by one tenth equals 10

11.

.10

=

1 X10

1=

MULTIPLIER

10

Page 12: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

12

If investment increases by $100, If investment increases by $100, with an MPC of 9/10, what effect with an MPC of 9/10, what effect will this have on the economy?will this have on the economy?

If investment increases by $100, If investment increases by $100, with an MPC of 9/10, what effect with an MPC of 9/10, what effect will this have on the economy?will this have on the economy?

The economy will grow by The economy will grow by $1,000 eventually$1,000 eventually

Page 13: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

13

If investment declines by $100, If investment declines by $100, what’s the effect on the economy what’s the effect on the economy

with an MPC of 9/10?with an MPC of 9/10?

If investment declines by $100, If investment declines by $100, what’s the effect on the economy what’s the effect on the economy

with an MPC of 9/10?with an MPC of 9/10?The economy will shrink by

$1,000

Page 14: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

14

Numerical example

I = 10

k = 1/(1-c) = 4

c = 0.75

Y = k I = 4*10 = 40

E = 50 + 0.75Y

0

E

Y

45 line

E = 40 + 0.75Y

160 200

Page 15: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

15

Given: C = 20 + 0.75Y

I = 20 + 0.1Y

1. Calculate the change in Y resulted from an autonomous increase in I by $10.

2. Calculate the value of the multiplier.

Page 16: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

16

AE = C + I

AE = 40 + 0.85Y

AE = Y in equilibrium

40 + 0.85Y = Y

Y = 266.67

1. Calculate the change in Y resulted from an autonomous increase in I by $10.

When I = 20 + 0.1Y, AE = C + I

AE = 50 + 0.85Y

AE = Y in equilibrium

50 + 0.85Y = Y

Y = 333.33

When I = 30 + 0.1Y,

Change in Y = 66.67

Page 17: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

17

2. Calculate the value of the multiplier.

k = Change in Y / Change in I = 6.67

If I is an induced function, the size of the simple Keynesian multiplier will be greater. Why is this so?

Page 18: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

18

Multiplier with induced I

1/mps-mpi

Page 19: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

19

Figure 23-10 (Lipsey)

The Size of the Simple Multiplier

Page 20: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

20

Relationship between MPC, MPS, and the Spending Multiplier

MPC

105

MPS

4

3

2

1.5

Spending Multiplier

.90

.80

.75

.67

.50

.33

.10

.20

.25

.33

.50

.67

Page 21: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

21

Figure 12 The multiplier effects of autonomousdecrease in saving (= C rise)

0

E

Y

I

S

S’A

B

C

Page 22: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

22

Figure 13 The multiplier effects of autonomousincrease in investment

0

E

Y

I

S

I’

A

B

C

Page 23: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

23

3-Sector & 4-Sector Models

The simple Keynesian model discussed is a two-sector model, which includes only firms and households. In this section, we first add the government sector and then the foreign trade sector into our model. Lastly, we consider the concepts of aggregate demand and aggregate supply and how they are related with the Keynesian model.

Nextslide

Page 24: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

24

Household

Financial markets

Firms

Figure 1 Three-sector national income model

National income

National expenditure

Incomegenerated

Payment for goods and service

C

S

I

E Y

Government GT

Page 25: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

25

Factorpayments

Consumption ofdomestically

produced goodsand services (Cd)

BANKS, etc GOV.

Investment (I)Investment (I)

GovernmentGovernmentexpenditure (expenditure (GG))

NetNetsaving (S)saving (S)

NetNettaxes (T)taxes (T)

The circular flow of incomeThe circular flow of income

Page 26: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

26Figure 2(d) Consumption function in an 3-sector

income-expenditure diagram

E

Y

C

a-cT*

0

Slope = c (1 – t)

Page 27: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

27

Keynes and the Great Depression• Keynes argued that prices and wages are not

sufficiently flexible to ensure the full employment of resources

• Furthermore, Keynes argued that when resources (especially labor) are not fully employed (due to a lack of private investment expenditures), the government could provide offsetting expenditures as a means of stabilizing the economy

• Thus, Keynesian economics places emphasis on planned expenditures and all its components

Page 28: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

28

What is the GDP Gap (P.16-7.2.5.4. & Wong 2000: 104)?

