1 CSS/330: Critical Thinking and Computer Logic © 2004 University of Phoenix. University of Phoenix...
-
Upload
jarvis-mccabe -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of 1 CSS/330: Critical Thinking and Computer Logic © 2004 University of Phoenix. University of Phoenix...
11
CSS/330:CSS/330: Critical Thinking Critical Thinking and Computer Logicand Computer Logic
© 2004 University of Phoenix. University of Phoenix is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
(Week 3)
22
Strategies in Decision MakingStrategies in Decision Making
Week One:Week One: Characteristics of Critical Thinking & Decision Characteristics of Critical Thinking & Decision
MakingMakingWeek Two:Week Two:
Problem Identification & FormulationProblem Identification & Formulation
Week Three:Week Three: Decision MakingDecision Making
Week Four:Week Four: Decision ImplementationDecision Implementation
Week Five:Week Five: Evaluation of Decision Outcomes & ProcessesEvaluation of Decision Outcomes & Processes
33
Decision MakingDecision Making
Decision Making Tools and TechniquesDecision Making Tools and Techniques Decision Making StylesDecision Making Styles Influences that affect Decision MakingInfluences that affect Decision Making
44
Tools and TechniquesTools and Techniques Affinity DiagramAffinity Diagram BenchmarkingBenchmarking Cause-&-Effect Cause-&-Effect
(Fishbone) Diagram(Fishbone) Diagram Criteria MatrixCriteria Matrix Decision TreeDecision Tree Flow ChartFlow Chart Gant ChartGant Chart CSP AnalysisCSP Analysis Venn DiagramVenn Diagram
Bar ChartBar Chart BrainstormingBrainstorming SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis Cause-&-Effect Cause-&-Effect
Diagrams w/cardsDiagrams w/cards Cause ScreeningCause Screening Check ListsCheck Lists Scatter DiagramsScatter Diagrams Statistical Process Statistical Process
ControlControl Pareto ChartsPareto Charts
55
Tool CategoriesTool Categories
Define and Measure ToolsDefine and Measure Tools• Help frame the problem and quantify it.Help frame the problem and quantify it.
Analysis/Decision Making ToolsAnalysis/Decision Making Tools• Help think critically about a problem by Help think critically about a problem by
providing ways to process data into useful providing ways to process data into useful informationinformation..
Process Control ToolsProcess Control Tools• Help monitor the performance of a process to Help monitor the performance of a process to
ensure it stays on track.ensure it stays on track.• Act as early warning systems for an out of Act as early warning systems for an out of
control process.control process.
66
Define and Measure ToolsDefine and Measure Tools
Flow DiagramFlow Diagram Stakeholders Analysis TableStakeholders Analysis Table Pareto chartPareto chart Run ChartsRun Charts
77
Tools: Flow DiagramTools: Flow Diagram
B
ForecastG enerated
Dem andG enerated
O rder Parts
G enerate W orkO rder
PartsShipped
Parts PulledFrom
Stockroom
M ove toHead Shop
W ait for HeadShop Resource
Sort PartsInto Sub-
Assy.
PrepareHead Shell
Prepare Sub-Assy.
(up to 10)
CalibrateTracking and
FocusingTest Store in Cabinet
M ove toG P Test
Integrateinto
System
TestP iezo
Rotation
TestCL
Linearity
TestSystemSpec.
F inaled(Buff and
Polish)
M ove toG P Test
Re-Intergrateinto
System
FinalTest
SystemCom pleted
M ove toShipping
W ith inShippingW indow
Shipto
Custom er
Holdin
Shipping
PassPass25%
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass50%
Pass60%
Fail
Pass99%
1 Fail
1Fail
Yes
No
- Sales/M arketing- K. Tuller
- Forecast-Custom er O rder
A
Fail 75% Fail 50% Fail 40%
B
Fail 1%
Assem bleHead
M ove toHead Shop
Calibrateand
Align
A
Closed Loop Head Present State Process MapJuly 9, 2003
Head Shop Team:W ayne C retin T racy E spinozaJoe R odriguez P ete TagleC hris W ard
Corporate Quality:M ark H olm an
Rem oveHead from
System
88
Tools: Stakeholder AnalysisTools: Stakeholder Analysis
Validates team membershipValidates team membership Understand the milieu in which Understand the milieu in which
the team operatesthe team operates Build support for the project Build support for the project Understand who the process Understand who the process
impactsimpacts Minimize resistance to Minimize resistance to
implementing solutions implementing solutions
99
Stakeholder Analysis ExampleStakeholder Analysis Example
Level of Commitment
Sales
Upstream
Dept.
