1 Budget Activity: CSHD A013 - Low Income Home and Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Purpose: To...
-
Upload
cordelia-melissa-doyle -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 Budget Activity: CSHD A013 - Low Income Home and Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Purpose: To...
1
Budget Activity: CSHD A013 - Low Income Home and Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Purpose: To provide temporary financial assistance to help low-income families with home heating costs Priority of Government: Move low-income and vulnerable families to self-sufficiency Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:
• Energy Assistance distributed nearly $52 million in the 2011 heating season. Due to a delay in funding and a milder winter, A slightly higher percentage of eligible households were served during 2011 than during the 2010 heating season. This is due to the amount of funding and timing of the releases
• Commerce committed a total of $1,750,000 in LIHEAP funds during the 2010 and 2011 heating season to basic food clients in order to cover the standard utility allowance. Each dollar leverages approximately $84 in food benefits annually. The total effort leverages more than $70 million in federal funds annually.
• Targets fluctuate as federal funding levels change.This slide is updated annually in October.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
62,100 61,10072,400
81,500
63,400 66,700
104,40097,664
111,157
70000
120000
70000
135000
1067- Number of Households Served (output)
Households servedEnergy Assistance direct service dollarsHouseholds served target
Program Year
Num
ber o
f Hou
seho
lds
Serv
ed
Ener
gy A
ssis
tanc
e D
irec
t Ser
vice
Dol
lars
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Address federal recommendations, per program policies and procedures, for increased documentation surrounding fraud.
Cinqué Finnie October 2011 October 2011
Action Plan
2
Budget Activity: CSHD A003 - Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Purpose: Eliminate or ameliorate effects of poverty by funding a network of community action programs that provide services Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington's vulnerable children and adults Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Due to a nationwide database glitch, the number of low-
income individuals receiving one or more non-emergency services is not yet available. This slide will be updated next quarter.
• The total number of individual clients served in 2011 in Washington was 759,852 (down from 2010 by over 182,000).
• The total number of unique families served in 2011 was 296,444 (down from 2010 by over 14,000).
• Possible reason for reduction in total clients served from 2010 is that CSBG ARRA funding no longer available, and CAAs reported other funds were harder to access.
This slide is updated annually in April.
CY 2006 CY 2007 CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 20110%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
0
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
125,000
58%
74% 74%
48%
93%
1069 – The Percent of Low Income Individuals Receiv-ing One or More Non-emergency Services from a
Community Action Agency Who Make Progress During the Period (outcome)
Actual TargetPeople Enrolled
Calendar Year
Perc
enta
ge o
f Ind
ivid
uals
Mak
ing
Prog
ress
Num
ber o
f Ind
ivid
uals
Enr
olle
d
Action Plan:
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Review year-end data in February and March, 2012 Maitri Sojourner March 31, 2012
March 29, 2012
Review state data totals once database glitch is fixed by NASCSP. Maitri Sojourner Spring, 2012
3
Budget Activity: CSHD A012 - Long Term Care Ombudsman Purpose: Ombudsmen protect and promote the rights and quality of life of long-term care residents. Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children and adults Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• This measure tracks health and safety complaints, the most
serious complaints that the ombudsmen investigate. Health and safety complaints are: abuse, neglect and exploitation; transfer/discharge; care; and outside perpetrator.
• Last quarter the Ombudsman investigated 213 verified complaints and resolved 203 (97 percent).
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.Q
5Q
6Q
7Q
8Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
5Q
6Q
7Q
8Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
4
FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
91%91%89%
94%
88%
92% 92%
95%96%
94%
90%
92%93%
97%
92%
97%
1073- Percent of Health and Safety Complaints Resolved in Long-term Care Facilities (outcome)
Actual Target Verified Complaints Received
State Fiscal YearPe
rcen
tage
of C
ompl
aint
s Re
solv
ed
Num
ber o
f Com
plai
nts
Rece
ived
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Begin RFA process to search for qualified providers to administer statewide Long-Term Care Ombudsman program.
Maitri Sojourner October 2011 Postponed Due to Budget Cuts
We currently track health and safety complaints/resolutions. The new state Long-Term Care Ombudsman will research other data sets we might track.
Long-Term Care Ombudsman
July 2012
Action Plan
4
Budget Activity: CSHD A021 – Sexual Assault Prevention Purpose: Increase the understanding and awareness of sexual violence in communities statewide Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The Sexual Assault Prevention Program is designed to increase
awareness of sexual assault and abuse and build skills within communities to prevent sexual violence.