The difference between full employment real GDP and actual real GDP

Page 29: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

29

What is the Recessionary AD Gap (P.16-7.2.5.4.)?

The amount by which aggregate expenditures fall short of the amount required to achieve full employment equilibrium

Page 30: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

30Figure 2(a) Deflationary AD gap

E

Y

E

Y-line

Ye Yf0

G

R

DG

45o

Page 31: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

31

The deflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

J

Ye

Page 32: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

32

The deflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

J

YeYF

Page 33: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

33

The deflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

J

YeYF

Deflationary AD gap

c

d

Page 34: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

34

The deflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

J

YeYF

Deflationary AD gap

c

d

J*

Page 35: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

35

What is the Keynesian Keynesian remedyremedy for a Recessionary AD Gap (P.16-7.2.5.5.)?

Increase autonomous spending by the amount of the recessionary AD gap

Page 36: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

36

What can the Government doGovernment do to close a Recessionary AD Gap?• Increase government

spending• Lower taxes• Raise transfer payments

Page 37: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

37

Exhibit 2: U.S. Federal Budget Deficits and Surplus Relative to GDP (P.17-7.2.6.1.2.)

Exhibit 2: U.S. Federal Budget Deficits and Surplus Relative to GDP (P.17-7.2.6.1.2.)

Source: Developed based on budget figures in Economic Report of the President, February 1999.

Per

cen

t o

f G

DP

–7

–6

–5

–4

–3

–2

–1

0

11975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Fiscal Year

1970

3Federal Budgets and Public Policy

Page 38: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

38

What is an Inflationary AD Inflationary AD GapGap (P.16-7.2.5.4.)?

The amount by which aggregate expenditures exceed the amount required to achieve full employment equilibrium

Page 39: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

39Figure 2(b) Inflationary AD gap

E

Y

E

Y-line

Yf0

F

GIG

Ye

45o

Page 40: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

40

The inflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

Ye

J

Page 41: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

41

The inflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

YeYF

J

Page 42: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

42

The inflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

YeYF

g

h

Inflationary AD gap

J

Page 43: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

43

The inflationary AD gap

OY

W

W, J

YeYF

g

h

Inflationary AD gap

JJ*

Page 44: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

44

What is the Keynesian Keynesian remedyremedy for an Inflationary AD Gap (P.16-7.2.5.5.)?

Reduce autonomous spending by the amount of the inflationary AD gap

Page 45: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

45

How can the GovernmentGovernment close an Inflationary AD Gap?

• Cut government spending• Increase taxes• Reduce transfer payments

Page 46: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

46

9. Keynes’ criticism of the classical theory was that the Great Depression would not correct itself. The multiplier effect would restore an economy to full employment if

a. government would follow a “least government is the best government” policy.

b. government taxes were increased.c. government spending were increased.d. government spending were decreased.

c. Keynes’ prescription to cure the Great Depression was for government to play an active role rather than depend on the classical theory that the price system will eventually restore full employment.

Page 47: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

47

10. The equilibrium level of real GDP is $1,000 billion, the full employment level of real GDP is $1,250 billion, and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.60. The full-employment target can be reached if government spending is increased

a. by $60 billion.b. by $100 billion.c. by $250 billion.d. by $25 billion.

b. Change in real GDP required = spending multiplier x change in government spending (G). Rewritten,

G = 1/(1 - 0.60) x ($1,250 - $1,000) G x 2.5 = $250 G = $100 billion.

