PowerPoint Presentation

03/11/14SLUB - as w21

SLUB Honours Class [Week 2 General: how to write a book; AS: ascientiss framework for understanding the law; FK: gently introducing Dutch Law to Scientists]AERNOUT SCHMIDTFRANKE VD KLAAUW1Two basic jurisprudential methods: for interpreting and for application of the laws 03/11/14SLUB - as - w122Interpretation as basic scientific method in Law (Bobbitt)03/11/14SLUB - as - w13Historic argumentTextual argumentDoctrinal argumentPrudential argumentStructural argumentEthical argument3The formal existential requirements for the Rule of Law as basic to the scientific method of legal application, based on Fullers eight Moralities of Duty [Wikipedia]03/11/14SLUB - as - w14The lack of rules or law, which leads to ad hoc and inconsistent adjudication.Failure to publicize or make known the rules of law.Unclear or obscure legislation that is impossible to understand.Retrospective legislation.Contradictions in the law.Demands that are beyond the power of the subjects and the ruled.Unstable legislation (ex. daily revisions of laws).Divergence between adjudication/administration and legislation.4INSTITUTION: Another basic notion,FRAME03/11/14SLUB - as w25Game (players, audiences, props, domain, referees, competitions, skills)Language systemLaw systemNorm systemOrganisational unitStyles, cultures5For Next Week: Week 203/11/14SLUB - as w26Project issues: Describe example casusWhat disciplines do Rub, in casu?Fundamental-fundamental? How?Fundamental-Applied? How?Applied-Applied? How?

(Re-)Read: Rakoff, Berger and GoodsteinPrepare 1: Recital (I) descriptivePrepare 2: Recital (I) use wrt aimPrepare 3: Recital (G) project progress6AIM: Turn Risk into Art into Use03/11/14SLUB - as - w17

7RDG: Rubbing Disciplines Generalized03/11/14SLUB - as w28

8RDG: Rubbing Disciplines Generalized03/11/14SLUB - as w29FundamentalAppliedFundamentalAppliedFundamentalAppliedFundamentalAppliedCRULH: A crude look at the whole heuristicPOPH: Primacy of Parsimony heuristicCACH: Completeness and consistency heuristicQUAMH: Quantum mechanics heuristicComplexity & Contingencies & DynamicsCOHERENCE REQUIREMENTSVERTICAL (emergence, autonomy, C&C)HORIZONTAL (cultural anomalies, TABOOS)9Example Clashes: Grudge, Buikhuizen, Daubert, Dover, Lucia03/11/14SLUB - as w2101. Grudge informer - Hart-Fuller HLR debate 19582. Inadmissable Research , , Buikhuizen 19783. Admissible Expertise , , Daubert 19934. Intelligent design , , Kitzmillar-Dover 20055. Junk statistics , , , , , , Lucia de Berk 2003-201010Possible borderlines example clashess:03/11/14SLUB - as w211 1234511The Book03/11/14SLUB - as w2121. Introduction2. --- disciplines and cultures--- - 3. Disciplinary discomforts in the Lucia Case, , , 4. Heuristics and Hypotheses 5. Approaches to falsification6. Conclusions

12For Next Week: Week 3 (18/11/14)03/11/14SLUB - as w213Project issues: Write a blog an a fundamental applied debate in the culture of your choice (and upload to dotlegalslub)Write a blog on a cross disciplinary debate between two cultures of your choice (and upload to dotlegalslub)

Upload before Monday 17-11, 20.00 h.

Read: Wong, Gostin & Cabrera (687-746)Prepare 1: Recital (I) descriptivePrepare 2: Recital (I) use wrt aim1303/11/14SLUB - as w214THANKS & GOOD LUCK!14