Enthusia
sti
cHelpfu
l
Complia
nt
Hesitan
tIndiff
erent
Uncoopera
tive
Opposed
Hostile
People
or
Groups
X
X
X
X = Present Commitment
= Level Required
Union
1010
Named after Italian economist Vilfredo Named after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto (circa 1906)Pareto (circa 1906)
Separates the “vital few” from the Separates the “vital few” from the “trivial many”“trivial many”
• 80/20 rule: 80% of the problems can be 80/20 rule: 80% of the problems can be attributed to only 20% of the causesattributed to only 20% of the causes
• Focus on the vital 20% to get the biggest Focus on the vital 20% to get the biggest impact (80%)impact (80%)
Clearly illustrates where to focus Clearly illustrates where to focus improvement effortsimprovement efforts
Tools: Pareto AnalysisTools: Pareto Analysis
1111
Pareto Analysis ExamplePareto Analysis ExampleDAFM-CL Defect Pareto (since 5/30/03)
29%
52%
68%
81%
90%
100%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Piezo Rotation CL Linearity Wiring Mechanical PCB Electrical
Defect Category
Nu
mb
er o
f O
ccu
rren
ces
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1212
Presents trends over time.Presents trends over time. Can link changes to order Can link changes to order volume,operational changes, volume,operational changes, process adjustments, etc.process adjustments, etc.
Tools: Run ChartsTools: Run Charts
1313
Run Chart ExampleRun Chart Example
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
On-Time % 70.5% 66.5% 47.4% 80.9% 80.6% 85.3% 86.5% 92.2%
On-Time Goal % 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 78.0% 82.0% 85.0% 86.0% 88.0%
Total # of Shipments 305 224 456 314 222 184 141 344
On-Time # of Shipments 215 149 216 254 179 157 122 317
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
On-Time Shipment of Non-System Orders
1414
Analysis ToolsAnalysis Tools Cause and Effect Analysis (Fishbone diagram)Cause and Effect Analysis (Fishbone diagram) The Five Why’sThe Five Why’s Flow DiagramsFlow Diagrams Solution Prioritization MatrixSolution Prioritization Matrix Cost Benefit (ROI) analysisCost Benefit (ROI) analysis Gant Chart (Schedule)Gant Chart (Schedule) CSP AnalysisCSP Analysis BrainstormingBrainstorming SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis Venn DiagramVenn Diagram
1515
A method for developing root cause theoriesA method for developing root cause theories Provides a structure to understand the Provides a structure to understand the
relationship between potential causes.relationship between potential causes. Helps team members communicate within Helps team members communicate within
the team and across departments.the team and across departments. Provides a framework for planning what data Provides a framework for planning what data
to collect.to collect.
Tools: Cause & Effect AnalysisTools: Cause & Effect Analysis(Fish Bone Diagram)(Fish Bone Diagram)
1616
Tools: Cause & Effect AnalysisTools: Cause & Effect Analysis
Milieu(or
Environment)Machines Methods
Measurement Manpower(or People)
Materials
Problem or
Effect
“Fishbone” diagram with the “Six Ms”
1717
Tools: Cause & Effect AnalysisTools: Cause & Effect AnalysisMachine
sMethods
Measurement Manpower
(or People)
Materials
Poor PrintQualit
y
Inks
PaperInconsistent
Blanket Wash
NegativeNot Balanced
Opticopy Neg.
Fountain Solution
PlatesOverexposedUnderexposed
Blankets
Roller Wash
Rollers
Original Negatives
Not Checked
pH Off
Rollers NotSet Right
Don’t UnderstandProcess
Not Enough Inkin Fountain
Ink Adjust FountainToo Often
Adjust FountainWater Balance
Not Trained
Don’t Care AttitudeTwo much variation
in amount in fountain
DensitometersNot Calibrated
Press Not Capable
Too Many Trip Offs
PaperWon’t Feed
NotEnough
Dot Grain
Specs.Not Clear
Too Muchof a Hurry
Not EnoughTime to Maintain
Run PressToo Fast/Slow
Front to Back(Sheet)
Paper Movingon Back of Sheet
Too MuchDot Gain
Press Worn
Layoutof Form
Customer Doesn’t Understand Variation
Specs Wrong/Impossible to Meet
1818
““Peeling the onion” technique Peeling the onion” technique A method to uncover root causesA method to uncover root causes
• What initially appears to be a “root cause” may What initially appears to be a “root cause” may really be a deeply embedded symptomreally be a deeply embedded symptom
Ask “Why?” five timesAsk “Why?” five times• Each response brings you closer to the root causeEach response brings you closer to the root cause• Keep digging until you run out of answersKeep digging until you run out of answers
Tools: The Five WhysTools: The Five Whys“Separating true problems from their
manifestations”
1919
A video rental chain experienced an increasing degree of customer A video rental chain experienced an increasing degree of customer dissatisfaction. A simple questionnaire revealed the two most dissatisfaction. A simple questionnaire revealed the two most frequently mentioned reasons were long checkout lines and poor frequently mentioned reasons were long checkout lines and poor title selection title selection
The Five Whys ExampleThe Five Whys Example
WHY?
WHY?
