1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental...

36
1 © 2005 Thomson/South-Western © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design Experimental Design Introduction to Analysis of Variance Introduction to Analysis of Variance Analysis of Variance: Testing for the Equality of Analysis of Variance: Testing for the Equality of k k Population Means Population Means Multiple Comparison Procedures Multiple Comparison Procedures

Transcript of 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental...

Page 1: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

1 1 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Chapter 13, Part AChapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Analysis of Variance and Experimental

Design Design Introduction to Analysis of Variance Introduction to Analysis of Variance Analysis of Variance: Testing for the Equality of Analysis of Variance: Testing for the Equality of k k Population Means Population Means Multiple Comparison ProceduresMultiple Comparison Procedures

Page 2: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

2 2 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Introduction to Analysis of VarianceIntroduction to Analysis of Variance

Analysis of VarianceAnalysis of Variance (ANOVA) can be used to test (ANOVA) can be used to test for the equality of three or more population means.for the equality of three or more population means. Analysis of VarianceAnalysis of Variance (ANOVA) can be used to test (ANOVA) can be used to test for the equality of three or more population means.for the equality of three or more population means.

Data obtained from observational or experimentalData obtained from observational or experimental studies can be used for the analysis.studies can be used for the analysis. Data obtained from observational or experimentalData obtained from observational or experimental studies can be used for the analysis.studies can be used for the analysis.

We want to use the sample results to test theWe want to use the sample results to test the following hypotheses:following hypotheses: We want to use the sample results to test theWe want to use the sample results to test the following hypotheses:following hypotheses:

HH00: : 11==22==33==. . . . . . = = kk

HHaa: Not all population means are equal: Not all population means are equal

Page 3: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

3 3 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Introduction to Analysis of VarianceIntroduction to Analysis of Variance

HH00: : 11==22==33==. . . . . . = = kk

HHaa: Not all population means are equal: Not all population means are equal

If If HH00 is rejected, we cannot conclude that is rejected, we cannot conclude that allall population means are different.population means are different.

If If HH00 is rejected, we cannot conclude that is rejected, we cannot conclude that allall population means are different.population means are different.

Rejecting Rejecting HH00 means that at least two population means that at least two population means have different values.means have different values.

Rejecting Rejecting HH00 means that at least two population means that at least two population means have different values.means have different values.

Page 4: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

4 4 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Sampling Distribution of Given Sampling Distribution of Given HH00 is True is Truexx

Introduction to Analysis of VarianceIntroduction to Analysis of Variance

1x1x 3x3x2x2x

Sample means are close togetherSample means are close together because there is onlybecause there is only

one sampling distributionone sampling distribution when when HH00 is true. is true.

22x n

2

2x n

Page 5: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

5 5 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Introduction to Analysis of VarianceIntroduction to Analysis of Variance

Sampling Distribution of Given Sampling Distribution of Given HH00 is False is Falsexx

33 1x1x 2x2x3x3x 11 22

Sample means come fromSample means come fromdifferent sampling distributionsdifferent sampling distributionsand are not as close togetherand are not as close together

when when HH00 is false. is false.

Page 6: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

6 6 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

For each population, the response variable isFor each population, the response variable is normally distributed.normally distributed. For each population, the response variable isFor each population, the response variable is normally distributed.normally distributed.

Assumptions for Analysis of VarianceAssumptions for Analysis of Variance

The variance of the response variable, denoted The variance of the response variable, denoted 22,, is the same for all of the populations.is the same for all of the populations. The variance of the response variable, denoted The variance of the response variable, denoted 22,, is the same for all of the populations.is the same for all of the populations.

The observations must be independent.The observations must be independent. The observations must be independent.The observations must be independent.

Page 7: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

7 7 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Analysis of Variance:Analysis of Variance:Testing for the Equality of Testing for the Equality of kk Population Population

MeansMeans Between-Treatments Estimate of Population VarianceBetween-Treatments Estimate of Population Variance

Within-Treatments Estimate of Population VarianceWithin-Treatments Estimate of Population Variance Comparing the Variance Estimates: The Comparing the Variance Estimates: The F F Test Test ANOVA TableANOVA Table

Page 8: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

8 8 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Between-Treatments EstimateBetween-Treatments Estimateof Population Varianceof Population Variance

A between-treatment estimate of A between-treatment estimate of 2 2 is called the is called the mean square treatmentmean square treatment and is denoted MSTR. and is denoted MSTR.

