00-SAIP-76inspectionTracking

Previous Issue: New Next Planned Update: 1 June, 2009 of 23 Primary contact: Nasser M. Balhareth on 874-5018

Inspection Procedure

00-SAIP-76 31 May, 2004 Worksheet Control and Tracking Program

Document Responsibility: Inspection Department

Saudi Aramco DeskTop Standards Table of Contents 1 Scope............................................................. 2 2 Applicable Documents................................... 2 3 Definitions...................................................... 2 4 Responsibilities.............................................. 3 5 Instructions.................................................... 5 6 Reporting....................................................... 6 7 Suggested E-System..................................... 7 Attachment I –Worksheet Data Fields.................. 9 Attachment II – Flowchart................................... 11 Attachment III – Deterioration and Abnormality Failure Codes................... 14 Attachment IV – Example of Report Formats..... 19

Document Responsibility: Inspection Department 00-SAIP-76 Issue Date: 31 May, 2004 Next Planned Update: 1 June, 2009 Worksheet Control and Tracking Program

1 Scope

This SAIP provides guidelines for inspection personnel on their specific involvement in the initiation, compilation, review, approval and implementation tracking of worksheets issued by their inspection unit.

2 Applicable Documents

The following reference documents have been used during the compilation of this procedure. The latest edition should always be used.

Saudi Aramco General Instruction

GI-1000.500 Maintenance Work Order

Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedure

SAEP-325 Inspection of Pressurized Equipment

Saudi Aramco Inspection Procedure

00-SAIP-78 Inspection Records/Filing Procedure

Saudi Aramco Forms

Form 2643-ENG Worksheet

Form 4745 Records Retention Policy

3 Definitions

Deficiency: Non-conformance to an existing Saudi Aramco standard or other Saudi Aramco reference document; or deterioration of Saudi Aramco infrastructure; or fault condition characterized by an inability to perform a required function.

Inspector: A Saudi Aramco (or contract employee) qualified, certified and experienced within an inspector job description discipline of P&E/W, electrical, civil, coatings, cathodic protection, non-destructive testing (NDT), telecommunications, or lifting equipment (crane).

Logbook: As per 00-SAIP-78 definition.

Worksheet: A notification that an item(s) is non-conforming to company specified standards, procedures or other reference or has deteriorated and requires further evaluation, repair or modification to be suitable for use. Saudi Aramco Form 2643-

of 23


ENG is an example of a current paper-based worksheet. Electronic worksheets can also be utilized if in accordance with the requirements of this SAIP.

4 Responsibilities

4.1 Inspector

4.1.1 Identifies a deficiency that requires a worksheet to a proponent.

4.1.2 Compiles a draft worksheet using either Saudi Aramco Form 2643-ENG, a PIU equivalent form, or an electronic equivalent ensuring all required data fields are completed and any optional data fields specified by the unit. Refer to Attachment I for examples of suggested data fields.

4.1.3 References applicable standards, attaches to the worksheet any construction or isometric drawings, sketches, data, OSI drawings, etc., that will help clarify the location, type, nature and characteristics of the deficiency such that the deficiency is accurately identified, described and traceable in the field.

4.1.4 Discusses with operations foreman the intent to issue a worksheet and agrees a SAP Priority for each individual line item (if deemed necessary). If a priority-1 item per GI-1000.500, then an immediate site visit shall be made by the Inspector, Foreman and any other necessary discipline if deemed necessary by the Foreman.

4.1.5 Submits the worksheet to a unit supervisor, or field supervisor (if approval responsibility has been delegated) for review and approval. Distributes the worksheet to proponent and circulates copies as appropriate for PIU once the worksheet is approved for issue.

4.1.6 Monitors the work progress and obtains SAP Notification and Job Order numbers, or any other changing priority status, or reference number associated with the job from the proponent until worksheet closure. The inspectors monitoring activities can consist of surveillance, witness, record or data review, or hold point inspection points as specified in the inspection and test plan for the individual item.

4.1.7 Verifies worksheet closure in the field and updates the tracking system adopted by the PIU every time a change in worksheet status occurs.

