1 1 Studia Generalia Lecture Sustainable Development: One of the Main Challenges for the OECD’s...

46
1 1 Studia Generalia Lecture Sustainable Development: One of the Main Challenges for the OECD’s Future Work Kiyo Akasaka OECD, Deputy Secretary General

Transcript of 1 1 Studia Generalia Lecture Sustainable Development: One of the Main Challenges for the OECD’s...

11

Studia Generalia Lecture

Sustainable Development: One of the Main Challenges for the

OECD’s Future Work

Kiyo AkasakaOECD, Deputy Secretary General

22

Overview

I. What is the OECD?

II. Sustainable Development

III. OECD Recommendations

IV. Finland’s track record

V. OECD and the Global Challenges

33

I. What is the OECD?

An intergovernmental organisation

30 Member Countries + 100 partners

€188m budget and 2000 staff

Mission:- Growth- Development- Trade

44

Address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation.

Provide and pool comparative data.

Do analysis and forecasts to underpin national policies and multilateral co-operation.

Share experiences about policy among policymakers.

Submit to “peer reviews” of their national policies and performance.

OECD is a forum where countries:

55

OECD work method

Analysis

Data collection &case studies

Discussion

Recommendations

Implementation

Peer reviews,multilateral surveillance

66

II. Sustainable Development

3 dimensions of Sustainable Dev:– Environmental Protection– Economic Growth– Social Development

Our Common Future - Brundtland Report– development which meets the needs of the present without

compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs

OECD aims to reduce trade offs between the three dimensions

77

OECD Environmental Challenges

• Some air pollutants (lead, CFCs, NOx, SOx)

• Forest coverage in OECD regions

• Water use

• Surface water quality

• Hazardous waste & toxic emissions from industry

• Energy production & use

• Forest quality in OECD regions

•Waste management

•GHG emissions

• Motor vehicle & aviation air pollution

• Agricultural pollution & groundwater quality

• Over-fishing

• Biodiversity & tropical forest coverage

• Chemicals in the environment

88

Considerable progress in:Water management:

Water pricing, tradable permits, river basin managementClean up of most polluted waters, point-source pollutionChallenges: groundwater pollution, diffuse pollution (e.g. agricultural)

Reducing local air pollutants:OECD NOx emissions reduced by 15% since 1990, and SOx emissions by 40%.Regulatory timetables for air quality in all OECD regions to 2008Better transport and air pollution taxes, charges and regulationsChallenges: small PMs, VOCs, smog, critical loads for acid rain

99

Reductions in SOx and NOx emissions

0

50

100

150

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

fossil fuel supply

SOx emissions

gross domestic product

OECD SOx and NOx emissionsIndex 1990=100

NOx emissions

1010

Progress (contd.)

Environmental and health risks from chemicals & GMOs:

Regulatory frameworks for assessing risks of GMOs, Unique Identifiers.

Challenges: bioaccumulating and toxic chemicals in the environment.

Entry into force of multilateral environmental agreements:

Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent.

Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants.

1111

Major environmental challenges:

Climate change

Decoupling environmental pressures from economic growth

Biodiversity management

Resource mobilisation

1212

Climate Change

●Only one-third of OECD countries have stabilised or reduced GHG emissions since 1990.

●Policies slowly being adopted, but insufficient.

●Only a slight decoupling of GHG emissions from economic growth.

1313

1414

The mitigation challenge

1515

CO2 Emissions

0

25

50

75

100

125

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

fossil fuel supplyCO2 emissions from energy use

gross domestic product

OECD emissionsIndex 1990=100

GHG emissions

1616

1990-2001 1990-2001% %

change change

Australia 21 Korea ..Austria 10 Luxembourg -55Belgium 6.7 Mexico ..Canada 18.5 Netherlands 4.6Czech Republic -22.9 New Zealand 17.2Denmark 0.3 Norway 8.1Finland 4.7 Poland -32.2France 0 Portugal 36.4Germany -18 Slovak Republic -30.6Greece 26.1 Spain 33.1Hungary -22.7 Sweden -3.1Iceland -4.1 Switzerland 0.7Ireland 31.5 Turkey ..Italy 7.2 United Kingdom -11.7Japan 9.5 United States 13

OECD 5.6

GHG Emmissions

1717

Decoupling Environmental Pressures from Growth

AgricultureGovernment support to farmers = €229 billion (2003).

80% are environmentally damaging subsidies.

Transport & EnergyAir pollution, CO2 emissions, congestion, urban sprawl.

New technologies: promising, but slow.

Challenges: air transport, public transport, energy efficiency, fuel mix.

1818

BiodiversityProtected areas have increased in OECD to 14.6% of land area, but biodiversity loss outside these areas continues.

Percentage of endangered species continues to increase.

75% of marine fish stocks are fully exploited, overexploited, depleting, or recovering.

Challenges: better management of protected areas, establishment of marine parks, integration of biodiversity concerns in sectoral policies.

1919

Biodiversity (contd.)

1980 1985 1990 1997 20030

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Natural monuments (III)Habitat/species management areas (IV)Protected landscapes/seascapes (V)Managed resource protected areas (VI)

Strict nature reserves (Ia)Wilderness areas (Ib)National parks (II)

I to VI

Protected areas, OECD% of total area

IUCN categories:

Without IUCN category assigned

2020

International Financial Resources

Resources are insufficient:

$68.5 billion ODA in 2003

Only $5-6 billion to environment-related projects.

MDG goals to halve population without access to water & sanitation by 2015

Additional investment needs = $75 billion p.a. (current ODA and lending = $4 billion).

2121

Traffic Lights Summary

Some progress, but not enough.

Priority red lights: climate change, biodiversity, decoupling in agriculture, transport, energy.