2

1

( )

MSTR1

k

j jj

n x x

k

2

1

( )

MSTR1

k

j jj

n x x

k

Denominator representsDenominator represents the the degrees of freedomdegrees of freedom associated with SSTRassociated with SSTR

Numerator is theNumerator is the sum of squaressum of squares

due to treatmentsdue to treatmentsand is denoted SSTRand is denoted SSTR

Page 9: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

9 9 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

The estimate of The estimate of 22 based on the variation of the based on the variation of the sample observations within each sample is called sample observations within each sample is called the the mean square errormean square error and is denoted by MSE. and is denoted by MSE.

Within-Samples EstimateWithin-Samples Estimateof Population Varianceof Population Variance

kn

sn

T

k

jjj

1

2)1(

MSEkn

sn

T

k

jjj

1

2)1(

MSE

Denominator representsDenominator represents the the degrees of freedomdegrees of freedom

associated with SSEassociated with SSE

Numerator is theNumerator is the sum of squaressum of squares

due to errordue to errorand is denoted SSEand is denoted SSE

Page 10: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

10 10 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Comparing the Variance Estimates: The Comparing the Variance Estimates: The FF TestTest

If the null hypothesis is true and the ANOVAIf the null hypothesis is true and the ANOVA assumptions are valid, the sampling distribution ofassumptions are valid, the sampling distribution of MSTR/MSE is an MSTR/MSE is an FF distribution with MSTR d.f. distribution with MSTR d.f. equal to equal to kk - 1 and MSE d.f. equal to - 1 and MSE d.f. equal to nnTT - - kk..

If the means of the If the means of the kk populations are not equal, the populations are not equal, the value of MSTR/MSE will be inflated because MSTRvalue of MSTR/MSE will be inflated because MSTR overestimates overestimates 22.. Hence, we will reject Hence, we will reject HH00 if the resulting value of if the resulting value of MSTR/MSE appears to be too large to have beenMSTR/MSE appears to be too large to have been selected at random from the appropriate selected at random from the appropriate FF distribution.distribution.

Page 11: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

11 11 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

FF = MSTR/MSE = MSTR/MSE

HH00: : 11==22==33==. . . . . . = = kk

HHaa: Not all population means are equal: Not all population means are equal

HypothesesHypotheses

Test StatisticTest Statistic

Page 12: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

12 12 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

Rejection RuleRejection Rule

where the value of where the value of FF is based on an is based on anFF distribution with distribution with kk - 1 numerator d.f. - 1 numerator d.f.and and nnTT - - kk denominator d.f. denominator d.f.

Reject Reject HH00 if if pp-value -value << pp-value Approach:-value Approach:

Critical Value Approach:Critical Value Approach: Reject Reject HH00 if if FF >> FF

Page 13: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

13 13 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Sampling Distribution of MSTR/MSESampling Distribution of MSTR/MSE

Rejection RegionRejection Region

Do Not Reject H0Do Not Reject H0

Reject H0Reject H0

MSTR/MSEMSTR/MSE

Critical ValueCritical ValueFF

Sampling DistributionSampling Distributionof MSTR/MSEof MSTR/MSE

Page 14: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

14 14 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

ANOVA TableANOVA Table

SST is SST is partitionedpartitioned

into SSTR and into SSTR and SSE.SSE.

SST’s degrees of SST’s degrees of freedomfreedom

(d.f.) are partitioned (d.f.) are partitioned intointo

SSTR’s d.f. and SSE’s SSTR’s d.f. and SSE’s d.f.d.f.

TreatmentTreatment

ErrorError

TotalTotal

SSTRSSTR

SSESSE

SSTSST

kk – 1 – 1

nnT T – – kk

nnTT - 1 - 1

MSTRMSTR

MSEMSE

Source ofSource ofVariationVariation

Sum ofSum ofSquaresSquares

Degrees ofDegrees ofFreedomFreedom

MeanMeanSquaresSquares

MSTR/MSEMSTR/MSE

FF

Page 15: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

15 15 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

ANOVA TableANOVA Table

SST divided by its degrees of freedom SST divided by its degrees of freedom nnTT – 1 is the – 1 is the overall sample variance that would be obtained if weoverall sample variance that would be obtained if we treated the entire set of observations as one data set.treated the entire set of observations as one data set.

