© WTEC 2010 Welcome. © WTEC 2010 In keeping with integrated community sustainability strategies...
Transcript of © WTEC 2010 Welcome. © WTEC 2010 In keeping with integrated community sustainability strategies...
© WTEC 2010
Welcome
© WTEC 2010
In keeping with integrated community sustainability strategies and plans it is WTEC’s goal to provide a logical, cost effective and environmentally sound, long-term solution for :
The safe destruction of biomass & other waste. Provide valuable renewable thermal & electrical
energy. Provide economic opportunities. Provide a safe & clean environment for generations
to come.
CGS RationaleCGS Rationale
© WTEC 2010
Fully integrated waste to energy plan OEM supply model Deployment of leading edge, environmentally
sound, proven technology “CGS” Provide ongoing long-term Operations &
Maintenance support.
DeliverablesDeliverables
© WTEC 2010
Convert waste wood and biomass into sustainable opportunity.
Provide improved health & welfare.
Safe/clean environment for future generations.
Demonstrate Social & Environmental Leadership
Reduce Waste Hauling Pollution & Costs
OutcomesOutcomes
© WTEC 2010
Continuous Gasifier System (CGS) Continuous Gasifier System (CGS) Technology OverviewTechnology Overview
© WTEC 2010
Continuous feed Continuous feed Single or double reaction chamberSingle or double reaction chamber
Two-staged Air-starvedTwo-staged Air-starvedThermal GasifierThermal Gasifier
Continuous Gasifier System (CGS)Continuous Gasifier System (CGS)
© WTEC 2010
Biomass, waste wood, sawdust & other fairly consistent solid wastes are fed continuously into the hearth area of a vertical reaction chamber.
Innovative hearth design requires no moving grate or fluidized bed.
Hot syngas produced in the air-starved zone of the lower chamber is fully oxidized in the excess-air zone of the upper chamber.
Residence time of flue gas at design temperature ≥ 5 sec. Optional second reaction chamber increases residence time
further and slows gas to allow particulate settling. Heat recovery, power generation, and emissions controls are by
standard technologies.
ConceptConcept
© WTEC 2010
Most appropriate for waste types of relatively consistent size and calorific value such as:
• Solid waste of relatively consistent content• Wood waste• Agricultural residues
Waste Feedstock TypesWaste Feedstock Types
© WTEC 2010
COR High River, 10 years of operation COR Thora, one of three on site
Continuous OperationContinuous Operation
© WTEC 2010
Air-Starved Gasification Zone:• Automatic feed using augers or rams provides continuous operation.• Low-temperature gasification in V-shaped hearth
(left) at bottom of first reaction tower.• Hot syngas released up to secondary oxidation zone
in same tower.• Easy ash removal by ram during operation.
Excess-Air Oxidation Zone:• Takes place in upper zone of first reaction tower.• Control of Time / Temperature / Turbulence.• Second tower (at left) can be added to increase
residence time of gases at design temperature and slow gases to allow particulate settling.
Unified 2-Stage GasificationUnified 2-Stage Gasification
© WTEC 2010
The three-step, V-shaped hearth itself has no moving parts and so avoids the frequent breakdowns and high maintenance costs that occur with the moving metal grates and fluidized beds found in mass burn incinerators.
= Excellent reliability & reduces costs for capital equipment, operations, maintenance & repairs. = Holding the ash longer for gasification zone leaves as little bottom ash behind as possible.
COR during construction
Unified 2-Stage GasificationUnified 2-Stage Gasification
© WTEC 2010
Combustion of hot syngas takes place in upper zone of chamber.
Residence time of gases at design temperature is ≥ 5 sec, which is 3 sec more than EPA requires.
Generates heat for conversion to steam and / or electricity.
Meets all US & EU EPA emissions standards after scrubbing.
COR High River, 10 years of operation in Northern Canada
Secondary Combustion ChamberSecondary Combustion Chamber
© WTEC 2010
• Sterile & Non-toxic.• Virtually no carbon.• No slag or clinkers.• Easily separated from glass
& metals for recycling.• Passes EPA’s “Toxicity
Characteristics Leaching Procedure” (TCLP) test.
• Bottom ash can be sold as aggregate for concrete or for asphalt road surfacing.
• Landfilling not required.
Bottom AshBottom Ash
© WTEC 2010
Primary Fuel Consistent Feedstock Primary Fuel Consistent Feedstock
Integrated Gasification (Hot Syngas) and Oxidisation
(Super Hot Flue-Gas
Integrated Gasification (Hot Syngas) and Oxidisation
(Super Hot Flue-Gas
Organic Rankine CycleTurbine Generator
Organic Rankine CycleTurbine Generator
ElectricityElectricity
Emissions Control System
Emissions Control System
ElectricityElectricity
Turbine GeneratorTurbine Generator
Super Heated SteamSuper Heated Steam
Heat Recovery BoilerHeat Recovery Boiler
EconomizerEconomizer
CondenserCondenser
WaterWater
CGSCGS
Options for Energy RecoveryOptions for Energy Recovery
© WTEC 2010
Daily capacity of 1000 tonnes can be achieved with two CGS™ process trains of 500 tons each.Larger capacities can be achieved by increasing the capacities of the individual CGS™ process trains and / or by adding more process trains.
Typical layout for Energy GenerationTypical layout for Energy Generation
© WTEC 2010
Indicative Steam and Electric Power GenerationIndicative Steam and Electric Power GenerationType of Waste Metric Tons Steam /
Metric Ton of WasteNet kW hrs Electricity
for Sale / Metric Ton of Waste
Municipal 3.4 MT 550 kWh
Industrial 4.0 MT 650 kWh
Air-Dried Wood 5.0 MT 850 kWh
Tires & Plastics 10.0 MT 1700 kWh
Actual energy recovery & power generation depends on calorific value & moisture content of waste, types of heat recovery & power generation technology selected, their designs & configuration, & other project-specific factors.
