08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

download 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

of 11

Transcript of 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    1/11

    THE CONSTITUTION (PART I) 83

    THE CONSTITUTION

    ANDFUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES

    (PART 1)

    The Constituent Assem bly

    The history chapters tell us about

    Indias struggle for freedom and

    how d i f f e r en t g roups were

    protesting against British rule.

    They wanted the British to leave

    India. T hey wanted India to be a

    free country.

    Wha t were the grievances that

    the Indians had about the wa ythey were ruled under the BritishSystem of Administration?

    Along with this struggle for freedom there was

    anot her qu estion discussed b y people involved in

    the Freedom M ovement . Th is was: W hat shou ld

    be th e form of governmen t after th e British leave?

    Should we go back to the rule of the kings, as

    some of our old rulers are suggesting?

    While most people agreed that we should have

    our own rule, people had d ifferent op inions about

    what kind of government we shou ld have. Some

    people thought that most of the powers should

    be with t he Panchayats. O thers believed t hat t he

    Prime Minister or President should have more

    power. Should we have elections? Should we have

    the same rules for everyone? H ow should we collect

    taxes? W hat kind of life do we want for everyone

    in the country?

    In order to decide on such q uestions and visualise

    the future of our country, a group of people, calledth e Con stituent Assembly was elected. Its task was

    to write the Constitution the document that

    gives the basic laws and principles by which the

    country will be governed. The Constituent

    Assembly had 299 members from all parts of the

    coun try. T hey held long discussions on every point

    that was to be put in the Constitution. These

    discussion s went on for th ree years.

    A t the s t roke o f the midn igh t hour , when the wor ld s leeps , Ind ia w i l la w a k e t o l i f e an d f r e e d o m. T h i s w a s h o w Ja w a h a r l al N e h ruaddressed the midn igh t sess ion o f the Cons t i tuen t Assemb ly in De lh ion the n igh t o f 14 th Augus t 1947 .

    CHAPTER 8

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    2/11

    Gandhi who is the main exponent of untouchability, has

    used it in various ways and on different occasions with differ-

    ent meanings. So when we are going to use the word un-

    touchability, we should be very clear in our mind as to what

    we really mean by it. What is the real implication of this

    word?

    I think we should make no distinction between untouchabil-

    ity and caste distinction, because as Mr.Thakur has said,

    untouchability is merely a symptom, the root cause is caste

    distinction and unless and until the root cause, that is caste

    distinction is removed, untouchability in some form or other

    is bound to exist and when we are going to have an indepen-

    dent India, we should expect everyone to be enjoying equal

    social conditions.

    Srijut Rohini Kumar Chaudhury: ...[For] defining untouch-

    ability, it may be clearly stated that:Untouchability means

    any act committed in exercise of discrimination on grounds of

    religion, caste or lawful vocation of life . . .

    M r. K. Munshi: Sir, I oppose this amendment. The defini-

    tion is so worded that if it is accepted,. it will make any

    discrimination even on the ground of place of birth or caste

    or even sexuntouchability.

    M r. Dhirendra Nath Datta : Sir, it seems to me that whetherthe definition suggested by Mr. Rohini Kumar Chaudhury is

    accepted or not, it is necessary that there should be some

    definition put in. Here it is said thatuntouchabilityin any

    form is an offence. A magistrate or a judge dealing with of-

    fences shall have to look to the definition. One magistrate will

    consider a particular thing to be untouchability, while another

    magistrate may hold a different thing to be untouchability,

    with the result there will be no uniformity on the part of the

    magistracy in dealing with offences. It will be very difficult

    for the judge to decide cases.

    Moreover, untouchability means different things in different

    areas. In Bengal, untouchability means one thing, while in

    other provinces, it means an entirely different thing.

    M r. President: I should like to draw the attention of the

    House to clause 24 which says ...[that the] Union Legislature

    shall make laws to give effect to those

    provisions of this part which require

    such legislation. . . [Therefore,] I take it

    that the Union legislature will define the

    worduntouchabilityso that the courts

    might prescribe proper punishment.

    [Eventually it was decided to leave the

    definition of untouchibility up to future

    law makers .]

    CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY OF INDIA VOLUME-IIITuesday, the 29th April, 1947

    The Constituent Assembly of India met in the Constitution Hall, New Delhi, at half past Eight of the Clock,

    Mr. President (The Honble Dr. Rajendra Prasad) in the Chair.

    The Honble Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel: ...There were two

    schools of thought in the Committee and there was a large

    number of very eminent lawyers who could scrutinise every

    word of every sentence, even commas and semi-colons, from

    a very critical point of view.These two schools viewed the

    matter from two different angles. One school considered it

    advisable to include as many rights as possible in this Report-

    rights which could straightaway be enforceable in a court of

    law, rights in regard to which a citizen may without difficulty

    go straightaway to a court of law and get his rights enforced.

    The other school of thought considered it advisable to restrict

    fundamental rights to a few very essential things that may be

    considered fundamental. Between the two schools there was

    considerable amount of discussion and finally a mean was

    drawn, which was considered to be a very good mean. . . . the

    two schools of thought . . . studied not the fundamental rights

    of one country alone but of almost every country in the W orld.

    They studied all the Constitutions of the world and they

    came to the conclusion that in this Report we should include

    as far as possible rights which may be considered to be rea-

    sonable. On that there may be difference of opinion in this

    House and this House is entitled to consider every clause

    from a critical point of view and to suggest alterations, modi-

    fications or omissions...

    What does the word Fundamental mean?

    Outline some of the ways by which the makers of the

    Constitution decided upon the rights that were to be in-

    cluded in the constitution?

    ... the debate continues...

    M r. Promatha Ranjan Thakur: Sir, ... [A] point to which I

    wish to refer is in relation to clause 6 regardinguntouchabil-

    itywhere it is said that-

    Untouchability in any form is abolished and the imposition

    of any disability only on that account shall be an offence.

    I do not understand how you can abolish untouchability with-

    out abolishing the very caste system. Untouchability is noth-ing but the symptom of the disease, namely, the caste sys-

    tem.... Unless we can do away with the caste system alto-

    gether there is no use tinkering with the problem of untouch-

    ability superficially.

    S. C. Banerjee: Mr. President, the word untouchability

    actually requires clarification. W e have been accustomed to

    this word for the last 25 years, still there is a lot of confusion

    as to what it connotes. Sometimes it means merely taking a

    glass of water and sometimes it has been used in the sense of

    admission of Harijans into temples, sometimes it meant

    inter-caste dinner, sometimes inter-caste marriage. Mahatma

    ForExtraReading atH ome...

    Wouldyouliketofindouthowthepeoplein theConstituentAssem

    blydecidedwhatthe

    Constitutionshouldsay?Andwhyittooksolong?Youcangetanide

    aoftheirdiscussions

    fromthefollowing.AcommitteehadsubmittedaReportonFundam

    entalRightsandthis

    discussiontookplaceafterthat.

    Rajendra Prasad

    Sardar Patel

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    3/11

    THE CONSTITUTION (PART I) 85

    Finally, th e Con stitut ion was adopt ed by mem -

    bers of the Constituent Assembly on behalf of

    all the people of India.

    A b o v e i s t h e P r e a m b l e ( i n t r o d u c -t i o n ) t o t h e C o n st i tu t i o n . D o n tw o r r y i f y o u d o n t u n d er st an d a l lthe d i f f i cu l t w ords in the Preamb le .W e w i l l d i scuss som e o f them la ter.The words in boxes were added in1 9 7 6 .

    Republic D ay

    The Constitution came

    into force on 2 6 January

    1950, which has been

    celebrated as Republic

    D ay ever since.

    Ja w a h a r l a l N e h ru si g n i n g t h e C o n st i t u t i o n

    T he Constitution of India

    T he Constitu tion d escribes how In dia is divided

    into States and Union Territories. There aregovernment s at bo th levels. O ne at th e Cent re

    (D elhi) for th e entire country and the oth er in

    each State or Un ion Territory for that particu lar

    state or Un ion Territory.

    This was done because the members of the

    Con stituent Assembly felt that Ind ia was a large

    count ry and one government at the cent re would

    not be able to solve the problems and look after

    the interests of all the people and the different

    regions.

