1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W...

19
1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria

Transcript of 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W...

Page 1: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

1

BundeswettbewerbsbehördeGD Dr. Theodor Thanner

St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDEFederal Competition Authority of Austria

Page 2: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

2

Regulation 1/2003- 5 years on -

„Form is the sworn enemy of caprice, the twin sister of liberty. […]“

Jhering, Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung, 2.

Theil, 2. Abteilung, 3. Auflage 1875 U 470.

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 3: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

3

An Expedition

27 mountaineers

with EC-equipment

climbing a mountain

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 4: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

4

Edward Theodore Compton, 1918

Großglockner, 3798m

Page 5: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

5

ECN

cooperation

exchange of information and evidence

best placed authority

new investigative powers

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 6: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

6

Cooperation

principle subsidiarity

communication

transparency

confidentiality

Page 7: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

7

Subsidiarity I

Treaties of the European Union Rome, 1957

- principle of subsidiarity

Treaty of Maastricht, 1992

- official introduction of the principle to increase transparency and

openness in the decision making process of the Community

Treaty of Amsterdam, 1997

- detailed criteria for the application of the principle by the Community institutions participating in the legislative procedure

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 8: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

8

Subsidiarity II

Constitution for Europe, 2004 (failed 2005) - new definition of the principle

- local and regional dimension

- mechanisms for implementation and monitoring

Lisbon Treaty, 2007- national parliaments with regard to the principle monitoring has

been strengthened

- infringements of the principle MS‘ governments can take case

to the European Court of Justice

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 9: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

9

Principle of SubsidiarityArt 5 EC-Treaty*

– it is a guiding principle for defining the boundary between MS and EU

– exclusive competence of EC – subsidiarity does not apply

– shared competence of MS and EC – decentralisation

– EC only if objectives cannot be achieved sufficiently by MS and if they can be better achieved by the EC

*Art 5 Para 2 EC Treaty and protocol nr 30

Page 10: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

10

Reg 1/2003 quo vadis? Case Study I

„Best placed authority“

- EC - MS: partnership marked by division of labour

- priority setting of Competition Authorities

- petrol markets no priority of the EC – shifted to national level

- NCA took responsibility and investigated

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 11: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

11

Reg 1/2003 quo vadis? Case Study I

- National investigations: good results

- Results: prices follow closely (contractually) the prices of Platts*

*Platts: business unit of the McGraw-Hill Companies, a global provider of information regarding energy and resources existent since nearly a century

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 12: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

12

Reg 1/2003 quo vadis? Case Study I

- Nobody knows but we would like to understand

- FCA of Austria (A) cannot send formal information requests to a company with headquarters in London

- FCA of A sent letter asking for basic information

- What if they are still on Easter holiday?

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 13: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

13

Reg 1/2003 quo vadis? Case Study I

- We have to think beyond!

- European retail- and wholesale prices are linked to these notations >>> notations have tremendous impact on price developments

- More transparency >>>more rational actions

- Isn‘t there a need for regulation?

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 14: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

14

Reg 1/2003 quo vadis?Case Study II

The role of the judges

- Art 9 Commitment Decision implemented in Austrian Law (like in many other national legislations)

- 2 cases so far closed by Commitment Decision

- but: task work for the FCA to follow a formal proceeding before the Cartel Court

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 15: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

15

Reg 1/2003 quo vadis?Case Study II

How could judges be more integrated in the

ECN?

Do we have enough legal certainty?

Do the parties have enough legal protection?

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 16: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

16

Legal Protection

- transparency vs business secrets

- confidentiality between NCA vs confidentialitybetween law firms

- communication

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 17: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

17

Outlook

cooperation >> partnership

exchange of information and evidence >> transparency and communication

conflict of competence>> best placed authority

new investigative powers>>effectiveness

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 18: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

18

Conclusion

Not to bend the rules but to stand the rules.

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Page 19: 1 Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde GD Dr. Theodor Thanner St. Gallen ICF, 24 April 2009 B UNDES W ETTBEWERBS B EHÖRDE Federal Competition Authority of Austria.

19

BUNDESWETTBEWERBSBEHÖRDE

Thank you for your attention!