1 Contractor Pre-qualification. 2 What Is Contractors PQ? Screening construction contractors...
-
Upload
deanna-withington -
Category
Documents
-
view
277 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 Contractor Pre-qualification. 2 What Is Contractors PQ? Screening construction contractors...
1
Contractor Pre-qualification
2
What Is Contractors PQ?
Screening construction contractors according to a pre determined set of criteria in order to determine their competence or ability to participate in the project bid.
3
Awarding Authorities Should Verify That the Bidder Has: Adequate financial resources,
experience, personnel resources, and equipment to perform the task.
The ability to comply with the required performance and time schedule.
4
Benefits of PQ Avoiding overburdened of the
contractor. Elimination limited financial sources
contractors. Only the qualify will stay. Protecting the contactor. Speeding devaluation & awarding
process. Moving from subjectivity to
objectivity.
5
Tenders PQEmployer/ Engineer Contractor
Acknowledge Receipt
Analyze PQ data: Company/ Joint venture structure Experience & Resources. Financial & General stability
Select Company/ Joint venture for inclusion in list of Tenderers.
Notify all Contractors/ Joint venture of the list of selected Tenderers.
Invitation to Contractors to Pre-qualify.
Issue and Submission of PQ Documents.
Respond to Questionnaires on Company/ Joint venture
Acknowledge Receipt
Confirm Intention to Submit Valid Tender
Analysis of PQ Data selection & Notification of List of selection
Place PQ Advertisement In Press, Etc. As Appropriate Stating: Employer & Engineer Outline Of Project (Scope, Location, Etc.) Enquiry Issue & Tender Submission Date. Instruction For Applying PQ. Submission Date For Contractor. PQ Data.
Request PQ Documents
Issue PQ instruction & Questionnaire requesting from each company/ Joint venture: Organization and Structure. Experience in Same Type of work. Resources (Managerial, Technical,
labor, etc). Financial Statement
6
Contractor Data Sources:
1. Internal: Reports,documents, ..Etc.
2. External: Questionnaire filled by the contractor. Additional sources (banks, suppliers,..Etc). Site visits to currently projects done by the
contractor.
7
Typical Questionnaire Includes:
Introduction: a brief description of the project.
Organization: classification and company’s organizational chart.
Financial resources: financial capability of the contractor.
Physical resources: contractor manpower, equipment, …etc.
Experience: contractor experience on similar projects.
8
Gather Contractor Data (PQ Questionnaire)
Check Sufficiency & Correctness of Data
Available Data not Sufficient to make a Decision
Available Data Sufficient to make a Decision
Gather More Data
Apply Contractor Data to criteria (Systematic Model)
Decision
Qualify Contractor Reject Contractor
Contractor Informed to Collect Bidding Documents
Inform Rejected Contractors
Contractor Submits a Proposal
Development of Criteria (Questionnaire)
Contractor PQ Process
9
PQ Elements 1)LITTER TO CONTRACTORS (invitation) 2)PRE-QUALIFICATION FORM:
A) Information for the contractor: i)Objective and scope of workii)General information
1)Degree of eligibility2)Formation of partnership or joint venture3)Bonding capacity4)Official language5)Supply materials
10
PQ Elements Cont..6)Questionnaire submission
7)Beginning and duration of construction
B) PQ questionnaire:
i)Identification of the contractor
ii)Contractor performance
iii)Contractor’s equipment
iv)Construction ability
v)Completion ability
vi)Client relationship
C)Certification and waves
11
Contractor Rating Strategies:
A) dimensional weighting strategy:
Contractor SelectionCriteria
WEIGHT
(%) X
Contractor
A B CY X*Y Y X*Y Y X*
Y
Experience in Completion of Project on Schedule.
60 9 5.4
8 4.8 4 2.4
Present Workload & Capability to Support Project
25 6 1.5
7 1.75
7 1.75
Availability of first-Line Supervisors
15 3 0.45
5 0.75
6 0.9
Total Score 100
6.45 7.3 5.05
12
Contractor Rating Strategies Cont.. B)two-step pre-qualification: Allow to eliminate unwanted
contractors. Contractor to satisfy selected
screening dimensions. If passes, use DWS with more
specific criteria.
13
Project: -------------------- Determining For Weights Evaluation
CRITERIA RAW SCORE
ASSIGNED SCORE
A Experience 6 10 B Equipment 2 3.3 C Financial Resources 1 1.7 D Reputation 2 3.3
B C D A A-2 A-3 A/ D B B/ C B-1 C D-1 D
3- Major Preference. 2- Medium Preference. 1- Minor Preference. 0- No Preference.
Paired Comparison Criteria Weighting:
14
Contractor Name: ---------------------- Grade: --------- Address: ---------------------------------
CRITERIA
Wei
ght
5 E
xce
4
V. G
3 G
ood
2 Fa
ir
1 Poo
r
A Experience 10 x 40 B Equipment 3.3 x 16.5 C Financial Resources 1.7 x 5.3 D Reputation 3.3 x 6.6
TOTAL SCORE 68.4
Evaluation Matrix:
15
Model Philosophy:
Uses DWS based on multiple-criterion decision-making.
