1 2. Neurons and Conductance-Based Models Lecture Notes on Brain and Computation Byoung-Tak Zhang...
-
Upload
elmer-stewart -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of 1 2. Neurons and Conductance-Based Models Lecture Notes on Brain and Computation Byoung-Tak Zhang...
1
2. Neurons and Conductance-Based Models
Lecture Notes on Brain and Computation
Byoung-Tak Zhang
Biointelligence Laboratory
School of Computer Science and Engineering
Graduate Programs in Cognitive Science, Brain Science and Bioinformatics
Brain-Mind-Behavior Concentration Program
Seoul National University
E-mail: [email protected]
This material is available online at http://bi.snu.ac.kr/
Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience, T. P . Trappenberg, 2002.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr 2
Outline2.12.22.32.4
2.5
2.6
Modeling biological neuronsNeurons are specialized cellsBasic synaptic mechanismsThe generation of action potentials: Hodgkin-Huxley equationsDendritic trees, the propagation of action potentials, and compartmental modelsAbove and beyond the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron: fatigue, bursting, and simplifica-tions
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.1 Modeling biological neurons
The networks of neuron-like elements¨ The heart of many information-processing abilities of brain
The working of single neurons¨ Information transmission
Simplified versions of the real neurons¨ Make computations with large numbers of neurons tractable¨ Enable certain emergent properties in networks¨ Nodes
The sophisticated computational abilities of neurons The computational approaches used to describe single neu-
rons
3
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2 Neurons are specialized cells
4
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.1 Structural properties (1)
5
Fig. 2.1 (A) Schematic neuron that is similar in appear-ance to pyramidal cells in the neocortex. The compo-nents outlined in the drawing are, however, typical for major neuron types.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.1 Structural properties (2) Fig. 2.1 (B-E) Examples of mor-
phologies of different neurons. ¨ (B) Pyramidal cell from the mo-
tor cortex¨ (C) Granule neuron from olfac-
tory bulb¨ (D) Spiny neuron from the cau-
date nucleus¨ (E) Golgi-stained Purkinje cell
from the cerebellum.
6
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.2 Information-processing mechanisms
Neurons can receive signals from many other neurons
Synapses (contact site)¨ Presynaptic (from axon)¨ Postsynaptic (to dendrite or cell
body)
Signal = action potential¨ Electronic pulse
7
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.3 Membrane potential Membrane potential
¨ The difference between the electric potential within the cell and its surround-ing
8
mV
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.4 Ion channels (1) The permeability of the membrane to certain ions is achieved by ion channels
9
Fig. 2.2 Schematic illustrations of dif-ferent types of ion channels. (A) Leak-age channels are always open. (B) Neu-rotransmitter-gated ion channel that opens when a neurotransmitter mole-cule binds to the channel protein, which in turn changes the shape of the channel protein so that specific ions can pass through. (C) The opening of voltage-gated ion channels depends on the membrane potential. This is indicated by a little wire inside the neurons and a grounding wire outside the neuron. Such ion channels can in addition be neurotransmitter-gated (not shown in this figure). (D) Ion pumps are ion channels that transport ions against the concentration gradients. (E) Some neu-rotransmitters bind to receptor mole-cules which triggers a whole cascade of chemical reactions in neurons which produce secondary messengers which in turn can influence ion channels
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.4 Ion channels (2) Major ion channels
¨ Pump: use energy¨ Channel: use difference of ions concentration
10
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.2.4 Ion channels (3) Resting potential
11
mVVrest 65
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
SupplementEquilibrium potential and Nernst equation
12
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.3 Basic synaptic mechanisms Signal transduction within the cell is mediated by electrical
potentials.¨ Electrical synapse or gap-junctions¨ Chemical synapse
Synaptic plasticity
13
2.3.1 Chemical synapses and neurotransmitters neurotransmitters stored in
synaptic vesicles¨ glutamate (Glu)¨ gamma-aminobutyric acid
(GABA)¨ Dopamine (DA)¨ acetylcholine (ACh)
synaptic cleft (a small gap of only a few micrometers)
Receptor (channel) and Postsy-naptic potential (PSP)
Fig. 2.3 (A) Schematic illustration of chemical synapses and (B) an electron microscope photo of a synaptic terminal.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr 14
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr 15
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.3.2 Excitatory and inhibitory synapses
Different types of neurotransmitters Excitatory synapse
¨ PSP: depolarization¨ Neurotransmitters trigger the increase of the membrane potential¨ Neurotransmitter: Glu, ACh
Inhibitory synapse¨ PSP: hyperpolarization¨ Neurotransmitters trigger the decrease of the membrane potential¨ Neurotransmitter: GABA
Non-standard synapses¨ Influence ion channels in an indirect way¨ Modulation
16
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.3.3 The time-course of postsynaptic potentials
Excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) resulting from non-NMDA re-ceptors
w: amplitude factor¨ strength of EPSP or efficiency of the
synapse f(t)=t·exp(-t): α-function
¨ functional form of a PSP Inhibitory postsynaptic potential
(IPSP) resulting from non-NMDA re-ceptors
EPSP resulting from NMDA receptor
17
peakttNMDAnonm etwV /
21 //)( ttm
NMDAm eeVcV
peakttNMDAnonm etwV /
(2.1)
(2.2)
Fig. 2.4 Examples of an EPSP (solid line) and IPSP (dashed line) as modeled by an α-function after the synaptic delay. The dotted lines represent two examples of the difference of two exponential functions with different amplitudes. Note that the time scale is variable and not meant to fit experimen-tal data in the illustration. Indeed, NMDA synapses are often much slower than non-NMDA synapses, often showing their maximal value long after the peak in the effect of the non-NMDA synapses.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.3.4 Superposition of PSP
18
Electrical potentials have the physical property¨ They superimpose as the sum of individual potentials.