• Increases in October through December are due primarily to the beginning of the school year, and remains consistent between Year 1 (Q2) and Year 2 (Q6).
• The initial confusion in Q1 and corrections in Q2 may have leveled off by Q3 and results are much closer to target.
This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag to ensure accuracy
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
05,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,000
29,28025,433
25,689 29,101
9,108
32,328
22,823
1085 – The Number of People who Participated in Prevention Presentations/Events (output)
Actual Target
State Fiscal YearN
umbe
r of P
arti
cipa
nts
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continue to implement the revised statewide plan approved by CDC. Stephanie Condon
June 2013
Action Plan
5
Budget Activity: CSHD A019 Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP)Purpose: Uses talents and lifelong experience of volunteers over age 55 to help with diverse community needsPriority of Government: Improve the economic vitality of businesses and individualsAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) provides funding to
recruit citizens to help with community needs at nonprofit agencies and other organizations who rely on volunteers for their operation.
• Sectors that rely on retired senior volunteers include healthcare, food banks, adult literacy, senior meal programs, small businesses, and after school programs.
• RSVP stakeholders report that economic factors are causing seniors to take part-time jobs and volunteer less.
• These volunteer hours provide us with approximately $12.4 million of in-kind savings.
• In 2011, there were 2, 829 new volunteer placements.• Volunteer hours for 2011 were 1,797,355.
Data reported annually in February.
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 130
2,0004,0006,0008,000
10,00012,00014,00016,00018,000
13,213 12,841 12,651
10,897
12,79911,517
1087 - Number of volunteer placements (output)
Actual Target
State Fiscal Year
Num
ber o
f Pla
cem
ents
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Provide volunteerism by Priorities of Government and subcategories for future GMAP.
Diane Fay FY 2011
Action Plan
6
Budget Activity: CSHD A168 - Asset Building for Working Families Purpose: Provides opportunities and incentives for families to save, acquire and preserve assets Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children and adults Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Individual Development Accounts create incentives to save and
invest in assets. IDA account holders have leveraged federal and private funds.
• Since the IDA program has not received additional funding since 2007, the program met all enrollment targets in Q6, 2009 and now it is focused on graduation targets (assets purchased). Eventually all currently enrolled accounts will be closed as assets are purchased.
• The IDA program continues to help families save and build economic security and stimulate the economy. Last quarter IDA accounts purchased 2 homes, capitalized 13 businesses, created 4 education accounts and purchased 1 vehicle.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140117
39
56
31 27
57 55 5948
2011
20
1088 – Number of Assets Purchased (output)
Purchases Purchase Target
State Fiscal Year
Indi
vidu
al D
evel
opm
ent A
ccou
nts
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
The program manager provides ongoing training and technical assistance to counties including King, Pierce, Cowlitz, Clark, Spokane, Chelan-Douglas, and Grant counties.
Diane Fay Ongoing
Monitoring visits of Lower Columbia CAP, Spokane Neighborhood Action Program, Associated Ministries and Tacoma Housing Authority.
Diane Fay Quarterly
Action Plan
7
Budget Activity: CSHD A097 - Community Mobilization Against Substance Abuse Purpose: Support quality community initiatives to reduce substance abuse and violence through evidence based programs Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Outcome data confirms that nationally recognized programs are
being effectively replicated in Washington.
• Prevention programs are at risk nationally and in Washington State due to declining resources.
• Substance abuse and violence prevention services include parenting education classes and events, and family wellness camp.
• Participants are surveyed before and after they participate in programs to assess program effectiveness.
Data is updated annually in August of the following state fiscal year.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
73% 72%77%
86%
97%
85%
1090 - Percent of Family Based Prevention Services where Individuals Made Progress*
(outcome)
Actual Target
Program Year
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Search for new funding mechanisms to support delivery of programs on the local level. None identified to date.
Ramona Leber Immediate Ongoing
Action Plan
8
Budget Activity: CSHD A017 Reemployment Service Centers Purpose: Provides newly unemployed workers with services that eliminate barriers to job searchPriority of Government: Improve the economic vitality of businesses and individuals Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Centers are funded by an Employment Security
Department’s Penalty and Interest fund. Commerce has an interlocal agreement to contract services to three local contractors providing services in King, Jefferson, Clallam, Grays Harbor, and Pacific Counties.
• Companies were experiencing massive layoffs in record numbers in 2009. In second half of FY10, while layoffs continue, the number of employees being laid off at one time began to decrease. In 2011 we see this trend continuing to reduce the number of workers accessing unemployment services, although this number has not yet reached pre-recession levels.