    The Constitution, therefore, also provides

    specific powers for the governm ent at th e Centre

    and at th e State level. You can read abou t this

    l a t e r o n i n t h e c h a p t e r o n t h e C e n t r a l

    Government.

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    4/11

    86 THE CONSTITUTION (PART I)

    demos (people) + kratos (rule) =democracy, meaning rule by th e people.

    In a democracy, people shou ld participate in t he

    making and changing of government s. T hus, every

    adult has the same power to vote. Whether a person

    is rich or poor or belongs to a particular social

    background does not matter . The Freedom

    M ovement had h ighlighted the idea that all people

    are equal.

    The Constitution is to be followed by all the

    people of India. In a democracy no individual

    should be considered to be above the law, no

    matter how high or important that person is.

    T herefore wheth er it is th e Prime M inister, Chief

    Justice, Presiden t o r any ot her h igh official, th ey

    all have to follow the laws. T hey also have to m akesure that these laws are followed by all. The

    Constitution tells in detail how these officials

    shou ld fun ction.

    T he C onstitution lays down the guidelines for all

    laws made by the C entral and State governm ents.

    All laws must be in line with t he C onstitution.

    O ur C onstitution is very long. It has 395 Articles,

    divided into 22 Parts. It has parts that discuss

    Fund amental Rights and D uties,

    th e Jud iciary (court s), election s,citizenship, official languages,

    finance and trade, etc. It also

    descr ibes how the

    Constitution itself can be

    changed.

    Universal Adult Franchise

    Franchise means th e right to vote.

    Universal means that this right

    applies to all adu lts in all of India.

    Thus, the Constitution states that governments

    in Ind ia are to be formed th rough election s. T hese

    elections are based on the principle ofuniversal

    adult franch ise. All elections in Ind ia for forming

    governments at any level have to follow this

    p r i n c i p l e ,

    s ince i t i sstated in th e

    Constitution.

    D r . B . R . A mb e d k a r p l a y e d a ma jo rr o l e i n w r i t i n g t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n . H ew a s t h e C h a i rma n o f t h e c o mmi t t e eo f e i g h t p e o p l e w h o w r o t e t h e f i r s t

    d r a f t o f t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n . T h e y

    presented th is draf t to the Const i tuentA s s e m b l y f o r d i s c u s s i o n a n dm o d i f i c a t i o n . I n t h i s p h o t o D r .A m b e d k a r i s s e e n w i t h a g r o u p o f

    d a l i t w o m e n a n d c h i l d r e n .

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    5/11

    THE CONSTITUTION (PART I) 87

    FUNDFUNDFUNDFUNDFUNDAMENTAMENTAMENTAMENTAMENTAL RIGHTSAL RIGHTSAL RIGHTSAL RIGHTSAL RIGHTST he th ird part of the C onstitution is very important because it states our Fu nd amental Rights. It

    is th e respon sibility of the governm ent to m ake sure th at n o on es Fun dam ental Right s are violated.

    If you feel that someone or some organisation (or the government) has

    violated your Fu nd amental Rights, then you can file a case against the

    government in th e H igh C ourt or Supreme Co urt. You can charge

    the governm ent with failing to protect your Fun dament al Rights.

    T hese right s form t he basis for man y laws. Sometim es someon e feels

    that a law has been passed by th e Cent ral or State G overnm ent t hat

    is in violation of the Fundamental Rights stated in theConstitu tion . S/he can th en file a case against the governm ent

    in the H igh C ourt or th e Supreme Court. Th e courts must

    then decide whether or not the law is according to the

    Constitution.

    The Constitution has divided Fundamental Rights into six

    sections. Let us study each one of them.

    Last year we r ead about th e St at e

    Governmentand theJudiciary.Nowwewilllearn

    aboutourFundamentalRightsandDuties.

    1. Right to EqualityT he C onstitution says that the governm ent shall

    no t den y to any person equality before th e law or

    equal protection of the laws. T his means that th e

    laws apply in the same manner to all, regardless

    of a persons incom e, status, backgroun d etc.