Page 48: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

48Figure 2(c) Equilibrium income equals

potential income

E

Y

E

Y-line

0 Yf = Ye

45o

Page 49: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

49

Does the equilibrium yield full Does the equilibrium yield full employment?employment?

Does the equilibrium yield full Does the equilibrium yield full employment?employment?

Not necessarily, according to Keynes. We could move toward a less than full employment equilibrium.

Page 50: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

50

What can we do if the What can we do if the economy is moving toward economy is moving toward less than full employment?less than full employment?

What can we do if the What can we do if the economy is moving toward economy is moving toward less than full employment?less than full employment?

We use our fiscal policies to shift the equilibrium to a point of GDP that gives us full employment.

Page 51: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

51

What is Fiscal Policy? (P.16-7.2.6. & Wong 2000: 137)

• Fiscal policy is the deliberate manipulation of government purchases, transfer payments, taxes, and borrowing in order to influence macroeconomic variables such as employment, the price level, and the level of GDP

Page 52: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

52

What is a Discretionary Discretionary Fiscal PolicyFiscal Policy (P.16-7.2.6.1. & Wong 2000: 139)?

The deliberatedeliberate use of changes in government spending, transfer payments, taxes and borrowing to alter aggregate demand and stabilize the stabilize the economyeconomy

Page 53: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

53

Discretionary Fiscal PolicyDiscretionary Fiscal Policy (P.16-7.2.6.1. & Wong 2000: 139)

= The discretionary changes in government expenditures and/or taxes in order to achieve certain national economic goals

• High employment• Price stability• Economic growth• Level of GDP• Improvement of international payments balan

ce

Slide 13-8

Page 54: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

54

Why is Government spendingGovernment spending considered an AutonomousAutonomous Expenditure (Wong 2000: 94)?

Because Government spending is primarily the result of a political decision made decision made independent of the level independent of the level of national output.of national output.

Page 55: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

55

What are examples of Expansionary Fiscal PolicyExpansionary Fiscal Policy

(P.16-7.2.6.1.1.)?

• Increase government spending

• Decrease taxes• increase government

spending and taxes equally

Page 56: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

56

The Effect on GDP of an Increase in Government Spending

Real GDP

$

C+I+G

45o C+I+G’

GDP

G Simple government expenditures multiplier =

GDP/G = 1/(1-MPC)

Simple government expenditures multiplier =

GDP/G = 1/(1-MPC)

Page 57: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

57

The Effect on GDP of a Decrease in Lump-sum Taxes

Real GDP

$

C+I+G

45o C’+I+G

GDP

Simple tax multiplier =

GDP/T = -MPC/(1-MPC)

Simple tax multiplier =

GDP/T = -MPC/(1-MPC)

Page 58: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

58

Shifting the aggregate demand curve upward

Shifting the aggregate demand curve upward

Real GDP

C1 + I1 + G1

45o

less than full employment

C2 + I2 + G2

Pla

nned

Spe

ndin

g

full employment

Page 59: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

59

How can we shift the aggregate How can we shift the aggregate demand curve upward?demand curve upward?

How can we shift the aggregate How can we shift the aggregate demand curve upward?demand curve upward?

We can use fiscal policies to• lower taxes• increase government

spending

Page 60: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

60Figure 3(a) Expansionary fiscal policy

E

Y

E

Y-line

Ye Yf0

E’

45o

Page 61: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

61

What is a Cyclical Deficit & a Structural DeficitStructural Deficit (P.16-7.2.6.1.4.)?

• The part of the deficit that varies with the business cycle is a Cyclical Deficit.

• The part of the deficit that is independent of the business cycle is a Structural Deficit.