This data is reported by state fiscal year annually following the 4th and 8th quarters. This slide is updated in the 1st and 5th quarters.
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
15,828
9,520
16,992
47,123
35,159
20,702
22441887 2260
9467
5348
3796
1092 – Units of service delivered (output)
Units Delivered
Units Delivered Target
People Served
Year
Uni
ts D
eliv
ered
Peop
le S
erve
d
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continue to work with providers on service delivery Eva Harper July 2012
Action Plan
9
Budget Activity: CSHD A178 – Financial Fraud and Identity Theft (FFIT) Task Forces Purpose: To fund law enforcement investigators, prosecutors, and other resources for investigation & prosecution of financial fraud and identity theft crimes at a regional levelPriority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Financial Fraud and Identity Theft is a growing crime which often
spans multiple criminal justice jurisdictions. In response, the legislature has established two regional task forces which began operation in late 2009: Greater Puget Sound Task Force (King & Pierce county area) and the Spokane County Task Force.
• This program is funded by a fee on Uniform Commercial Code filings established by Second Substitute House Bill 1273 (2008).
• The Number of Convictions represents the combined efforts of both FFIT task forces. Financial fraud investigations are complex, and typically require intensive commitment of time and resources to reach successful outcomes – sometimes including multiple suspects of organized criminal operations. For this reason, conviction rates can be somewhat variable. The Task Forces are maturing.
• The 2011Greater Puget Sound Task Force Report and the Spokane Task Force Report are available at www.commerce.wa.gov.
This slide is updated quarterly.
Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0
50
100
150
200
3718 25 31 26 22
59 5992
158
1096 – Number of Convictions resulting from the Prosecution of FFIT Task Force Cases
(outcome)Actual Target
State Fiscal Year
Num
ber o
f Con
victi
ons
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Prepare new contracts for each Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Task Force to provide budget and work plan for SFY 2012.
J. Harvey Queen June, 2012 Completed June, 2012
Conduct annual monitoring visits to each Financial Fraud and Identity Theft Task Force to assure contract compliance
J. Harvey Queen June, 2012 Completed June, 2012
Action Plan
10
Budget Activity: CSHD A174– Statewide Dispute Resolution Center (DRC) Program Purpose: Ensure that citizens have access to litigation alternatives through dispute resolution programs Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The Dispute Resolution Centers (DRCs) enhance the capacity and
availability of out-of-court mediation services statewide by funding mediator training and mediation expenses.
• DRCs provide mediation and training in twenty-five counties which cover 94 percent of the state’s population.
• DRCs keep prices affordable because most services are provided by dedicated professionals volunteering their time.
• Target for 2011 reduced by 11 percent due to budget cuts.• 2011 cases by type:
Business / Workplace 28.0 %Parenting Plans 21.0%Landlord / Tenant: 18.0%Neighborhood 5.0%Divorce 5.0%All Others* 22.0%
* Includes School, Elder, Parent/Teen and Victim/Offender.
Data is available annually in April.
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
1,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,000 6,599
5,535 5,777 5,846 5,6805,332
1098– Number of non-litigation cases an-nually (output)
ActualTarget
Year
Non
-Liti
gati
on C
ases
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Approve a plan and statement of work to reduce litigation cases across the state. Assist in program monitoring as needed.
Bill Johnston Annually Ongoing
Action Plan
11
Budget Activity: CSHD A179 – New Americans and Workforce Development Programs Purpose: Provide naturalization assistance for legal permanent residentsPriority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The New Americans Program was created in 2008, consistent with
the Governor’s Executive Order 08-01 that asserted the value of naturalization assistance for the many legal permanent residents who come to Washington.
• This program provides technical assistance including free access to immigration experts who work with applicants to make sure that applications are completed correctly. Submitting an accurate N-400 application important because the filing fee is $695 and the applicants often wait over a year before moving to the next phase of naturalization.
• The New Americans Program subcontractors ensure applications are completed correctly through: a) Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) accreditation b) G-28 forms for their clients, which recognize subcontractor staff as the client’s legal representative and c) Citizenship Day events statewide where applications are reviewed a number of times by volunteer attorneys.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
050
100150200250300
43
144
228 263
96
259
171
11083
164
95
216
1100 – Number of program participants completing N-400 applications for citizen-
ship. (output)ActualTarget
State Fiscal Year
Num
ber o
f N-4
00s
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Submit the New Americans report to the Legislature Joyce Beebe September 2012
Action Plan
12
Budget Activity: CSHD A064 - Lead Based Paint Hazard Mitigation Purpose: Ensure work performed within homes that contain lead-based paint is completed in a safe and healthy manner Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property and Improve the health of Washingtonians Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The implementation of the renovation rule has dramatically
increased trainings. The program started taking applications March 16, 2011.