Linear superposition of synaptic input Nonlinear voltage-current relationship Nonlinear interaction
¨ Divisive ¨ Shunting inhibition
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4 The generation of action potentials
19
Fig. 2.6 Schematic illustration o the minimal mechanisms necessary for the generation of a spike. The resting poten-tial of a cell is maintained by a leakage channel through which potassium ions can flow as a result of concentration differences between the inside of the cell and the surround-ing fluid. A voltage-gated sodium channel allows the in-flux of positively charged sodium ions and thereby the de-polarization of the cell. After a short time the sodium channel is blocked and a voltage-gated potassium channel opens. This results in a hyperpolarization of the cell. Fi-nally, the hyperpolarization causes the inactivation of the voltage-gated channels and a return to the resting potential.
Fig. 2.5 Typical form of an action potential, redrawn from an oscilloscope picture of Hodgkin and Huxley.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr 20
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4.3 Hodgkin-Huxley equations (1)
21
Quantified the process of spike generation
Input Current ¨ Electric conductance¨ Membrane potential relative to
the resting potential ¨ Equilibrium potential
K+, Na+ conductance dependent ¨ n, The activation of the K channel¨ m, The activation of the Na channel¨ h, The inactivation of the Na channel
)( ionionion EVgI
ionE
iong
V
4ngg KK
(2.3)
(2.4)
(2.5)hmgg NaNa3
Fig. 2.7 A Circuit representation of the Hodgkin-Huxley model. This circuit includes a capacitor on which the membrane potential can b e measured and three resistors together with their own battery modeling the ion channels; two are voltage-dependent and one is static.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4.3 Hodgkin-Huxley equations (2)
n, m, h have the same form of first-order differential-equation x should be substituted by each of the variables n, m and h
22
)]([)(
10 Vxx
Vdt
dx
x
(2.6)
Fig. 2.8 (A) The equilibrium functions and (B) time constants for the three variables n, m, and h in the Hodgkin-Huxley model with parameters used to model the gain axon of the squid.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4.3 Hodgkin-Huxley equations (3)
Hodgkin-Huxley model¨ C, capacitance¨ I(t), external current
Three ionic currents
23
ion
ion tIIdt
dVC )(
(2.7)
)()()()( 34 tIEVgEVhmgEVngdt
dVC LLNaNaKK
)]([ 0 Vnndt
dnn
)]([ 0 Vmmdt
dmm
)]([ 0 Vhhdt
dhh
(2.8)
(2.9)
(2.10)
Fig. 2.7 A Circuit represen-tation of the Hodgkin-Hux-ley model. This circuit in-cludes a capacitor on which the membrane potential can b e measured and three re-sistors together with their own battery modeling the ion channels; two are volt-age-dependent and one is static.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4.4 Numerical integration
A. A Hodgkin-Huxley neuron responds with constant firing to a constant external current.
B. The dependence of the firing rate with the external current (nonlinear curve). (dashed line: noise added)
24
Fig. 2.9 (A) A Hodgkin-Huxley neuron responds with constant firing to a constant external cur-rent of Iext = 10. (B) The depen-dence of the firing rate with the strength of the external current shows a sharp onset of firing around Ic
ext = 6 (solid line). High-frequency noise in the current has the tendency to ‘linearize’ these response characteristics (dashed line).
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4.5 Refractory period Absolute refractory period
¨ The inactivation of the sodium channel makes it impossible to initiate another action potential for about 1ms.
¨ Limiting the firing rates of neu-rons to a maximum of about 1000Hz
Relative refractory period¨ Due to the hyperpolarizing action
potential it is relatively difficult to initiate another spike during this time period.