C:\My Documents\Econppt\Macro\HLch27GovtSpending.ppt

Page 62: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

62

What are examples of Contractionary Fiscal PolicyContractionary Fiscal Policy

(P.16-7.2.6.1.1.)?• Decrease government

spending• Increase taxes

Page 63: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

63Figure 3(b) Contractionary fiscal policy

E

Y

E

Y-line

YeYf0

E’

45o

Page 64: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

64

Figure 4 A balance-budget increase in G and T will have an expansionary effect on the economy

E

Y

Y-line

0

C + I + G

Y

c T*

G*

45o

Page 65: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

65

What is the Tax Multiplier Tax Multiplier (P.15-7.2.4.3.=Wong 2000: 101)(P.15-7.2.4.3.=Wong 2000: 101)?

The change in aggregate demand (total spending) resulting from an initial change in taxes

Page 66: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

66

What is the Balanced Balanced Budget Multiplier (P.15-Budget Multiplier (P.15-

7.2.4.3.)7.2.4.3.)?An equal change in

government spending and taxes, which changes aggregate demand by the amount of the change in government spending

Page 67: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

67

What is a Countercyclical Countercyclical Fiscal Policy (P.16-7.2.6.1.3.)?Changes in taxes or

government spending designed to counteract a boom or recession.

C:\My Documents\Econppt\Macro\HLch27GovtSpending.ppt

Page 68: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

68

What are What are limitationslimitations to to Countercyclical Policies?Countercyclical Policies?TimingTiming Problems Problems – there are the lags of recognition, decision, and action IrreversibilityIrreversibility – government policies tend to become entrenched

Page 69: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

69

Fiscal Policy: problems • Time lags (P.18-7.2.6.3.1.)

– Recognition Time Lag• The time required to gather information about the

current state of the economy

– Action Time Lag• The time required between recognizing an economic

problem and putting policy into effect– Particularly long for fiscal policy

– Effect Time Lag• The time it takes for a fiscal policy to affect the

economySlide 13-39

Page 70: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

70

Discretionary Fiscal Policy

in Practice• Fiscal policy time lags are long. A policy designed to correct a recession may not produce results until the economy is experiencing inflation.

• Fiscal policy time lags are variable in length (1–3 years). The timing of the desired effect cannot be predicted.

Slide 13-42

Page 71: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

71

What are Automatic Stabilizers? (P.17-7.2.6.2. & Wong 2000: 138)

What are Automatic Stabilizers? (P.17-7.2.6.2. & Wong 2000: 138)

Forces that reduce the size of the expenditure multiplier and diminish the impact of spending shocks

Page 72: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

72

What is an Automatic Automatic StabilizerStabilizer (P.17-7.2.6.2. & Wong 2000: 138)?• Government expenditures and tax

revenues that automatically change levels in order to stabilize an economic expansion or contraction

• Structural features of government spending and taxation that smooth fluctuations in disposable income over the business cycle

Page 73: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

73

Automatic Stabilizers• Changes in government spending and

taxation that occur automatically without deliberate action of government

• Examples:–Progressive income tax system with its

increasing marginal income tax rates

–Unemployment compensation

–Welfare spending

–Transfer paymentsSlide 13-43

Page 74: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

74

What are some examples of Stabilizers?

What are some examples of Stabilizers?

• Transfer payments that increase and decrease with changes in the economy

• Income (proportional/progressive) taxes that rise and fall with income

How do automatic stabilizers affect spending How do automatic stabilizers affect spending shocks?shocks?

• They smooth out the ups and downs of the economy.

Page 75: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

75

Automatic Stabilizers

Real GDP per Year($ trillions)

0

Gov

ernm

ent

Tra

nsfe

rsan

d T

ax R

even

ues

Taxrevenues

Unemploymentcompensation and welfare

Y1

Budget surplus

Y2

Budgetdeficit

The automatic changes tend to drive the economy back toward its full-employment output level

Slide 13-44

Page 76: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

76

Automatic Stabilizers

Real GDP per Year($ trillions)