• Historically, the program receives approximately 250 applications in a year with the second quarter receiving the highest number of applications followed by a dip the third quarter. This changed with the addition of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Renovation, Repair and Painting rule (RRP). Our measure is a combination of RRP and Abatement. 860 new individuals and firms are RRP certified in the first full quarter after RRP was implemented. 93 new individuals and firms were certified under Abatement.
• While our targets are based on historical data, accurate quarterly targets are difficult to set, since the number of firms and individuals getting certified is a function of economic conditions. When the economy is bad and work dries up, we tend to see more demand for training.
This slide is updated annually. Data as stands is for FY12 Q1. The next update will be FY13 Q5.
FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 130
200400600800
100012001400
51
506
1235 - Number of firms and individuals certi-fied in lead-based paint inspection and re-
mediation (output)Actual AbatementActual RenovatorsActual Before FY 12Target AbatementTarget Renovators
State Fiscal Year
Certi
ficati
ons
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Finalize policies and procedures for the Renovation, Repair and Painting rule. LBP staff December 2012
Action Plan
13
Budget Activity: CSHD A065 - Low Income Weatherization and Matchmakers Program Purpose: Improve energy efficiency and preserve affordability of low-income housing through energy conservation and repair measures Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property and Improve the health of Washingtonians Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Recovery Act units are combined with regular
weatherization units in this measure. They are shown as the gray portion of the stacked bar. Recovery Act data labels are shown above the stacked bar and in red.
• Regular Recovery Act production ended December 31, 2011.
• The Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers Recovery Act grant continues through July 2012 and is included in the Recovery Act unit count.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0100020003000400050006000700080009000
8181651 2076 2595
680 815 10002008
271 271
18532923
47
921
3369
5043
1547
3398
4735
5966
1168
2655
2742
3240
1237- Number of units preserved through weatheriza-tion and repair (outcome)
Regular Weatherization Recovery Act Targets
State Fiscal Year
Num
ber o
f Uni
tsAction Plan
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Work with weatherization network on post-Recovery Act performance strategy. Steve Payne, Teri Ramsauer
September 30, 2012
Review with weatherization network annual performance plan to results Teri Ramsauer Quarterly
14
Budget Activity: CSHD A068 - Mobile Home Relocation Assistance Purpose: Provide financial reimbursement to low-income families displaced due to mobile home park closure Priority of Government: Improve the economic vitality of businesses and individualsAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• 10 homeowners were reimbursed from the waitlist Q4,
maintaining allotment plan to ensure fund stability.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
05
101520253035
1517
1115
710
30
0
96
16
2
68
11 10
1239 - Number of homeowners receiving re-location assistance (output)
ActualTarget
State Fiscal Year
Hom
eow
ners
Rec
eivi
ng A
ssis
tanc
eAction Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Develop an Interpretive Statement to establish program policy when partial closure of mobile home parks would result in homeowner reimbursement.
Brigid Flynn Teri Ramsauer
December 2012
Action Plan
15
Budget Activity: CSHD A153 – Farmworker HousingPurpose: Provide seasonal, permanent and emergency housing development for migrant and local farm workersPriority of Government: Improve the economic vitality of businesses and householdsAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:This measure includes both permanent (year-round) and seasonal
housing. Seasonal housing includes both on-farm and off-farm projects. Each of these is funded through a separate process using different guidelines.
Permanent projects are funded through the HTF’s biannual competitive
process and are reported as “units.” Off-farm, or community-based, seasonal projects are funded through
the HTF, but applications are accepted on an open-door basis. Projects are reported as “beds.”
On-farm seasonal projects are funded through a separate program for
agricultural employers. Projects are funded on an ongoing basis and are reported as “beds.” Targets for all units/beds are based on projects placed in service; i.e., completed and available for occupancy.
Funding for the On-Farm program was eliminated in 2011-2013, so that program is in close-out phase. The remaining projects are pending final approvals and permits and the program is expected to be fully closed out by August 31, 2012.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0200400600800
1000120014001600
645 661747
1379
126
452 452642
299
606 606799
1240 – Number of Farmworker units created and preserved (includes units and beds)
(Output)
Actual Target
State Fiscal Year
Uni
ts P
rese
rved
and
Cre
ated
Action Plan
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Develop plan for ongoing oversight of on-farm projects after program close-out.