Commentary Note:

of 23


The inspector should discuss with the applicable operations engineer the intent to issue a worksheet and make him aware of the intended nature of the recommendation(s) in the worksheet.

4.2 Field Supervisor

4.2.1 Review the worksheet for legitimacy, accuracy, identification and traceability.

4.2.2 Approves the worksheet and signs if paper-based or accepts if electronic system-based.

4.2.3 Immediately informs the unit supervisor of any priority 1 worksheet.

4.2.4 Monitors the worksheet tracking system updates performed by an inspector at arbitrary periodic intervals to identify and advise discrepancies to the inspector.

4.2.5 Conduct worksheet reviews with proponents at least once per month.

4.2.6 Compiles monthly worksheet status reports to proponent management during the 1st working week of each month per local data needs.

4.2.7 Can cancel a worksheet if responsibility is delegated by unit supervisor.

4.3 PIU Supervisor

4.3.1 Monitors the worksheet tracking system updates performed by an inspector and field supervisor at arbitrary periodic intervals to identify and advise discrepancies to the inspector and field supervisor.

4.3.2 Reviews all priority 1 worksheets.

4.3.3 Reviews, approves and issues hard-copy or electronic monthly worksheet status reports to proponent management during the 1st working week of each month per local PIU data needs.

4.3.4 Conduct worksheet reviews with proponents at least once per quarter.

4.3.5 Compiles and issues year-end hard copy or electronic monthly worksheet status reports to proponent management within two weeks from the start of each Gregorian year.

4.3.6 Is the second level role that can cancel a worksheet.

of 23


4.3.7 Is the only role that can delete a worksheet from the system (duplicates, mistakes, etc.).

Commentary Note:

The Proponent Operations Foreman (or other nominated proponent representative) assigns work priority of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 as per SAP priority criteria in GI-1000.50 section 4 and as agreed with inspector.

5 Instructions

5.1 Organizational System

5.1.1 Worksheets) may be hard copy (paper), or electronic provided it is fully accepted by the records retention policy (Form 4745) of the department and Saudi Aramco auditing department policies.

5.1.2 Each inspection unit supervisor establishes a tracking system to control and track worksheets. The flowchart depicting the tracking system business workflow and responsibilities is shown in Attachment II.

5.1.3 The plant inspection unit, as part of the internal self assessment shall review the system for compliance to this SAIP. This review shall occur once per year to ensure that a system is established, meets the requirements of this SAIP and is being regularly updated.

5.2 Worksheet Issue

5.2.1 The inspector shall complete all mandatory data fields as required by his PIU as shown in Attachment I. If the discrepancy is a non-conforming item the reference and relevant paragraph shall be quoted. If the discrepancy is deterioration or functional abnormality then a preliminary failure code may be referenced for the item as depicted in Attachment III.

5.2.2 In the event that consensus cannot be reached on the necessity for issuance of a worksheet between proponent representatives and inspector, the matter will be highlighted to the immediate supervisory roles for each of the parties for further direction.

5.2.3 A worksheet can still be issued by the inspection units to record a discrepancy and the proponent division head must formally respond to record and archive the reasons for the cancellation of the worksheet.

5.2.4 The inspector proceeds with all his responsibilities as listed under section 4.1.

of 23


5.3 Worksheet Tracking

5.3.1 The inspector shall appropriately monitor progress from initiation to closure of the worksheets as outlined in section 4.1.9 and the progress shall be reviewed by the inspection field supervisor and unit supervisor as outlined in sections 4.2.6 and 4.3.1.

5.3.2 A standardized table of worksheet status disposition shall be utilized as follows:

a) Awaiting Maintenance Action b) Draft Notification (worksheet) c) No SAP Notification Issued d) No SAP Work Order Issued e) No Job Request f) No Engineering Package g) No Material h) Shutdown Required i) Work In Progress j) Cancelled k) On Hold l) Completed m) No Service Order n) Awaiting CP Operations Action o) Awaiting Contractor Action p) Superceded

5.3.4 The updating interval of worksheet status is an ongoing activity and the assigned facility inspector should maintain communication with proponent operations foremen, planners, maintenance foremen, plant engineers and field location visits to ascertain the progress. It is the responsibility of the proponent to advise the inspector of any change in work progress or status in order that the inspector can verify and update the worksheet system immediately upon his verification.

