01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
-
Upload
simon-gray -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
![Page 1: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
01/17/20021
4-CP Discussion
October 16,2002Retail Market Subcommittee
Austin, Texas
![Page 2: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Protocol References
9.8 Transmission Billing Determinant Calculation
ERCOT will provide the market with the determinants defined below to facilitate billing of Transmission access service. ERCOT will not be responsible for billing, collection or dispersal of payments associated to Transmission access service.
9.8.1
ERCOT shall calculate and provide to Market Participants via MIS the following data elements annually to be used by TDSP’s as billing determinants for Transmission access service. This data shall be provided by December 01 of each year. This calculation shall be made in accordance with the requirements of the PUCT. The data used to perform these calculations shall come from the same system(s) used to calculate settlement-billing determinants used by ERCOT:
1. The 4-Coincident Peaks (4-CP) for each TDSP, as applicable.
2. The ERCOT average 4-CP.
3. The average 4-CP for each TDSP, as applicable, coincident to the ERCOT average 4-CP.
Average 4-CP is defined as “the average Settlement Interval coincidental MW peak occurring during the months of June, July, August, and September.”
Settlement Interval MW coincidental peak is defined as “the highest monthly 15 minute MW peak for the entire ERCOT Transmission Grid as captured by the ERCOT settlement system.”
![Page 3: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Data Aggregation Process
Initial AggregationProcesses
SETTLEMENT DATA PROCESSING
AggregateGeneration and
Zonal Data
Aggregate DC TieData
Apply LoadProfiles &
Aggregate IDRData
IDR Estimation
NOIE LoadAggregation
FinalAggregation for
SettlementDeterminants
Apply DistributionLoss Factors
ApplyTransmissionLoss Factors
Calculate andAllocate UFE
TDSPProvided
ConsumptionData
ERCOTEPS Meter
ConsumptionData
ResourceRelationships
EPSCompensation
Factors
EPSNetting &Splitting
NOIEMeter Point
Relationships
DC Tie DailySchedules
LoadProfiles
ESI-ID / RIDRelationships
UFE ZonalMeter Data
DistributionLoss Factors
TransmissionLoss Factors
![Page 4: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Quantity Conversion & Sum by TDSP
LSEGUFE_1_14_RESLOWR_COAST_NIDR_NWS_NOTOU_D_U1_S01_1
• For each load cut, there are 96 interval of MWH data
• Unique combinations of LSEGUFE for the 4CP trade dates• 949 in August • 1,121 in September
Quantity Conversion consists of converting the MWH data into KW
KW = MWH X 4 X 1000
LSEGUFE Load Cuts are Summed by TDSP for the peak interval.
Note: Cuts where the Lodestar LSE Code equals a DC Tie name were omitted from the TDSP totals.
![Page 5: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Data Cut Definitions
LSEGUFE_1_14_RESLOWR_COAST_NIDR_NWS_NOTOU_D_U1_S01_1
Load Segment Cut Type:LSEGUNADJ = Base Load valuesLSEGDL = Base Load + Distribution LossesLSEGTL = Base Load + Distribution Losses +Transmission LossesLSEGUFE = Base Load + DL + TL + UFE
Lodestar LSE Code: (1 = RELIANT LSE)
Lodestar QSE Code: (14 = RELIANT)
Load Profile Code:
Distribution Loss Factor Code (A-E or T)
UFE Settlement Zone
Congestion Management Zone
Lodestar TDSP Code: (1 = RELIANT)
![Page 6: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Lodestar TDSP to 4 CP Entity Mapping
126 Unique TDSPs in Lodestar
126 Unique TDSPs in Lodestar
77 Load Entities in
4 CP Submission
s
77 Load Entities in
4 CP Submission
s
TXLA Tex-La Electric CoopRUSK COUNTY ELECTRIC CO OP (TDSP)Deep East Texas Electric Co Op IncHouston County Electric Co Op IncJasper-Newton Electric Co Op IncSAM HOUSTON ELECTRIC CO OP INC (TDSP)CHEROKEE COUNTY ELEC CO OP ASSOC
Versus
• Lodestar TDSPs are mapped to the corresponding 4-CP Load Entity Listing.
• KW Per Lodestar TDSP is summed per mapping.
