(03 JUNE 2013)

(03 JUNE 2013)

WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES

EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016)WP5 Analysis and Recommendations

• EMODnet chem needs very specific use cases, MSFD is the (current) best fit

• 2 lines of iterative engagement; SDN user panel (the details), and WG-DIKE/GES (the policy)

• Phase II; moving from ”off the rack” products to something ”tailored”

In Conclusion...

BACKGROUND: Who’s pulling the strings...

DG-MARE (Maritime Affairs)

Blue growthBlue technologyShippingWind/Wave energyFisheries and Aquaculture

DG-ENV (Environment) & EEA

Effect of pressures from exploitationImpacts on environment of human activityIntrinsic value of environment

BACKGROUND: and the tools they have...

DG-MARE (Maritime Affairs)

Data Collection Framework (DCF) and DC-MAPMarine Knowledge 2020EMODNET

DG-ENV (Environment) & EEA

Water and Marine Framework Directive (WFD/MSFD) Habitats, Bathing water etc. DirectivesINSPIRE (Public body spatial data)WISE and WISE-Marine

TIMELINE: Some important events

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2018

MODEG est.

Marine knowledge 2020

MSFD

EMODnet phase I EMODnet phase II

INSPIRE

GES, ESA and WG-DIKE

WG-DIKE (tech sub-group)

EMODnet Chemistry I (2009-2012)....improvements for next time

- Large volume of work (still to do) on standardization of data/meta-data

- Complexity of measurements in the current SDN vocabulary structure (too many possible combinations)

- Heterogenity of measurements (spatial, method), need to split into homogeneous datasets for product generation

- Contaminants; fixed QC is not adequate- Regional experts needed for regional products

EMODnet Chemistry I (2009-2012)....improvements for next time


WP description: inputs• Specific MSFD feedback through WG-DIKE and WG-

GES• Other users, needs and feedback• Gather feedback from ENV 2012/11 “Sea basin

Checkpoints”• Feedback from Chemistry project partners including

data providers • Overall EMODNet strategy developments at EU and

Member States levels


WP description: objectives• Engage with MSFD stakeholders and align/revise

chemical portal and products through dialogue• identify key users and report on the effectiveness of the

system in meeting the needs of end-users• provide a summary feedback to the products work

package (WP3) • To establish efficient tools to obtain users feedback


2 lines of iterative engagement; - SDN user panel

- MSFD decision making working groups:GES (Good environmental Status)ESA (Economics and Social Assessment)DIKE (Data and Information Knowledge Exchange)

EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016)

From DOW

calculate spatially distributed data products specifically relevant for Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptors 5 (eutrophication), 8 (chemical pollution) and 9 (contaminants in seafood)1 based on guidance provided by the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Common Implementation Strategy2

2) MSFD CIS*- A series of papers developed and agreed

through Commission working groups- Have implicit member state acceptance

through marine directors- Provide guidance but not specifics on the

‘how to’

1) Role of Regional Sea Commissions (RSC’s)

- Commission has clarified since the drafting of EMODnet II tenders

- Expectation to use/adapt existing data products/indicators

WG-DIKE and WISE-Marine

Data assembly standards

Data access

Data discovery

Strategy for activities under Art 19.3DIKE-7/2013/05

WG-DIKE technical meeting (July 04)

- WISE-Marine data flows mapping proposal template

Assessment

Data Collection (sources of observations)

Data assembly

Indicators

WG-DIKE

WG-GES

WG-DIKE technical meeting (July 04)Region: MSFD

Region/Subregion(s)Descriptor: MSFD descriptor

Decision basis Operational basis

ASSESSMENT - Reference to national assessment(s) and when

- Reference to regional assessment (RSC or other i.e ICES)

- Reference to European assessment

- Reference to Baseline assessment/Commission decisions

Description of assessment product

- Appropriateness for WISE-Marine output

- Adaptations needed

- Assessment scale

- Temporal scale

INDICATOR(S) - Reference to national indicator(s)

- Reference to RSC indicator

- References to Commission decisions/MSFD related working group decisions

- References to other directives/frameworks (i.e. DCF/DCMAP, habitats directive)

Linkages to indicators:

- Location/Availability

- New/Existing provision

- Supporting information

- Frequency of provision

- Spatial unit (related to MSFD units)

- Context of use (consistency with MSFD scope)

DATA ASSEMBLY - Data not assembled beyond national scope

- Not applicable

- Data assembled under RSC

o References to RSC bodies/committees/processes

o References to institutes/organisations that carry out/sub-contract work

o References to methodologies/reports that outline assembly method

- Linkages to assembled data

o Location/Availability

o Usage rights

o Update frequency

o Format/Outputs

o Metadata

o Spatial unit

o QC applied

- Data assembled under EU project/EU infrastructure

o Linkages to RSC bodies/committees/processes

o References to institutes/WP leaders/organisations that carry out/sub-contract work

o References to methodologies/reports that outline assembly method

- Mechanism(s) to assembled data

o Location/Availability

o Operational portal/web service

o Usage rights

o Update frequency

o Format/Outputs

o Metadata

o Spatial unit

o QC applied

DATA COLLECTION (sources of observations)

- Regional sea monitoring programme(s) and regional coordination of national programmes

- Member state monitoring programme(s)

- Member state data source provision (institutes, or central distribution point

- MS data provision mechanism(s)o Availabilityo Usage rightso Update frequencyo Format/Outputso Metadatao Spatial unit

WG-DIKE technical meeting (July 04)

- Specific agenda placeholder for input from EMODnet Chemistry

” How can Emodnet (chemistry) engage in support to MSFD data

reporting”

• MSFD is the (current) best fit

• Phase II; moving from ”off the rack” products to something ”tailored”

(03 JUNE 2013)

Documents

Transcript of (03 JUNE 2013)