    For example, if some official is found guilty of a

    crime then he or she should be given the same

    punishment as applies to any other person. No

    one can claim special treatment because of his or

    her class or background.

    The Constitution also says that we should not

    show any pre f e r ence or t r ea t some one

    un favourably because of religion , race, caste, sex

    or place of birth. It also specifies that no one

    should be stopped from using public places such

    as ho tels, shops, film halls, pub lic wells, tan ks and

    bath ing ghats or stopp ed from o ffering prayers in

    a place of pu blic worship.

    Thus, people of any one religion have the same

    rights as th e people of any oth er religion.

    N O T E :

    In t h e f o l l o w in g p a g e s ,the ph rases in qu otes areg iven in the same wordsas in the Cons t i tu t ion .

    T h e S u p re me C o u r t ( i n N e w D e lh i ) .

    Everyone is equa l be fo re the law.

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    6/11

    88 THE CONSTITUTION (PART I)

    Reservation

    Why does the Const i tut ion t ry to prevent

    discrimination on the basis of caste? Because

    peoples abilities and merits are not determined

    by th eir caste. A baby born in a dalit family is no

    different from a baby born in any other family.

    Both children should therefore have an equaloppor tun ity to lead a good life. T he C onstitution

    guarantees this right.

    H owever, even m any years after the Co nstitu tion

    had guaranteed this right, there is still a lot of

    discrimination based on caste. For example, mo st

    dalit children are not able to get an education.

    D A L I T SI t i s necessary to id en t i fy w h ic h cas tes andt r ibes a re d isc r im ina ted aga ins t so tha t the i rr igh ts can be de fended . The Cons t i tu t ionre fe rs to these g roups (w hom w e usua l l y c a l ld alits) as Schedu led Cas tes and Schedu ledTr ibes (SC/ST). Schedu le m eans l i st .

    Get t ing a Job

    M anoha rlals s on recent ly cleared his B.Teche xa m i na t i on f r o m K ur u k s h e t r a R e g io n a lEngineering College and st ood 6 t h in his college.

    M a n y l a r g e c o m p u t e rcompanies came t o h isc o l l e g e f o r c a mp u sint erviews and he appliedfor many jobs. However, he

    was not selectedfor any job. On

    t h e o t h e r

    h a n d , h i sc l a s s -m a t e sw i t h

    l o w e rg r a d e s w e r e

    e a s i l y s e le c t e d .M anohar lal looked at h is s ons bio-dat a. I tshowed an excellent record. Aft er some t hought ,he advised his s on t o remove t he ment ion of hisscheduled caste s ta tus . H is son made thec h a n ge a n d s e n t h is a p p lic a t io n t o m o r e

    companies. This t ime ma ny of t he compa niest hat int erviewed him offered a job!

    Thefollowingisanactualexample of the widespreaddiscrimin ation that dalitstudentsface.

    Wha t kinds of rights to equa lity does theConstitution ensure ? Give examples. What doesthe Preamb le to the Constitution say aboutequality?

    Discuss whether you th ink each of the followingis a violation of the Fundam ental Right toEquality. Also discuss whether you think it is rightor wrong to do such th ings.

    In some hom es separa te utensils are kept tobe used by people of certain communities.

    While filling wa ter from a public source somepeople object if the vessel of another persontouches their pots.

    In some villages particular comm unitiescann ot organise a baraa t procession

    through the main streets of the village.

    If you want to rent a house, the houseownersare keen to know your caste and religion.

    Some comm unities are never provided a placeto live within the village but a lways outside.

    In som e schools, certa in children are no tallowed to serve wa ter because they belongto a particular caste.

    M embers of some communities do not go tomany places of worship because they fear thatthey will be ill treated or bea ten up.

    The Constitution specifies that there should be

    equality of opport un ity for all citizens in m atters

    relating to employment and that n o one should

    be discr iminated against on the grounds of

    religion, caste, sex, p lace of birth etc. Th is means,

    for example, that girls cannot be denied training

    as airplane pilots even thou gh some employer mayfeel that girls are no t suited for the job of pilots.

    T he C onstitution clearly states, Un touchability

    is abolished and its practice in any form is

    forbidden.

