0 American Physical Society MultiDivisional Neutrino Study DOE-OS Briefing January 7, 2005...
-
Upload
jacob-sharp -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 0 American Physical Society MultiDivisional Neutrino Study DOE-OS Briefing January 7, 2005...
1
American Physical Society MultiDivisional Neutrino Study
DOE-OS Briefing January 7, 2005
Washington DC
Stuart FreedmanBoris Kayser
2
Super KamiokANDE PMT Matrix
Part IWhy study neutrinos?
A view of the Sun from 1 Km underground
4
Ray Davis
Pioneering venture in Neutrino Physics
6
E2 = m2c2
E1 = m1c2B. Pontecorvo
€
Ψe (t) = cos(θ)e−im1c
2th ν 1 + sin(θ)e
−im2c2t
h ν 2
Ψe (t) Ψe (0)2
=1− sin2(2θ)sin2((m2 −m1)c
2
2ht)
€
Pee =1−sin2(2θ )sin2(1.27(m2
2 −m12 )L
E)
Neutrino Ocillations
In the rest frame
Boosted to the lab frame
€
m22 −m1
2 = Δm2
7
Atmospheric Neutrinos
π → μ +νμ
μ → e+νe +νμ
€
N(ν μ ) = 2N(ν e )
8
The SuperKamiokande Light-Water Cherenkov Detector
9
Solar Neutrino Experiments
10
Neutrino Flavor Composition of 8B Flux
SNO
11
Reactor Antineutrino Experiments
LMA: m2 = 5.5x10-5 eV2
sin2 2 = 0.833
KamLAND
12
818 events if no oscillation56 events observed
MINOS (FNAL Soudan) 2005
Terrestrial Version of Atmospheric Neutrino Experiment
If no oscillation: 151 11
Observe: 108
13
KamLANDIs the Neutrino Spectrum Distorted?
€
Pee =1− sin2(2θ)sin2(1.27(m2
2 −m12)L
E)
14
€
Ψe (t) Ψe (0)2
=1− sin2(2θ)sin2((m2 −m1)c
2
2ht)
Is there an oscillation effect
€
Pee =1− sin2(2θ)sin2(1.27(m2
2 −m12)L
E)
€
trestframe =tlabγ
=m
Etlab
€
L = c • tlab
15
Observing the oscillations in the neutrino rest frame
16
ν μ ν e?
ν ep→ e+n
μ+→ e+νeν μ
p→ π +
π+→ μ+νμ
LSND at Los Alamos
17
Excerpts from the Charge
“…response to the remarkable recent series of discoveries in neutrino physics…”
“…build on the 2002 long range plans developed by NSAC and HEPAP.”
“…create a scientific roadmap for neutrino physics.”
“…examine the broad sweep of neutrino physics…”
“…move towards agreement on the next steps…”
The Study will lay scientific groundwork for the choices that must be made during the next few years.
18
Neutrino Study Organization
Chairpersons
Solar and Atmospheric Neutrino ExperimentsReactor Neutrino Experiments
Superbeam Experiments and DevelopmentNeutrino Factory and Beta-Beam Experiments and Development
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and Direct Searches for Neutrino MassWhat Cosmology/Astrophysics and Neutrino Physics can Teach Each Other
Theory Discussion Group
Writing Committee
Organizing Committee
19
APS Neutrino Study: Midcourse CorrectionApril 1-2, 2004Berkeley
UMNS =
Ue1 Ue2 Ue3
Uμ1 Uμ2 Uμ3
Uτ1 Uτ2 Uτ3
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟
=
1
c23 s23
−s23 c23
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟
c13 s13e−iδ
1
−s13eiδ c13
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟
c12 s12
−s12 c12
1
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟
www.aps.org/neutrino
20
US scientists participate in neutrino physics worldwide
21
Present US Program in Neutrino Physics
NSF
NSF
DOE NP/HEP
DOE HEP
DOE NP/HEP
DOE NP
DOE HEP
NASA
DOE HEP
NSF NP
DOE HEP
NSF
DOE NP
22
Many of the past experiments and many of the future experiments we feel are particularly important rely on suitable underground facilities. The availability of these facilities will be crucial to future neutrino research.
101
102
103
104
105
106
Muon Intensity, m
-2 y
-1
5 6 7 8 9
103
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
104
Depth, metres water equivalent
IMB
Soudan
Kamioka
Gran Sasso
HomestakeBaksan
Mont Blanc
Sudbury
Kolar
Muon flux vs overburden
Underground Facilities
23
SNO
Part IIThe Story
24
What Have We What Have We Learned?Learned?
