0 in 3: How to Avoid the Most Common Triennial Review Findings
-
Upload
new-york-public-transit-association -
Category
Education
-
view
1.371 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 0 in 3: How to Avoid the Most Common Triennial Review Findings
New York Public Transit Association
Fall ConferenceFTA Triennial Review Program
FY 2010
US Department of TransportationFederal Transit AdministrationWashington, DC
Triennial Review ProcessGrantee Perspective
• Prepare for Review• Top Level Support• Communicate with FTA• Conduct Self Assessment• Attend Workshop
Grantee Perspective Prepare for Review
• Start Preparing for the next review the day the Review Team Leaves–Review and Rectify Deficiencies–Implement your FTA recommendations–Ways to ensure you get it done–3 years go by very quickly
Grantee Perspective Top Level Support
• Their Buy-in is Critical• What’s in it for them?• Consequences for non-support
Grantee PerspectiveUseful Resources
• FTA Project Manager• Networking
–Other County/Grantee Peers–At Conferences
• FTA Website• Prior Triennial Reports• Professional Colleagues
Grantee PerspectiveSelf Assessment
• Bi Annual Bus Maintenance Review• Drug and Alcohol Testing Review• The Contract
–Obligations–Roles and Responsibilities–Consequences
Grantee PerspectiveResolving Deficiencies
• Best Practices• Good News Story
–Local Town Lot Cameras–6 Year Project–Grant and Project are Successfully Closed–FTA and County are Happy–BUT a Noted Deficiency
Grantee PerspectiveResolving Deficiencies
• A Lesson Learned• Geographical Preference• Met with FTA & Town• Discussed Options
–Town Remove Permit–Town Pays for Share of Cameras
• Resolution
FY07 DeficienciesTop 6 Areas of Findings
18.97%
17.24%
15.52%
12.07%
8.62%8.62%
SCCPROCUREMENTTECHNICALD & ADBEMAINTENANCE
FY07 Deficiencies Top 6 Areas of Findings
• Satisfactory Continuing Control (19%)–Inadequate Equipment Records–Inventory Results Not Reconciled
• Procurement (17%)–No/Incorrect FTA Clause
• Technical (16%)–Excessive Delays in Project Implementation
FY07 Deficiencies Top 6 Areas of Findings
• Drug & Alcohol (12%)– Contractors, subrecipients, and/or lessees not properly
monitored– Drug and/or alcohol program vendors not properly
monitored• Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (9%)
– No TVM certification• Maintenance (9%)
– Facility/equipment maintenance plan lacking or inadequate– Late facility/equipment preventive maintenance
Triennial Review ProcessFTA Perspective
• Conduct Workshops• Conduct Desk Review• Finalize Site Visit• Conduct Site Visit• Issue Final Report• Provide Technical Assistance
FTA PerspectiveConduct Workshops
• Current Guidance• Changes from Prior Year• Interaction with
–Regional Staff–Triennial Reviewer–Colleagues
FTA PerspectiveConduct Desk Review
• Meet with Regional Staff• Review the Grantee TEAM Data• Review Grantee Files• Schedule Site Visit
– Contact Grantee– Develop Working Relationship with Triennial Review
Coordinator
• Prepare/Finalize Review Package
FTA PerspectiveFinalize Site Visit
• Review Grantee Input• Prepare Final Review Package
– Follow-up Questions– Source Documents– Procurement, ECHO, Maintenance Samples
• Prepare Final Schedule– Site Visits– Facility Tours
FTA PerspectiveConduct Site Visit
• Entrance Conference• Review Areas• Visit Facilities• Visit Third Parties• Complete Draft Report and Transmittal
Letter• Exit Conference
FTA PerspectiveIssue Final Report
• Incorporate Grantee Response• Incorporate Region Response• Transmit Report to Region• Transmit Report to Grantee
FTA PerspectiveProvide Technical Assistance
• Regional Discretion• Address Deficiencies
Changes in 2010
• Triennial Review Package–Instructions–Sample Site Visit Schedule–Grantee Profile–Requested Documents–Questions for Review
Changes in 2010
• Workbook–Focus on 5316/5317 Recipients–Oversight of Subrecipients/Contractors/Lessees–Fully Incorporated 4220.1F and 5010.1D–Now 24, Not 23 Areas
• ARRA–Toolkit
• References
Contacts
• Jim Buckley– [email protected]
• Diane King– [email protected]• 105 N. 22nd Street
Philadelphia, PA 19105• 215-496-9100• 215-496-0980• Mike Shine