5.3.5 Only an inspection field supervisor or unit supervisor can change a worksheet status to cancelled when justified and documented. No worksheet covering temporary work is allowed to be closed without proper and documented review by all concerned parties.

of 23


5.3.6 Only a unit supervisor can delete a worksheet from the system. This shall be supported by proper documented review and justification (unless it's a duplicate worksheet).

6 Reporting

6.1 Reporting may be hard copy (paper based), or electronic such as automated data extraction from databases and published to pre defined web reports that can automatically be archived at periodic intervals for historical review, or trending. Attachment IV gives an example of typical formats that can be produced using either method.

6.2 The inspection unit supervisor shall issue worksheet reports at periodic intervals suitable for the local proponent and PIU management but not more than at 3-months intervals. Monthly is an appropriate reporting interval for critical and long outstanding worksheets and also an end of year summary is recommended.

6.3 The format of the report shall be at the discretion of the inspection unit supervisor and the data needs of the local proponent management. Management may specify graphical representations of the data.

6.4 The data of all inspection worksheet status reports shall be formatted in a manner suitable for storage, archival and easy extraction per the records retention policy of the business line management.

6.5 The individual data fields (if adopted by PIU) that are suggested in attachments I and III shall be searchable to produce individual unique reports to allow trending and identification of gaps.

6.6 Worksheet Status Reports shall group the age of open notifications (worksheets) from date of issue. These groupings can be dependent upon the SAP priority of a notification as shown in the table below; the actual format is dependent upon PIU needs. The only worksheets not considered as open are those with a status of completed or cancelled.

PRIORITY None 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Age < 1 Month

Age >1 < 3 Month

Age >3 < 6 Month

Age >6 < 12 Month

of 23


Age >12 < 24 Month

Age ≥ 24 Month

Total

7 Suggested E-System

It is suggested that an electronic worksheet control and tracking system be established with the following features:

7.1 Be able to have unique separate data fields as selected from Attachment I to allow rapid sorting of data.

7.2 For each change event that occurs be capable of: a) Automatically recording the initiator name and logon.

b) Automatically recording the date and time of change.

7.3 Producing pre-defined reports automatically at fixed intervals without manual intervention (attachment IV indicates an example).

7.4 Emailing predefined reports or hyperlinks to report automatically to pre-determined SAP job roles and/or webpage's if deemed necessary by PIU.

7.5 Have a query mechanism to allow data sorting and extraction to MS-Office excel spreadsheets.

7.6 Fully auditable and can derive a log of every individual user access, date, time, and duration.

Revision Summary 31 May, 2004 New Saudi Aramco Inspection Procedure.

of 23


Attachment I – Worksheet Data Fields

Data Field Typical Entry Examples Comments

Issued by: Admin Area/ Department/ Division/Unit

Worksheet No/Year Division/Unit-xxxx/yyyy

Worksheet Discipline P&E/W, Civil, Elect, C.P, Coatings, Crane, NDT, Telecom Drop down list selection

Worksheet Issue Date dd-mmm-yyyy Auto-input by system Date of Inspection dd-mmm-yyyy Date Entry Name clerk1 Auto-input by system Data Entry Logon smitnx0a Auto-input by system

Data Entry Signature Text or auto input logon of person making entry Auto-input by system

Inspector Name A.N Other Auto-input by system Inspector Logon smitnx0b Auto-input by system

Inspector Signature Text or auto input logon of person making entry Auto-input by system

Immediate Supervisor Name Text Auto-input by system Immediate Supervisor Logon smitnx0c Auto-input by system

Immediate Supervisor Signature Text or auto input logon of person making entry Auto-input by system

Ops Foreman Name Text Auto-input by system Ops Foreman Logon boultdb Auto-input by system