What Do We What Do We NotNot Know? Know?
25
Neutrino masses —There is some spectrum of 3 or more neutrino mass
eigenstates i:
(Mass)2
1
2
3
4
Mass () mi
From neutrino flavor change (oscillation) experiments, we have learned that —
Neutrinos have nonzero rest massesLeptons mix
26
We do not know how many different neutrinos there are. Just 3, the partners of the 3 charged leptons??
If the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) experiment is confirmed, there are more than 3.
If LSND is not confirmed, nature may contain only 3 neutrinos.
Then, from the existing neutrino oscillation data, the neutrino spectrum looks like —
27
(Mass)2
1
2
3
or
1
23
}m2sol
m2atm
}m2sol
m2atm
m2sol = 8 x 10–5 eV2, m2
atm = 2.5 x 10–3 eV2~ ~
Normal Inverted
28
Grand Unified Theories relate the Leptons to the Quarks.
is un-quark-like, and would probably involve a lepton symmetry with no quark analogue.
A grand goal of elementary particle physics is to unify all the forces of nature into a single force.
The Grand Unified Theories, which do this for all the forces of nature save gravity, favor —
29
When W+ l+ + ,
the produced neutrino state |> is
| > = U*i |i> .
Neutrino of flavor Neutrino of definite mass mi
Unitary Leptonic Mixing Matrix
Flavor- fraction of i = |< |i>|2 = |Ui|2 .
le e, l , l
e, , or
i
Leptonic mixing —
30
m2atm
e [|Uei|2] [|Ui|2] [|Ui|2]
(Mass)2
m2sol}
Bounded by reactor exps. with L ~ 1 km
From max. atm. mixing,
€
3 ≅ν μ +ν τ
2
From (Up) oscillate but (Down) don’t{{
{
In LMA–MSW, Psol(e e) = e fraction of 2
From max. atm. mixing, includes (–)/√2
From distortion of e(solar) and e(reactor) spectra
31
The Mixing Matrix
€
U =
1 0 0
0 c23 s23
0 −s23 c23
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥×
c13 0 s13e−iδ
0 1 0
−s13eiδ 0 c13
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥×
c12 s12 0
−s12 c12 0
0 0 1
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥
×
eiα1 /2 0 0
0 eiα 2 /2 0
0 0 1
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥ ⎥
12 ≈ sol ≈ 32°, 23 ≈ atm ≈ 36-54°, 13 < 15°
would lead to P( ) ≠ P( ). CP
But note the crucial role of s13 sin 13.
cij cos ij
sij sin ij
Atmospheric Cross-Mixing Solar
Majorana CP phases~
32
Are Neutrinos the Reason We Exist?The universe contains Matter, but essentially no antimatter.
Good thing for us:
This preponderance of Matter over antimatter could not have developed unless the two behave differently. (CP)
The observed difference between Quark and antiquark behavior, as described by the Standard Model, is inadequate.
Could the interactions of Matter and antimatter with neutrinos provide the crucial difference?
Matter AntimatterPoof!
33
There is a natural way in which they could.
The most popular theory of why neutrinos are so light is the —
See-Saw Mechanism
NVery heavy neutrino
Familiar light neutrino
}
{
The heavy neutrinos N would have been made in the hot Big Bang.
34
If Matter and antimatter interact differently with these heavy neutrinos N, then we can have —
Probability [ N e- + … ] ≠ Probability [ N e+ + … ]
Matter antimatter
in the early universe.
This phenomenon (leptogenesis) would have led to a universe containing unequal amounts of Matter and antimatter.
In time, they would have decayed into lighter particles.
35
We cannot repeat the early universe.
But we can lend credibility to the hypothesis of leptogenesis by showing that Matter and antimatter interact differently with the light neutrinos .
Source Detector
e- -
Source Detector
e+ +
A neutrino flavor change involving Matter:
A neutrino flavor change involving antimatter:
If these two flavor changes have different probabilities, then quite likely so do —
N e- + … and N e+ + …
36
If N decays led to the present preponderance of Matter over antimatter, then we are all descendants
of heavy neutrinos.
In Pursuit of 13
Both CP violation and our ability to tell whether the spectrum is normal or
inverted depend on 13.
How may 13 be measured?
