valuemanagement.sap.com · XLS file · Web view2014-07-28 · Finance shared services include...
Transcript of valuemanagement.sap.com · XLS file · Web view2014-07-28 · Finance shared services include...
Project Information
ResponseProject NameOrganization NameRegionCountryScope of ProjectName of the Division (If Applicable)IndustrySub IndustryCurrencyRevenuePeriod end date for data provided
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
Finance Shared Services: Survey Instructions
Survey Structure
Welcome to the SAP Finance Shared Services survey. The survey will help you assess your Finance Shared Services organization's current process and technology performance and maturity, based on key performance indicators and best practices vis-a-vis your peers. Upon submission of this survey, you will receive a confidential and comprehensive analysis report, comparing your Shared Services' performance and maturity against your peers.
Here are a few tips before you get started:
The survey has three pages:• Page 1 includes general instructions.• Page 2 includes participant profile, key performance indicators and information technology deployed.• Page 3 includes a series of best practices along with their maturity models to help you to assess their importance and adoption/coverage for your organization.• Maturity Model includes descriptions of maturity stages for each best practice listed on Page 3. They should be used as a gauge for best practices Coverage (1 - 5).
Completion Instructions:
Terms and Conditions
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
• An online glossary is in place to address the most common questions. The glossary can be accessed by clicking on the “Help” button.• Please provide all data for the timeframe you indicated in the project set up which should be preferably rolling 12 months or based on most recent annual figures. ONLY for the divisions/ geographies in scope.• In case a question with a numeric answer is not applicable for your agency or in case you cannot answer a question, please leave the answer field blank and do not enter ZERO (“0”)• For % responses, please indicate numbers only without the “%” sign (e.g., 20, NOT 0.2 or 20%)
By your entering of data into this survey, you are indicating your agreement with and acceptance of the terms and conditions associated with SAP’s Benchmarking ProgramClick here to review the Terms and Conditions
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
Company and Shared Services Profile
1 Please indicate whether your company has Financial Shared Services in place.
2 Please specify your role in Financial Shared Services.
3 Please indicate the number of Financial Shared Services centers in operation.
4 Please provide the information on the Finance Shared Services centers, location, year of launch and reach.
Name of Finance Shared Services Center Location Year Launched
5
Business Process In Place Human Resources Procurement IT Infrastructure Legal Sales/ Ordering Customer Service Facilities/ Operations
Geography Served
(national/ regional/ global)
Please indicate the other non-finance business processes for which Shared Services are in place and whether these shared services are included within the same organization.
Within Same Organization
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
6
Shared Services Center Profile
7 Please provide the name of the Finance Shared Services Center for which you are completing the survey.
8 Please indicate the number of countries supported by the Finance Shared Services Center.
9
10 Please indicate the number of languages supported by the Finance Shared Services Center.
11 Please provide an estimate for the number of staff working in the shared services center. Number of Shared Service Center Employees Number of Contractors
12 Please provide an estimate of the extent of which you are using outsourcing providers for service delivery (in %).
13 Please indicate the number of outsourcing providers you work with.
14 Please indicate the number of banks and credit card clearing companies you work with.
15 Please specify the position held by the executive sponsor for Finance Shared Services.
Single Shared Service Center Scope
16
Please indicate to what extent has your company adopted Finance Shared Services globally and to what extent is your global Finance Shared Services organization managed centrally.
The previous questions referred to your organization's overall Finance Shared Services environment, now please select a single Finance Shared Services Center only and complete the following questions for the selected center.
Please provide the number of employees supported by the Finance Shared Services Center (including contractors).
Please indicate in the first column to what extent each Finance function is supported through the Shared Service center today, in the second column to what extent it could be supported, and in the third column, please indicate
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
the phase in which the function was implemented as part of the Shared Service center.
S. No. Function 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
17 Please indicate if you implemented Shared Services by country or by function.
18
Finance Shared Services: Information Technology Deployed
19 Please indicate for which Financial processes you are currently using SAP.
S. No. Solution Implemented from SAP 1
2 3 4
Current Coverage of Function (in %) Provided by Shared Services Center
Target Coverage of Function (in %) Possible Through Shared Service Center
Implementation Phase
Finance Strategy and Leadership Compliance and Risk Management Budgeting and Forecasting Business Operations Analysis and Reporting G/L and Financial Closing Management (cost) Accounting Treasury and Cash Management Tax Accounting and Reporting Accounts Payable Expense Management Payroll Administration Accounts Receivable Customer Billing, Credit and Collections Accounting Help Desk (call center) Other
Please indicate the significance of your change management efforts - (1 = No change management required; 10 = Very significant change management efforts required).