WHY?
WHY?
WHY?
Dissatisfied
Customers
Poor Title Selection
Long Check-
out Times
Manual Invoicing
Poor Employe
e Training
Poor Custome
r Analysis
No Computer System
High Employee Turnover
Poor Question Method
Low Mgt Expertis
e
Low Wages
Poor Employe
e Training
Low Mgt Expertis
e
Low Wages
High Employee Turnover
2020
Process flow maps as analysis tools:Process flow maps as analysis tools:• Activity flowchartActivity flowchart
Displays complexityDisplays complexity Shows decision pointsShows decision points Identifies loops and bottlenecksIdentifies loops and bottlenecks
• Deployment flowchartDeployment flowchart Highlights hand-off points between people and Highlights hand-off points between people and
functionsfunctions Clarifies roles or dependenciesClarifies roles or dependencies
• Value Stream MapValue Stream Map Examines value added, time and work in Examines value added, time and work in
progress elements for each process step.progress elements for each process step.
Tools: Flow DiagramsTools: Flow Diagrams
2121
Flow Diagrams ExampleFlow Diagrams ExampleActivity Flowchart: First PassActivity Flowchart: First PassOn-Time Shipment of Non-System OrdersOn-Time Shipment of Non-System Orders
Recieve Requestfor Spare Part
Enter OrderERP Backlog
Report
Planning ChecksAvailability
Order Part
Commit Part
Receive Part
ERP PickReport
Stock RoomPicksPart
Deliver Partto Shipping
Pack Part Ship Part
Shipping Report toFinance
Invoice and CloseOrder
2222
Flow Diagram ExampleFlow Diagram ExampleActivity Flowchart: In-DepthActivity Flowchart: In-DepthOn-Time Shipment of Non-System OrdersOn-Time Shipment of Non-System Orders
Receive Requestf or Order Check Availabiliy available? Type of
order?Process Order in
Glovia
SalesOrder
WarrentyOrder
Type?
Create S-Invoice
-950
-960
M or B?
Check MRP
Y
N
Buy
ExistingPO?
Y
N
Review COGNOSReport Review BOM Check Leadtime
Provide CustomerW/ Leadtime
Check Allocation
Expedite?
Review ExpediteW/ Planning
Determine NewDate
N
Y
Make
in stock?
available?N
Y
Run Sales OrderBacklog Report
Commit SalesOrder
Y
N MANUALLYUpdate and
Review PlanningLog
Release WorkOrders
Rev iew ShortageReport shortages?
Inform Purchasingof Shorts
Commit Parts thatare in Stock
Y
Update PlannerLog
?
Deliver toStockroom
Stockroom:Generate Pick List Pick
OrderComplete?
Stockroom toNotify Packing
N
review urgancy of orderupon request
remove expedite loop
eliminate warr. orders andmake then $0 sales order
(with approval)
N
Create Pack List Update ShippingLog
Deliver to Shipping-S/O, packlist,
pars
Release WorkOrder to Stock for
PickStockroom Pick
AssemblyNotification
AssemblyOperations
Inform Planningwhen Complete
Return Parts toStock
Review DeliveryDates on time?
Planner ReportsParts In-house
Date
Inform Customerof Late Delivery
Receive Partsafter Leadtime
Shiping: ReviewOrder
type oforder?
hazard?
hazard? Pack
Hazmat Report
Hazmat Report
Process Shipment
International
Domestic Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
2323
Tools: Solution Tools: Solution Prioritization MatrixPrioritization Matrix Assists the team in evaluating Assists the team in evaluating solutions.solutions.
Links possible solutions to the needs or Links possible solutions to the needs or constraints of the business/process constraints of the business/process environment. environment.
