09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 1 Today’s Agenda – 9/27/10 Housekeeping Show and Tell...
-
Upload
roger-oliver -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 1 Today’s Agenda – 9/27/10 Housekeeping Show and Tell...
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 1
Today’s Agenda – 9/27/10• Housekeeping• Show and Tell of Patented Items• Questions from Last Week
• Scheduling the Simulations• This Week
• Formatting a Claim• Becoming familiar with a patent and its file history
(and why)• Reading a Case
Timing – 5:20 break (10 minutes); 6:35 adjourn.
Next Week: Optional: Instant Patent Law – what topic(s) or just as much of the can of worms as we can get through?
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 2
Great Editors!
I was out of town Tuesday-Sunday and have not yet had a chance to read your annotated How—works carefully. But at a fast skim, I was able to tell that there are some excellent editors in this group.
I will announce the stopper-finder prize winner on 10/11 because the 10/4 class is optional.
Please see me at the break: Shenghan, Keya, Will, Jane / Josh (Brett? Evan?)
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 3
Good Note Taker Needed
Zubin won’t be here today and won’t be here next week. I need a volunteer notetaker to go over the slides with him and tell him what the slides don’t. That shouldn’t take more than a few minutes before or after class on 10/11.
Li Tian won’t be here today either. Would a good notetaker be willing to talk to her next week before or after class?
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 4
Teams, etc.6 law students: Darrell, Zac, Wyatt, Norm, Will, Jane.
Last initials start with A through K. 8 science grad students:
Zubin, Tosin, Keya, Daniel, Lieven, Miling, Shenghan, Zhou
Last initials start with H, then O-Z. Weird.4 science auditors
Brett, Evan, Li, Josh. Last initials mostly at end of alphabet, too.
Simulations: 3 Teams (assuming no dropouts)2 with 2 lawyers, 2 experts, 1 tutorial expert1 with 2 lawyers, 2 experts
or a 4th team of 2 Ph.D. candidates who can be both or a 4th team of 2 Ph.D. candidates who can be both lawyers and experts and/or use auditors for extra roles.lawyers and experts and/or use auditors for extra roles.
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 5
Who Are You? Questions about Course Description- cont’d
Grad Students - Zubin: Explain the simulation format in more detail.
Daniel: Is the goal for PhDs to teach us how to be experts or about the patent process?
Shenghan:
How much patent law reading will I need to do to follow the discussion?
Do the experts in the simulation just answer questions, or do they argue? Is there a verdict?
What do you mean by “balanced”? Can I venture out of my own field within Chem Eng for the simulation project?
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 6
Questions about last week
Norm: validity v. enforceability
Daniel: is this how law school is?
Jane: law students’ questionnaire
Shenghan: fence-sitting; the various meanings of “art”; infringement
Miling: Rule 56? Posting date/time?
Jing: Infringement; other countries?
Will: ‘work-for-hire’
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 7
Why I need to know NOWhow reliable and serious you are
http://lawreg.stanford.edu/stanford/prereg/CourseDetails.asp?cClschedid=+24922
1
2
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 8
2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm Week 01 8
Your Patented Objects
If you brought the item, show it off. darrell watchzac staplerwyatt tea sacnorm liquid hand soapzubin ultra jet dusterwill steam masterjane kleenex boxtosin chlorox containerkeya boxer...daniel gemini specsziv crest toothpasteli pineapple slicerlieven colgate toothpasteshenghan dandruff shampoomiling animal watererjing hair condit
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 9
If nobody volunteers...ht
tp:/
/sta
nfor
d.ed
u/~r
jmor
ris/
scie
v.10
/AS
SIG
N/0
927.
HT
M
Order of Comments on VNUSnorm
shenghandarrell
jing[zubin]keyawyattmilingjoshwillzac
lievenjane[li]jing
Random Order 2darrell norm jane evan
lieven tosin wyatt will jing keya zac
daniel shenghan
josh miling brett
Random Order 1miling
shenghan jane tosin josh
wyatt lieven
zac keya
daniel brett will
norm jing
darrell evan cp
Randomized by random.org/lists
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 10
Reformatting a Claim
Li (also Wyatt, Zac and Will, and ~Jing) present [C] so you know you can discuss it as “applying energy ... to create a thermal effect...”