Approach assumptions: Impact for each criterion ( 1unsatisfactory to
10 excellent). Obtain numerical value from PQ
questionnaires. Addition or deletion of decision parameters
have no dependency of model’s parameters.
16
CDF (Experience)
DF (Size of Completed Projects)
DF (Type of Completed Projects)
Example of Decision Parameters
Model Philosophy Cont..
17
Model Calculation: a. Calculate the mean impact for each DF included in each CDF. b. Calculate the DF weight to each DF from equation: Where: wij = the weight of the DFj associated with the CDFi . DFMIij = the mean impact of the DFj associated with CDFi, zero (no impact) to four (very high impact).
)1.(
1
EqmDFMI
DFMIwij
i
jij
ij
18
c . C a lc u la t e t h e m e a n im p a c t f o r t h e C D F f r o m e q u a t io n :
)2.(1 Eqm i
m iDFMI ij
CDFMI ij
W h e r e : C D F M I i= m e a n v a lu e o f C D F .
m i = t h e n u m b e r o f D F s in t h e C D F .
d . C a lc u la t e t h e w e ig h t o f t h e C D F u s in g t h e e q u a t io n :
)3.(
1
Eqn
iCDFMI i
CDFMI iw i
Model Calculation Cont..
19
c . F in d t h e a g g r e g a t e s c o r e o f t h e c a n d id a t e c o n t r a c t o r K
u s in g t h e f o l l o w in g e q u a t io n :
)4.(11
Eqm i
jR ijKw ij
n
iw iAWS K
W h e r e : A W S K : a g g r e g a t e w e ig h t e d r a t in g f o r t h e c o n t r a c t o r K .
n = n u m b e r o f C D F s ; m = n u m b e r o f D F s in t h e C D F .
R i j K : s c o r e o f t h e D F j i n t h e C D F i f o r t h e c o n t r a c t o r K o n s c a le o f 1 ( u n s a t i s f a c t o r y ) t o 1 0 ( e x c e l l e n t f o r s p e c i fi c p r o j e c t ) .
Model Calculation Cont..
Example:Contactor A:
CDF(1) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK1Banking Arrangement 2 0.222 3 0.667Bonding Capacity 4 0.444 4 1.778Financial Statement 3 0.333 8 2.667
CDF(2) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK2Success of Completing Projects 3 0.375 4 1.500Size of Completing Projects 2 0.250 3 0.750No of Similar Comletdd Projects 2 0.250 6 1.500Types of Completing Projects 1 0.125 5 0.625
CDF(3) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK3Current Work load Current Work load 3 1 3 0.375 7 7 2.625
AWSK (A)Total = AWSK1+AWSK2+AWSK3 = 5.635
1.9167
5.111
Financial Stability
9
3 0.375
Experience 2 0.25 1.0938
73
8 4.375
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
Example Cont..Contactor B:
CDF(1) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK1Banking Arrangement 2 0.222 5 1.111Bonding Capacity 4 0.444 3 1.333Financial Statement 3 0.333 7 2.333
CDF(2) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK2Success of Completing Projects 3 0.375 3 1.125Size of Completing Projects 2 0.250 5 1.250No of Similar Comletdd Projects 2 0.250 4 1.000Types of Completing Projects 1 0.125 8 1.000
CDF(3) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK3Current Work load Current Work load 3 1 3 0.375 6 6 2.25
AWSK (B)Total = AWSK1+AWSK2+AWSK3 = 5.135
63
8 4.375
Experience 2 0.25 1.0938
1.7917
4.778
Financial Stability
9
3 0.375
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
Example Cont..Contactor C:
CDF(1) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK1Banking Arrangement 2 0.222 4 0.889Bonding Capacity 4 0.444 8 3.556Financial Statement 3 0.333 6 2.000
CDF(2) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK2Success of Completing Projects 3 0.375 4 1.500Size of Completing Projects 2 0.250 6 1.500No of Similar Comletdd Projects 2 0.250 3 0.750Types of Completing Projects 1 0.125 7 0.875
CDF(3) DF DFMI Wij CDFMIi Wi Rijk Wij*Rijk AWSK3Current Work load Current Work load 3 1 3 0.375 8 8 3
AWSK (C)Total = AWSK1+AWSK2+AWSK3 = 6.573
83
8 4.625
Experience 2 0.25 1.1563
2.4167
6.444
Financial Stability
9
3 0.375
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jD F M I i j
1
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
m i
jR i j Kw i j
1
Result: Contractor A has the highest score followed by Contractor C then contractor B.
23
Model Advantages:
Simple and understandable. Provides a systematic approach for
all candidate evaluation. The calculated aggregate weighted
score for each contractor provides a basis for comparison.