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    7/11

    2. Right to Freedom T he C onstitution lists many kinds of things that

    we as ind ividuals, are free to do. T his means th at

    no one should stop us from having th ese freedom s.

    However, along with freedoms there are some

    restrictions, i.e. some things that we are notsupposed to do. Let us discuss some of these

    freedom s and restrictions.

    Freedom of speech and expression

    Citizens are free to express their views in many

    ways such as through meetings, publications,

    plays, pain tin gs etc. H owever, there are som e

    restrictions, too. For example, there are laws

    forbidding people to publicly tell others to rebel

    against the government. Laws also forbid people

    to publicly defame others (to publicly say false

    and m ean t hings about someon e that will damage

    that persons reputation).

    Freedom to assemble peacefully and

    without arms

    People have the right t o come together or assemble

    for many reasons such as to hold meetings about

    th eir right s, to discuss th eir problems or business

    issues, to exchange ideas and share views etc.Everyone a lso has the r ight to car ry out

    demonstrations, public meetings and rallies.

    H owever, th ere are some restrictions on t his right

    for example, any assembly shou ld be cond ucted

    in a peaceful manner without the display or use

    of arms. Similarly, when ever a dem onstration or a

    rally is organised, prior permission from the

    admin istration n eeds to be taken.

    In order to overcome discrimination on the b asis

    of caste, the government has made laws for

    reservation of jobs and seats in higher education

    to scheduled castes and tribes. For example,

    medical colleges must adm it a certain percentage

    of stud ents who belong to SC/ ST.

    Reservation has been mad e in order to give people

    belonging to SC/ ST th e same opportu nities that

    oth er people have. Without reservation they would

    have almost n o chance of getting certain kind s of

    jo bs. T h us, reser vat io n does n ot give people

    belonging to SC /ST an advantage over oth ers - it

    merely removes a disadvantage.

    H owever, the laws for reservation are no t always

    enforced. Discrimination has persisted. Even

    thou gh 24% of the total population belongs to SC/ST, only 13% of the best jobs in governm ent and

    only 2% of all university and college teachers

    belong to SC/ ST.

    I F WE ARE ABLETO GO TO SCHOOL,WE MAY NOT BETREATED AS WELL ASOTHER STUDENTS,J UST BECAUSE WEARE DALI TS. EVEN I FWE MANAGE TOFI NI SH SCHOOL ANDPOST GRADUATI ON,AND DO WELL I NEXAMS, WE DONTGET AS HI GH PAYI NG

    J OBS AS OTHERS.

    A p e a c e fu l r a l l y o f p e o p le d e ma n d in g t h e r i g h tto be rehab i l i ta ted be fo re be ing d isp laced f romthe i r v i l l ages due to the cons t ruc t ion o f a dam.

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    8/11

    90 THE CONSTITUTION (PART I)

    Freedom to move freely throughout

    the territory of India

    Citizens are free to m ove in any part of the coun try.

    H owever, th e governmen t m ay impose som e

    restrictions. For example, in some border areas th e

    government thin ks that free movement is posing

    problems for the security of the country. In such

    a situation restrictions on movement may be

    imposed.

    Freedom to reside and settle in any

    part of the territory of India

    Any Indian can reside or seek employmen t in any

    part of the country. Let us read an example of a

    case related to th is freedom.

    Freedom to form associations or unions

    People are free to form man y kinds of associations - cultu ral groups,

    business associations, trade unions etc. For example, you may

    have heard that m any factories have workers un ions. These un ions

    hold meetings to discuss their problems. They make

    demands to the officers of the factory and at times

    may also organise a strike in the factory.T hu s, the un ion protects the rights of the

    workers.

    In spite of th e right to form associations,

    in many factories the employers do not

    allow th e workers to do so. In some cases

    they make workers sign a bond that they

    will not join a union. Workers may also

    face the threat of being fired. Since so

    many people in our count ry a r e

    unem ployed or do not find enough work,no one wou ld like to lose a regular factory

    job . H ence man y peop le do not protest

    against this loss of freedom.