Ops Foreman Signature Text or auto input logon of person making entry Auto-input by system

Supt Name Text Auto-input by system -Only required for cases where declines to perform job

Supt Logon hfgftehe Auto-input by system-Only required for cases where decline to perform job

Supt Signature Text or auto input logon of person making entry

Auto-input by system-Only required for cases where decline to perform job

Supt Justification to decline worksheet Text Only required for cases where

decline to perform job

Facility/Unit No 459, H16, etc (per drafting manual) Drop down list linked to Admin Area/Dept/Division Selection

Facility/Unit Name Haw-2 GOSP etc (per drafting manual)

Linked to Facility/Unit No drop down list

Equipment No 459-SR-1000-1A1M Equipment Name Drain piping from dehydrator Equipment Sub-System Common Trains, etc (i.e) Qurayyah

of 23


Location Text

Attachment I –Worksheet Data Fields (continued)

Data Field Typical Entry Examples Comments Service Hydrocarbon Drop down list On-Plot/Off-Plot On-Plot toggle selection Worksheet applicable to Area Text (Well Services, etc) Drop down list

FARIS/SAIF System ID number 32, 33, etc Linked to FARIS/SAIF System Description (drop down list)

FARIS/SAIF System Description Sewer system Linked to FARIS/SAIF System ID (drop down list linked to System ID)

SAP Notification No text SAP Job Number text SAP Job No Issue Date dd-mmm-yyyy Engineering Job Number text

Worksheet Priority 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 per SAP criteria Drop down list

Worksheet Status On-Hold, In Progress etc. As listed in section 5.3.4 (drop down list)

Worksheet Age <1 Month, <3 month, etc Auto input by system based on worksheet issue date (see 6.6).

Worksheet For Action By Foreman, XXXXX/XXXX SAP Job Position Title Worksheet Scope Text

Worksheet Item No 1, 2, 3, etc A worksheet can have many Items

Worksheet Item No Type Non-Conformance, Deterioration or Abnormality, Observation or All

Dependent upon selection of Item Type a different choice of drop down list occurs.

Worksheet Item No Discrepancy Description Text

Worksheet Item No Reference or Deterioration Code SAEP-308, Int Corr Drop down list

Worksheet Item No Ref paragraph or Deterioration sub-code (if applicable)

3.3.3,

Worksheet Item No Recommendation Text

Worksheet Closure Date dd-mmm-yyyy Auto input by system Worksheet Closed by Name 1 Text Auto input by system Worksheet Closed by Logon fgfbfhr Auto input by system Worksheet Cancel/Closed by Name

Text or auto input logon of person making entry Auto input by system

Worksheet Cancel/Closure verified by Name

Text or auto input logon of person making entry Auto input by system

Worksheet Cancel/ Closure verified by logon yrhejs Auto input by system

of 23


Worksheet Cancel/Closure by Name Text Auto input by system

Attachment II – Flowchart

of 23


IdentifyDiscrepancy(Inspector)

ENDNO

Discuss withOps Foreman

(Inspector)

YES

Discuss withEngineering(Inspector)

Compile DraftWorksheetNotification(Inspector)

Acceptible?(ImmediateSupervisor)

Cancel/Delete?

(ImmediateSupervisor)

NO

NO

Cancel Delete DraftWorksheetNotification

(Supervisor orImmediate Superisor)

END

YES

DistributeWorksheetNotification(Inspector)

SAPNotification Issued

& Informed Inspector?(OperationsForeman)

ShutdownItem

& Informed Inspector?(OperationsForeman)

YES

NO

SAPJob Order Issued &Informed Inspector?

(OperationsForeman)

Update Statusto S/D item(Inspector)

YES

Update Statuswith SAP

Notification(Inspector)

Update Statuswith SAP Job

Number(Inspector)

YES

2a

ProponentReviews Worksheet

Notification & will assignresources to complete ?

