1 Dialogue Mapping: Dialogue Mapping: Dr. Jeff Conklin CogNexus Institute cognexus.org Revealing the...
-
Upload
sydney-cullen -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
5
Transcript of 1 Dialogue Mapping: Dialogue Mapping: Dr. Jeff Conklin CogNexus Institute cognexus.org Revealing the...
1
Dialogue Mapping: Dialogue Mapping:
Dr. Jeff ConklinDr. Jeff Conklin
CogNexus InstituteCogNexus Institute
cognexuscognexus.org.org
Revealing the Deep Revealing the Deep Structure of Structure of
ConversationsConversations
© 2008 CogNexus Institute2
OverviewOverview
Opportunity Driven Problem SolvingOpportunity Driven Problem Solving Wicked problemsWicked problems
Dialogue Mapping: mapping linear Dialogue Mapping: mapping linear process into non-linear mediaprocess into non-linear media
Surface Structure – how Surface Structure – how we communicate about we communicate about an issuean issue
Linear Process & Linear Process & MediaMedia
Deep structure – the Deep structure – the organization of the organization of the contentcontent
Non-linear Non-linear Process & Process & mediamedia
© 2008 CogNexus Institute3
Work is planned as a linear Work is planned as a linear process …process …
TimeTime
Gather the data about the problemGather the data about the problem
Analyze the dataAnalyze the data
Formulate a solutionFormulate a solution
Implement itImplement it
© 2008 CogNexus Institute4
… … but cognition is but cognition is non-linear.non-linear.
TimeTime
Guindon, R. (1990) “Designing Guindon, R. (1990) “Designing the Design Process: Exploiting the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts”, Opportunistic Thoughts”, Human-Computer InteractionHuman-Computer Interaction, , Vol. 5, pp. 305-344.Vol. 5, pp. 305-344.
““Opportunity Driven” Problem Opportunity Driven” Problem SolvingSolving
© 2008 CogNexus Institute5
Key Characteristic of Key Characteristic of “Wicked” Problems“Wicked” Problems
Every proposed solution …Every proposed solution …
reveals aspects of the reveals aspects of the problem …problem …
Conklin, J. (2006) “Wicked Conklin, J. (2006) “Wicked Problems and Social Problems and Social Complexity”, white paper, Complexity”, white paper, Chapter 1 of Chapter 1 of Dialogue MappingDialogue Mapping bookbook
Problem wickedness trumps Problem wickedness trumps linear linear processprocess
that cause revision of that cause revision of the solutionthe solution
© 2008 CogNexus Institute6
Characteristics of problem Characteristics of problem “wickedness”“wickedness”
cannot be easily defined so that all stakeholders cannot be easily defined so that all stakeholders agree on the problem to solve; agree on the problem to solve;
require complex judgments about the level of require complex judgments about the level of abstraction at which to define the problem; abstraction at which to define the problem;
have no clear stopping rules; have no clear stopping rules; have better or worse solutions, not right and wrong have better or worse solutions, not right and wrong
ones; ones; have no objective measure of success; have no objective measure of success; require iteration-every trial counts; require iteration-every trial counts; have no given alternative solutions-these must be have no given alternative solutions-these must be
discovered; discovered; often have strong moral, political or professional often have strong moral, political or professional
dimensions. dimensions.
© 2008 CogNexus Institute7
Some consequences of not Some consequences of not distinguishing wicked problemsdistinguishing wicked problems
Less clarity and agreement about the problem Less clarity and agreement about the problem spacespace
More non-linear problem solving processMore non-linear problem solving process Less productive communicationLess productive communication More fragmented and polarized stakeholdersMore fragmented and polarized stakeholders Less trust, more blame and second-guessingLess trust, more blame and second-guessing More power and politics dominate the processMore power and politics dominate the process Deeper issues go unaddressed (avoidance, Deeper issues go unaddressed (avoidance,
denial)denial)
© 2008 CogNexus Institute8
Issue MappingIssue Mapping
IBIS - Issue Based Information IBIS - Issue Based Information SystemSystem
Horst RittelHorst Rittel Basic argumentation structure:Basic argumentation structure:
– Questions (issues)Questions (issues)– Answers (options, alternatives)Answers (options, alternatives)– Pros & Cons (arguments)Pros & Cons (arguments)
© 2008 CogNexus Institute9
Conversational structure Conversational structure versus versus
Issue structureIssue structure
The basic unit of conversation is a ‘comment’
The structure of conversation is ‘turn taking’ – each person’s comment follows the one before
a comment
© 2008 CogNexus Institute10
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
Structure based on individual judgments of relevance and importance
Structure based on mapper’s judgments about implicit relationships among comments
© 2008 CogNexus Institute11
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute12
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
Issue mapper infers the question that the comment addresses
© 2008 CogNexus Institute13
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute14
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute15
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute16
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute17
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute18
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
Again, inferring the ‘missing’ question clarifies the map
© 2008 CogNexus Institute19
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute20
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
© 2008 CogNexus Institute21
Conversational structure
Issue-based structure
Structure based on individual choices about relevance and importance
Structure based on mapper’s judgments about implicit relationships among comments
© 2008 CogNexus Institute22
Meeting notes
Issue Map
Which structure is more coherent?