Using Product from Other Software Provider
Name of Other Software Provider
Financial Accounting Processes (G/L, A/R, A/P, consolidations) Management (cost) Accounting Processes Planning and Forecasting Processes Risk and Compliance Processes
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
5 6
20
Shared Services Impact
21
Metric In First 3 Years In Last Year
22 Please provide both, the potential and the actual impact you expect shared services to have on a given strategic value driver.
Area
Reporting and Analytics Processes Accounting Help Desk (call/interaction center)
Please provide the approximate number of manual reports (spreadsheets etc.) used for ongoing tracking and reporting purposes.
Please provide percentage improvements/reductions for the following metrics. If your SSC is 3 years old or less, then enter data in the first column only. If your SSC is 4 year old or older, please complete both columns.
Percentage Annual Headcount Reduction Percentage Annual Productivity Improvement Improvement In Cost Per Transaction (in %) Reduction in Transaction Cycle Time (in %) Percentage Reduction in Reporting Cycle Time Reduction in Error Rates (in %) Reduction of SLA Violations (in %) Improvement of First Call Resolution (in %) Percentage Of Improvement In Customer Satisfaction
Potential Impact (on a scale of 1 - 5; 1 = low; 5 = high)
Actual Impact (on a scale of 1 - 5; 1 = low; 5 = high)
Identification Of New Opportunities (markets, M&A, etc.) Faster Integration of New Acquisitions Freed-up Resources for More Strategic Activities Scalability for Growth Increased Visibility into Cross-organizational Information Risk Mitigation Regulatory Compliance Cost Reduction (lower SG&A) Process Accountabilities Fraud Reduction
Copyright SAP. All Rights Reserved
23 Please provide any additional comments/ clarifications for the Finance Shared Services KPI information provided above.
Finance Shared Services: Best Practices
24 Shared Services Scope and Adoption Importance Coverage
Finance shared services supports all possible business units and locations
25 Shared Services Processes Importance Coverage
26 Shared Services Technology Importance Coverage
On a scale of 1-5, please rank each best practice in terms of importance and degree of coverage: Importance: 1 = Not important; 5 = Extremely importantCoverage: 1 = No coverage today - Organization does not employ this best practice; 5 = Best practice is fully adopted Please indicate NA for both importance and coverage if best practice is not applicable to your organization:
Shared Services include a large functional scope and have moved upstream to include strategic analytics and planningShared Services covers all possible end-to-end activities in covered process areas
Finance shared services include decision and analytics support for covered processesThe organization has strategic outsourcing in place, enhancing/complementing skill levels
Majority of processes, which can be standardized, are standardized between business units and/or locationsFinancial reporting definitions are fully standardized between business units and/or locationsThe organization leverages standardized and common finance data elements between business units and/or locationsThe organization leverages standardized and common rules for access to data and processes, and segregation of dutiesThe organization regularly analyses call center activity for process and technology improvement opportunities
27 Shared Services Talent Management Importance Coverage
28 Governance of Financial Services Importance Coverage
Finance shared services processes are automated and manual reconciliations are eliminatedAll finance processes are run on a single, integrated system which leverages a common master data frameworkThe organization leverages a finance platform implemented in a standard manner with no customizations in placeCustomers and vendors have self-service for billing, payment and disputes managementManagement and executives rely heavily on robust finance shared services analytics and reports to drive business decisionsAll financial forms are automated through workflows, standardized and electronically routed and updated into the financial systemThe organization has compliance roles in place, with automation of provisioning and detailed analytics available, to track corporate riskThe organization provides a simplified finance user experience by integrating technology to manage and monitor callsTechnology is in place to effectively monitor adherence to service level agreements (SLA's) at the center and the individual KPI level
The organization accounts for current as well as future skill requirements while maintaining a talent pipelineThe organization facilitates role based training for employees, with a targeted curriculum per role and access to trainings for further developmentA process is in place for regular and formal evaluation of the core and functional competencies of shared services with clear goals and objectives definedCompensation plans are designed for a combination of group service level agreements (SLA) and individual objectivesShared service employees have a clear career path, with options to acquire additional skills and advance inside and outside of the shared services organization
A steering committee is in place to define shared services strategy and directionThe shared services leadership frequently communicates with the CEO and other senior executives to align shared services strategy with corporate objectives
29
30
31
A formal, periodic business planning process is in place to jointly agree with internal customers on priorities and performance targets for the next periodA formal, regular process and mechanism is in place to capture customer feedback and take action where appropriateService level agreement (SLA) performance is embedded in the daily management of the shared services centerA year over year formal benchmarking process is in place at the shared services center; results for key metrics are communicated to internal customersThe shared services center management is fully accountable for adherence to auditing, internal controls, and segregation of duties of the processes within the centerShared service center has evolved from being a transaction processor to being considered a value-add business partner
Please describe other best practices your shared service has adopted to drive leading performance.