Illustrates strengths and weakness of Illustrates strengths and weakness of solutionssolutions
Shows areas which may need attention Shows areas which may need attention during the implementationduring the implementation
2424
2525DD
21.521.5CC
30.530.5BB
27.527.55 x (1.0) = 5 x (1.0) = 552 x (1.5) = 2 x (1.5) = 33AA
Su
m o
f weig
hte
d p
rod
ucts
Su
m o
f weig
hte
d p
rod
ucts
(2.0)(2.0)(1.5)(1.5)(1.0)(1.0)(1.0)(1.0)(1.5)(1.5)
Solu
tion
Solu
tion
Cost Cost EffectiveEffective
High High ImpactImpact
Efficient use Efficient use of Resourcesof Resources
Acceptable Acceptable across across
organizationorganization
Easy to Easy to implementimplement
Criteria and WeightsCriteria and Weights
Solution Prioritization Matrix Example
3 x (1.0) = 3 x (1.0) = 33
2 x (1.0) = 2 x (1.0) = 22
5 x (1.0) = 5 x (1.0) = 55
5 x (1.5)=5 x (1.5)=7.57.5
3 x (1.5)=3 x (1.5)=4.54.5
4 x (1.5) = 4 x (1.5) = 66
4x (1.0) = 4x (1.0) = 44
5 x (1.0) = 5 x (1.0) = 55
2 x (1.0) = 2 x (1.0) = 22
4x (1.0) = 4x (1.0) = 44 5 x (1.5)=5 x (1.5)=7.57.5
4 x (1.5) = 4 x (1.5) = 66
4 x (1.5) = 4 x (1.5) = 66
4 x (1.5) = 4 x (1.5) = 66
4 x (2.0) = 4 x (2.0) = 88
5 x (2.0)=5 x (2.0)=1010
2 x (2.0) = 2 x (2.0) = 44
3 x (2.0) = 3 x (2.0) = 66
Weighting Factor
Solution Evaluation
2525
+ +++++
Enables the team to estimate the real cost and Enables the team to estimate the real cost and benefits for alternatives under consideration benefits for alternatives under consideration
Uncovers costs and benefits that aren’t Uncovers costs and benefits that aren’t immediately evidentimmediately evident
Creates a financial case for adopting a specific Creates a financial case for adopting a specific implementation planimplementation plan
Tools: Cost/Benefit AnalysisTools: Cost/Benefit Analysis(ROI Analysis)(ROI Analysis)
$$$
$$$ +
++ +
2626
Tools: Cost/Benefit Analysis Tools: Cost/Benefit Analysis (ROI Analysis)(ROI Analysis)
CostsMachineRewiring and installationTrainingLost productionTotal cost
Benefits Year 1 and ongoingReduce failures by 10%Increase throughputReduce set-up timeTotal benefits
$ 750$ 500$ 250$1,500
$1,000$ 500$ 500$ 250$2,250
Comparing the costs and benefits over 2 years shows:
Costs Benefits ProfitYear 1 $2,250 $1,500 ($ 750)Year 2 $1,500 $1,500Total $2,250 $3,000 $ 750
2727
Allows you to visualize the timing and Allows you to visualize the timing and complexity of a project. complexity of a project.
Microsoft Project software.Microsoft Project software. Steps:Steps:
• Identify desired outcome and date of Identify desired outcome and date of completion.completion.
• Identify starting point.Identify starting point.• Brainstorm all steps in between.Brainstorm all steps in between.• Put in order and assign length of time for Put in order and assign length of time for
each step.each step.
Tools: Gantt ChartTools: Gantt Chart
2828
Gantt Chart ExampleGantt Chart ExampleID Task Name
1 Review Veeco ATP Data
2 Compile Data on Tilt Angle ATP Tests @ Veeco
3 Analyze Tilt Angle ATP Data
4 Review Current Tilt Angle Procedure
5 Audit Tilt Angle Repeatability Test
6 Establish Configuration of Seagate IBE Mills
7 Develop Survey for Normandale Field Service
8 Send Survey to Veeco Service @ Normandale
9 Complete Survey & Provide Results to PV
10 Review/Compile Survey Data
11 Identity Test Configuration
12 Conduct Tests @ Veeco
13 Identify Suitable Tool & Schedule Test Time
14 Configure Veeco Tool for Test Like Seagate Tool(s)
15 Assure Digital Inclinometer in Calibration
16 Design Fixturing to Affix Inclinometer to Wafer Seat
17 Machine Fixturing to Affix Inclinometer to Wafer Seat
18 Obtain Tilt Angle & Dwell Times from Seagate (email)
9/24
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T FSep 9, '01 Sep 16, '01 Sep 23, '01
Microsoft Project Chart
2929
Tools: CSP AnalysisTools: CSP Analysis
CostCost
ScheduleSchedule
PerformancePerformance
Every project is controlled by these three variables
Any two can be freely changed but the third is dependent on the other two
3030
Group exerciseGroup exercise• Define the problemDefine the problem• Collect ideas rapidly until there are no more contributions from Collect ideas rapidly until there are no more contributions from
the teamthe team• Collect ideas, facts, opinions on cards, “Post It” notes or Collect ideas, facts, opinions on cards, “Post It” notes or
electronic boardelectronic board• No critiques of ideas, just collection.No critiques of ideas, just collection.• Everybody participates, no bench warmersEverybody participates, no bench warmers• Arrange ideas in groups of thoughts / patternsArrange ideas in groups of thoughts / patterns• Give each group a category nameGive each group a category name
Be aware of group dynamics:Be aware of group dynamics:• Peer pressure, boss-subordinate inhibitionsPeer pressure, boss-subordinate inhibitions• Storming, Forming, Conforming, PerformingStorming, Forming, Conforming, Performing
Variations: Variations: • round robinround robin• nominal group technique. nominal group technique.
