1 20/10/2004

Petroleum Development OmanPetroleum Development Oman

Xxxxxxxxxxx (Audit Title) Xxxxxxxxxxx (Audit Title)

HSE MS AuditHSE MS Audit

Xxxxxx (Period)Xxxxxx (Period)

2 20/10/2004

AgendaAgenda Audit teamAudit team Terms of referenceTerms of reference MethodologyMethodology ScheduleSchedule Audit opinionAudit opinion Classification of findingsClassification of findings Positives – Negatives Positives – Negatives Review of 8 HSE MS elementsReview of 8 HSE MS elements Audit follow-upAudit follow-up

3 20/10/2004

Team MembersTeam Members

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

4 20/10/2004

Terms of Reference 1Terms of Reference 1

Objective:Objective:

The objective of the audit is to The objective of the audit is to assess the effectiveness of the assess the effectiveness of the HSE Management System andHSE Management System and Operational ControlsOperational Controls in the in the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

5 20/10/2004

Terms of Reference 2 (SCOPE)Terms of Reference 2 (SCOPE)Special attention will be given to:Special attention will be given to:

• Adherence to PDO HSE policiesAdherence to PDO HSE policies• The process used for preparation and validation of the HSE Assurance The process used for preparation and validation of the HSE Assurance

Statements as part of the Annual Assurance ProcessStatements as part of the Annual Assurance Process• Adherence to PDO Minimum Environmental Standards Adherence to PDO Minimum Environmental Standards • Processes for the identification of HSE-related legislative requirements, Processes for the identification of HSE-related legislative requirements,

their dissemination, and for confirming adherence to themtheir dissemination, and for confirming adherence to them• Completeness of the identification of HSE critical activities, roles, Completeness of the identification of HSE critical activities, roles,

responsibilities and competency requirements associated with HSE responsibilities and competency requirements associated with HSE critical activitiescritical activities

• Implementation of HSE training program’s to close competency gaps for Implementation of HSE training program’s to close competency gaps for those carrying out of HSE critical activitiesthose carrying out of HSE critical activities

• Availability and effectiveness of required procedures for the Availability and effectiveness of required procedures for the identification and control of all significant hazards and effects including identification and control of all significant hazards and effects including the demonstration of ALARPthe demonstration of ALARP

• Responsibilities, accountabilities and effectiveness of individual HSE Responsibilities, accountabilities and effectiveness of individual HSE tasks and targets and their contribution to continuous performance tasks and targets and their contribution to continuous performance improvementimprovement

6 20/10/2004

Terms of Reference 3 (SCOPE CONT’D)Terms of Reference 3 (SCOPE CONT’D)• Effectiveness in HSE data management and HSE performance Effectiveness in HSE data management and HSE performance

monitoringmonitoring• Effectiveness of HSE documentation and the processes for its Effectiveness of HSE documentation and the processes for its

disseminationdissemination• Effectiveness of controls with respect to safeguarding of asset Effectiveness of controls with respect to safeguarding of asset

integrityintegrity• Effectiveness of change control proceduresEffectiveness of change control procedures• Requirements for contractors to have an implemented HSE policy Requirements for contractors to have an implemented HSE policy

and MSand MS• Completeness of HSE CasesCompleteness of HSE Cases• Adequacy of emergency response procedures and contingency plansAdequacy of emergency response procedures and contingency plans• Confirmation that findings from audits, inspections and incident Confirmation that findings from audits, inspections and incident

investigations have been satisfactorily addressed, and closed out in investigations have been satisfactorily addressed, and closed out in an auditable processan auditable process

• Identification of significant gaps in the implementation of the HSE MS Identification of significant gaps in the implementation of the HSE MS which have not been recognised, or for which no prioritised and which have not been recognised, or for which no prioritised and resourced remediation plan is in place.resourced remediation plan is in place.

• Adequacy and monitoring of the Electrical Infrastructure HSE PlanAdequacy and monitoring of the Electrical Infrastructure HSE Plan

7 20/10/2004

StandardsStandards

The audit was conducted in accordance with The audit was conducted in accordance with methodology in EP95 0130 (December 1999)methodology in EP95 0130 (December 1999)

The Audit was conducted against the following The Audit was conducted against the following standards (in order of priority):standards (in order of priority):

Oman laws and regulations Oman laws and regulations

PDO HSE policy PDO HSE policy

PDO HSE-MS as documented in the HSE Code of PDO HSE-MS as documented in the HSE Code of Practice Manual CP-122Practice Manual CP-122

PDO standards and proceduresPDO standards and procedures

Group and SIEP HSE policies, commitments & Group and SIEP HSE policies, commitments & guidelines such as EP95 000guidelines such as EP95 000

8 20/10/2004

Areas VisitedAreas Visited

FacilitiesFacilitiesMaintenance, Operations and Construction activity taking Maintenance, Operations and Construction activity taking place in xxxxxxxxxxplace in xxxxxxxxxx

In particular:In particular:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

9 20/10/2004

Audit ProcessAudit Process

• Terms of referenceTerms of reference• Audit programmeAudit programme• EP95-0130 EP95-0130

FamiliarisationFamiliarisation

Review & TestingReview & Testing

ReportingReporting

Site visit Interviews Test findings

Drafting EditingReport

Finalisation Agree findingsPresentFindings

StudyDocumentation

TODAY!TODAY!