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 11
2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm Week 01 11
Reformatting a Patent Claim
2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm 11Week 01
We are also not at liberty to DELETE words when we reformat. Later, to facilitate discussion of particular aspects of the claim, we may shorten it. The reformatting will help us figure out what is ignorable. Deleting words when you first quote a claim would be wrong (and possibly dishonest); deleting words when you reformat a claim is wrong (and absolutely foolish). EVERY WORD must be there.
Why?
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 12
Today’s Assignment - Looking at a Patentht
tp:/
/sta
nfor
d.ed
u/~r
jmor
ris/
scie
v.10
/AS
SIG
N/0
927.
HT
M
http://www.stanford.edu/~rjmorris/sciev.10/DOCS/7406970.PDF
not in the Hologic Patent
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 13
5,9
13
,81
3 C
OV
ER
SH
EET
issue date
filing date
prior artThis
patent e
xpires o
n
Jul. 2
4, 2017
Jul. 24, 2
017
It did not g
o into
effect
It did not g
o into
effect
until Ju
n. 22, 1
999.
until Ju
n. 22, 1
999.
class
Assignee: Not Hologic?
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 14
Today’s Assignment - Looking at a File History
http
://s
tanf
ord.
edu/
~rjm
orri
s/sc
iev.
10/A
SS
IGN
/092
7.H
TM
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 15
Today’s Assignment - Looking at a Case; Looking at Another Student’s Work
http
://s
tanf
ord.
edu/
~rjm
orri
s/sc
iev.
10/A
SS
IGN
/092
7.H
TM
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 16
But also (and always) remember, in a variation on famous words from 1992:
IT’S THE _______
STUPID.2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm Week 01 16
Reading a Patent
2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm 16Week 01
CLAIM
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 17
Major Issues of Liability in Patent Law
•Validity•Infringement
The other part of a patent case, after liability is determined, is DAMAGES, or more generally REMEDIES
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 18
Next Week
Claim Interpretation and File Histories.
As you look at a patent and its history, think about:
- ideas for design arounds and noninfringement arguments
- ideas for invalidity arguments
- questions for which experts would be needed
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 19
19
Concept Patent Copyright Trademark
Coverage Inventions(Machines, Things, Processes, Mole-cules, etc.)
Creative Expression(Words, Art, Video, Audio)
Commercial Identity Stuff (Logos, names, slogans, product appearance,etc.)
Agency associated with obtaining it
Patent & Trademark Office (Part of the Dept of Commerce)
Copyright Office(Part of the Library of CONGRESS)
Patent & Trademark Office (Part of the Dept of Commerce)
Verb associated with obtaining it
APPLY REGISTER APPLY
Can Agency REJECT?
YES Not often YES
When does protection START
From ISSUANCE From CREATION From use or registration
When does protection STOP
20 years from date of filing of application, MOSTLY
Life of author + 70 years to the next 12/31, USUALLY
Never, MOSTLY
PTO PTO
Patents != Copyright != Trademarks
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 20
P-I-S v P.A.Situation A
Patent-in-suit = NEWPrior Art Patent = OLD
Situation BPatent-in-suit = OLDPatent on accused device = NEW
Is the New patent valid over the Old patent?
Is the Old patent infringed by someone practicing the New patent?
New Patent Look at New's CLAIMS Look at New's SPECIFICATION (to see what people do who would PRACTICE New’s invention)
Old Patent Look at Old's SPECIFICATION (to see what it "teaches")
Look at Old's CLAIMS
Q.When do you look at the CLAIMS? A.When the patent is ________
Because we have 2 toothpaste patents, let’s use them for NEW and OLD. Do they have to CLAIM similar things, or not?
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 21
2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm Week 01 21
Validity
Infringement
AI
Preponderance
C&C
PO
WHO HAS THE
BOP?
WHAT IS THE QOP?
How do BOP and QOP affect the litigators and scientific experts?
Major Issues of Liability in Patent Law
09/27/10 RJM - Sci Ev Seminar - Fall 2010 22
2009 - Sci.Ev. - rjm Week 01 22
Reading a Patent – Who asked you to?
• AI – to design around it to avoid infringement– to challenge validity or enforceability
• PAppl – – to see if you need to disclose (and claim around)– to see if you should buy/license it
• M&A – to evaluate an asset
• PO – to evaluate whether you can sue within the bounds of Rule 11
Why? • AVOID inequitable conduct• COMPLY with
Rule 56 and your duty of candor
• Obtain a solid patent