SST divided by its degrees of freedom SST divided by its degrees of freedom nnTT – 1 is the – 1 is the overall sample variance that would be obtained if weoverall sample variance that would be obtained if we treated the entire set of observations as one data set.treated the entire set of observations as one data set.

With the entire data set as one sample, the formulaWith the entire data set as one sample, the formula for computing the total sum of squares, SST, is:for computing the total sum of squares, SST, is: With the entire data set as one sample, the formulaWith the entire data set as one sample, the formula for computing the total sum of squares, SST, is:for computing the total sum of squares, SST, is:

2

1 1

SST ( ) SSTR SSEjnk

ijj i

x x

2

1 1

SST ( ) SSTR SSEjnk

ijj i

x x

Page 16: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

16 16 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

ANOVA TableANOVA Table

ANOVA can be viewed as the process of partitioningANOVA can be viewed as the process of partitioning the total sum of squares and the degrees of freedomthe total sum of squares and the degrees of freedom into their corresponding sources: treatments and error.into their corresponding sources: treatments and error.

ANOVA can be viewed as the process of partitioningANOVA can be viewed as the process of partitioning the total sum of squares and the degrees of freedomthe total sum of squares and the degrees of freedom into their corresponding sources: treatments and error.into their corresponding sources: treatments and error.

Dividing the sum of squares by the appropriateDividing the sum of squares by the appropriate degrees of freedom provides the variance estimatesdegrees of freedom provides the variance estimates and the and the FF value used to test the hypothesis of equal value used to test the hypothesis of equal population means.population means.

Dividing the sum of squares by the appropriateDividing the sum of squares by the appropriate degrees of freedom provides the variance estimatesdegrees of freedom provides the variance estimates and the and the FF value used to test the hypothesis of equal value used to test the hypothesis of equal population means.population means.

Page 17: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

17 17 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Example: Reed ManufacturingExample: Reed Manufacturing

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

Janet Reed would like to know ifJanet Reed would like to know ifthere is any significant difference inthere is any significant difference inthe mean number of hours worked per the mean number of hours worked per week for the department managersweek for the department managersat her three manufacturing plantsat her three manufacturing plants(in Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and Detroit). (in Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and Detroit).

Page 18: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

18 18 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Example: Reed ManufacturingExample: Reed Manufacturing

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

A simple random sample of fiveA simple random sample of fivemanagers from each of the three plantsmanagers from each of the three plantswas taken and the number of hourswas taken and the number of hoursworked by each manager for theworked by each manager for theprevious week is shown on the nextprevious week is shown on the nextslide.slide. Conduct an Conduct an FF test using test using = .05. = .05.

Page 19: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

19 19 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

1122334455

48485454575754546262

73736363666664647474

51516363616154545656

Plant 1Plant 1BuffaloBuffalo

Plant 2Plant 2PittsburghPittsburgh

Plant 3Plant 3DetroitDetroitObservationObservation

Sample MeanSample MeanSample VarianceSample Variance

5555 68 68 57 5726.026.0 26.5 26.5 24.5 24.5

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

Page 20: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

20 20 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

HH00: : 11==22==33

HHaa: Not all the means are equal: Not all the means are equalwhere: where: 1 1 = mean number of hours worked per= mean number of hours worked per

week by the managers at Plant 1week by the managers at Plant 1 2 2 = mean number of hours worked per= mean number of hours worked per week by the managers at Plant 2week by the managers at Plant 23 3 = mean number of hours worked per= mean number of hours worked per week by the managers at Plant 3week by the managers at Plant 3

1. Develop the hypotheses.1. Develop the hypotheses.

pp -Value and Critical Value Approaches -Value and Critical Value Approaches

Page 21: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

21 21 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

2. Specify the level of significance.2. Specify the level of significance. = .05= .05

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

pp -Value and Critical Value Approaches -Value and Critical Value Approaches

3. Compute the value of the test statistic.3. Compute the value of the test statistic.

MSTR = 490/(3 - 1) = 245MSTR = 490/(3 - 1) = 245SSTR = 5(55 - 60)SSTR = 5(55 - 60)22 + 5(68 - 60) + 5(68 - 60)22 + 5(57 - 60) + 5(57 - 60)22 = 490 = 490

= (55 + 68 + 57)/3 = 60= (55 + 68 + 57)/3 = 60xx(Sample sizes are all equal.)(Sample sizes are all equal.)