Tools: BrainstormingTools: Brainstorming
3131
1. Adding structure to a large or complicated issue
2. Breaking down a complicated issue into broad categories
3. Gaining agreement on an issue or situation
One of the most widely used of the Japanese management and planning tools
Brainstormed list of ideasAffinity diagram, in which ideas
have been grouped into affinity sets
3232
SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis• Strengths• Weaknesses• Opportunities• Threats
SWOT Analysis is an effective method of identifying your Strengths and Weaknesses, and to examine the Opportunities and Threats you face. Often carrying out an analysis using the SWOT framework will be enough to reveal changes which can be usefully made.
3333
SWOT Analysis: How toSWOT Analysis: How to Strengths:Strengths:
• What are your advantages? What are your advantages? • What do you do well? What do you do well?
• Consider this from your own point of view and from the point of Consider this from your own point of view and from the point of view of the people you deal with. Don't be modest, be realistic. If view of the people you deal with. Don't be modest, be realistic. If you are having any difficulty with this, try writing down a list of your you are having any difficulty with this, try writing down a list of your characteristics. Some of these will hopefully be strengths! characteristics. Some of these will hopefully be strengths!
Weaknesses:Weaknesses: • What could be improved? What could be improved? • What is done badly? What is done badly? • What should be avoided? What should be avoided?
• Again this should be considered from an internal and external basis Again this should be considered from an internal and external basis - do other people perceive weaknesses that you don't see? Do your - do other people perceive weaknesses that you don't see? Do your competitors do any better? It is best to be realistic now, and face competitors do any better? It is best to be realistic now, and face any unpleasant truths as soon as possible. any unpleasant truths as soon as possible.
3434
SWOT Analysis: How toSWOT Analysis: How to Opportunities
• Where are the good chances facing you? • What are the interesting trends? • Useful opportunities can come from such things as:
Changes in technology and markets on both a broad and narrow scale Changes in government policy related to your field Changes in social patterns, population profiles, lifestyle changes, etc. Local Events
Threats • What obstacles do you face? • What is your competition doing? • Are the required specifications for your job, products or services
changing? • Is changing technology threatening your position? • Do you have bad debt or cash-flow problems?
• Carrying out this analysis is will often be illuminating - both in terms of pointing out what needs to be done, and in putting problems into perspective.
3535
SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis
American Vs. Foreign carsAmerican Vs. Foreign cars
3636
Tool: Venn DiagramTool: Venn Diagram Answer what part of the Answer what part of the
diagram represents each diagram represents each of the groups below:of the groups below:
1.1. Voters registered as Democrat Voters registered as Democrat and Republicanand Republican
2.2. Voters under 25 and not Voters under 25 and not registered as either Democrat registered as either Democrat or Republicanor Republican
3.3. Voters under 25 that are Voters under 25 that are registered both as Democrat registered both as Democrat and Republicanand Republican
4.4. Voters over 25 that are Voters over 25 that are registered only as Democratregistered only as Democrat
Democrat
Registered Voters under 25
Republican
3737
Gantt ChartGantt Chart SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 158158 -- 159159 FMEAFMEA SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 2626 -- 2727 Planning GridPlanning Grid SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 160160 -- 161161 BrainstormingBrainstorming SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 9696 -- 9898 Consensus Decision MakingConsensus Decision Making SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 153153 -- 154 154 Flow DiagramsFlow Diagrams SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 104104 -- 110110 Solution Prioritization MatrixSolution Prioritization Matrix SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 152152 -- 153153 Run ChartRun Chart SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 5757 -- 6262 Pareto ChartPareto Chart SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 8383 -- 8686 Frequency PlotFrequency Plot SSPGSSPG –– pgspgs 7070 -- 8282
Helpful Tools SummaryHelpful Tools Summary
• Rath & Strong’s Six Sigma Pocket Guide
3838
Process Control ToolsProcess Control Tools
Quality control ChartQuality control Chart Statistical Process Control ChartStatistical Process Control Chart Advanced/Special Statistical MethodsAdvanced/Special Statistical Methods
• Design of ExperimentsDesign of Experiments• Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)• OthersOthers
3939
Tool: QC Process ChartTool: QC Process Chart
Corrective ActionsCorrective ActionsIndicatorsIndicatorsProcess StepProcess Step
Alert Process Engineer Alert Process Engineer immediately; organize immediately; organize investigation.investigation.
If more than 1 per If more than 1 per order, stop process, order, stop process, contact Packaging contact Packaging Engineer.Engineer.
Plot time on each Plot time on each order; should be order; should be << 2 2 hours; check for special hours; check for special causes.causes.
Count errors.Count errors.
ACTACTCHECKCHECKPLAN/DOPLAN/DO
4040
Provides a record of how the process is Provides a record of how the process is performingperforming• Objective way to determine if the process is Objective way to determine if the process is
stablestable• Differentiates between natural variation and Differentiates between natural variation and
assignable causesassignable causes Catches process changes before they Catches process changes before they
become problemsbecome problems Focuses attention on monitoring process Focuses attention on monitoring process
variation over time.variation over time. See your local black belt for assistance.See your local black belt for assistance.