10 20/10/2004

ObjectivityObjectivityBalanced Team (Yes? Contractor!)Balanced Team (Yes? Contractor!)

xxxx, xxx, xxxx, xxx,

IndependenceIndependence Yes, one team member involved from audited Yes, one team member involved from audited

operationoperation

Defined ProcessDefined Process EP 95EP 95 0 00000

Standard ApproachStandard Approach 8 HSE-MS elements8 HSE-MS elements

Base questionnairesBase questionnaires

Standard evaluation sheetsStandard evaluation sheets

11 20/10/2004

Audit AssessmentAudit Assessment

Level of concernLevel of concern: : SpecificSpecific

Level of concernLevel of concern: : Overall scope forOverall scope for enhancementenhancement

GoodGood

FairFair

Level of concernLevel of concern: : Overall cause for Overall cause for concernconcern

Level of concernLevel of concern: : Overall cause for Overall cause for grave concerngrave concern

PoorPoor

Unacceptable Unacceptable

12 20/10/2004

123

Weakness Classification Matrix Weakness Classification Matrix People Assets Environ-

mentRepu-tation

Severity

0

1

2

3

4

5

Noinjury

Slightinjury

Minorinjury

Majorinjury

Singlefatality

Multiplefatalities

Nodamage

Slightdamage

Minordamage

Localdamage

Majordamage

Extensivedamage

Noeffect

Noimpact

Slighteffect

Slightimpact

Minoreffect

Minorimpact

Localisedeffect

Consider-able

impact

Majoreffect

Nationalimpact

Inter-nationalimpact

Massiveeffect

Never heard of in

EP industry

A

LowLow

MediumMedium

HighHigh

Has occurred in EP industry

B

Has occurred inthe audited OU

C DHappens

several times a year in the audited OU

EHappens

several times a year in the

audited facility

High: Though not serious, essential to be brought to Management attention. Includes medium weaknesses as repeat from previous reports.

Low: No major HSE impact at process level, correction will assure greater effectiveness/efficiency in process concerned.

Serious: Exposes OU to a major extent in terms of achievement of corporate HSE objectives or results.

Medium: Could result in perceptible and undesirable effect on achievement of HSE objectives.

SeriousSerious

13 20/10/2004

Audit OpinionAudit Opinion

Serious:Serious: 0 0

HighHigh:: 2 (Reporting) 2 (Reporting)

MediumMedium:: 1616

LowLow:: 9 9

Total:Total: 27 27

Overall Audit Opinion: Overall Audit Opinion: XXXXXXXX

14 20/10/2004

Audit OpinionAudit Opinion

0 0 0/F - 0 0 My - 0 F F - 0 F F/My My 1-2 - - - 0 My - - >2 - - -

Key: F = few <20 My = many >40

Findings Most Favourable Opinion S H M H+M Unacc. Poor Fair Good

15 20/10/2004

Classification of FindingsClassification of Findings

Each Finding is categorised as follows:Each Finding is categorised as follows:

1.1. Category:Category: People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)

2.2. Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix):Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix): Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L)

3.3. Each Finding is assigned to one HSE MS elementEach Finding is assigned to one HSE MS element

4.4. A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one or more Recommendations to address the gap.or more Recommendations to address the gap.

16 20/10/2004

Classification of FindingsClassification of Findings

Each Finding is categorised as follows:Each Finding is categorised as follows:

1.1. Category:Category: People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)People (P), Assets (A), Environment (E) or Reputation (R)

2.2. Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix):Severity level (from Weakness Classification Matrix): Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) Serious (S), High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L)

3.3. Each Finding is assigned to one HSE MS elementEach Finding is assigned to one HSE MS element

4.4. A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one A Finding is accompanied by the Significance and one or more Recommendations to address the gap.or more Recommendations to address the gap.

17 20/10/2004

Findings ClassificationFindings Classification

Findings per HSE MS Element

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

1

0

1

3

0

6

5

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

4

2

1

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Leadership &Commitments

Policy & Strategic Objective

Organ. Res & Documents

HEMP

Planning and Procedure

Impelentation & monitoring

Audits

Review

Ele

men

ts

Number of findings

Serious

High

Meduim

Low

18 20/10/2004

Positive Findings Positive Findings

System Integrity is being maintained at high level.

Additional power requirements are being met in a timely manner

Role of CFDH is being discharged well. (Authorisation of Staff, Issue of Standards and Proceedures, Technical Support to Assets

19 20/10/2004

Areas of ConcernAreas of Concern

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

20 20/10/2004

1: Leadership and Commitment1: Leadership and Commitment

PositivePositiveXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvementXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

21 20/10/2004

2: Policy & Strategic Objectives2: Policy & Strategic Objectives

PositivePositiveXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvementXXXXXXXXXXXX

22 20/10/2004

3: Organisation, Responsibilities, 3: Organisation, Responsibilities, Resources, Standards and Documents Resources, Standards and Documents

PositivePositive XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

23 20/10/2004

4: HEMP 4: HEMP PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

24 20/10/2004

5: Planning and Procedures5: Planning and ProceduresPositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

25 20/10/2004

6: Implementation & Monitoring6: Implementation & Monitoring

PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

26 20/10/2004

7: Audit 7: Audit

PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

27 20/10/2004

8: Management Review8: Management Review

PositivePositive XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Area’s for improvementArea’s for improvement XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

28 20/10/2004

Audit Follow-UpAudit Follow-Up

Review findings and recommendationsReview findings and recommendationsIdentify action partiesIdentify action partiesAgree and prioritise actions, set XXXAgree and prioritise actions, set XXXResource actionsResource actionsDevelop implementation scheduleDevelop implementation scheduleSet-up reporting and review programmeSet-up reporting and review programmeMonitor follow-up progress to close outMonitor follow-up progress to close out

XXXXXX responsibilityresponsibility !!

29 20/10/2004

The EndThe Endof the of the

Close Out PresentationClose Out Presentation