    What about Slum Dwellers?There are m any cit ies like M umba i, Kolkat a, andDelhi where large numbers of people from faroff villages com e in sea rch of jobs. They do notget jobs very ea s ily. They us ually work as da ilywage labourers wherever t hey find work. S incet hey do not find proper places t o st ay, t hey liveon roadside pavement s or places near ra ilway

    tracks.

    M a n y y e a r s b a c k , t h e M u m b a i M u n i c i p a lCo r po r a t io n t r ie d t o r emo ve s o me 5 0 , 0 0 0people who had been living on t he pavement s. Itbegan t o dest roy t heir shelt ers. In 19 8 2 a casewas fi led in t he Supreme Court against t hisact ion. While t he case was pending, t he peoplecould not be removed.

    A n a c t i v i st o f a f arm w o rk e rs u n i o n c a l l e dM a z d o o r K i sa n Sa n g ra m Sa m i t i d e l i v e r i n ga speech in Arwa l , B iha r .

    Wha t associations are there in your area?

    Why are workers unions formed? What problems

    do they face?

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    9/11

    THE CONSTITUTION (PART I) 91

    Wha t is the difference between t he role ofthe police and tha t of t he court? Can yourecal l t his discussion from th e Class 7 cha pter on Law - Courts and Justice?

    Why is it essentia l tha t a n ar rested per sonbe produced in a court within 2 4 hou rs?

    Why do people want to move a nd sett le invar ious part s of the country?

    Wha t is the responsibility of the governm ent toworkers who are a ble to find some w ork in thecity but dont ha ve a proper place to live?

    If there w ere no slums in cities, how m ight thisaff ect the lives of city dw ellers?

    Theslumdwellersshould not beremoved fromtheir homes

    until theyaregivenanalternative space tosettle. Alarge

    numberof constructionworkerscomefromoutside the

    ci ty and provid e labourto bui ld houses. It isthe

    responsibilityofthe Municipal Corporation toprovidespace

    for peopleto settle. Since nearlyfifty percent ofthe

    population of Mumbai livesonunauthorised landthereis

    agreatfailureonthepart oftheplanningauthoritiesto

    provide adequate and lawfulspaceforpeople.Iftheyare

    forciblyremovedfromthepavementsthen it isa violation

    oftheir fundamental right offreedomtosettle inany place

    inIndia.

    In 19 8 5 t he Supreme Court reached a decision,sa ying We hold t hat no person has t he rightt o encroach, by erect ing a st ruct ure or ot herwiseon foot pat hs, pavement s or any ot her placereserved or earmarked for a public purpose.However, it furt her ordered t he government t oma ke provisions for t hose people who had beenliving t here for a long t ime t o be set t led in ad i f f e r e n t p l a c e b e f o r e d e s t r o y in g t h e ir

    pavement dwellings.

    Here is what the lawyers for the slum dwellersargued:

    H o m e s n e x t t o r ai l r o a d t r ac k s i n M u m b a iFreedom to practice any

    profession or carry on any

    occupat ion,trade or

    b u s i n e s s .

    All Indian citizens have

    the freedom to choose

    the type of job

    they wish.

    N o o n e

    should

    f o r c e

    someone tot a k e u p a

    particular job.

    Protection against arrest and

    detention in certain cases

    The police may arrest a person if they think the

    person has comm itted a serious crime. H owever, it

    is everyones fun dam ental right to know why they

    have been arrested and to be produced in court

    within 24 hours. It is the duty of the police to inform

    th em of the reasons for th eir arrest.

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    10/11

    Protection of l ife and personal

    liberty

    Every ind ividu al has a right t o live and a right to

    be free. T his right is guaranteed in the Con stitution

    as a fun dam ental right. It is th e responsibility of

    the government to p rotect th e life of all individuals.

    W hen there is a threat t o ou r lives, for examp le in

    a riot or dacoity, the police have to provide

    protection. If the police fail to do so we all have

    the right to fight against th is in th e court .

    Along with p rotection of life we have the freedom

    to live our life as we desire. This is the right to

    personal liberty. H owever, according to th e laws,

    personal liberty can sometimes be taken away

    for example by arresting people, by pu ttin g people

    in jails, etc. In extreme cases, even life can be

    taken away by a judge awarding a death sent ence

    to a person wh o has comm itted mu rder.