Tools: SPC Control ChartTools: SPC Control Chart
4141
SPC Control Chart ExampleSPC Control Chart Example
Ground Grids Control Chart (+/- 3 sigma)
0.265
0.275
0.285
0.295
0.305
104
106
108
118
120
-5
122
-6
124
126
-12
128
-14
130
-16
132
-18
134
-20
136
-21
Do
me
He
igh
t
UCL
LCL
Mean
4242
TOOLS ENDTOOLS END
4343
Decision Making StylesDecision Making Styles
Autocratic ApproachAutocratic Approach Consultative Approach Consultative Approach Team ApproachTeam Approach DemocraticDemocratic
4444
DECISION MAKING STYLES CONT’DDECISION MAKING STYLES CONT’D
Autocratic• Leader maintains total control and Leader maintains total control and
ownership of decision.ownership of decision.• Advantages:Advantages:
Fast decisionFast decision Personal responsibilityPersonal responsibility Good in emergenciesGood in emergencies
• Disadvantages:Disadvantages: No buy-in from the groupNo buy-in from the group Dissent among the ranksDissent among the ranks
4545
DECISION MAKING STYLES CONT’DDECISION MAKING STYLES CONT’D
Consultative (Participative)• Leader maintains control of the decision.• Leader seeks and encourages input from
the group.• Advantages:
Personal responsibility Buy-in from the group (if decision is appears
good)
• Disadvantages: Time consuming decision process Backfire if leader does not listen to input
4646
DECISION MAKING STYLES CONT’DDECISION MAKING STYLES CONT’D
Team (Consensus)Team (Consensus)• Leader gives up control of decision.Leader gives up control of decision.• The group makes the decision after seeking total The group makes the decision after seeking total
agreement and buy-in.agreement and buy-in.• Advantages:Advantages:
Group commitmentGroup commitment Group responsibilityGroup responsibility A more quality decision is reached based on diversityA more quality decision is reached based on diversity
• Disadvantages:Disadvantages: Very time consumingVery time consuming Requires high level of organizationRequires high level of organization Takes practiceTakes practice Can revert to democratic if total agreement is not Can revert to democratic if total agreement is not
achieved.achieved.
4747
DECISION MAKING STYLESDECISION MAKING STYLES
DemocraticDemocratic – – • Leader gives up ownership by Leader gives up ownership by
allowing the group to vote.allowing the group to vote.• Advantage: Advantage:
Fairly fast decisionsFairly fast decisions Group participationGroup participation
• Disadvantage:Disadvantage: Neither the leader nor the group accept Neither the leader nor the group accept
responsibility.responsibility.
4848
Management Decision Making Management Decision Making ModelModel
Crisis Situation
"The building is on Fire!"
Autocratic Approach
Routine Situation Knowledge Situation
Team Approach
Individual Decision Making Group Decision Making
Need for CommitmentTime Pressure
“I’ve seen this before, or
something like it.”
“I don’t know what the problem is or understand the
issues”
Consultative Approach
4949
GUIDELINES FOR SUCCESSFUL GUIDELINES FOR SUCCESSFUL DECISION MAKINGDECISION MAKING
Ensure a CHAMPION – a responsible leader should manage Ensure a CHAMPION – a responsible leader should manage the decision making process.the decision making process.
SEEK UNDERSTANDING – probe through signals and SEEK UNDERSTANDING – probe through signals and symptoms to reach the root cause.symptoms to reach the root cause.
ESTABLISH AN OBJECTIVE – make decisions based on ESTABLISH AN OBJECTIVE – make decisions based on objective, not just a “first” solution. Analyze “trade-offs”.objective, not just a “first” solution. Analyze “trade-offs”.
USE CREATIVITY AND DIPLOMACY – develop diverse ideas, USE CREATIVITY AND DIPLOMACY – develop diverse ideas, avoid fallacies.avoid fallacies.
IDENTIFY MULTIPLE OPTIONS – reviewing competing IDENTIFY MULTIPLE OPTIONS – reviewing competing options makes for a better choice.options makes for a better choice.
IDENTIFY BARRIERS – seek participation to get buy-in.IDENTIFY BARRIERS – seek participation to get buy-in.
5050
Influences on Decision Making Influences on Decision Making
• Contextual FactorsContextual Factors• Urgency Urgency • ImportanceImportance• ConstraintsConstraints• Resource Resource
AvailabilityAvailability• Political SupportPolitical Support
• PersonalitiesPersonalities• DiversityDiversity• GlobalizationGlobalization• EthicsEthics• MediaMedia
5151
Class Activity: Count the F’s in this sentenceClass Activity: Count the F’s in this sentence
FOULED UP FILES ARE THE RESULT OF FOULED UP FILES ARE THE RESULT OF FOOLISH NEGLECT AND FINISHED FOOLISH NEGLECT AND FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF FILES ARE THE RESULT OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY COMBINED WITH SCIENTIFIC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS.THE EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS.