© WTEC 2010
CGS™ facility with two process trains—each containing oneprimary and one secondary chamber—feeding two boilers,
two baghouses, and one turbine generator.
Typical layout with two ‘trains’Typical layout with two ‘trains’
© WTEC 2010
Automated CGS™ Process ControlsAutomated CGS™ Process Controls
• Operator interface by touch-screen controls.• SCADA (Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition) data logging capability.• Option for real-time remote monitoring by WTEC technical staff.• Photos show touch-screen monitor and control panels at BOS™ waste-
to-energy facility in Scotland.
© WTEC 2010
Operator interface by touch-screen controls.• Optional SCADA (Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition)
data logging capability.• Real-time remote monitoring by WTEC technical staff.
Automation & ControlsAutomation & Controls
© WTEC 2010
Touch-Screen Control PanelTouch-Screen Control Panel
CGS have automatic controls with manual override that operators can monitor or adjust using the simple touch-screen control panel.
© WTEC 2010
Inherently low COR™ emissions can be reduced furtherby treatment of flue gases using Best Available Technology:
View of stack with facility operating at full capacity.
• Flue gas retention time ≥ 2 sec at temps up to 1300° C as required.
• Sodium bicarbonate to neutralize acids.
• Activated carbon to remove trace dioxins, furans & heavy metals.
• Flue gas recirculation & selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) to control NOx.
• Filter baghouse to collect scrubber consumables & residual fly ash.
Advance Flue Gas TreatmentAdvance Flue Gas Treatment
© WTEC 2010
CGS™ emissions meet all EPA standards in US & European Union.
CGS Emissions ManagementCGS Emissions Management
© WTEC 2010
Design Basis for CGS Facility Compared to EU LimitsDesign Basis for CGS Facility Compared to EU Limits
CGS™ plants can be designed & operated to achieve even lower limits.
SubstanceCGS
Design Basis@ 0°C & 11% O2
Maximum LimitsEU Regulations@ 0°C & 11% O2
Particulate Matter (PM) < 5 mg / Nm3 10 mg / Nm3
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) < 100 mg / Nm3 200 mg / Nm3
Carbon Monoxide (CO) < 10 mg / Nm3 50 mg / Nm3
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) < 10 mg / Nm3 50 mg / Nm3
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) < 2 mg / Nm3 10 mg / Nm3
Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) < 5 mg / Nm3 10 mg / Nm3
Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) < 1 mg / Nm3 1 mg / Nm3
Dioxin & Furans TEQ < 0.08 ng / Nm3 0.10 ng / Nm3
Mercury (Hg) < 0.05 mg / Nm3 0.05 mg / Nm3
Cadmium (Cd) < 0.05 mg / Nm3 0.05 mg / Nm3
Total Other Metals < 0.5 mg / Nm3 0.5 mg / Nm3
© WTEC 2010
Continuous Emissions Monitoring Log Compared Continuous Emissions Monitoring Log Compared to Daily & Half-Hourly EU Limitsto Daily & Half-Hourly EU Limits
CO PM (Dust) HCl
NO2 Note: Add-on de-NOx equipment not operated during test.
SO2 VOC
© WTEC 2010
Monitoring Results for Dioxins & Furans Compared Monitoring Results for Dioxins & Furans Compared to EU Limitsto EU Limits
Independent tests show emissions at only 35% of stringent EU limits.
© WTEC 2010
Design Comparison to US EPA Emissions LimitsDesign Comparison to US EPA Emissions Limits
CGS™ plants can be designed & operated to achieve even lower emissions that may be necessary to meet annual output limits
required by local air quality districts.
© WTEC 2010
Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data Compared toContinuous Emissions Monitoring Data Compared toEU Emissions LimitsEU Emissions Limits
Note that this plant has no NOx reduction equipment. Data is from * days of CEM log in December, 2007. Raw data available on request.
© WTEC 2010
2002 - High Level, Alberta, 600 TPD Wood Waste2003 - Swan River, Manitoba, 135 TPD Wood Waste2003 - Fruitvale, British Columbia 200 TPD Wood Waste2004 - Slave Lake, Alberta, 500 TPD Wood Waste2005 - Gudang, Indonesia, 200 TPD Tobacco Waste2007 - Thora, Australia, 200 TPD Wood Waste2012 - Kelly Lake, BC, 300 TPD Wood Waste (in pre-deploy)
Sample CGS DeploymentsSample CGS Deployments
© WTEC 2010
Electricity. Process steam for industry. Process steam for district heating. Chilled water or air for central cooling. Potable water. Disposal fees or avoided costs. Bottom ash as soil amendment (biomass only) or
concrete aggregate. Carbon credits. Renewable energy credits. Renewable energy grants and tax credits.
CGS Energy UtilisationCGS Energy Utilisation
© WTEC 2010
Large-capacity, continuous-feed, two-stage thermal gasification in single or double vertical reaction chambers for consistent wastes such as biomass and household waste.
Simple, robust design with very few moving parts. Innovative hearth design eliminates complicated moving grates
and fluidized beds found in mass burn incinerators. Sophisticated controls for air, waste feed, and auxiliary fuel first
developed for the BOS™ are now available on CGS™. Lower capital, labour, and other operating costs than other
conversion technologies. Meets or exceeds CDN, EU and US emissions standards with
appropriate control equipment.
Why CGS ?Why CGS ?
© WTEC 2010
Thank You wtecanada.comwtecanada.com