Please specify what would you do differently, if you had a chance to start your shared services implementation over again.
Please provide the name, email address, phone number and organization name of any person(s) other than yourself you wish to give permission to actively participate in the benchmarking process. This person(s) will be included in any and all interactions between you and the SAP team related to the validation and comparative results of this survey. By entering this person's contact information, you indicate that you are giving permission for this person(s) to view your organization’s survey data, benchmark results, and related communications; to participate in meetings; and to submit/correct benchmark related data to SAP on your behalf. You also agree that, regarding all aspects of the SAP Benchmarking program, this person(s) is subject to the same level of confidentiality to you as you are to SAP.
32Shared Services Scope And Adoption
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1
2
3
4
5
Outsourcing not used Outsourcing used tactically
33Shared Services Processes
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1
Process are not standardized Major processes are standardized
2
3
4
5
34Shared Services Technology
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1
Shared Services: Best Practices Maturity Model
Shared services piloted in one or two transactional process areas
Shared Services limited to a few transactional processes
Shared Services cover majority of transactional processes
Shared services covers limited activities that feed into end-to-end process areas
Shared services covers some end-to-end activities in covered process areas
Shared services covers majority of end-to-end activities in covered process areas for several geographies/business units
Shared services piloted with a few business units/ locations
Some business units/ locations participate in Shared Services
Over half of business units/ locations participate
Shared services do not include decision support and analytics support for covered processes
Shared services include some decision support and analytics support for covered processes for individual locations/business units
Shared services include some decision support and analytics support for at least half of covered processes, for half of locations/business units
Outsourcing starting to be used to gain economies of skills
Initial efforts to standardize financial processes have been taken
Reporting definitions are not standardized
Initial efforts to standardize financial reporting definitions have been taken
Initial efforts to standardize management (costing) reporting definitions have been taken
Financials data elements (accounts, costing structures) are not common
Initial efforts to standardize financial data elements have been taken (primarily chart of accounts)
Initial efforts to standardize financial data elements have been taken (other financial data elements and costing structures)
Rules for access to data and processes are not standardized, and handled manually
Initial efforts to standardize access to data have been undertaken
Access to data has been standardized for major functions; initial efforts to standardize processes and segregation of duties have been taken
No call center in place for financial processes; e-mail is answered manually
Some call center activity is implemented, and analyzed regularly for process or technology improvement opportunities
Key shared services processes are manual (paper, spreadsheets, etc.), and very significant amount of time is spend on data entry and audit
Some shared services processes are automated, while remaining processes remain manual (paper, spreadsheets, etc.), and significant time is spend on data entry and audit
Key shared services processes are automated and many manual reconciliations are largely eliminated
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
35Shared Services Talent Management
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1
2
3
4
Many systems are in place for managing Financial processes
A common Financials system is leveraged for the chart of accounts, and other applications are in place to manage detailed transactional, planning and analytics processes.
A common Financials system is leveraged for core financial transactional processes (sub ledger accounting, such as A/R, A/P, assets) and additional applications are in place for other cost and project management and analytical processes.