Which structure is more meaningful?
Which structure better supports exploration of complex topics?
http://www.youtube.com/DrJeffConklin
© 2008 CogNexus Institute23
Linear vs Issue Based Linear vs Issue Based StructureStructure
Linear structureLinear structure Issue-based Issue-based structurestructure
Normal surface structureNormal surface structure Content deep structureContent deep structure
Traditional, familiarTraditional, familiar Specialized, denseSpecialized, dense
Chronological: each Chronological: each successive element successive element based on salience & based on salience & relevance with previousrelevance with previous
Elements organized by Elements organized by key questions - key questions - sequence factored outsequence factored out
Optimized to minimize Optimized to minimize load on working memoryload on working memory
Optimized for large Optimized for large scale coherencescale coherence
© 2008 CogNexus Institute24
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
© 2008 CogNexus Institute25
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“The problem is that process X doesn’t work well.”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute26
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“The problem is that process X doesn’t work well.”
“I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well.”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute27
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“The problem is that process X doesn’t work well.”
“I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well.”
“Yeah. There have been big improvements in X lately. …“
© 2008 CogNexus Institute28
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“The problem is that process X doesn’t work well.”
“I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well.”
“Yeah. There have been big improvements in X lately. I think we should just implement Plan A, like we discussed months ago!”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute29
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“The problem is that process X doesn’t work well.”
“I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well.”
“Yeah. There have been big improvements in X lately. I think we should just implement Plan A, like we discussed months ago!”
“Plan A won’t work, because it doesn’t address process Z. The truth is, Z doesn’t work at all!”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute30
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“I agree. We need to start over with a new Plan B and start getting upper management input.”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute31
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“I agree. We need to start over with a new Plan B and start getting upper management input.”
“Wait a minute. What’s the problem with Z? I thought we had that fixed?”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute32
Dialogue map follows the non-Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation processlinear conversation process
“I agree. We need to start over with a new Plan B and start getting upper management input.”
“Wait a minute. What’s the problem with Z? I thought we had that fixed?”
“Z costs too much, and the costs are increasing, and in any case it doesn’t meet the new interoperability standards.”
© 2008 CogNexus Institute33
Non-linear cognition means jumping Non-linear cognition means jumping around between issuesaround between issues
TimeTime
What is the problem? …What is the problem? …
What are the criteria? …What are the criteria? …
What does ‘xxxxxx’ mean? …What does ‘xxxxxx’ mean? …
What should we do? …What should we do? …
What are the facts? …What are the facts? …
How should we do X? …How should we do X? …
© 2008 CogNexus Institute34
Bridging the Structural GapBridging the Structural Gap
We need tools We need tools that show both that show both surface & deep surface & deep structures and structures and the connections the connections between thembetween them
Surface Structure – how we Surface Structure – how we communicate about an issuecommunicate about an issue
Linear Process & Linear Process & MediaMedia
Deep structure – the Deep structure – the organization of the contentorganization of the content
Non-linear Process Non-linear Process & media& media
Article about Article about global global
warmingwarming
Map of deep Map of deep structure of articlestructure of article
© 2008 CogNexus Institute35
CogNexus InstituteCogNexus InstituteKnowledge Mapping for Nonlinear Knowledge Mapping for Nonlinear
ProcessesProcesses
http://cognexus.orghttp://cognexus.org The bookThe book