¨ Reduced the firing frequency of neurons even further
25
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.4.6 Propagation of action potentials
26
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr 27
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.5 Dendritic trees, the propagation of action po-tentials, and compartmental models
Axons with active membranes able to generate action poten-tial
But, dendirtes are a bit more like passive conductors¨ The long cable¨ Cable theory
Compartmental models
28
Fig. 2.10 Short cylindrical compartments describ-ing small equipotential pieces of a passive den-drite or small pieces of a active dendrite or axon when including the necessary ion channels. (A) Chains and (B) branches determine the boundary conditions of each compartment. (C) The topol-ogy of single neurons can be reconstructed with compartments, and such models can be simulated using numerical integration techniques.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.5.1 Cable theory (1) Cable equation : the spatial-temporal variation of an electric
potential
The potential of the cable at each location of the cable, the physical properties of the cable and has the dimensions of
Ωcm,¨ Ex) cylindrical cable of diameter d,¨ The specific resistance of the membrane,¨ The specific intracellular resistance of the cable,
29
),(4),(),(),(
2
22 txIRdVtxV
t
txV
x
txVinjmrestm
mm
i
m
R
dR
4
),( txVm
mR
iR
(2.11)
(2.12)
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.5.1 Cable theory (2) The time constant
¨ The resistance of the membrane,¨ The capacitance, the capacitance per unit area,
Stable configuration
Semi-infinite cable
Nonlinear cable equation, include voltage-dependent ion channels as in the Hodgkin-Huxley equation
30
mmm CR
mR
mC
xxm evevxV
21)(
restx
restm VeVVV )( 0
)),,((4),(),(),(
2
22 ttxVIRdVtxV
t
txV
x
txVminjmrestm
mm
(2.13)
(2.14)
(2.15)
(2.16)
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.5.2 Physical shape of neurons The physical shape of neurons
¨ Simple homogeneous linear cable is to divide the cable into small pieces, compartment.
¨ Each compartment is governed by a cable equation for a finite cable
¨ The boundary conditions
31
2
11
2
2
)(
)()(2),(
jij
jjjm
xx
tVtVV
x
txV
(2.17)
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.5.3 Neuron simulators Ex) Neuron, Genesis
32
Fig. 2.11 Example of the NEURON simulation environment. The example shows a simulation with a re-constructed pyramidal cell, in which a short current pulse was injected at t = 1 ms at the location of the dendrite indicated by the dot and the cursor in the window on the left.
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.6 Above and beyond the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron: fatigue, bursting, simplifications (1)
Simplification of the Hodgkin-Huxley model¨ The time constant is so small for all values of .¨ The rate of inactivation of the Na+ channel is approximately re-
ciprocal to the opening of the K+ channel.¨ Neocortical neurons often show no inactivation of the fast Na+
channel.
¨ The recovery of the membrane potential
33
)]([ 0 VRRdt
dRR
m V
R
(2.18)
(2.19)
)())(()( tIEVVgEVRgdt
dVC NaNaKK
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.6 Above and beyond the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron: fatigue, bursting, simplifications (2)
Extensions of the Hodgkin-Huxley model¨ Ca2+ channel, a dynamic gating variable T.¨ Slow hyperpolarizing current , Ca2+-mediated K+ channel, a
dynamic gating variable H.
34
)()()()())(( tIEVHgEVTgEVRgEVVgdt
dVC hHTTkkNaNa
24810.33476.08.17)( VVVgNa)]([ 0 VRR
dt
dRR
)]([ 0 VTTdt
dTT
)](3[ VTHdt
dHH
240 210.3037.024.1)( VVVR
240 810116.0205.4)( VVVT
(2.20)
(2.21)
(2.22)
(2.23)
(2.24)
(2.25)
(2.26)
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
2.6 Above and beyond the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron: fatigue, bursting, simplifications (3) Simulation of the Wilson model
35
Fig. 2.12 Simulated spike train of the Wilson model. The upper graph simulates fast spiking neu-rons (FS) typical of inhibitory neurons in the mammalian neo-cortex (τR = 1.5ms, gT = 0.25, gH = 0). The middle graph models regular spiking neurons (RS) with longer spikes (τR = 4.2ms, gT = 0.1). The slow calcium-me-diated potassium channel (gH = 5) is responsible for the slow adaptation in the spike fre-quency. The lower graph demon-strate that even more complex behavior, typical of mammalian neocortical neurons, is incorpo-rated in the Wilson model. The parameters (τR = 4.2ms, gT = 2.25, gH = 9.5) result I a typical bursting behavior, including a typical after-depolarizing poten-tial (ADP).
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
Fig. 2.12 Simulated spike train of the Wilson model. The up-per graph simulates fast spiking neurons (FS) typical of in-hibitory neurons in the mammalian neocortex (τR = 1.5ms, gT = 0.25, gH = 0). The middle graph models regular spiking neurons (RS) with longer spikes (τR = 4.2ms, gT = 0.1). The slow calcium-mediated potassium channel (gH = 5) is respon-sible for the slow adaptation in the spike frequency. The lower graph demonstrate that even more complex behavior, typical of mammalian neocortical neurons, is incorporated in the Wilson model. The parameters (τR = 4.2ms, gT = 2.25, gH = 9.5) result I a typical bursting behavior, including a typical af-ter-depolarizing potential (ADP).
36
(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab(C) 2009 SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab, http://bi.snu.ac.kr
Conclusion Neurons utilize a variety of specialized biochemical mecha-
nisms for information processing transmission¨ Membrane potential, ion channel¨ Action potential, neurotransmitter¨ Propagation, refractory period
Conductance-based models¨ Hodgkin-Huxley equation
Compartmental models¨ Cable theory
Neuron simulators¨ Neuron, Genesis
37