More efficient and effective environmental policies -- taxes, tradable permits, subsidy removal.

Need for greater environmental policy integration and international co-operation.

2222

III. OECD Recommendations

Based on:

Costs & benefits of present and future environmental policies

Costs of inaction on environmental issues

Obstacles to reform, such as competitiveness concerns and social impacts

Appropriate policy mixes for particular sectors

2323

Environmental Goals & Economic Efficiency

Environment protection costs about 1 to 2% of GDP in OECD countries.

Design policies that lead to more economically efficient environmental policies.

Costs could be reduced by approximately 25%.

2424

Economic Instruments

Voluntary agreements

Regulations

Trading Schemes

Taxation

Removal of Subsidies

2525

Trends in environmental policy

Increased use of economic instruments (taxes; tradable permits)

Concern with impacts on society and competitiveness

Increased use of voluntary approaches… but these are often ineffective and costly

2626

Regulations

The main instrument used to control air pollution and resource extraction.

Many forms of regulations.

Regulatory instruments typically impose different costs across emitters.

Regulations mandating the use of a particular technology discourage innovation and have very high costs.

2727

Environmentally related taxes7 % of total tax revenue (OECD average)

2.5 % of GDP (range 1 - 4.5%)

http://www.oecd.org/env/policies/taxes/index.htm

Motor vehicles

26%

Transport fuels

64%

Heating &process fuels

5%

Electricity

3%

Other9%

Other 1%

Waste 1%

2828

Effectiveness of taxes?

FINLAND: – Pioneer in carbon taxes (1990)

DENMARK: – sulphur tax – tax on non-hazardous waste NORWAY:

– CO2 tax

SWEDEN:– sulphur tax

2929

But… taxes can be distortionary

Tax rate variations or exemptions such as: – under-taxing transport diesel fuel.– under-taxing coal.– tax-free aviation fuel (& airlines tickets).– almost full energy tax exemption to the industrial

sector.

Over 1500 tax exemptions recorded in the OECD environmental taxes database.

3030

Voluntary approaches

Broad use in EU, US, Japan Some Benefits Limitations:

– may not achieve extra environmental benefits– asymmetry in information – industry knows

more about costs – need of back-up policy for non-compliance

3131

Tradable permits

High potential for CO2/ GHGs:

Continue/ extend in other areas: – SOx

– Water, waste, transport

OECD: strategic guidelines and ex post evaluation.

3232

Reform of harmful subsidies

OECD country subsidies: – Well over €400 billion p.a. – $318 billion (2002) for agriculture

Environmentally harmful subsidy reform:

Obstacles to reform:– lack of comparable/ reliable data.– vested interests.– difficult to agree on alternative (e.g. income support)

3333

Estimates of Env-Related Subsidies – late 1990s

Sector OECD countries

non-OECD countries

Total

Agriculture 335 65 400

Water 15 45 60

Energy 80 160 240

Forestry 5 30 35

Fisheries 10 10 20

Other sectors (mainly road transport)

280 30 310

Total 725 340 1065

(% GDP) (3.4) (6.3) (4)

3434

Integrated Decision Making

Is there a common understanding of SD? Is there clear commitment and leadership? Are institutional structures in place to steer

SD? Is stakeholder involvement in decision making

encouraged? Is the diversity of knowledge and scientific

input to problems well managed?

3535

Future Work on SD at the OECD

Obstacles to removing environmentally harmful subsidies

Obstacles to the further use of economic instruments

Material flow accounting, decoupling and resource productivity

Inputs to the UNCSD process

3636

IV. Finland’s Track Record

The economy:

Impressive record from 1993-2000 Strong recovery since 2002 GDP per capita well ahead of Euro-area

and OECD averages Population aging a major challenge Need to enhance effectiveness of public

spending

3737

Finland and Sustainable Development

What is Finland’s environmental policy track record?

What more can it contribute to help reach targets such as those set out in the MDGs?

3838

2002-2003 OECD Economic Surveys : S.D. in Finland

1. Climate Change

2. Air Pollution

3. Natural Resources - forests

3939

SD Policy Advice to Finland (1)

Climate Change:

Participate in EU-wide permit trading scheme in order to increase cost effectiveness of emission abatement.

Equalise carbon taxes across various sectors of the economy.

Reassess exemption of energy taxes on peat.

4040

SD Policy Advice (2)

Air Pollution:

Reduce particulate pollution by accelerating the replacement of older cars and diesel engines by new models.

Reconsider tax differential between diesel and gasoline so they reflect externalities.

Create a trading scheme for NOx emissions.

Institute road pricing.

4141

SD Policy Advice (3)

Natural Resources:

Good governance of forest resources.

Costs and benefits of expanding protected areas needs to be weighed.

Competitive bidding might expand forest protection at least cost to society.

4242

V. Global Challenges

Millennium Development Goals

Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development

– Poverty eradication– Changing patterns of consumption and production– Protecting and managing natural resources– Health (HIV/AIDS, etc)

4343

OECD Development Strategy

Shaping Globalization– Regionalisation, Globalisation, the Doha Agenda, International Migration,

Global Risk Management, Security and Development

Supporting Reforms for Development– Policy Coherence, Poverty Reduction, Investment and Private Sector

Development, Institutions, Governance and Capacity Building

Improving Development Co-operation and Finance

– Aid Effectiveness, Aid Harmonisation, Mobilisation of Domestic Resources and Taxation, Statistical Capacity Building

4444

OECD Contributions

OECD Clients:

OECD Member Countries

100 partner Countries

International organisations & forums– UNCSD, MDG+5, G-8

4545

Finland and the OECD

Julin Report Trade and Development Ministerial Active participation in the OECD

4646

Kiitos!