Mean Square Due to TreatmentsMean Square Due to Treatments

Page 22: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

22 22 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

3. Compute the value of the test statistic.3. Compute the value of the test statistic.

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

MSE = 308/(15 - 3) = 25.667MSE = 308/(15 - 3) = 25.667

SSE = 4(26.0) + 4(26.5) + 4(24.5) = 308SSE = 4(26.0) + 4(26.5) + 4(24.5) = 308Mean Square Due to ErrorMean Square Due to Error

(continued)(continued)

FF = MSTR/MSE = 245/25.667 = 9.55 = MSTR/MSE = 245/25.667 = 9.55

pp -Value and Critical Value Approaches -Value and Critical Value Approaches

Page 23: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

23 23 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

TreatmentTreatment

ErrorError

TotalTotal

490490

308308

798798

22

1212

1414

245245

25.66725.667

Source ofSource ofVariationVariation

Sum ofSum ofSquaresSquares

Degrees ofDegrees ofFreedomFreedom

MeanMeanSquaresSquares

9.559.55

FF

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

ANOVA TableANOVA Table

Page 24: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

24 24 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

5. Determine whether to reject 5. Determine whether to reject HH00..

We have sufficient evidence to conclude that We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean number of hours worked per week the mean number of hours worked per week by department managers is not the same at by department managers is not the same at all 3 plant.all 3 plant.

The The pp-value -value << .05, .05, so we reject so we reject HH00..

With 2 numerator d.f. and 12 With 2 numerator d.f. and 12 denominator d.f.,denominator d.f.,the the pp-value is .01 for -value is .01 for FF = 6.93. = 6.93. Therefore, theTherefore, thepp-value is less than .01 for -value is less than .01 for FF = 9.55. = 9.55.

pp –Value Approach –Value Approach

4. Compute the 4. Compute the pp –value. –value.

Page 25: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

25 25 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

5. Determine whether to reject 5. Determine whether to reject HH00..

Because Because FF = 9.55 = 9.55 >> 3.89, we reject 3.89, we reject HH00..

Critical Value ApproachCritical Value Approach

4. Determine the critical value and rejection rule.4. Determine the critical value and rejection rule.

Reject Reject HH00 if if FF >> 3.89 3.89

Test for the Equality of Test for the Equality of kk Population Population MeansMeans

We have sufficient evidence to conclude that We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean number of hours worked per week the mean number of hours worked per week by department managers is not the same at by department managers is not the same at all 3 plant.all 3 plant.

Based on an Based on an FF distribution with 2 numerator distribution with 2 numeratord.f. and 12 denominator d.f., d.f. and 12 denominator d.f., FF.05.05 = 3.89. = 3.89.

Page 26: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

26 26 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Multiple Comparison ProceduresMultiple Comparison Procedures

Suppose that analysis of variance has Suppose that analysis of variance has provided statistical evidence to reject the null provided statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis of equal population means.hypothesis of equal population means.

Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) procedure can Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) procedure can be used to determine where the differences occur.be used to determine where the differences occur.

Page 27: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

27 27 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD Procedure

1 1MSE( )

i j

i j

x xt

n n

1 1MSE( )

i j

i j

x xt

n n

Test StatisticTest Statistic

HypothesesHypotheses

0 : i jH 0 : i jH : a i jH : a i jH

Page 28: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

28 28 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD Procedure

where the value of where the value of ttaa/2 /2 is based on ais based on a

tt distribution with distribution with nnTT - - kk degrees of freedom. degrees of freedom.

Rejection RuleRejection Rule

Reject Reject HH00 if if pp-value -value <<

pp-value Approach:-value Approach:

Critical Value Approach:Critical Value Approach:

Reject Reject HH00 if if tt < - < -ttaa/2 /2 or or tt > > ttaa/2 /2

Page 29: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

29 29 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Test StatisticTest Statistic

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD ProcedureBased on the Test Statistic Based on the Test Statistic xxii - - xxjj

__ __

/ 21 1LSD MSE( )

i jt n n / 2

1 1LSD MSE( )i j

t n n wherewhere

i jx xi jx x

Reject Reject HH00 if > LSD if > LSDi jx xi jx x

HypothesesHypotheses

Rejection RuleRejection Rule

0 : i jH 0 : i jH : a i jH : a i jH

Page 30: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

30 30 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD ProcedureBased on the Test Statistic Based on the Test Statistic xxii - - xxjj

Example: Reed ManufacturingExample: Reed Manufacturing

Recall that Janet Reed wants to knowRecall that Janet Reed wants to knowif there is any significant difference inif there is any significant difference inthe mean number of hours worked per the mean number of hours worked per week for the department managersweek for the department managersat her three manufacturing plants. at her three manufacturing plants.