Call out how many - let’s see who’s right firstCall out how many - let’s see who’s right first
5252
Solution to Decision ExerciseSolution to Decision Exercise
Solution:Solution:
Which decision was faster to make?Which decision was faster to make?Which was more accurate?Which was more accurate?
5353
Consensus ExerciseConsensus Exercise
Directions: Directions:
Read the story below and record the Read the story below and record the appropriate response on the attached appropriate response on the attached answer sheet for the eleven statements answer sheet for the eleven statements that follow it. Your response options are ‘T’ that follow it. Your response options are ‘T’ for true, ‘F’ for false, and ‘?’ for don’t for true, ‘F’ for false, and ‘?’ for don’t know.know.
**Read carefully and focus on what you know and don’t knowRead carefully and focus on what you know and don’t know
5454
Consensus Exercise (cont.)Consensus Exercise (cont.)
The story …The story …
A businessman had just turned off the A businessman had just turned off the lights in the store when a man lights in the store when a man appeared and demanded money. The appeared and demanded money. The owner opened a cash register. The owner opened a cash register. The contents of the cash register were contents of the cash register were scooped up, and the man sped away. scooped up, and the man sped away. A member of the police force was A member of the police force was notified promptlynotified promptly
University Associates, Inc.
San Diego, CA
5555
Consensus Exercise (cont.)Consensus Exercise (cont.)
1.1. A man appeared after the owner had turned off his store lights.A man appeared after the owner had turned off his store lights.
2.2. The robber was a man.The robber was a man.
3.3. The man did not demand money.The man did not demand money.
4.4. The man who opened the cash register was the owner.The man who opened the cash register was the owner.
5.5. The store owner scooped up the contents of the cash register and ran away.The store owner scooped up the contents of the cash register and ran away.
6.6. Someone opened a cash register.Someone opened a cash register.
7.7. After the man who demanded the money scooped up the contents of the cash. After the man who demanded the money scooped up the contents of the cash. register, he ran away.register, he ran away.
8.8. While the cash register contained money, the story does not state how much.While the cash register contained money, the story does not state how much.
9.9. The robber demanded money.The robber demanded money.
10.10. The story concerns a series of events in which only three persons are referred The story concerns a series of events in which only three persons are referred to: The owner of the store, a man who demanded money, and a member of the to: The owner of the store, a man who demanded money, and a member of the police force.police force.
11.11. The following events in the story are true: Someone demanded money, a cash The following events in the story are true: Someone demanded money, a cash register was opened, its contents were scooped up, and a man dashed out of register was opened, its contents were scooped up, and a man dashed out of the store.the store.
5656
Consensus Exercise SolutionConsensus Exercise Solution
5757
Problem Solving ModelsProblem Solving Models
PDCA 4-step plan PDCA 4-step plan • Plan, Do, Check, ActPlan, Do, Check, Act
DMAIC 5-Step plan (Six Sigma)DMAIC 5-Step plan (Six Sigma)• Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, ControlDefine, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control
University of Phoenix 9-step planUniversity of Phoenix 9-step plan• Describe, Frame, State goals, Identify Describe, Frame, State goals, Identify
alternatives, Evaluate alternatives, Assess alternatives, Evaluate alternatives, Assess risks, Make decision, Develop/Implement risks, Make decision, Develop/Implement solution, Evaluate results.solution, Evaluate results.
5858
PDCA Problem Solving CyclePDCA Problem Solving Cycle
PDCAPDCA
5959
Step One: Defining the Problem Step One: Defining the Problem and Collecting Dataand Collecting Data
6060
Step Two: Analyzing DataStep Two: Analyzing Data
Affinity MatrixAffinity Matrix
6161
Step Two: Analyzing Data Step Two: Analyzing Data
Building Consensus through MultivotingBuilding Consensus through Multivoting
6262
Step Three: Evaluating and Step Three: Evaluating and Selecting Potential SolutionsSelecting Potential Solutions
Prioritization MatrixPrioritization Matrix
6363
Step Three: Evaluating and Step Three: Evaluating and Selecting Potential SolutionsSelecting Potential Solutions
Variation: Weighted Solution Prioritization Matrix
6464
Step Four: Developing an Action Step Four: Developing an Action Plan for Implementation Plan for Implementation
Constructing a Tree DiagramConstructing a Tree Diagram
6565
Step Four: Developing an Action Step Four: Developing an Action Plan for ImplementationPlan for Implementation
Tree Diagram ExampleTree Diagram Example
6666
PDCA Problem Solving CyclePDCA Problem Solving Cycle
Summary of Steps and TechniquesSummary of Steps and Techniques
6767
Six Sigma Problem Solving ProcessSix Sigma Problem Solving Process
1Define
2Measure
3Analyze
4Improve
5Control
Data
Capability
Sampling
PatternsC
losu
re
Evalu
ate
Mon
itor
Docum
ent
StandardizeControl
Data
Analysis
Pro
cess
An
aly
sis
Root C
ause
Determ
inatio
n
Implementation
Pilot
Error Proof
Solutions
Pro
ject
Ch
art
er
Flo
w C
hart
Stakeholder
AnalysisVoi
ce o
f the
Custo
mer
6868
UoP Decision Making ModelUoP Decision Making Model
6969
Helpful Tips to Foster Better Decision Helpful Tips to Foster Better Decision MakingMaking
7070
Strategies for Increasing Creativity Strategies for Increasing Creativity in Problem Solving in Problem Solving
7171
Management’s Role in Supporting Management’s Role in Supporting and Stimulating Creativityand Stimulating Creativity
7272
Management’s Role in Supporting Management’s Role in Supporting and Stimulating Creativityand Stimulating Creativity
7373
Decision Analysis: Chapter 2Decision Analysis: Chapter 2 Identifying Objectives and Identifying Objectives and
Creating a Value TreeCreating a Value Tree
7474
Decision Making: Identifying Decision Making: Identifying Objectives Objectives
A Comprehensive Value TreeA Comprehensive Value Tree
7575
Value Tree Example: Widen Maple street?Value Tree Example: Widen Maple street?