Pat Arnold August 2012
16
Budget Activity: CSHD A 157 – Homeless Housing AssistancePurpose: Provide a continuum of care that provides housing with supportive services so that individuals and families can move to permanent housing Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children and adults Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The increasing number of individuals served in Q3 primarily
reflects improvements in data collection through the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).
• In order to collect more accurate data, this data will now be reported with a one quarter lag.
This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
1070110276
108071011011246
1039510603
8107
118401270713280
1243 – Number of Individuals Provided Shelter (output)
ActualTarget
State Fiscal YearIn
divi
dual
s Pr
ovid
ed S
helt
er
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continue to review data quality, provide technical assistance to grantees on the homeless management information system.
Bruce Yasutake Ongoing
Action Plan
17
Budget Activity: CSHD A157 - Homeless Housing AssistancePurpose: Provide a continuum of care that provides housing with supportive services so that individuals and families can move to permanent housing Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children and adultsAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• During the quarter, 69% percent of reported exiting households
moved to permanent housing. This percentage reflects complete data.
• In order to collect more accurate data, this data will now be reported with a one quarter lag.
This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
67%76% 78%
64%54% 51%
57%
76%67%
75%69%
1245- Percent of Households Exiting to Per-manent Housing (outcome)
Actual Target
State Fiscal YearPe
rcen
tage
of H
ouse
hold
s
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continued monitoring of data quality Cheryl Bayle Ongoing
Complete resolution of data integration issues HMIS Team Ongoing
Action Plan
18
Budget Activity: CSHD A159 - Affordable Housing DevelopmentPurpose: Provide affordable housing Priority of Government: Improve the economic vitality of businesses and individualsAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:
• Placed in Service (PIS) volume is below target for the quarter, but remains over target for FY12 as many 2009 projects reached completion in Q1. Numbers remained low for the remainder of the biennium, since no funds were awarded in 2010 and projects funded in 2011 are just now underway.
• 58 new units targeted for homeless households were placed in service this quarter, bringing the total to 875 units for this population. This addresses 8 percent towards the need of 10,606 units of housing for homeless households.
• An application round is currently underway. Communities of Concern and Homeless Veterans set-aside awards will be announced July 31, Homeless Demonstration awards on August 23, and general 2012 awards on November 15.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700577
180
496
178
584
99
536
286
555
245
350
597567
219
0
103
1249 – Units Added to the Affordable Housing Stock (outcome)
ActualTarget
State Fiscal Year
Uni
ts A
dded
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Allocate 2011 funds to eligible projects through a competitive application process. Janet Masella October 2011 October 2011
Work with stakeholders to develop process, timeline and criteria for the award of Communities of Concern and Homeless Veteran set-aside funds.
Janet Masella March 2012 February 2012
Allocate 2012 funds to eligible projects Janet Masella November 2012
19
Budget Activity: CSHD A180- ARRA Homelessness PreventionPurpose: Provide financial assistance and services to prevent individuals and families from becoming homeless or help those who are homeless to be quickly re-housed and stabilized Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children and adultsAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• We have exceeded our target of households served for the
eleventh quarter and will more than meet our annual target.
• 3,681 of the households assisted were in the Prevention category while 1,931 were in the Rapid Re-Housing category. (These numbers are unduplicated.)
• To date 4,429 households have received rental assistance, 1,871 have received security and utility deposits and 379 have received utility payments. 5,498 of the total households were served with case management, 918 with outreach and engagement, and 1,390 were assisted with housing searches and placement. (These numbers are unduplicated.)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
17384
10042019
29053312
38284243
4649 49675237
5589
1252– Number of households provided as-sistance (output, cumulative)
Assisted Households
Target
State Fiscal Year
Hou
seho
lds
Prov
ided
Ass
ista
nce
Action Plan
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continue to monitor grantee performance to include spending rates and data entry compliance.
Jessica Simon September 2012
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
20
Budget Activity: CSHD A180- ARRA Lead Hazard Control ProgramPurpose: Provide funding to remediate lead hazards in low-income units Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property and improve the health of WashingtoniansAgency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The total number of units to be completed during the course of
the ARRA grant is 162. Under the terms of the Recovery Act, 50 percent of the funds must be spent by April 14th, 2011, so targets were set using the average cost per unit to reach this objective.
• This quarter 35 units were finished for a total of 223 finished units to date. This is 61 over the target.
• Our midpoint goal of 81 units was exceeded by 20 units six months ahead of schedule our deadline of $1.6 million by March 30, 2011 was met three months early.