Many customizations are in place for automated processes
Some customizations are in place for automated processes
The Financials system is implemented in a standard manner for corporate consolidated processes, with few customizations in place; local systems still significant some customizations
No self-services are in place for customers or vendors
Limited self-services are in place for customers in a view-only mode
Some interactive self-services are in place for customers, with limited self-services in place for vendors in a view-only mode
Shared services provides primarily reports based on spreadsheets at a summary level
Shared services provides some level of detailed reporting on spreadsheets
Shared services provides limited analytics and reports, with a few scenarios for planning, for management and executives at a summary level
Financial forms and transactions are not automated or standardized and manually routed and keyed into an Excel or a Financial system
Some Financial forms are automated, standardized and electronically routed and updated into an Excel or Financial system
Some Financial forms are automated, standardized and electronically routed and updated into a Financial system (no Excels are in use for transaction processing)
Manual auditing takes place of systems that are accessed by financial professionals (passive analysis)
Access to financial systems is proactively approved and granted, but on a manual basis
Roles are in place to group access to transactions. Some automated provisioning and testing of the roles
No technology to manage and monitor calls
Some technology is in place to manage and monitor calls
Shared Services KPIs are not tracked
Shared Services KPIs are tracked manually
Some Shared Services KPIs are tracked automatically, while others are tracked manually
Recruiting occurs reactively, on an ad-hoc basis, when a position opens up in the shared service center, with no long term outlook on required skills
Recruiting processes are proactive and take into account both current as well as future skill requirements
No training in place except on the job training
Training is available for basic shared service wide required skills, such as a computer training or call center training
No evaluation of shared service employee takes place
Evaluation of shared service employees takes place only at the time of reorganizations
Regular, informal evaluations of shared service employees take place, but no goals/ objective setting process
Compensation plans are common for some employees throughout the company, whether employees are in a shared service center or not
Compensation plans are common for all employees in the shared service center, regardless of group (SLA) or individual performance
Compensation plans are common for all employees in a given group of the shared service center, regardless of group (SLA) or individual performance
5
36 Governance Of Financial Services For Callers ("Customers")Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1 No customer governance in place
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
No clear career path established for shared services employees
Limited number of career path options are in place, mainly related to in shared service rotations
An informal steering committee is in place which is mainly responsible for issue resolution
An informal steering committee is in place which is mainly responsible for issue resolution
Shared services leadership has no communication with corporate or senior management
Shared services leadership has limited communication with corporate and senior management, primarily upwards status reporting
Shared services leadership takes corporate direction into account when developing shared services strategy, with little two-way communication
No business planning process is in place, and tasks are handled on a first-come, first-served basis regardless of the type of request
Shared services determines priorities based primarily on customer escalations to determine priorities
Shared services determines priorities with limited communication and interaction with customers to discuss priorities
Customer feedback is not measured Customer feedback is manually captured
Formal, but no regular customer feedback process
No service level agreement (SLA’s) Verbal SLAs in place; no formal and regular update/ negotiation process
Written SLAs in place, but no formal and regular update process
No usage of benchmarking Benchmark select metrics infrequently
Completed full benchmarking assessment
No accountability process in place for auditing adherence, internal controls and segregation of duties
Informal accountability in place for auditing adherence, internal controls and segregation of duties
Formal accountability in place for auditing adherence, internal controls and segregation of duties
The shared service center takes over very manual and administrative tasks that do not require analysis or decision-making
The shared service center begins to automate transactions to become more efficient and responsive to requests
The shared service center automates most transactions and handles exceptions based on predefined decision criteria
Shared Services Scope And AdoptionLevel 4 Level 5
Shared Services ProcessesLevel 4 Level 5
Major processes are standardized
Shared Services TechnologyLevel 4 Level 5
Shared Services: Best Practices Maturity Model
Shared Services cover majority of transactional processes and some siloed planning processes
Shared Services cover majority of transactional processes and integrated planning across locations and businesses
Shared services covers majority of end-to-end activities in covered process areas for all geographics/ business units
Shared Services covers all possible end-to-end activities in covered process areas for all geographics/ business units
Most business units and locations are supported by shared services
Shared Services support all possible business units and locations
Shared services include some decision support and analytics support for most covered processes, for the majority of locations/business units
Shared Services include decision support and analytics support for covered processes, in all locations/business units
Outsourcing starting to be used strategically to gain economies of skills
Strategic outsourcing in place, enhancing/ complementing skill levels
Majority of processes, which can be standardized, are standardized
Reporting definitions are standardized for financial and tax reporting, and some costing standardization
Reporting definitions which can be standardized, are fully standardized between for all financial, tax and costing reports
Financial data elements are standardized and common (for financial elements such as chart of accounts), some standardization between costing structures
Financial data elements which can be standardized, are standardized and common for all financial and costing data elements
Access to data and to processes, for segregation of duties, are standardized for major functions
Rules for access to data and processes, and segregation of duties, which can be standardized, are standardized and common
Majority of call center activity is implemented, and analyzed regularly for process or technology improvement opportunities
Key shared services processes are automated, some transaction types are managed by exception using manual processes
Shared services processes are highly automated, and transactions are primarily managed by exception
Shared Services Talent ManagementLevel 4 Level 5
A common Financials system is leveraged for core financial transactional processes and some cost accounting processes. Additional applications are in place for planning and analytics processes.