(OperationsForeman)

SuptSigns for worknot be done(Ops Supt)

YES

YES

NONO

2b

Attachment II – Flowchart (continued)

of 23


2a

Proponent Performs work &controls all contractors ensuring

all Saudi Aramco existingrequirements are complied with

in full(Operations Foreman)

Performs Surveillance,Witness, Hold-Point and review

points to ensure all SaudiAramco existing requirements

are complied with in full.(Inspector)

Hasadvised

Inspector about work activities & status

changes?(OperationsForeman)

YES

Proponent Performs rework &controls all contractors ensuring

all Saudi Aramco existingrequirements are complied with

in full(Operations Foreman)

NO

StatusChange?

(Inspection)

Updates Status toreflect current

Status(Inspector)

YES

NO

E-System Auto NotifiesImmediate Inspection Supervisor

of Status Change or if papersystem Inspector performs

notification(System/Inspector)

2b

Review StatusChanges

(Immediate InspectionSupervisor)

StatusChange Acceptible?

(Immediate InspectionSupervisor

NO

First Weekof Calendar Month?

(Immediate InspectionSupervisor

System Auto-Reminderor Supervisor first of

Month(System/ Inspection Unit

Supervisor)

YES

END NO

YES

3a

3b

Attachment II – Flowchart (continued)

of 23


3a

E-system?(Immediate Inspection

Supervisor

System generates pre-formattedreports automatically and emails

hyperlink to pre-defined jobpositions every month and

archives automatically(System)

YES

Receivers receive StatusReports, review and assign any

necessary actions(All participants)

Generate PIU agreed pre-formatted status reports first

week of every month.(Immediate Inspection

Supervisor)

NO

Review, correct and issue statusreport to pre-defined job

positions during first week ofevery month

(Unit Inspection Supervisor)

End of YearStatus?

(Unit InspectionSupervisor

End of YearStatus?

(System)

System generates pre-formattedannual reports automatically andemails hyperlink to pre-defined

job positions at start of eachGregorian year and archives

automatically(System)

YES

Generate PIU agreed pre-formatted annual status reportsto pre-defined job positions at

start of each Gregorian year andarchives accordingly

(Unit Inspection Supervisor)

YES

NO NO

END

3b

Attachment III – Deterioration and Abnormality Failure Codes

of 23


Item Damage Code Damage Code Description SAP

EquivalentMeridium

Equivalent Comments

1 A0001 Abnormal- instrument reading (AIR)2 A0002 Annulus- pressure build up (APU)3 B0001 Bent/Kinked4 B0002 Blown (Fuse)5 B0003 Breakdown (BRD)6 B0004 Brittle Fracture API 5817 B0005 Brittleness due to High Temp Ageing API 5818 B0006 Broken 9 B0007 Burnt10 B0008 Burst11 CP001 C.P - Abnormal Measurement12 CP002 C.P - Broken CAD Weld / Wire13 CP003 C.P - Consumed Anodes14 CP004 C.P - Insufficient Protection15 CP005 C.P - Interference16 CP006 C.P - Other17 C0001 Carburization API 58118 C0002 Cavitation API 58119 C0003 Chipped20 CT001 Coating - Failure D-610 General ASTM-D-61021 CT002 Coating - Failure D-610 Hybrid ASTM-D-61022 CT003 Coating - Failure D-610 Pinpoint ASTM-D-61023 CT004 Coating - Failure D-610 Spot ASTM-D-61024 C0004 Collapsed

25 CN000 Concrete Category 0 New, no cracks or defects detectable.

26 CN001 Concrete Category 1Fine shrinkage cracks present, minor surface defects may be present, no evidence of reinforcing steel corrosion.

27 CN002 Concrete Category 2

Shrinkage cracks present, surface defects such as weathering and small accidental gouges or breakouts, may be present, small cracks attributed to reinforcement corrosion may be present.

28 CN003 Concrete Category 3

Severe surface damage due to weathering or chemical attack, open cracks due to reinforcement corrosion. Hollow sounding areas due to reinforcement corrosion, spalling.