Analysis of variance has providedAnalysis of variance has providedstatistical evidence to reject the nullstatistical evidence to reject the nullhypothesis of equal population means.hypothesis of equal population means.Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) procedureprocedurecan be used to determine where the differences can be used to determine where the differences occur.occur.

Page 31: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

31 31 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

For For = .05 and = .05 and nnTT - - kk = 15 – 3 = 12 = 15 – 3 = 12

degrees of freedom, degrees of freedom, tt..025 025 = 2.179 = 2.179

LSD 2 179 25 667 15

15 6 98. . ( ) .LSD 2 179 25 667 1

51

5 6 98. . ( ) .

/ 21 1LSD MSE( )

i jt n n / 2

1 1LSD MSE( )i j

t n n

MSE value wasMSE value wascomputed earliercomputed earlier

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD ProcedureBased on the Test Statistic Based on the Test Statistic xxii - - xxjj

Page 32: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

32 32 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

LSD for Plants 1 and 2LSD for Plants 1 and 2

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD ProcedureBased on the Test Statistic Based on the Test Statistic xxii - - xxjj

• ConclusionConclusion

• Test StatisticTest Statistic1 2x x1 2x x = |55 = |55 68| = 13 68| = 13

Reject Reject HH00 if if > 6.98 > 6.981 2x x1 2x x

• Rejection RuleRejection Rule

0 1 2: H 0 1 2: H 1 2: aH 1 2: aH

• Hypotheses (A)Hypotheses (A)

The mean number of hours worked at Plant 1 isThe mean number of hours worked at Plant 1 isnot equalnot equal to the mean number worked at Plant 2. to the mean number worked at Plant 2.

Page 33: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

33 33 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

LSD for Plants 1 and 3LSD for Plants 1 and 3

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD ProcedureBased on the Test Statistic Based on the Test Statistic xxii - - xxjj

• ConclusionConclusion

• Test StatisticTest Statistic1 3x x1 3x x = |55 = |55 57| = 2 57| = 2

Reject Reject HH00 if if > 6.98 > 6.981 3x x1 3x x

• Rejection RuleRejection Rule

0 1 3: H 0 1 3: H 1 3: aH 1 3: aH

• Hypotheses (B)Hypotheses (B)

There is There is no significant differenceno significant difference between the mean between the mean number of hours worked at Plant 1 and number of hours worked at Plant 1 and the meanthe mean number of hours worked at Plant 3.number of hours worked at Plant 3.

Page 34: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

34 34 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

LSD for Plants 2 and 3LSD for Plants 2 and 3

Fisher’s LSD ProcedureFisher’s LSD ProcedureBased on the Test Statistic Based on the Test Statistic xxii - - xxjj

• ConclusionConclusion

• Test StatisticTest Statistic2 3x x2 3x x = |68 = |68 57| = 11 57| = 11

Reject Reject HH00 if if > 6.98 > 6.982 3x x2 3x x

• Rejection RuleRejection Rule

0 2 3: H 0 2 3: H 2 3: aH 2 3: aH

• Hypotheses (C)Hypotheses (C)

The mean number of hours worked at Plant 2 isThe mean number of hours worked at Plant 2 is not equalnot equal to the mean number worked at Plant 3. to the mean number worked at Plant 3.

Page 35: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

35 35 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

The experimentwise Type I error rate gets larger for The experimentwise Type I error rate gets larger for problems with more populations (larger problems with more populations (larger kk).).

Type I Error RatesType I Error Rates

EWEW = 1 – (1 – = 1 – (1 – ))((k k – 1)!– 1)!

The The comparisonwise Type I error ratecomparisonwise Type I error rate indicates the level of significance associated indicates the level of significance associated with a single pairwise comparison.with a single pairwise comparison.

The The experimentwise Type I error rateexperimentwise Type I error rate EWEW is the is the probability of making a Type I error on at least probability of making a Type I error on at least one of the (one of the (kk – 1)! pairwise comparisons. – 1)! pairwise comparisons.

Page 36: 1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.

36 36 Slide

Slide

© 2005 Thomson/South-Western© 2005 Thomson/South-Western

End of Chapter 13, Part AEnd of Chapter 13, Part A