    This c lass in a rura l school is be ing heldo u t d o o r s b e c a u s e o f a s h o r t a g e o fc lassroom s. D o these ch i ld ren h ave a r igh tto a c lass room?

    Right to Education

    The Parliament has recent ly passed a new add ition

    t o t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n ( a n a m e n d m e n t ) , t h e

    fundamental right to education. It has made

    education for all children from th e age of 6 to 1 4

    a fundamental right. This makes it necessary for

    the government to arrange for schools and forparents to see to it that their children attend schools

    regularly. Th is right has been add ed because people

    feel that all children should h ave the opportunity to

    study, learn about the world aroun d th em, acquire

    skills to express themselves and make creative

    contributions to society, and have more opportun ities

    for their future.

    Wh at a re the differ ent typ es of schools you

    see in your area ? Why do you think thereare such differen t types of schools?

    Are there some children who dont go t oschool at all? Why?

    Are all schools availa ble to all children?Do a ll children who live around your a rearea l ly have an equa l opportuni ty to be educated in a simila r m an ner? Discuss.

  • 7/30/2019 08 the Constitution and the Fundamental Rights and Duties (Part I)

    11/11

    THE CONSTITUTION (PART I) 93

    EXERCISES1. How and w hen was the Constitution written?

    2. Wha t does the Constitu tion discuss besides Funda men ta l Rights?

    3. Suppose someone ha s built a house by encroaching on land wh ich is a pa rt of a roa d. Can th at

    person claim t hat the hou se should no t be destroyed by the municipal corpor at ion because everyonehas a right to settle anywhere in India?

    4. Suppose the government got a new w ell dug in a village. If some da lits are stopped from using thiswell, which Fundam ental Rights are being violated?

    5. Wha t do you think would happen if the Fundam ental Right to equality was not in the Constitution?

    6. A number of years ago some Indian airlines had a rule that a ir hostesses (wom en who t ake care ofthe needs of passengers on aeroplanes) would loose their jobs if they got married. Was thisaga inst t heir Fundam enta l Rights? Explain.

    A Case AgainstLife and PersonalLibert y

    A s e s s i o n s j u d g e w a shearing a case against ap e r s o n b y t h e n a m eB h o m a C h a r a n O r a o n .Suspect ing that Bhoma

    w a s s u f f e r i n g f r o m ament al il lness, he was sent t o a ment al asylumf o r t r e a t m e n t . A f t e r Bh om a s s t a y in t h em e n t a l a s y l u m f o r s i x m o n t h s , t h esuper in t endent o f t he asy lum in formed t hec o ur t t h a t h e wa s w ell en o ug h t o b edischa rged. The judge however did not t akenecessary steps to release him. Bhoma hadt o live t here for six more years .

    Letsread about

    an actu al situ at ion

    wh ereth er ight t o

    personallibertyhad

    beenviolated.

    A c a s e w a s f i l e d a g a i n s tB h o ma s d e t e n t i on in t h eS u p r e m e Co u r t . I t wa sp r o ve d in t h e co u r t t h a tt h e r e w a s a v i o l a t i o n o fB h o ma s r i g h t t o l if e a n dp e r s o n a l li be r t y. T h eSupreme Court ordered t hes t a t e g o v e r n m e n t t o p a yRs. 15 ,0 0 0 as compensat iont o B h o m a . T h e S u p r e m eC o u r t a l s o s a i d i n i t sj u d g m e n t t h a t n o n e o ft h e s e c o mp e n s a t i o n s c a nact ually compensat e t he sixyears of l i fe that had beenl o s t t o B h o m a - w h o h a sbeen t urned t o a living dead

    si t uat ion.

    Discuss the meaning of the fo l lowingphra ses in your cla ss:per sona l libe rt y; m enta l asylu m; liv ingdead.

    Write in your own words: How w as there av iolat ion of Bhoma Charans right to l i fe and personal liberty?

    The Preamble t o th e Constitution says thatthe Gov e r nme nt ha s to ma k e s ur e a l l

    citizens ha ve certa in kinds of libert y. Afterreading about some of the fundam enta l rights to freedom, can you explain what thePream ble m eans by liberty?