Y20

Gov

ernm

ent

Tra

nsfe

rsan

d T

ax R

even

ues

Taxrevenues

Y1Yf

Unemploymentcompensation and welfare

Budget surplusBudgetdeficit

Figure 13-6 Slide 13-45

Page 77: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

77

Household

Financial markets

Firms

Figure 5 Four-sector national income model

National income

National expenditure

Incomegenerated

Payment for goods and service

C

S

I

E Y

GovernmentGT

Foreign markets

X

M

Page 78: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

78

Factorpayments

Consumption ofdomestically

produced goodsand services (Cd)

BANKS, etc GOV. ABROAD

Investment (I)Investment (I)

GovernmentGovernmentexpenditure (expenditure (GG))

ExportExportexpenditure (X)expenditure (X)

NetNetsaving (S)saving (S)

NetNettaxes (T)taxes (T)

ImportImportexpenditure (M)expenditure (M)

The circular flow of incomeThe circular flow of income

WITHDRAWALSWITHDRAWALS

INJECTIONSINJECTIONS

Page 79: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

79Figure 6 Determining the equilibrium income of an open economy

E

Y

E = C + I + G + (X - M)

Y-line

0Ye

45o

(a)

(b)

E

Y

I + G + X

S + T + M

0 Ye

Page 80: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

80Figure 7 Aggregate demand curve

P

Q

AD

0

Page 81: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

81Figure 8(a) Keynesian (kinked) aggregate supply

curve

P

Q0

AS

Qf

Page 82: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

82Figure 8(b) Upward-sloping aggregate supply curve

P

Q0

AS

Qf

Page 83: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

83Figure 8(c) Classical aggregate supply curve

P

Q0

AS

Qf

Page 84: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

84

Figure 9 Equilibrium of aggregate demand and supply

P

Q

AD

0

AS

Pe

Qe

Page 85: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

85Figure 10(a) Unemployment equilibrium

P

Q

AD

0

AS

Qf

DG

Page 86: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

86

P

Q

AD

0

AS

Qf

IG

Figure 10(b) Over-employment equilibrium

Page 87: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

87Figure 10(c) Full employment equilibrium

P

Q

AD

0

AS

Qf

Page 88: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

88

Figure 11

Multiplier effect with changing price level

P

Q0

AS

Qf

P

Q0

P

Q0Qf

AD

AD’•

AS

AD

AD’

If P unchanged

If P

••

AD

AD’

AS

(a)(b)

(c)

Advanced LevelMicroeconomicsAdvanced Level

Macroeconomics

Previousslide

Page 89: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

89

The paradox of thrift:An attempt to save more may lead to lower income and no actual increase in saving if everybody do the same.Saving is a virtue for the individual, but may not be good for the society as a whole!

Page 90: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

90

Case 1

When you want to save more by decreasing autonomous consumption and others follow what you did, the saving function shifts upwards. The national income is decreased. The level of saving remains the same.

S

Y

S = -a + sY

I = I*

Ye

S’ = -a’ + sY

Ye’

Page 91: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

91

Case 2

If investment is an induced function, how will an upward shift in saving function affect the level of equilibrium income and saving? Show your answer in the following diagram?

S’ = -a’ + sY

Ye’

S

Y

S = -a + sYI = I* + iY

Ye

SS’

Page 92: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

92

Resolution:

The amount of investment is independent of the rate of interest and the amount of saving. An increase in saving leads to an accumulation of unintended inventory and then output and income will fall.

Rate of interest (r)

Loanable funds for investment

D = investmentS = saving

S’

S, I

I

Y

S

S’

YeYe’

Page 93: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

93

Would the paradox still arise if investment is negatively

related to the rate of interest?

Page 94: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

94

Annual Percentage Changes in U.S. Real GDP, Real Consumption, and Real Investment

–20.0

–15.0

–10.0

–5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

An

nu

al p

erc

en

tag

e c

ha

ng

e

19

62

19

64

19

66

19

68

19

72

19

76

19

78

19

84

19

86

19

88

19

92

19

94

19

96

199

8

Investm ent

GDP

Consum ption

Year

196

0

197

0

19

74

19

80

19

82

19

90

Source: Based on annual estimated found in Survey of Current Business, U.S. Department of Commerce, 77 (August 1997) and 79 (January 1999).

