1 EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on...
-
Upload
francis-hunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels on...
1
EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels
on 13th October 2010________________________________________________
Notes from Vivien Levy-Garboua,
Senior Advisor at the Directorate General of BNP Paribas
2
EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels
on 13th October 2010________________________________________________
1. Exchanges are much more competitive than they used to be
need for a stable ground on which to rely. We cannot have complexity at all levels.
Hence the importance of a stable framework for post trade infrastructures.
2. Post trade = CCP’s(+TR) EMIR
CSD’s New directive « announced »for 2011
There is a need for such a directive on CSD’s
3
EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels
on 13th October 2010_____________________________________________________3. EMIR / CCP’s – EMIR goes in the right direction
CCP’s are of a systemic nature
Safety /efficiency trade off. There is no trade off – The risk part is not negociable, it can not be a « risk return » type of choice.
The Risk Management tool of a CCP is crucial. CCP’s take counterparty risk.
CCP’s should be regulated
Access to CB money intra-day / over night CCP’s should be banks
CCP’s should be linked to their monetary zone
Interoperability must not be done at the expense of the risk taken
A CCP must be able to refuse to deal with another CCP
n>2 is very different from n=2 when you speak of interoperability
There will be a need for consolidation, on a regional basis
Intragroup transactions should not be obliged to go through a CCP : when my AM works with FI its BNP vs BNP
4
EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels
on 13th October 2010_____________________________________________________4. CSD’s
Role n°1 : Notarial vote / Regalian Role / Central Banks for Securities.
1) Relation with issuers
2) Creation of dematerialized securities in its systems
3) Registration of the Securities
4) Control of the integrity : Supply = Demand in number of shares
+ Sometimes :
5) Information on the life of the share (elementary Corporate Action)
5
EPFSF Lunch discussion on « Clearing and Settlement » at the European Parliament in Brussels
on 13th October 2010_____________________________________________________
4. CSD’sRole n°2 : Settlement / DVP
1) DVP in CB money – Guarantee this process
2) Enable the circulation of securities
3) Guarantee the existence of securities and cash
+ Sometimes :
4) A technical role in the lending / borrowing of securities without taking any counterparty risk. Only operational risk
A CSD should not take any liquidity risk / counterparty risk – Only operational risk.
The new Directive (i) should regulate this part which is « Public utility » / not for profit / Central Bank for Securities (ii) should define the conditions under which a CSD can develop other « non regalian » activities.