7676
Class Activity: Name Key Terms Class Activity: Name Key Terms and Conceptsand Concepts
AffinitizingAffinitizing Analogies (in problem Analogies (in problem
solving)solving) BrainstormingBrainstorming Convergent thinkingConvergent thinking CreativityCreativity Divergent thinkingDivergent thinking Idea growersIdea growers Idea killersIdea killers Innovation chamberInnovation chamber
MultivotingMultivoting Nominal group Nominal group
techniquetechnique PDCA cyclePDCA cycle Post-It Note Post-It Note
brainstormingbrainstorming P-P-C techniqueP-P-C technique Prioritization matrixPrioritization matrix Problem solvingProblem solving Round robinRound robin Tree diagramTree diagram
7777
Next Week’s ReadingsNext Week’s Readings Management: Chapter 9Management: Chapter 9 Judgment in Managerial Decision Making: Judgment in Managerial Decision Making:
Chapter 6Chapter 6 Wharton on Making decision: Chapter 6Wharton on Making decision: Chapter 6 Supplements for case study: “Let it Pour”Supplements for case study: “Let it Pour”
7878
Next Week’s Individual AssignmentNext Week’s Individual Assignment
Respond to the Discussion Questions posted by your Respond to the Discussion Questions posted by your instructor.instructor.
Critical Thinking Case StudyCritical Thinking Case Study Prepare a 1,750-2,100 word paper on the critical thinking Prepare a 1,750-2,100 word paper on the critical thinking
case study assignment, “Critical Thinking Case Study: Let it case study assignment, “Critical Thinking Case Study: Let it Pour - My First Assignment as Executive Assistant.” You will Pour - My First Assignment as Executive Assistant.” You will work individually to complete this critical-thinking case work individually to complete this critical-thinking case study analysis. study analysis.
For use in completing the individual Case Study For use in completing the individual Case Study assignment, access the following University of Phoenix assignment, access the following University of Phoenix Materials located on the : Materials located on the : • ““Critical Thinking Case Study: Let it Pour” Critical Thinking Case Study: Let it Pour” • ““Case Study Characteristics: Evaluation Form” Case Study Characteristics: Evaluation Form” • ““Preparing Case Study Analysis” Preparing Case Study Analysis” • ““Problem Solving Tools and Techniques” Problem Solving Tools and Techniques” • ““Decision Making Steps” Decision Making Steps” • ““Decision Making Worksheet”Decision Making Worksheet”
7979
Case Study Grading CriterionCase Study Grading Criterion
Grading Criterion• Defines the problem that appears in the
case study• Proposes appropriate solutions to
problem• Uses course content to support
proposed solutions• Paper format
8080
Next Week’s Team AssignmentNext Week’s Team Assignment Meeting FourMeeting Four Part III: Problem Analysis and Decision-Making Part III: Problem Analysis and Decision-Making
Technique PaperTechnique Paper Prepare a 1,050-1,400-word paper in which you Prepare a 1,050-1,400-word paper in which you
analyze at least three alternative solutions to the analyze at least three alternative solutions to the problem selected in Learning Team Meeting One. problem selected in Learning Team Meeting One. Remember each alternative must stand on its Remember each alternative must stand on its own. Any combination of alternatives becomes an own. Any combination of alternatives becomes an alternative of its own. Utilizing Decision-Making alternative of its own. Utilizing Decision-Making Tools or Techniques analyze each alternative and Tools or Techniques analyze each alternative and select the best one. Chose one of the solutions select the best one. Chose one of the solutions and identify three influences on that choice. and identify three influences on that choice.
8181
THE ENDTHE END