Page 95: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

95

Why does the Consumption Function Shift (P.20-7.3.1.1.)?

• Expectations• Wealth• Price level• Interest rate

28

Page 96: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

96

How do Expectations affect the Consumption (P.22-7.3.1.1.10)?Consumers expectations of

things to happen in the future will affect their spending decisions today

29

Page 97: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

97

How does Wealth affect the Consumption (P.20-7.3.1.1.5)?Holding all other factors

constant, the more wealth households accumulate, the more they spend at any current level of disposable income

30

Page 98: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

98

How does the Price Level affect the Consumption

(P.21-7.3.1.1.6)?Any change in the general

price level shifts the consumption schedule by reducing or enlarging the consumers purchasing power

31

Page 99: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

99

How does the Interest Rate affect the Consumption

Function (P.21-7.3.1.1.8)?A high interest rate will

discourage people from borrowing money and a low interest rate will encourage people to borrow money

32

Page 100: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

101

According to Keynes, what determines the level of

Investment?Expectations of future

profits is the primary factor, the interest rate is the financing cost of any investment proposal

36

Page 101: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

102

7.4.3. How do Expectations affect Investment?

Business people are quite susceptible to moods of optimism and pessimism

41

Page 102: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

106

How do Business Taxes affect Investment?

Business decisions depend on the expected after-tax rate of profit

45

Page 103: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

107

8. Can the government maintain a permanent budget deficit? What would you need to know about the future path of interest rates and GDP growth rates to be able to answer this question?

• It depends. The government can (cannot) maintain a permanent budget deficit if the interest rate is lower (higher) than the GDP growth rate.

Page 104: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

108

Countercyclical fiscal policy• Argues that increasing government

spending or reducing taxes during a recession would mitigate the recession

–Suggested by Keynes in 1930s (Keynesian policy)

• Rationale now for “fiscal stimulus” package in Japan

• Discretionary versus automatic

Page 105: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

109

Effect of the economy on the budget deficit

• Budget deficit is cyclical

–Deficit rises in recessions

–Deficit falls during recoveries and expansions

• To see the reason look at tax revenues and expenditures

Page 106: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

110

Government tax revenues depend on the state of the economy

• when real GDP grows more rapidly, proportional tax revenues rise

–more people working, higher incomes

–people move into higher tax brackets

Page 107: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

111

Expenditures also depend on the economy

• When real GDP grows more rapidly, as in a recovery, expenditures such as transfer payments grow less rapidly

• When real GDP grows less rapidly or falls, as in a recession, expenditures grow more rapidly – unemployment compensation rises– welfare payments go up– more people retire, increasing social

security payments

Page 108: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

112

Net effect of real GDP on deficit

• deficit = government spending - tax revenue

•thus in a recession the deficit will rise, and in a recovery the deficit will fall

• Fill in P.17 table

Page 109: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

113

The structural deficit• The structural deficit is the deficit that

would exist if real GDP = potential GDP

• Also called full employment deficit

• Purpose is to take out (control for) the effects of economic fluctuations in real GDP on the deficit

• Changing structural deficit requires – change in tax laws, size of government,...

Page 110: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

114

4. The government budget deficit is

a) A stock variable.

b) A flow variable.

c) Neither a flow nor a stock variable.

d) Always increasing over time.

Answer: b

Page 111: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

115

Countercyclical fiscal policy• Argues that increasing government

spending or reducing taxes during a recession would mitigate the recession

–Suggested by Keynes in 1930s (Keynesian policy)

• Rationale now for “fiscal stimulus” package in Japan

• Discretionary versus automatic

Page 112: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

116

• There was no such thing as fiscal policy until John Maynard Keynes invented it in the 1930s– He maintained that

• The only way out of the Depression was to boost aggregate demand by increasing government spending

• If we ran a big enough budget deficit, we could jump-start the economy and, in effect, spend our way out of the depression

Fiscal Policy (P.16-7.2.6.)