29 CN004 Concrete Category 4 Severe cracking or breakup due to reinforcement corrosion. Reinforcement may be exposed.

30 CN005 Grout Category 5 No cracks or defects present.

31 CN006 Grout Category 6 Fine shrinkage cracks, no loss of bond with concrete.

of 23


Attachment III – Deterioration and Abnormality Failure Codes (continued)


EquivalentMeridium

Equivalent Comments

32 CN007 Grout Category 7Small cracks, some loss of bond with concrete, minor surface damage, metallic aggregate in exposed area.

33 CN008 Grout Category 8Break outs, major damage, extensive loss of bond with concrete.

34 CR001 Corrosion - Ammonia API 58135 CR002 Corrosion - Atmospheric API 58136 CR003 Corrosion - Biological API 58137 CR004 Corrosion - Boiling Water/ Condensate API 58138 CR005 Corrosion - C02 API 58139 CR006 Corrosion - Caustic API 58140 CR007 Corrosion - Chlorine/Sodium Hyperchlorite API 58141 CR008 Corrosion - Cooling Water API 58142 CR009 Corrosion - Crevice API 58143 CR010 Corrosion - Dealloying API 58144 CR011 Corrosion - Erosion API 58145 CR012 Corrosion - Flue Gas API 58146 CR013 Corrosion - Flue Gas Dewpoint API 58147 CR014 Corrosion - Galvanic API 58148 CR015 Corrosion - H2/H2S Sulfidation API 58149 CR016 Corrosion - High Temp Oxidation API 58150 CR017 Corrosion - Hot Corrosion API 58151 CR018 Corrosion - Hydrochloric Acid (Hcl) API 58152 CR019 Corrosion - Hydrofluoric Acid API 58153 CR020 Corrosion - Injection Point API 58154 CR021 Corrosion - Inorganic Chlorides API 58155 CR022 Corrosion - Naphthenic Acid API 58156 CR023 Corrosion - Organic Chlorides API 58157 CR024 Corrosion - Organic Sulfur API 58158 CR025 Corrosion - Phenol API 58159 CR026 Corrosion - Phosphoric Acid API 58160 CR027 Corrosion - Soil API 58161 CR028 Corrosion - Sour Water API 58162 CR029 Corrosion - under Fireproofing API 58163 CR030 Corrosion - under Insulation API 58164 CK001 Cracking - Amine API 58165 CK002 Cracking - Ammonia API 58166 CK003 Cracking - Carbonate API 58167 CK004 Cracking - Caustic API 58168 CK005 Cracking - Chloride Stress Corrosion API 58169 CK006 Cracking - Corrosion Fatigue API 58170 CK007 Cracking - Hydrofluoric Acid API 58171 CK008 Cracking - Liquid Metal Embritttlement API 58172 CK009 Cracking - Stress Corrosion API 58173 CK010 Cracking -Polythionic Acid (PTA) API 58174 C0005 Creep API 58175 C0006 Creep & Stress Rupture API 58176 C0007 Crushed77 C0008 Cut