• This program has now ended and no more updates will be provided.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
020406080
100120
4054
100
61
2217
21
1710
0
17 26
58
39
5 320 23
35
1253 - Number of units preserved through lead-hazard remediation (outcome)
Units in Progress
Units Complete
Target
State Fiscal Year
Uni
ts P
rese
rved
Action Plan
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Reallocate remaining funding so we exceed 162 units and spend every penny of the ARRA grant.
Cynthia Sanderson
March 2012 March 2012
21
Budget Activity: CSHD A177 – Criminal Justice Investments - Federal Purpose: Reduce drug trafficking and associated criminal gang crime Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• We are the only statewide program tracking the number of
Criminal Gang and Criminal Drug Organizations disrupted.
• This quarter, there were 34 criminal organizations of 5 or more individuals involved that were disrupted. Task forces disrupted 118 criminal organizations of 3-4 individuals.
• Task forces made 314 felony arrests and 19 misdemeanor arrests associated with these activities during the 4th quarter.
• During this quarter, Task Forces recorded a 85% successful prosecution rate on cases submitted for prosecution.
• Commerce has instituted an aggressive operational audit process (Peer Review) combined with a focused compliance monitoring/ TA schedule resulting in strong commitment by task forces to achieving program performance goals and measures.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
020406080
100120140160
88
6239
17 17 2411 17 21
32 26 24
13
56 50
108
16
2 4
33
30
18 45
6
1324 - Number of drug and gang organizations disrupted/dismantled (outcome)
Actual (DTOs only) Drug Orgs Gang Orgs
Combo Orgs Target
State Fiscal Year
Org
aniz
ation
s D
isru
pted
In Q1 FY12, the pro-gram began tracking drug and combo organi-zations.
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Complete eight of 19 drug-gang task forces Program Compliance Monitoring On-Site Evaluations and eight Self Reviews per contract year (Jul’12 to Jun’13).
Harvey Queen June 2013 On-track (1 self re- view and 3 monitorings are complete).
Track outcomes of mid-to-upper level GDO disruptions by drug-gang task forces to determine impact on criminal drug and gang organizations.
Harvey Queen June 2013 Tracking; will update report quarterly.
Complete 8 task force peer reviews per contract year (Jul’11 to Jun’12). Harvey Queen June 2013 On-track ( 2 done).
Action Plan
22
Budget Activity: CSHD A177 – Criminal Justice Investments - Federal Purpose: Reduce gun and gang-related crimes in Eastern Washington Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Project Safe Neighborhoods activities include: gang
investigation/prosecution, enhanced probation supervision and community patrols, the Keep Gangs and Guns Outta Schools Program, and public awareness campaigns.
• Eastern counties measured have included Spokane, Yakima, Benton, and Franklin.
• Results have been impacted by local economies and a decline in program funding.
*Index crimes: arson, murder, rape, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft.
This data is available annually in July.
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
59.67%53.25% 49.04%43.80% 42.53%42.80% 46.10%52.68%52.88%48.13%43.29%40.20%39.90%
39.85%
1331 – Reduce per capita index crime* in pro-gram counties compared to state average
(outcome)Project Safe NeighborhoodsTarget: stay below state average
State Fiscal Year
Per C
apita
Inde
x Cr
ime
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Fully implement program in Tri-Cities and Yakima Bill Johnston Funding reductions prevented implementation
Pending
Action Plan
23
Budget Activity: CSHD A177 – Criminal Justice Investments - Federal Purpose: Improve the quality and timeliness of forensics science services to local jurisdictions Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• This federally funded program invests in training, equipment, and
staff to improve and maintain faster forensics research results.• Commerce responsibility for this grant program is scheduled to
end September 30, 2011. The Washington State Patrol will assume full responsibility for the program after this closeout.
• In order to ensure accuracy in our final GMAP report on this measure, the 2010 information will be added Q1 2012.
• Prior reductions have encouraged a greater load on the system which has slowed output.
• This will be the last report for this measure.
This data is updated annually in May pending contractor information.
2007 2008 2009 20100
20
40
60
80
100
120
9185 89
105
1337 – Average number of days to process forensics cases (output)
Actual Target
State Fiscal Year
Num
ber o
f Day
sAction Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Complete reporting for this measure. Transfer program to Washington State Patrol.
