1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit...

25
1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS

Transcript of 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit...

Page 1: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

1

CHAPTER 16:DETERMINANTS OF THE

MS

Page 2: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

2

In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the amount of checking deposits (D), bank reserves (R), and the monetary base (therefore the money supply) by changing the reserve requirement (r) and through OMOs.

Page 3: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

3

However, the model assumes unrealistically that:

1) The public holds no cash (C) 2) Banks hold no excess reserves (ER).

Page 4: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

4

The MS Model and the Money Multiplier:   Money supply model that allows the public to

hold cash balances. We include currency in circulation now.  

NOTE: Money = C + D

Page 5: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

5

We link the monetary base, which the central bank can control better than reserves, to the money supply (M for M1), using the money multiplier (m).

M = m x MB                (1)

Page 6: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

6

Money Multiplier (m): It is a ratio that shows how much the money

supply changes for a given change in the monetary base.

Because the multiplier is larger than one, the base is called “high powered money”:

A change in MB by 1% leads to a change in M by more than 1%.

Page 7: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

7

Factors affecting the size of (m):

1- Depositor’s decision regarding their holding of currency.

2- Reserve requirement.

3- ER.

Page 8: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

8

Deriving the Money Multiplier

Here we account for the possibility that depositors hold some cash (outside the banking system) and banks hold excess reserves. These two decisions affect (m).

We assume that holdings of  currency (C) and excess reserves (ER) grow proportionally with checkable deposits (D), which means that the following ratios are constants:

Page 9: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

9

c = {C/D} = C ratio, e = (ER/D) = ER ratio

Next, we derive a formula showing how these ratios plus the required reserve ratio (r) affect m.

Total reserves (R) equals the sum of required reserves (RR) and excess reserves (ER): 

R = RR + ER

Page 10: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

10

RR equals checking deposits (D) multiplied by the reserve requirement ratio (r):

RR = r x D Thus R equals:  R = (r x D) + ER

Since (r < 1), then a ($1) of reserves can support more than ($1) of deposits and the multiple expansion of deposits occurs.

Page 11: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

11

Example: if (ER=0), (r =10%), (D=$800):Then the amount of reserves needed: = (0.10) (800) = ($80). The ($80) of reserves can support ($800) in checkable

deposits (multiple deposit creation). Recall: R = (r x D) + ER But MB = C + R; can rewrite the above equation as

follows: MB = R + C

                     = RR + ER + C                            = (r x D) + ER + C

Page 12: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

12

This equation shows:

1) The amount of MB needed to support the existing amounts of checkable deposits, currency and excess reserves.

2) An additional ($1) of MB arises from an additional ($1) of currency does not support any additional deposits (No changes in D).

Result: An increase in the MB that goes into C is not multiplied, but an increase that goes into supporting D is multiplied.   

Page 13: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

13

3) An additional ($1) of MB that goes into (ER) doesn’t support any additional (D) or (C).

This is because when a bank decides to hold (ER), it doesn’t make additional loans, so (ER) do not lead to the creation of deposits.

This means that for a given level of (R), a higher amount of (ER) implies that the banking system has fewer reserves to support (D).

Page 14: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

14

m =        1 + c/ r + e + c                                 

And (m) is a function of (c, e, r): m depends on: {C/D} set by depositors, {ER/D} set by banks, and (r) set by the central bank.

Page 15: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

15

r = 0.1, ER = $0.8 billion, C= $400, D= $800, and M = $1200 billion.  

We can calculate the values of the currency and excess reserve ratios (c, e):

c = C/D = 400 / 800 = 0.5, e = ER/D = 0.8 / 800 = 0.001

The money multiplier is calculated as follows:  m = (1+0.5) / (0.1 + 0.001 + 0.5) = 1.5 / 0.601 = 2.5

Page 16: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

16

The multiplier shows that, given the r = 10%,  and the behavior of depositors represented by c = 0.5, and banks as represented by e 0.001, a ($1) increase in MB leads to an increase in money supply by ($2.5)

The value of (m) is much smaller than (10), which was expected in chapter 15.

Page 17: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

17

There are two reasons for the low value found here.

1) The possibility that the public hold currency proportional to their holdings of deposits.

2) Banks are also allowed to hold excess reserves proportional to the value of deposits.

Page 18: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

18

Factors that Determine the Money Multiplier1- Changes in r:  If (r) increases, leaving all other variables unchanged,

more required reserves are needed to support the level of checkable deposits.

This reduces the bank’s ability to lend, so loans will decline and as a result (new) deposits decline too. Finally, money supply has to decline.

Page 19: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

19

But since money supply has declined while MB didn’t change, this means that (m) must have declined (M = m x MB).

In other words, if (r) is higher, less multiple expansion of checkable deposits occur which means that (m) must fall.

Page 20: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

20

Example If (r) increases from (10%) to (15%): m = (1+0.5) / (0.15 + 0.001 + 0.5) = 1.5 / 0.651 = 2.3

Result: The money supply and the money multiplier are

negatively related to the required reserve ratio.

Page 21: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

21

2- Changes in the currency ratio c = {C/D}:

An increase in {C/D} means that depositors are converting some of their checkable deposits into currency. As it was shown in chapter 15, checkable deposits undergo multiple expansion while currency does not.

Therefore, an increase in currency results in a decline in the level of multiple expansion and m too.

Page 22: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

22

Example If {C/D} rises from (0.5) to (0.75): m = (1+0.75) / (0.15 + 0.001 + 0.75)

= 1.75 / 0.851 = 2.06

Result: The money multiplier and the money supply are

negatively related to the currency ratio.

Page 23: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

23

 3- Changes in {ER/D}: When banks increase their holdings of excess

reserves relative to checkable deposits, the banking system has fewer reserves to support checkable deposits.

This means that for the same level of MB, banks will reduce their loans, causing a decline in the level of checkable deposits and a decline in the money supply. As a result, m must fall.

Page 24: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

24

Example If {ER/D} rises from 0.001 to 0.005. m = (1+0.5) / (0.15 + 0.005 + 0.5) = 1.5 / 0.605 = 2.48

Result: The money multiplier and the money supply are

negatively related to the excess reserve ratio.

Page 25: 1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.

25

SUMMARY:

Variable Change Response in Ms

MB ↑ ↑

r ↑ ↓

C/D ↑ ↓

ER/D ↑ ↓