• Complete mapping list is included in ERCOT filing with PUC
STEC South Texas Electric Coop JACKSON ELECTRICAL CO OP INCKARNES ELECTRIC CO OP INCNUECES ELECTRIC CO OP INCNUECES ELECTRIC CO OP INC AEP (TDSP)SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC CO OP INC (TDSP)SAN PATRICIO ELECTRIC CO OP (TDSP)VICTORIA ELECTRIC CO OP INCVICTORIA ELECTRIC CO OP INC AEP (TDSP)WHARTON COUNTY ELECTRIC CO OP INC
![Page 7: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Process Summary
Select Peak Interval and
Convert MWH to KW
Sum KW per Lodestar TDSP(Omitting DC Ties)
Sum Lodestar TDSPs to 4CP
Entity List
Compile 4 Months data into Average 4CP for PUC Filing
Determine Time of Peak for each
4 CP Month
Secure Aggregation Load
Cut Data for 4 CP Trade Days
![Page 8: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
UFE Data
• 433.02 MWH
• 1,732,080 KW
August 15th @ 16:30
• 414.85 MWH
• 1,659,400 KW
September 7th @ 16:30
Energy is allocated to load cuts in competitive TDSP service areas based
upon UFE allocation mechanism in Section 11 of Protocols.
![Page 9: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
What’s New with the Resettlement Data?
Less Estimation• 100% of IDR Data was Present• 99+% or Non-IDR Data was Present
Data Modifications• Corrections to NOIE Wholesale Points• Removal of ESI IDs created in error• Removal of Substation ESI IDs• Correction to Generation Site Data
New Peak Day Revealed for August• New Peak is August 15th @ 4:30 PM
• (Previous August peak was August 22nd @ 4:45 PM)
![Page 10: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Comparison of August Data (March ’02 data VS October ’02 Data)
0.0% Change For The Remaining 70 Entities
LSE Acronym
Load Serving Entity Name08-15-01@16:30
Oct '02 Filing
08-22-01 @16:45
March '02 Filing
Oct Data
MarchData
OctMinusMarch
ACPL AEP Central Power and Light 4,113,736.4 4,042,408.8 7.5% 7.3% 0.2%AWTU AEP West Texas Utilities 1,065,863.6 1,009,483.6 1.9% 1.8% 0.1%AENX Austin Energy 2,184,916.4 2,165,702.8 4.0% 3.9% 0.1%BEPC Brazos Electric Coop 1,784,782.8 1,677,008.4 3.3% 3.0% 0.2%CPST City Public Service 3,850,907.6 3,752,652.8 7.0% 6.8% 0.2%GARL Garland Power and Light 476,502.4 445,490.4 0.9% 0.8% 0.1%PECX2 Pedernales Electric Coop -LCRA 770,412.0 744,879.2 1.4% 1.4% 0.1%REIL Reliant Energy HL&P 12,920,150.4 14,574,787.6 23.6% 26.5% -2.9%TXUE TXU 22,274,928.8 21,316,478.8 40.7% 38.7% 1.9%
SUBTOTAL 54,784,105.6 55,012,781.2
Contribution to the Peak For the Month
![Page 11: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Comparison of Sept 7th Data (March ’02 data VS October ’02 Data)
0.0% Change For The Remaining 72 Entities
LSE Acronym
Load Serving Entity Name09-07-01@16:30
in Oct '02
09-07-01@16:30
in March '02
Oct Data
MarchData
OctMinusMarch
ACPL AEP Central Power and Light 3,726,146.8 3,588,063.6 7.5% 7.2% 0.3%AWTU AEP West Texas Utilities 975,359.2 932,835.6 2.0% 1.9% 0.1%REIL Reliant Energy HL&P 12,628,106.4 14,026,363.2 25.5% 28.2% -2.7%
TNMP Texas-New Mexico Power Company 1,158,645.2 1,110,883.2 2.3% 2.2% 0.1%TXLA Tex-La Electric Coop 64,465.6 103,618.0 0.1% 0.2% -0.1%TXUE TXU 19,574,897.2 18,626,547.2 39.5% 37.5% 2.1%WEAT Weatherford, City of 55,498.4 29,786.8 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
SUBTOTAL 49,494,230.8 49,726,134.0
Contribution to Peakfor the Month
![Page 12: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Comparison of March ‘02 Filing to October ‘02 Filing
0.0% Change For The Remaining 72 Entities
LoadEntity
AcronymLoad Entity Name
Load Ratio Share based
upon March 02
data
Load Ratio Share based
upon October 02
data
OctoberMinusMarch
ACPL AEP Central Power and Light 6.92969% 7.04454% 0.1%AWTU AEP West Texas Utilities 2.36324% 2.41549% 0.1%BEPC Brazos Electric Coop 3.11076% 3.16886% 0.1%CPST City Public Service 6.91034% 6.97224% 0.1%REIL Reliant Energy HL&P 26.49353% 25.09876% -1.4%TXUE TXU 38.97831% 39.97117% 1.0%
![Page 13: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Transmission Connected IDR Information
Count of IDR with DLF Code of T 1,409
NOIE 988
Competitive 421Reliant 169TXU 140TNMP 6CPL 46WTU 60
![Page 14: 01/17/20021 4-CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082613/5697c0231a28abf838cd42bb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Questions