Bill Johnston September 2011
September 2011
Action Plan
24
Budget Activity: CSHD A179 – New Americans and Workforce Development Programs Purpose: Delivers services to support WorkFirst participants in attaining a job and advancement Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children and adults Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The WorkFirst partnership is currently re-
evaluating all performance measures including those for the Commerce employment programs. This process will result in new measures being established and may also affect Commerce’s ability to collect data.
• Additionally the WorkFirst partnership is working with OFM to establish new performance based contracting methods with partners who provide WorkFirst services. Commerce employment programs have always been performance based with providers, for other partners this is a significant change. Final decisions regarding expectations are still pending.
This slide is updated quarterly with variable lag in data.
Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
335 322
422
308262
324
551590
397 386
493
403331
426
556
451 454494
360421
1520- Statewide Community Jobs participants who obtain unsubsidized employment (outcome)
Number of People Employed Percentage of Participants Obtaining Employment
State Fiscal Year
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Establishing performance measures for all Commerce WorkFirst Programs. Diane Klontz, Eva Harper, Molly Onkka
Dec 2012
Negotiating and establishing DSHS contract performance expectations for all partners within the WorkFirst partnership.
Diane Klontz, Eva Harper Dec 2012
Engaging providers and business associations in the redesign and marketing of the Career Jump program.
Joyce Beebe, Molly Onkka Dec 2012
Action Plan
25
Budget Activity: CSHD Units Preserved in the Housing Trust Fund (HTF) PortfolioPurpose: Provide affordable housing Priority of Government: Improve the economic vitality of businesses and individuals Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• The HTF preserves existing affordable units by completing
capital improvements within the HTF portfolio, project and portfolio restructures, property transfers, and year 15 transition of tax credit properties.
• In FY12 – Q4, 435 units within the HTF Portfolio were preserved. The goal is 220 units/quarter.
• The 435 units preserved in the HTF Portfolio represents 7
projects consisting of 5 loan restructures, 1 “year 15” transition of a tax credit property, and 1 project that received additional funds for capital improvements plus the affordability period was extended .
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
0
200
400
600
800
158236
158 236
531
189138 83
256
720
219
435
1791 – Units Preserved in the Housing Trust Fund Portfolio
ActualTarget
State Fiscal Year
Uni
ts P
rese
rved
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Develop and implement processes to help HTF project owners assess and plan for current and projected capital needs.
Janet Masella, Dan Riebli, and staff.
May 2012 Completed July 2012
Implement the use of a Housing Trust Fund CNA / Operational Analysis Spreadsheet to help project owners assess and plan for current and projected capital needs for projects within the HTF Portfolio. By the Due Date, assess twelve projects.
Janet Masella, Dan Riebli, and staff.
July 2013
Action Plan
26
Budget Activity: CSHD Jobs ActPurpose: Provide jobs and energy savings Priority of Government: Improve economic vitality of businesses and individuals Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• This activity provides $50 million in grant funding to K-12 public
schools and higher education institutions for the immediate creation of jobs and long-term energy and operational cost savings.
• Grantees for this program were selected through two competitive rounds. Applications were due to Commerce on July 26, 2010 and September 20, 2010.
• The number of jobs funded have not been as high as the target set by OFM, but are showing that most of the work occurred during the summer months of 2011.
• Numbers have been updated to reflect recent reports on previous quarters.
This slide is updated quarterly with no lag in data.
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4FY 11 FY 12
050
100150200250300350
3 9 1855
96
3116 117 26
55
140
248
7146
21
1793 Number of jobs funded (outcome)Grant Funded Jobs Total JobsTotal Jobs Target Grant Funded Jobs Target
State Fiscal Year
Jobs
Fun
ded
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continue tracking Jobs data and start data collection on energy savings. Bill Cole June 30, 2012
Action Plan
27
Budget Activity: CSHD A011 - Strengthening Criminal Justice Response to Victims of Crime Purpose: Make victims safer and offenders more accountable, facilitate victim participation. Enhance resources for victims Priority of Government: Improve the safety of people and property Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Each county prosecutor has a victim witness assistance unit. The
purpose of which is to provide statutory notices, information and assistance in the criminal justice system.
• The notices and services provided vary in the quality and quantity from county to county. We have divided the eligible services into two categories of “assistance” and “notification.” While notifications are important, they tend to be done by letter, with little or no other contact with the victim. Thus, we assert that services that actually include some action of assistance do strengthen the criminal justice response to victims of crime.
• Data from SFY 2011 was used to establish a baseline.
• Early indications demonstrate that what you measure can drive performance. Programmatic emphasis on victim assistance activities has resulted in an increase in the provision of assistance.
This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag in data to ensure accuracy.