of 23




EquivalentMeridium

Equivalent Comments

78 D0001 Decarburization API 58179 D0002 Delayed- operation (DOP)80 D0003 Dent/Dented81 EM001 Embrittlement - 885 F API 58182 EM002 Embrittlement - Carbide Precipitate API 58183 EM003 Embrittlement - Reheat Cracking API 58184 EM004 Embrittlement - Sigma & Chi phase API 58185 EM005 Embrittlement - Temper API 58186 ER001 Erosion - Droplets API 58187 ER002 Erosion - Solids API 58188 E0001 Erratic- output (ERO)89 F0001 Failed- to close on demand (FTC)90 F0002 Failed- to function on demand (FTF)91 F0003 Failed- to open on demand (FTO)92 F0004 Failed- to regulate (FTR)93 F0005 Failed- to start on demand (FTS)94 F0006 Failed- to stop on demand (STP)95 F0007 Failed- to synchronise (SYN)96 F0008 Fasteners - Loose97 F0009 Fasteners Incorrect98 F0010 Fatigue- Mechanical99 F0011 Fatigue -Thermal100 F0012 Faulty- output frequency (FOF)101 F0013 Faulty- output voltage (FOV)102 G0001 Galled103 G0002 Gasket Type Incorrect104 H0001 Hardening API 581105 HYD01 HIC - Cyanide Stress Cracking API 581106 HYD02 HIC Blisters API 581107 HYD03 HIC -Cracking / Step Wise Cracking API 581108 HYD04 HIC SOHIC API 581109 HYD05 HIC Sulphide Stress Cracking API 581110 H0002 High- output, unknown reading (HIU)111 H0003 High- output/reading (HIO)112 H0004 Holed113 HYD06 Hydrogen Attack - Embrittlement API 581114 HYD07 Hydrogen Attack - High Temperature API 581115 HYD08 Hydrogen Attack - Hydriding API 581116 I0001 Incipient Melting API 581117 I0002 Insufficient- heat transfer (IHT)118 INS01 Insulation - Banding Broken/Missing119 INS02 Insulation - Bulging120 INS03 Insulation - Damage Penetrations121 INS04 Insulation - Missing Jacketing / insulation122 INS05 Insulation - Sealing Deterioration123 I0003 Internal Fittings loose/broken124 I0004 Internal Fittings Tray loose125 I0005 Internal Foreign Deposits126 LK001 leakage- External/ fuel (ELF)127 LK002 leakage- External/ process medium (ELP)

of 23


Attachment III– Deterioration and Abnormality Failure Codes (continued)


EquivalentMeridium

Equivalent Comments

128 LK003 leakage- External/ utility medium (ELU)129 LK004 Leakage- in closed position (LCP)130 LK005 leakage- Internal (INL)131 LK006 Leaks - Existing Temporary Clamps132 LK007 Leaks - Other133 LK008 Leaks - Process134 LK009 Leaks - Steam Tracing135 L0001 Low- output (LOO)136 L0002 Low- output, unknown reading (LOU)137 L0003 Low-Very low output (VLO)138 M0001 Material - Incorrect139 M0002 Melted140 M0003 Metal Dusting API 581141 MA001 Misaligment -Other142 MA002 Misaligment - Restricted Movement143 MA003 Misalignment - Expansion Joint144 N0001 Nitriding API 581145 N0002 No- demand (OWD)146 N0003 No- output (NOO)147 N0004 Noise (NOI)148 OTH01 Other (OTH)149 OTH02 Overheating (OHE)150 OTH03 Overload (Plastic Collapse) API 581151 P0001 Parameter deviation (PDE)152 P0002 Pierced153 P0003 Plugged/Choked (PLU)154 P0004 Punctured155 R0001 Ruptered156 S0001 Sand Encroachment (External)157 S0002 Scaled / Scaling158 S0003 Scratched / Scored159 S0004 Seized160 S0005 Service- Minor problems (SER)161 S0006 Shattered162 S0007 Sliding Wear API 581163 S0008 Softening due to Overaging API 581164 S0009 Spheroidization & Graphitization API 581165 S0010 Splintered166 S0011 Split167 S0012 Spurious- high level alarm signal (SHH)168 S0013 Spurious- low level alarm signal (SLL)169 S0014 Spurious- operation (SPO)170 S0015 Spurious- stop (SPS)171 S0016 Strain Ageing API 581172 S0017 Structural- deficiency (STD)173 S0018 Subsidence174 SUP01 Supports - Bottomed Out Springs175 SUP02 Supports - Brace Distortion/ Leakage176 SUP03 Supports - Counter Balance Condition177 SUP04 Supports - Hanger Distortion or Breakage

of 23




EquivalentMeridium

Equivalent Comments

178 SUP05 Supports - Loose Brackets179 SUP06 Supports - Shoes off Supports180 SUP07 Supports - Slide Plates/ Rollers181 T0001 Thermal Racheting API 581182 T0002 Torn183 T0003 Twisted184 UNK01 Unknown185 VIB01 Vibration - Excessive Overhung Weight186 VIB02 Vibration - Inadequate Support187 VIB03 Vibration - Loose Supports188 VIB04 Vibration - Thin, small bore piping189 VIB05 Vibration - Threaded Connections190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227