12-4Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 113: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

117

The Public Debt (P.18-7.2.6.3.3.)• Differentiating between the Deficit and

the Debt– The deficit occurs when government spending is

greater than tax revenue– The debt is the cumulative total of all the budget

deficits less any surpluses• Suppose that our deficit declined one year from $200

billion to $150 billion

• The national debt would still go up by $150 billion

• So every year that we have a deficit – even a declining one – the national debt will go up

12-48Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 114: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

118

The Public Debt• Is the national debt a burden that will have

to be borne by future generations?– As long as we owe it to ourselves, the answer is

no– If we did owe it mainly to foreigners (in 4-sector

model), and if they wanted it paid off, it could be a great burden

– In the future, even if we never pay back one penny of the debt, our children and our grandchildren will have to pay hundreds of billions of dollars in interest. At least to that degree, the public debt will be a burden to future generations

12-50Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 115: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

119

The Public Debt

12-49Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

5

4

3

2

1

0

6

National Debt, 1975-2000

Economic Report of the President, 2000

Page 116: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

120

The Automatic Stabilizers• The automatic stabilizers protect us

from the extremes (peak & trough) of the business cycle– Personal Income and Payroll Taxes

• During recessions, tax receipts decline• During inflations, tax receipts rise

– Personal Savings• During recessions, saving declines• During prosperity, saving rises

12-27Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 117: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

121

The Automatic Stabilizers

–Credit Availability–Credit availability helps get us through recessions

–Unemployment Compensation

–During recessions more people collect unemployment benefits

12-28Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 118: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

122

The Automatic Stabilizers–The Corporate Profits Tax

• During recessions, corporations pay much less corporate income taxes

–Other Transfer Payments• Welfare (or public assistance) payments, Medical aid payments, and food stamps rise during recessions

12-29Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 119: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

123

Consumption and investment are two important aggregates in macroeconomic models. An autonomous change in one of them will cause the level of national income to change, via the multiplier effect. In this lesson, we take a closer look at consumption and investment. Firstly, we consider possible determinants of consumption demand other than the one (i.e. income) in the simple Keynesian model. Secondly, we examine two hypotheses of consumption demand which are used to explain the empirical data: the permanent income hypothesis and the life-cycle hypothesis. Lastly, we turn our attention to determinants of investment.

•Consumption and Investment

Page 120: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

124Figure 3 Permanent-income hypothesis

0

Consumption

Income (years)

C

Slope = MPC = APC

7.3.1.3.

Page 121: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

125Figure 4 Life-cycle income, consumption

and saving

0

$

Age

C

Income stream

7.3.1.2.

Page 122: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

126Figure 5 Life-cycle hypothesis

0

Consumption

Permanent income

C

Slope = MPC = APC =1

7.3.1.2.

Page 123: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

127Figure 6 Change in income distribution

0

C

Yd

CC

Yd

C

Yd

Slope = MPC

7.3.1.1.11.

Page 124: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

128Figure 9 The paradox of thrift

0

E

Y

I

S

S’

YeYe’ Yf0

E

Y

I

S

S’

YeYe’ Yf

(a) (b)

Page 125: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

Figure 10 The effect of increased saving on investment

0

Interest rate

Loanable fund forinvestment

I

SS’

0

E

Y

I

SS’

Ye Yf

(a) (b)

I’

129

Page 126: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

130

Discretionary Policy and Discretionary Policy and Permanent IncomePermanent Income

• Permanent income is income that individuals expect to receive on average over the long run

• To the extent that consumers base spending decisions on their permanent income, attempts to fine-tune the economy through discretionary fiscal policy will be less effective

Page 127: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

131

Permanent Income Hypothesis(Milton Friedman) 7.3.1.3.