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Continue to monitor to see if emphasis can be sustained over time Chris Fenno September 2013
Action Plan
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
July-Sept. (Q1 FY12) Oct.-Dec. (Q2 FY12)Jan.-Mar. (Q3 FY12) FY2011 Average
2009- Victims Who Receive a Service and Assistance (output)
28
Budget Activity: CSHD A008 - Services to Crime Victims Purpose: Improve services delivered to victims of crime through Office of Crime Victims Advocacy (OCVA) contractors Priority of Government: Improve the security of Washington’s vulnerable children Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:
• Data collected on service outcomes over 16 quarters has clearly shown the services to be effective. We are now focusing on continued quality improvement through quantity. The theory being that more time with clients results in broader, deeper service delivery.
• Q1 of SFY 2012 we began reporting on the median hours of service delivered per agency. Total agencies measured: 113.
• Targets are based off of previous biennium median service hours, and reflect fluctuations due to seasons, school year and granting cycles.
• Each successive year has shown an increase in direct service hours since we began data collection in July, 2006.
• Median service hours per agency was selected as measure to allow analysis of agency performance for monitoring. This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag in data to ensure accuracy.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q80
100
200
300
400
500
600
394 382
492
2010- Median Hours of Service Delivered Per Agency (output)
Actual Target
State Fiscal Year
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Given that this is a new measure, continue to monitor median service hours through the rest of the fiscal year and watch for trends.
Bev Emery Sept 2013
Action Plan
29
Budget Activity: Housing and Essential NeedsPurpose: Provides housing essential needs in the form of rent assistance and support for transportation and hygiene items.Priority of Government: Improve economic vitality of businesses and individuals Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:• Housing and Essential Needs (HEN) rent and utility assistance
helped 3,978 MCS-eligible persons in Q3 obtain or maintain housing.
• The estimated MCS enrollment for March (from DSHS) was 10,430. After sampling MCS client case files, it is clear that not all MCS enrolled clients are in need of housing or essential needs assistance from local HEN grantees.
• In order to collect more accurate data, this measure will be reported with a one quarter lag.
This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8FY 12 FY 13
02,0004,0006,0008,000
10,00012,000
0
2222
3978
2022- Number of People Receiving Housing Assistance
Actual Target
State Fiscal Year
Peop
le R
ecei
ving
Hou
sing
Ass
ista
nce
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Based on data from the homeless management information system (HMIS) and the number of MCS eligible from DSHS, we are soliciting Performance Targets from grantees that will more accurately project their spending and service levels for SFY 2013 – due to Commerce in August. From the grantee Targets we will be better able to project performance and where to make program adjustments.
Kathy Kinard September
Action Plan
30
Budget Activity: Foreclosure Fairness ProgramPurpose: Protect Homeowners from Unnecessary ForeclosuresPriority of Government: Improve economic vitality of businesses and individuals Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Analysis:
• Homeowners may be represented in more than one category during the same quarter.
• Counseling numbers are below target due to inexperienced counselors and the effort needed to adequately represent homeowners through mediation. More effort per client results in less clients.
• Lenders slowed the foreclosure process to address compliance with the Act and in anticipation of the AG settlement. This reduced the number of borrowers eligible for mediation and the number of borrowers referred to mediation. We expect this trend to reverse in the next quarter.
This slide is updated quarterly with a one quarter lag in data.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8FY 12 FY 13
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
320
1683
876
297 216 242464 309 378
2023- Number of Foreclosure Fairness Services Provided to Homeowners
Counseling Civil Legal Assistance
Mediation Counseling Target
Civil Legal Assistance Target Mediation Target
State Fiscal Year
Hom
eow
ners
Action Item Lead Due Date Date Completed
Establish new targets. Rick Torrance September 30, 2012
Coordinate new public service announcement with DFI. Nisha Wade September, 2012
Action Plan
31
Budget Activity: Foreclosure Fairness ProgramPurpose: Protect Homeowners from Unnecessary ForeclosuresPriority of Government: Improve economic vitality of businesses and individuals Agency Priority: Community Capacity
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8FY 12 FY 13
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 6 111 721
3
37
95
3
Non-Agreements
Beneficiary Lack of Good Faith Borrower Lack of Good Faith
Borrower Withdrawal Other
State Fiscal Year
Hom
eow
nersQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
FY 12 FY 13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
521
44
1
14
19
3
6
20
Agreements
Stayed in Home Did Not Stay in Home Other
State Fiscal Year
Hom
eow
ners
Mediation Outcomes