Mathew Cox - Dialogue Consulting - Short workshop: Social media – Marketing health insurance
1 Another world is under construction? Social movement responses to inequality and crisis Laurence...
-
Upload
jace-chambliss -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Another world is under construction? Social movement responses to inequality and crisis Laurence...
1
Another world is under construction?Social movement responses to inequality and crisis
Laurence Cox
Participatory action research programme in social movement practice
/ Grassroots Gatherings
2
Green Party experience 1998 editorial (DL and Labour in power):
we are fools to see the state, EU, media and legal systems as our natural allies
Betting on elites abandons popular mobilisation (and hands it to the right)
GP in government did sell out allied movements on Shannon, Tara, Rossport
2009 attack on unions on behalf of media
Making our organisations dependent on elites comes at a heavy political cost
3
Inequality is no accident Structured constellations of power, interest
and culture underpin systemic inequality Serious struggles for equality involve
confronting these directly Central role of independent social
movements of those without power and wealth
Power from below: numbers, delegitimising elites and capacity to disrupt
“Bait and switch” where we forget this and seek to convince the powerful instead
4
The antidote to inequality is popular movements For most of the world democracy,
independence from empire and (where they exist) welfare states arrived in living memory
They were forced on elites by massive popular movements which overthrew empires, remade states and forced preventative concessions
Defusing this basic historical fact – and normalising existing arrangements as eternal – is crucial to “business as usual”
5
Popular movements in Ireland Land War transformed class structure Civil Rights Movement in North Women’s movement defeated church,
broke “private patriarchy” LGBTQ movements reshaped Irish sexuality Defeat of nuclear power at Carnsore Scale of community action,
from housing campaigns via CPAD to Tenants First
Rossport still holding off Shell and state Irish movement experience different, but
not less than e.g. W Europe or Latin America
6
Squaring the circle – for a little while Brief period in Ireland of advancing equality while
avoiding direct confrontation with state power Some movements helped elites modernise Irish
society (“pushing on an open door”) EU and Celtic Tiger enabled
funding without redistribution Structural transformation went on long finger Historical context and strategic thinking forgotten Institutional / policy framework assumed as given This period is now ending as quickly as it came
7
Movements into “sectors” This process has affected trade unions,
community action, women’s organisations, LBGTQ activism, environmentalists, youth workers, development / solidarity groups, health / disability groups, anti-racism etc…
As we have become “sectoralised” we have lost track of what’s happened to each other and focussed on the state
8
Business as usual is over Elites see decreasing “rate of return” from
institutionalised movements (union experience) The Irish state no longer wants independent
advocates for equality (which tells us something) Inconvenient groups shut down, shut up or
assimilated into the state Parallels earlier US experience of “War on Poverty” This predates the crisis, but crisis provides an
excuse “Partnership” rules are being unilaterally rewritten State “responds to P – K4 with a lob over the net” Many groups have no alternative strategy but to
plead for the re-establishment of partnership
9
Global neo-liberal context Welfare states in W and national
developmentalism in S represented elite compromises with popular movements (anti-fascist resistance, anti-colonial nationalism, organised working class)
Neo-liberalism can’t make such deals constant problem of legitimacy and consent
Hence right-wing populism, fundamentalism, “opinion” as leisure activity, etc.
Search for “progressive” consent
10
Global “civil society” as simulation of consent New meaning of “civil society” as approved
interlocutors of power (contrast with 1980s) Often violently opposed to “incivil society”,
movements of the poor (RSA, India, Thailand…)
Movement language and processes borrowed for neo-liberal “governance” (consultation etc.)
Cut-price service delivery in majority world Economic gains for small constituencies or
cultural ones for larger ones sometimes possible
NGOs etc. used as cheap sources of legitimacy in return for official status and / or funding
11
Neo-liberalism in systemic crisis “Globalisation from below” of popular
movements against neo-liberalism (esp. Latin America, India, South Africa, W. Europe)
Crisis of legitimacy (summit protests, failure of war to restore “authority”)
Foreign policy crisis (in Middle East, “pink tide” in Latin America)
Economic failures (financial crash, food crisis, global warming)
12
Why systemic crisis? Regimes of accumulation are medium-term
institutional arrangements, subject to change albeit at a cost; they’re provisional only
When they no longer work for elite groups, they abandon them (as in 1970s) for alternative strategies, wise or unwise
Similarly, many NGOs seeking to turn back into SMOs: “respectable face of the movement”, not “caring face of capitalism”
13
… and Ireland? Crisis of developmentalism came early Belief that inequality etc. came from
“lagging behind”, lack of state commitment etc.