All Financial processes are run on a single, integrated financial system with integrated planning and analytics, and integration to operational systems
The Financials system is implemented in a fairly standard manner on both the corporate and local levels, with some customizations in place
Financial platform is implemented in a standard manner, minimal customizations in place
Many interactive self-services are in place for both customers and vendors
Customer and vendor self-services are in place where possible, such as billing and payment inquiries and disputes
Shared Services provides limited analytics and reports, with multiple scenarios and pre-defined what-if for planning, for management and executives
Management & executives rely heavily on robust shared service analytics and reports, as well as detailed, ad-hoc simulations for planning and budgeting, to drive business decisions
Many Financial forms and transactions (such as bank transactions) are automated, standardized and electronically routed and updated into the Financial system
All Financial forms and transactions (such as bank payments) are standardized and electronically routed and updated into the Financial system
Automated provisioning and testing of access to systems. Some process controls in place to ensure risk is minimized across all steps of an end-to-end process
Roles are in place to ensure compliance, with automation of provisioning and detailed analysis available, to mitigate corporate risk
Technology is in place to manage and monitor calls
All Shared Services KPIs are tracked automatically, and manually rolled up in a dashboard to monitor adherence to service level agreements (SLAs)
Technology is in place to effectively monitor adherence to service level agreements (SLA's) at the center and the individual KPI level
Recruiting processes are proactive and take into account both current as well as future skill requirements. A talent pipeline is maintained
Role-based training for employees is in place, with a targeted curriculum for each role; access to training for further development available
Regular and formal evaluation against Shared Services core competencies is in place. Some subjective goals in place
Regular and formal evaluation against Shared Services core and functional competencies is in place. Clear goals and objectives are defined
Compensation plans are common for all employees in a given group of the shared service center, taking SLA targets into account, but not individual performance
Compensation plans are designed for a combination of group service level agreements (SLA) and individual objectives
Governance Of Financial Services For Callers ("Customers")Level 4 Level 5
A clear career path is in place for shared services employees, with a variety of options to acquire additional skills and to advance inside and outside of the shared services organization
A steering committee is in place which defines shared services strategy and direction
A steering committee is in place which defines shared services strategy and direction
Shared services leadership has occasional communication with corporate and senior management to align the shared service strategy with corporate goals
Shared services leadership has frequent communications with CEO and other senior company executives to align shared services strategy with the corporate objectives
Initial business planning occurs on an annual basis to define priorities, but is not adjusted as conditions change
A formal periodic business planning process is in place to jointly agree with internal customers on priorities and performance targets for the next period
A formal, regular process & mechanism is in place to capture customer feedback
A formal, regular process and mechanism is in place to capture customer feedback and take action against where appropriate
Simple written service level agreement (SLA) in place based on agreement with business units/ locations
Service level agreement (SLA) performance is embedded in the daily management of the shared service center
Completed full Benchmarking assessment
Year-over-year formal benchmarking process in place; results for key metrics are communicated to internal customer
The shared service center management is fully accountable for adherence to auditing, internal controls, and segregation of duties of the processes within the center
The shared service center management is fully accountable for adherence to auditing, internal controls, and segregation of duties of the processes within the center
The shared service center has automated most transactions, and begins to support management with analytics to support decision-making processes
Shared service center has evolved from being a transaction processor to being considered a value-add business partner
N/A12
3
1
3
2
4