• People gear their consumption to their expected lifetime average earnings more than to their current income– Apparently there are quite a few deviations

from the behavior predicted by the permanent income hypothesis

Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5-49

Page 128: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

132

Figure 8.6a Life-cycle consumption, income, and saving

7.3.1.2.

Page 129: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

133

7.4 Investment (P. 23)

• “Investment” is the thing that really makes our economy go and grow!

• Investment is any NEW– Plant and equipment

• Investment is any NEW– Additional inventory

• Investment is any NEW– Residential housing

6-14Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 130: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

134

6-20Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

1200

1100

1000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

Investment in Plant and Equipment, 1960-2000 (in 1987 dollars)

There has been a strong upward trend in this investment sector over the last four decades. Note the periodic downturns, especially during recession years

Page 131: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

135

6-18Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

75

50

25

0

Ð251960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Inventory Investment, 1960-2000 (in billions of 1987 dollars)

This is the most volatile sector of investment. Note that investment was actually negative during three recessions

Page 132: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

136

Residential Construction

• Involves replacing old housing as well as adding to it

• Fluctuates considerably from year to year

• Has mortgage interest rates play a dominant role

Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-21

Page 133: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

137

Investment• Investment is the most volatile sector in

our economy– GDP = C + II + G + Xn

• Fluctuations in GDP are largely fluctuations in investment

• Recessions are touched off by declines in investment

• Recoveries are brought about by rising investment

6-22Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 134: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

138

Determinants of the Level of Investment

• Interest rate• Sales outlook• Expected rate of profit• Technological change• Business taxes• Autonomous reasons

Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-31

Page 135: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

139

7.4.2. The Interest Rate

• You won’t invest if interest rates (cost) are higher than MEC (benefit)

Interest rate = The interest paid / The amount borrowed

Assume you borrow $1000 for one year @ 12 %, how much interest do you pay?

.12 = X

$1000

X = $120

6-35Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 136: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

140

You Won’t Invest If Interest Rates Are Too High

• In general, the lower the interest rate, the more business firms will borrow

• To know how much they will borrow and whether they will borrow, you need to compare the interest rate with the expected rate of profit

• Even if they are investing their own money they need to make this comparison

6-39Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 137: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

141

7.4.3. The Sales Outlook• You won’t invest if the sales outlook

is bad• If sales are expected to be strong the

next few months the business is probably willing to add inventory

• If sales outlook is good for the next few years, firms will probably purchase new plant and equipment

6-32Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 138: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

142

Expected Rate of Profit(ERP)

ERP = -------------------------------------------Expected Profits

Money Invested

How much is the ERP on a $10,000 investment if you expect to make a profit of $1,650?

6-37Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 139: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

143

How much is the ERP on a $10,000 investment if you expect to make a profit of $1,650?

ERP = -------------------------------------------Expected Profits

Money Invested

ERP = -------------------------------------------$1,650

$10,000

ERP = .165 = 16.5 %

Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-38

Page 140: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

144

Why Do Firms Invest?

• Firm’s will only invest if the expected profit rate is “high enough”

• Firms invest when– Their sales outlook is good– Their expected profit rate is high

• Even if firm’s invest their own money, the interest rate is still a consideration

Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-40

Page 141: 1 Figure 11Multiplier effect E Y E 0 Ye Ye’ Y-line C* + I* EE 45 o E’ YY.

145

8-8 Copyright 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

45û

8,000

10,000

8,000 10,000

6,000

6,000

4,000

4,0002,000

2,000

C +I +G

Disposable income ($)

45û

8,000

10,000

8,000 10,000

6,000

6,000

4,000

4,0002,000

2,000

C +I +G

Disposable income ($)

C +I +G +Xn

C + I + G + Xn

Why is the C + I + G + Xn line lower than the C + I + G line?

Answer: It is lower because net exports (Xn) are negative