State and European elites seen as “on the side” of movements or capable of being so
Generational “coming in from the cold” 1990s conversion of social movement
organisations (SMOs) into NGOs
14
Boiling the frog, slowly Intense sectoral fragmentation on state
terms – unions, community, environmental, development / solidarity, peace / left…
Professional core has become key to what were once movement organisations
Specialising in policy, funding, media etc. Non-career participants unable to keep up,
progressively demobilised “clients” Groups which have not fitted the new
forms and structures have gone to the wall
15
“You and whose army?” Structural weakness faced with aggressive
attacks from state and media elites Loss of broader activist base, ability to
mobilise large numbers, capacity to disrupt Need for participation, legitimacy, funding
etc. to continue organisations Hence “the means justify the ends” State can happily roll up separate
“sectors” on its own terms, in its own time
16
People’s Global Action experience Zapatista-sponsored Encuentro, 1996 Asian peasant organisations: “we came here
to shut down the financial institutions” Seattle: direct action on the streets and new
confidence of majority world countries collapse World Trade Organisation meeting
No new “round” possible since then This achieved by popular movements
refusing to let elites set the terms of debate
17
Strategic crisis of Irish movement organisations Financial dependency on state, EU, donors Two decades of professionalisation,
demobilisation and respectability Such organisations now find it hard to
defend themselves, never mind their broader agenda, against their sponsors
State, EU and (most) donors will ultimately side with powerful, wealthy and culturally dominant against the poor and powerless
Where can movements for equality stand that is not dependent on their opponents?
18
Is there life after partnership? Think seriously about how we can win Routine politics, when the rules are rewritten
from above, are a strategy for being sidelined Relativise our routines / known world of “the
sector” – make new allies on unofficial terms Stand up to the state, together and publicly Build sustainable movement-based groups Stop making ourselves dependent Remember we used to do this stuff!
19
What does this mean in practice? Take our stand not in official legitimacy but in
popular struggles mass challenge to power Raise large themes, not just technical objections Move from funding-led to membership-led, in
finances, activities and strategies Rethink role of core workers: from career-based to
mass-based organising strategies From “working the system” to campaigning,
mobilising, popular education for structural change
Strategy for successful confrontation with power starts with how we organise ourselves
20
Reasserting equality within movement organisations Move from being transmission belt for
priorities and structures set from above, back to grassroots-controlled organisations
Change in training and education: from convincing elites / securing funding to mobilising, radicalising, winning
Rely on natural strengths of popular movements: delegitimising power, disrupting business as usual, setting alternative agendas
See ourselves as part of movement, not part of state
21
What role for NGOs etc. after partnership? Service delivery, lobbying etc. useful and
necessary, but no substitute for mobilising
Complementarity to popular movements as “respectable interlocutors” for state
This only works if there is a popular movement to force the state to negotiate
… and if NGOs etc. act out of solidarity with popular movements rather than in competition with them, as would-be monopoly representatives of civil society
22
Solidarity across movements State’s new priorities cannot be effectively
challenged using “the master’s tools” “Ecology of knowledges” and languages has
to be developed in struggle, from below Movements need each other to move outside
state, media, academic definitions of reality “Your struggles are also my struggles” –
if our goal is equality
23
Learning from each other’s practice: what we can do Survivor struggles highlighting the structural
violence of the past and elite collusion Rossport alliance across movements and
issues in face of overwhelming force Tenants First etc. moving outside “sector” Migrant-led organisations and Bloom! Return of disruptive tactics and popular
voice Loss of popular legitimacy for state policy
24
Delegitimising the elites Government, Finance, EU, media etc. claim to
speak for the general interest This enables them to attack our organisations,
create new inequalities and deepen existing gulfs
Movements have to set popular terms of debate, not remain on hostile terrain defined by statute, administrative practice and academic specialisations
Stand outside purely national / EU setting
25
“Another world is under construction”: some proposals
A counter-summit linking movements and sectors to visibly challenge and delegitimise state practice
Movement-based: large-scale participation, democratic processes and popular (not technical) priorities
Tied to strategic mass action for equality outside “channels”
26
Learning to be loyal to each other, not organisations Summer schools etc. to bring activists
from different movements together in self-controlled, self-funded spaces
Build collective strength, self-confidence, shared perspective for the long haul
Change sense of “we” from professionals in sector to popular movements in action
Learn from international experiences Highlander Folk School model may help
27
A national conversation outside the state Model of Zapatista “Other campaign” Slow, non-party tour of the country Listening to communities, workplaces,
movements and others Conversation with each other about
needs, equality and power “Beyond alliances of activists … to
building general cultures of politics and life”
Remaking the country “from below and on the left”
28
Hanging together – or hanging separately Our practice has conceded elites the right
to set the agenda and take equality off the table
To fight for equality we have to step outside their terrain and become independently powerful actors again, on our own terms
There is no textbook for doing this – but plenty of historical experience and “globalisation from below” to learn from
29
We can do it, ourselves “Our liberties were won in wars and
revolutions so terrible that we do not fear our governors: they fear us. Our children giggle and eat ice-cream in the palaces of past rulers. We snap our fingers at kings. We laugh at popes. When we have built up tyrants, we have brought them down.” (Ken MacLeod)