of 23


Attachment IV – Example of Report Formats

xxxxxxx Inspection Unit Worksheets Summary

Print Date Tuesday ~ 27 January, 2004

WS# WS Date Maint. W.O. Equipment Priority Status

08xx/2003 xx/xx/2003 101xxxx 1 1/2" DRAIN LINES 4 Await Maint. Action

0xxx/2003 xx/xx/2003 1018xxx 4" JETTING LINES 4 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 1x/xx/2003 101xxx55 4" WASH WATER LINE 4 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 1x/xx/2003 1018xxx 4" JETTING WATER LINES 4 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 1x/xx/2003 xxxxx SAFETY RELIEF VALVES 3 Work In progress

08xx/2003 1x/xx/2003 1018xxxx 12" DIA. WATER LINE 4 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 0xxx/2003 1018xxxx SMALL DIAMETER PIPING 4 Shutdown Required

08xx/2003 0xxx/2003 1018xxxx FIRE WATER MONITORS 2 Work In progress

08xx/2003 0xxx/2003 1018xxxx 10" Ø GAS LINE FROM LPPT 3 Work In progress

08xx/2003 0xxx/2003 1018xxxx 2"X1500# ELBOWS D/S OF LC 4 Work In progress

08xx/2003 1x/xx/2003 1018xxxx LEVEL COLUMN PIPING 3 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 1x/xx/2003 1018xxxx CONDUIT SEALS 3 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 2x/xx/2003 1018xxxx 2" & 4" DRAIN LINE 4 Await Maint. Action

08xx/2003 2x/xx/2003 1018xxxx 2" CHARGE PUMPS DRAIN 4 Work In progress

08xx/2003 2x/xx/2003 1018xxxx CHEMICAL CONCRETE 5 Work In progress

Number of Worksheets on this Plant: 15

of 23


Attachment IV – Example of Report Formats (continued)

Pre 2004 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Opened 9 7Closed 10 11Shutdown 7 9W/S For Action 99 95Outstanding 106 104

Notes:Opened = Worksheets opened between the 1st and last day of the month.Closed = Worksheets completed and cancelled during the above period.S/D Required = Cumulative number of "Shutdown Required" worksheets at the end of the month.W/S for Action = Cumulative worksheets except "Completed, Cancelled and S/D Required ".Outstanding = Total worksheets (cumulative) except "Completed" and "Cancelled" at the end of the month.

xxxxxx AREA CORROSION CONTROL/INSPECTION xxxxxxxxxxxxx INSPECTION UNIT (xxxx)

January 28, 2004xxxxx PRODUCING DIVISION

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Pre2004

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Opened Closed Shutdown W/S For Action Outstanding

Worksheet Summary Chart

of 23


Attachment IV – Example of Report Formats (continued)

of 23


xxxxxxx CORROSION CONTROL\ INSPECTION xxxxxx xxxxxx INSPECTION UNIT xxxxx Producing Wednesday, January 28, 2004

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

2

3,4 &

5

Engr A

ction

Ops. A

ction

<= 6 months > 6 month <= 1 year > 1 year

Worksheet Priority & Status Chart

Priorities 2 3,4 & 5 Engr Ops. Total Action Action <= 6 months 1 16 4 12 33 Time > 6 month <= 1 year 0 29 3 6 38 Worksheets > 1 year 0 28 0 5 33 Total 1 73 7 23 104 Are Outstanding Priority "1" - Emergency Work: To be done immediately (Safety, Production Loss or Equip Damage) Priority "2" - Urgent Work: Start within 48 hours and complete as soon as possible. Priority "3,4 & 5" - Normal Work: May schedule beyond 48 hours as maintenace resources permit. Engr Action - Worksheets issued for engineering evaluation or for a package. Ops Action - No work order/No Job request/or SD required issued by Operations.

of 23

00-SAIP-76inspectionTracking

Documents

Transcript of 00-SAIP-76inspectionTracking