If sin2213 < 0.01, a neutrino factory will be needed to study both of these issues.
38
m2atm
(Mass)2
m2sol}
sin213 is the small e piece of 3.
3 is at one end of m2atm.
We need an experiment sensitive to m2atm,
and involving e.
sin213
39
Complementary Approaches
Reactor e disappearance while traveling L ~ 1.5 km.
L/E ~ 500 km/GeV. This process depends on 13 alone.
Accelerator e while traveling L > Several hundred
km. L/E ~ 400 km/GeV. This process depends on 13 and
other neutrino properties, including whether the spectrum
is normal or inverted.
40
How To Determine If The Spectrum Is Normal Or Inverted
In the experiments we will do with earth-born neutrinos, the neutrinos will travel through earth
matter.
Exploit the fact that, in matter, e – e interactions raise the effective mass of e.
41
m2atm
e
(Mass)2
m2sol}
m2atm
m2sol}
vs.
sin213
sin213
If m2atm shrinks (grows) in matter, 13 grows (shrinks).
42
The effect of matter increases as the neutrino distance of travel within it, L, does.
Using larger L to determine whether the spectrum is normal or inverted could be a unique contribution of the U.S. program.
43
Does —
• i = i (Majorana neutrinos)
or• i ≠ i (Dirac neutrinos) ?
e+ ≠ e– since Charge(e+) = – Charge(e–).
But neutrinos may not carry any conserved charge-like quantum number.
A conserved Lepton Number L defined by—L() = L(l–) = –L() = –L(l+) = 1 may not exist.
If it does not, then i = i and we can have —
Are Neutrinos Their Own Antiparticles?
44
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay (0)
Observation would establish that —
• Lepton number L is not conserved
• Neutrinos are Majorana particles ( = )• The origin of neutrino mass is not the same as
the origin of the masses of charged leptons, quarks, nucleons, humans, the earth, galaxies
ii
W– W–
e– e–
Nuclear Process
Nucl Nucl’
Then neutrinos and their masses are very distinctive.
45
The Quest for the Origin of Mass
Neutrino experiments and the search for the Higgs boson both probe the origin of mass.
The see-saw mechanism suggests that the physics behind neutrino mass resides at 1015 GeV, the extremely high energy where Grand Unified Theories say all the
forces of nature, save gravity, become one.
46
The Open QuestionsThe Open Questions
47
Neutrinos and the New Paradigm
• What are the masses of the neutrinos?
• What is the pattern of mixing among the different types of neutrinos?
• Are neutrinos their own antiparticles?
• Do neutrinos violate the symmetry CP?
48
Neutrinos and the Unexpected
• Are there “sterile” neutrinos?
• Do neutrinos have unexpected or exotic properties?
• What can neutrinos tell us about the models of new physics beyond the Standard Model?
49
Neutrinos and the Cosmos
• What is the role of neutrinos in shaping the universe?
• Is CP violation by neutrinos the key to understanding the matter – antimatter asymmetry of the universe?
• What can neutrinos reveal about the deep interior of the earth and sun, and about supernovae and other ultra high energy astrophysical phenomena?
50
KamLAND
Part IIIRecommendations
for future experiments
52
53
54
55
56
57
KATRIN
’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’20
Running
Running
Exi
stin
g P
rogr
am
Signal?
MINOS
RunningConstr. 7Be Solar
US Based
US Participation
KamLANDReactor
MiniBooNE
Super-K + K2K+T2K
HE Astro
SNO
Running
Running
Constr. RunningR&D
Construction Running
Construction Running
Green < $10M/yr Blue $10M - $40M/yrOrange $40M -$100M/yr Red > $100M/yr
New
Exp
erim
ents RunningConstructionR&D
Constr. Running
R&D Construction Running
R&D Constr. Running
R&D Construction Running
R&D No Signal?
1 ton
pp Solar
Reactor
Long Baseline
200 kg
Construction/RunningCross Sections
’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’20
Green < $10M/yr Blue $10M - $40M/yrOrange $40M -$100M/yr Red > $100M/yr
New Experiments
Proton driver
R&D Construction Running
R&D R&D
Fac
ilit
ies
?01.02sin 132 ≥
R&D Construction Running
ConstructionR&D Multipurpose
Detector
UG Lab
Factory
Running
’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’20
Const.
Facilities
Green < $10M/yr Blue $10M - $40M/yrOrange $40M -$100M/yr Red > $100M/yr
61
MiniBOONE